The Pornographic Conspiracy
Destroying The Family - Degrading The Human Spirit
By Philip Jones
7-31-9
Introduction.
Destroy The Family.
The Conspirators.
Pornography : Debasing Human
Nature.
The Damage To Young People.
Pornography - A
Vicious Assault On The Family.
Lucifer's Indulgence:
Humankind's Scourge.
The Graphic Detail.
An Expanding Industry.
Legal Aid.
A Harmless Diversion?
Conclusion
Introduction.
Throughout the Western World, the Christian foundations of decency, morality,
restraint, and integrity; the very moral anchor which held our civilisation
together for centuries, has come under a concerted and simultaneous
multi-theatre attack, which in it's ferocity and intensity can only be described
as diabolical. Here in Northern Europe, with some rare exceptions, the last
bastion of what is true, virtuous and righteous, is to be found paradoxically,
only amongst the followers of Islam, and make no mistake about it, even that
community of faithful believers, is coming under pernicious attack by the agents
of change, in the form of the welfare state; dabbling in the affairs of Muslim
families, the education system, gradually breaking down the moral and belief
systems of the young, and of course, the sick and twisted `entertainment
industry` along with the mass media in general.
In my recent article, `Who Rules The World,`[1] I hypothesised
that the very source of those afflictions, which have and continue to debase and
de-construct our way of life, eroding ever more, all that was once marvellous
and righteous, in lands which once formed what was known as `Christendom,` is
literally the work of Satan/Lucifer, who with a little help from his legions of
`Fallen Angels,` Demon helpers, and his bloodline [3]descendants
known as the Illuminati, is establishing his dominion here on earth, just as he
set out to do at the very beginning of time.
Having outlined in detail in that three part series the basis for my hypothesis,
there is no need to elaborate further here. It is sufficient to direct the
reader to that article so that he/she may judge for his/herself whether there is
any credibility in my assertion.
Those elements of social and moral decay that we are witnessing today; the
increasingly pornographic culture, high divorce rates; growing numbers of unwed
single mothers; the hordes of illegitimate children; homosexuality and
lesbianism, sexual perversion and the alarmingly high number of abortions, is
not some new phenomenon. It is an ingenious and fiendish plot that has been
around for many Millennia (see Sodom and Gomorrah and the cruel and debased
cultures prevalent throughout the land of Canaan and further afield during Old
Testament times) designed to annihilate what is, the very heart and foundation
of all good and decent society; namely, the family!
You are about to read written proof of this clandestine conspiracy. You will
learn about who and what is behind it, and their fierce unwavering mission to
degrade and eradicate the family, separate man from his mate, pervert and `filthify`
our God given human spirit, and drag what's left of humanity after their multi
faceted depopulation agenda has been taken to it's illogical conclusion, into a
Luciferian nightmare, whereby a relatively small and immensely wealthy and
powerful `bloodline` elite, hold sway as the `proxy` lords of this planet, for
their master, Lucifer.
Destroy The Family.
In 1956, J. Edgar Hoover, [5] the then Director of the FBI,
himself a 33rd Degree Freemason and therefore no stranger to Luciferian
machinations and other deviant behaviour, somewhat paradoxically wrote:
"The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent." The Elks Magazine (August 1956)
Mr. Hoover knew what he was talking about, and it is probably even truer
today to comment that few people understand, or even consider the malicious
forces now arrayed against the family, the institution of marriage and the very
nature of our being. They simply cannot comprehend how hell-bent the forces of
evil are on destroying the family. Read into the chilling words of Communist
demagogue, Lenin: "Destroy the family and you destroy society," [1]and
then get an idea of the dire and perilous nature of the situation.
Lenin had a devious plan to carry out his sinister plot and he wasn't alone! We
will deal with this in a moment. But firstly, it is necessary to recognise the
direct parallels of our current state of affairs to the original Marxist
Communist plot to eradicate the family, as was noted in the 1926 July issue of
the Atlantic Monthly:
When the Bolsheviki came into power in 1917 they regarded the family, like every
other "bourgeois" institution, with fierce hatred, and set out with a will to
destroy it. "To clear the family out of the accumulated dust of the ages we had
to give it a good shake-up, and we did," declared Madame Smidovich, a leading
Communist and active participant in the recent discussion. So one of the first
decrees of the Soviet Government abolished the term "illegitimate children."
This was done simply by equalizing the legal status of all children, whether
born in wedlock or out of it, and now the Soviet Government boasts that Russia
is the only country where there are no illegitimate children. The father of a
child is forced to contribute to its support, usually paying the mother a third
of his salary...
At the same time, a law was passed which made divorce a matter of a few minutes,
to be obtained at the request of either partner in a marriage. Chaos was the
result. Men took to changing wives with the same zest which they displayed in
the consumption of the recently restored forty-per-cent vodka.
"Some men have twenty wives, living a week with one, a month with another,"
asserted an indignant woman delegate during the sessions of the Tzik. "They have
children with all of them, and these children are thrown on the street for lack
of support!"
(There are three hundred thousand shelter-less children in Russia to-day, who
are literally turned out on the streets. They are one of the greatest social
dangers of the present time, because they are developing into professional
criminals. More than half of them are drug addicts and sex perverts. It is
claimed by many Communists that the break-up of the family is responsible for a
large percentage of these children.)
The peasant villages have perhaps suffered most from this revolution in sex
relations. An epidemic of marriages and divorces broke out in the country
districts. [Marriage became a game where it] was not unusual for a boy of twenty
to have had three or four wives, or for a girl of the same age to have had three
or four abortions. The peasants bitterly complained: "Abortions cover our
villages with shame. Formerly we did not even hear of them." Many women found
marriage and childbearing a profitable occupation. They formed connections (
sexual) with the sons of well-to-do peasants and then blackmailed the father for
the support of the children. In some cases peasants have been obliged to sell
[everything] in order to settle such claims. The law has created still more
confusion because women can claim support for children born many years ago.
During the winter of 1924-1925 some of the older Communists accused the younger
generation of indulging in loose connections; they blame the girl students for
practising frequent abortions Russian women students [noted] that love was
almost the only cheap amusement left to them and demanded that they be given
free abortions that factory women enjoy. Both in the
villages and in the cities, the problem of the unmarried mother has become very
acute and provides a severe and annoying test of Communist theories.
Another new point was that wife and husband would have an equal right to claim
support from the other The woman would have the right to demand support for her
child even if she lived with several men during the period of conception; but,
in contrast to previous practice, she or the court would choose one man who
would be held responsible for the support. Commissar Kursky seemed especially
proud of this point because it differed so much from the 'bourgeois customs' of
Europe and America.
Another speaker objected to the proposed law on the ground that some women would
take advantage of its liberal provisions to form connections with wealthy men
and then blackmail them for alimony.[2]
[1] Lenin merely repeated what Socrates had
said and what Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx put into words. Lenin set out to do
just that, hoping that a new society -- with the State as the ultimate father --
could be constructed. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, we have seen the
consequences of the experiment.
[2] The Atlantic Monthly; July 1926; The Russian Effort to
Abolish Marriage; Volume 138, No. 1; page 108-114. You can read the document in
its entirety by <http://www.ejfi.org/Civilization/Civilization-4.htm>clicking
here.
Here's how the scheme to destroy the family is mapped out:
Eliminate the sacredness of the marriage covenant from the minds of the masses.
Make them believe marriage is outdated and blasé
Inspire hatred against the family unit, manhood and fatherhood
Institute no-fault divorce and encourage serial divorces
Incite rampant promiscuity, fornication and adultery
Make having illegitimate children become a common practice
Convince society that a child in the womb is not a human being
Provoke women to have abortions without regard to God or their consciences
Make true love seem like cheap amusement
Stimulate the people to confuse sex with love
Create an environment that encourages unwed single motherhood
Inspire men to disrespect, dishonour and abuse women
Design laws that motivate women to commit paternity fraud
Incite homosexuality, lesbianism, sexual immorality and perversion
Influence men to effortlessly abandon children they sire
Most importantly, provoke a fierce relentless gender war
Is there anybody reading this who can't draw parallels with their own society?
As you have read above, what happened in the Soviet Union in 1926 was no
accident, and it is important to appreciate and easy to see, that the social and
moral carnage now occurring throughout the West; the high divorce rate, the huge
numbers of unwed mothers, the rage against fatherhood, the gender wars, the
overt battle being waged against marriage and the family, and the highly
detailed attacks on the bedrock of our civilisation, are equally as well
planned, orchestrated and micromanaged by the same evil force which established
and funded that rotten regime.
We will now witness how certain Americans, like their Communist Russian
counterparts, have also been and still are, determined to de-construct,
dismantle and exterminate the family.
The Conspirators.
"The nuclear family must be destroyed , and people must find better ways of living together. ... Whatever it's ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process. ... "Families have supported oppression by separating people into small, isolated units, unable to join together to fight for common interests. ..." - Functions of the Family, Linda Gordon, WOMEN: A Journal of Liberation, Fall, 1969.
"By the year 2000 we will, I hope, raise our children to believe in human potential, not God" - Gloria Steinem, editor of 'MS' magazine.
"We can't destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage. " -- [Robin Morgan, "Sisterhood Is Powerful," (ed), 1970, p. 537]
"The most merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant members is to kill it" - Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, in Women and the New Rage, p.67
"Marriage has existed for the benefit of men; and has been a legally sanctioned method of control over women... We must work to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of women. Therefore it is important for us to encourage women to leave their husbands and not to live individually with men." - The Declaration of Feminism , November 1971
"Only when manhood is dead - and it will perish when ravaged femininity no longer sustains it - only then will we know what it is to be free." -- [Andrea Dworkin. "The Root Cause," speech, 26 Sept. 1975, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (published in Our Blood, ch. 9, 1976).]
"The care of children ...is infinitely better left to the best trained practitioners of both sexes who have chosen it as a vocation...[This] would further undermine family structure while contributing to the freedom of women." - Kate Millet, Sexual Politics 178-179
"In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them." -- Dr. Mary Jo Bane, feminist and assistant professor of education at Wellesley College and associate director of the school's Centre for Research on Woman
"Who cares how men feel or what they do or whether they suffer? They have had over 2000 years to dominate and made a complete hash of it. Now it is our turn. My only comment to men is, if you don't like it, bad luck - and if you get in my way I'll run you down." - Letter to the Editor: Women's Turn to Dominate, Signed: Liberated Women, Boronia; Herald-Sun, Melbourne, Australia, February 9, 1996
"Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation, and destroy the male sex." - Valerie Solana, SCUM Manifesto (Society for Cutting Up Men.)
"How will the family unit be destroyed? ... the demand alone will throw the whole ideology of the family into question, so that women can begin establishing a community of work with each other and we can fight collectively. Women will feel freer to leave their husbands and become economically independent, either through a job or welfare."- Female Liberation , by Roxanne Dunbar.
"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honourable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." - Robin Morgan, (editor of MS magazine)
"It is important for us to encourage women to leave their husbands and not to live individually with men... All of history must be re-written in terms of oppression of women. We must go back to ancient female religions like witchcraft" - The Declaration of Feminism , November 1971.
"God is going to change. We women... will change the world so much that He won't fit any-more." - Naomi Goldenberg, Changing of the Gods: Feminism and the End of Traditional Religions (Quoted at beginning of From Father God to Mother Earth)
I hope that the reader now understands by the sheer malevolence
of the above statements, that the Communist `front group` known as the feminist
movement, has nothing whatsoever to do with `women's rights,` and everything to
do with the complete and total emasculation of the human male, the enforced
collapse of patriarchy and the breakdown of the family, thereby facilitating the
depopulation agenda[2] and aiding the implementation of the Satanic New World
Order. This attack against the family, against the institution of marriage and
against God and country is not a game!
These people are serious about abolishing the family unit, and the American
nation, along with all other nation states in fact. They are relentless and will
stop at nothing to eradicate God, morals, marriage, manhood, womanhood,
fatherhood, motherhood, husband-hood and love of nation from our hearts and
minds. Their mission is to persuade the masses to engage in a cloaked form of
Satan Worship, disguised among other things as humanistic atheism, pantheism,
`earth` worship, along with accompanying social aberrations such as misogyny,
domestic violence, child abandonment, child support schemes and traps, paternity
fraud, serial divorces, serial abortions, pornography, sexual perversion,
homosexuality and lesbianism.
Pornography :
Debasing Human Nature.
It cannot be argued that one of the most insidious weapons being used in this
war against God's most honoured institution, is Pornography, and it is this
aspect of the vengeful battle being directed against the hearts, souls and
consciences of men and women, not only here in the west, but increasingly due to
internet access, on a global scale, which I will now deal with in some detail.
Sexual material of all kinds is now all too easily accessible through
television, movies, music videos, and particularly the Internet. Many will have
us believe that this relentless intrusion of pornographic, sexualised imagery is
harmless, but it is anything but. It is a debased aberrant form of human
sexuality, encouraged by the agents of those doing the work of Lucifer, which is
highly addictive, destructive, demoralising, corrupting and eventually fatal to
any chance of a moral and decent way of life. Despite what its apologists and
defenders say, pornography has a profoundly negative effect on how people view
sex and sexual behaviour. Researchers at the National Foundation for Family
Research and Education concluded not surprisingly that "exposure to pornography
puts viewers at increased risk for developing sexually deviant tendencies."
According to the report, "the rape myth (belief that women cause and enjoy rape,
and that rapists are normal) is very widespread in habitual male users of
pornography."
There is also evidence that the repeated use of pornography can interfere with
the ability to enjoy and participate in normal marital intimacy. Dr.Victor
Cline, a specialist in treating sex addiction, has documented a recurring
progression in the use of pornography. If left unchecked, what starts as casual
viewing of pornography can eventually lead to an escalation to more hard-core,
aberrant material. This, he claims, can lead to deviant sexual acts. Behavioural
scientists agree. Dr. Cline reports that "any type of sexual deviation can be
acquired in this way, and that it cannot be eliminated even by massive feelings
of guilt." Eventually, the viewer may try to act out the pornography-based,
immoral fantasies, often with devastating results.
The course of this problem may be gradual and undetected, concluded Cline. He
states: "Like a cancer, it keeps growing and spreading. It rarely ever reverses
itself, and it is also very difficult to treat and heal. Denial on the part of
the male addict and refusal to confront the problem are typical and predictable,
and this almost always leads to marital or couple disharmony, sometimes divorce,
and sometimes the breaking up of other intimate relationships."
The Damage To Young
People.
Some researchers say that exposure to pornography can affect the natural
development of a child's brain. Of course it can! Statistics show that the
primary consumers of pornography are boys between the ages of 12 and 17 years.
In fact, for many, pornography is their primary source of sexual education. This
has very disturbing ramifications. "Teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted
diseases," notes one report, "are completely non-existent in porn, giving a
false belief that there are no adverse consequences to behaviours depicted in
pornography." Young males are being targeted by this industry of filth for a
very definite reason: to warp and pervert their ability to interact normally
with girls, by portraying the human female as little more than a collection of
body orifices to be filled.
Dr.Judith Reisman, [6] president of the Institute for Media
Education, and one of the most exceptional human beings currently inhabiting
this planet, concludes: "Health-based neurological observations about the
instinctual brain-imprinted response to pornographic sights and sounds indicates
that viewing pornography is a biologically significant event that overrides
informed consent-and that is harmful to children's [moldable] 'plastic' brains
because it compromises their grasp of reality and thus their mental and physical
health, their well-being and their pursuit of happiness."
Pornography shapes attitudes and influences behaviour. Its messages are enticing
primarily because they are fantasy and thus presented as more exciting than the
real thing. "Individuals using pornography set themselves up for unrealistic
expectations leading to damaged relationships," notes one report. Pornography
not only can, but is of course intended, to destroy trust and openness, two
highly essential qualities in a marriage. Because it is primarily viewed in
secret, pornography use often leads to deception and lying. Mates feel betrayed.
They do not understand why their marriage partner no longer finds them
desirable, and what's more nor does he..
Remember, as we have discussed above, the object of the exercise is the
destruction of the family. How many marriage breakups and broken homes can be
blamed on pornographic addiction?
At a 2003 meeting of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, two thirds of
the 350 divorce lawyers who attended, said the Internet played a significant
role in the divorces in the past year, with excessive interest in on-line porn
contributing to more than half such cases. Pornography had an almost
non-existent role in divorce just seven or eight years ago[7]
The insistence on selfish instant gratification at all costs is inbuilt and
inherent in pornography use. Hence, viewing pornography is unloving. It
undercuts a true believer's fight to maintain chastity and a clean moral
standing before God. Pornography exploits men, women and children. It demeans
them and robs them of their dignity and rights.
The Main-Streaming Of Perversion.
Many people today are ambivalent toward pornography, because like all those
other vices now prevalent in the West, it has entered the mainstream and become
to a large degree, accepted practice. Modern attitudes toward pornography may be
reflected by the 'prostitute-chic' fashions many celebrities sport, the music
videos that increasingly flaunt sexual imagery, and the advertising media's
adoption of a "porno aesthetic."
Doctors now claim that pornography can spark an addiction that is far more
difficult to overcome than drug addiction. Treatment for drug addicts usually
starts with detoxification to remove the substance from the body. But addiction
to pornography, explains Dr. Mary Anne Layden of the University of Pennsylvania,
"produces mental imagery which is permanently implanted in the mind of the user
and is scaled in by brain chemistry." That is why individuals can vividly recall
pornographic images from years past. She concludes: "This is the first addictive
substance for which there is no hope for detoxification." But does that mean it
is impossible to break free from pornography's influence? And what specific harm
does pornography cause?
Internet Pornography Facts:
About 75 percent of Internet pornography originates in the United States. Close
to 15 percent originates in Europe.
It is estimated that some 70 million people a week visit pornographic Web sites.
About 20 million of these users are in Canada and the United States.
A study revealed that during a recent one-month period, Germany had the largest
audience for on-line pornography in Europe, followed by Great Britain, France,
Italy, and Spain.
In Germany, Internet pornography users spend an average of 70 minutes each month
viewing pornographic sites.
Among European viewers of Internet pornography, those above 50 years of age
spend the most time connected to adult Web sites.
According to one source, 70 percent of Internet pornography traffic occurs
during the day.
It is estimated by some that 100,000 Internet sites include material on child
pornography.
About 80 percent of the Internet's commercial child pornography originates in
Japan.
There is a proven connection between pornography and rape, as well as other
forms of violence against women and children. Infamous serial killer Ted Bundy
admits that he had a "strong appetite for violent pornography." He says: "This
condition is not immediately seen by the individual or identified as a serious
problem. But this interest becomes geared towards matters of a sexual nature
that involve violence. I cannot emphasize enough the gradual development of
this. It is not short-term."
Rather than portraying sexual relations as a beautiful and intimate expression
of love between a man and a woman in honourable marriage, pornography demeans
and distorts the sexual act. Casual and perverted sex is portrayed as being
exciting and desirable. Personal gratification with little or no regard for the
other person is highlighted. Women, men, and children are portrayed as objects
that exist only for sexual gratification. "Beauty is measured by proportion of
body parts, shaping unrealistic expectations," says one report. "Depicting women
as anonymous, ever-wanting/waiting, empty sex toys for men, stripping and
exposing their bodies for monetary gain and entertainment cannot possibly
translate into a message that can exist in harmony with equality, dignity and
humanity," concludes another report.
Soon, like any other improper stimulation, what initially arouses becomes
mundane and routine. "Over time," says one writer, "[the users of pornography]
require more explicit and deviant material. They may push their partners into
increasingly bizarre sexual activities, diminishing their [own] capacity to
express real affection." Does that sound like a harmless diversion?
Instead of love, pornography cultivates self-centred, selfish desire, and
fractures and stains every person it contaminates. It destroys all decency and
is a major threat to our traditional way of life, and particularly, marriage and
family.
Pornography - A Vicious Assault On The Family.
It is a sad reality that many Internet porn viewers are children. Youngsters who
though prohibited by law from purchasing pornographic literature or from renting
pornographic videos, can gain access to these in their own home with a few
clicks of the mouse. The choices are endless. Many children regularly visit
Internet sites without their parents' knowledge. In fact, The Detroit News
states that "more than two in five children have subscribed to a web site or
other service online even though nearly 85 percent of parents have rules against
them doing so."
Many think that a casual brush with pornography is harmless. However, the facts
show otherwise. Consider the case of a couple who seemed to have an ideal
marriage. They were financially secure, and they loved to travel. Their friends
thought of them as close, affectionate, and devoted, and in many ways they were.
However, problems arose when the husband started looking at pornography. Writing
to a popular advice columnist, his anxious wife described her concerns: "When
[my husband] first started to spend a lot of time on the computer in the middle
of the night and early morning, he told me it was 'research.' I walked in on him
one morning and caught him looking at [pornography]. He said it was only a
matter of curiosity. When I took a closer look at what he was watching, it made
me sick. He was embarrassed and promised to stop, and I believed he meant it. He
has always been honourable-a man of his word."
This man's perverse habit has cost him his self respect, his honour, his
integrity, and the respect and admiration of his wife. It has destroyed
something intrinsic and wholesome within him. He has become weakened and his
resolve degraded. Many men are now being lured into a similar trap; anxious to
avoid discovery, they log on late at night or early in the morning. If they are
caught, they often try to cover up what they are doing by lying, as this man
did. Can anyone reasonably claim that a "hobby" that causes "a man of his word"
to sneak around in the middle of the night and to lie to loved ones is harmless?
Pornography makes a profit out of the suffering of others, and is designed in
the main to degrade and subvert the innate goodness in people, causing serious
personal and family problems, to isolate, corrupt and demoralise. Many people
caught up in this evil `racket,` have admitted that watching pornography has
prevented them from developing close relationships with others. They don't want
people around while they indulge their passion for pornography. People tend to
fantasize when they watch pornography, and fantasy does not equip a person to
cultivate strong relationships or to deal with life in the real world.
Increasingly, we are hearing of cases where people who look at or read
pornographic material even have trouble enjoying normal sexual relations with
their mate. Is that conducive to good family relations? Of course not. Nor is it
intended to be. Can a pastime that alienates people from those who care the most
about them be truly innocuous?
We must consider God's original purpose for married people. He lovingly endowed
husbands and wives with the ability to give joyous expression of their love for
each other, through honourable sexual relations. Proverbs 5:18, 19 shows that
these were meant to be pleasurable: "Rejoice with the wife of your youth. Let
her own breasts intoxicate you at all times. With her love may you be in ecstasy
constantly."
Note that love, not depraved animal like lust, was to be the basis for sexual
relations. The person who looks at pornography is gratifying his own sexual
desires-and alone, in most cases. A married man who looks at pornography may
begin to view his mate as a mere object-someone who exists solely for his
pleasure, or conversely, he simply loses interest in her altogether. This is far
from the dignity and honour that the Creator intended men to accord women. (see
1 Peter 3:7) Such a practice that interferes with the most intimate aspects of
marriage can never be viewed as desirable? Moreover, the pornographic industry,
owned and controlled as it is by the Illuminati, understands only too well that
what begins as a casual indulgence inevitably leads to a damaging long-term
addiction. One writer observed: "Just as drug addicts require more potent drugs
to receive a 'high,' consumers of pornography must have a more intense
experience to achieve the same euphoric feelings as before."
That is apparently what happened to the husband mentioned earlier in this
article. One evening several months after he promised to stop watching
pornography, his wife returned home and found him at the computer. From his
demeanour she could see that something was wrong. "[He] appeared quite nervous
and upset," she wrote; "I looked at the computer, and sure enough, he had been
looking at some unbelievably raunchy stuff. He said he was sincere when he
promised to give it up, but he just couldn't stay away from it."
Just like narcotics, gambling, alcohol and the plethora of other vices tearing
down the Christian moral fabric of our societies, pornography has been created
and designed to create an immoral dependency, which destroys not only the trust
and respect of loved ones, but a person's self respect and trust in himself. It
is a tool of those who will dethrone all righteousness and goodness and replace
it with the purest of evil.
Lucifer's
Indulgence: Humankind's Scourge.
Sarah Evelyn Isobel Payne [4]was murdered by Roy William
Whiting in July 2000. The subsequent investigation became a high profile murder
case in the United Kingdom. Following his conviction, Whiting was imprisoned for
life and is currently being held in the maximum security Wakefield prison, in
West Yorkshire.
There is one fact in the disturbing history of Roy Whiting, convicted of the
murder of eight year-old Sarah Payne, which has not received much attention. He
had kept large quantities of pornography in his garage workshop. Indeed, there
is scarcely a sex offender who has not had an acute pornography habit. In
America, the FBI has reported that 81 percent of sex killers have said their
biggest sexual interest lay in viewing pornography, and in compulsive
masturbation. Now, no-one would suggest that pornography alone causes such men
to go and commit these terrible offences; and many men who use porn lead
otherwise blameless lives.
But equally, as the British sex crimes expert, Ray Wyre has observed,
pornography creates a climate of thought and belief which influences attitudes
towards women and children. What's more, Wyre says, the more men masturbate to
pornographic fantasies, the more likely they are to put those fantasies into
practice. In other words, porn has an effect on the behaviour of those who use
it. Yet many think instead it acts as a safety valve. Unlike fantasies involving
violence, sexual pornography is widely thought to be harmless. More than that, `Tatler`
magazine now reports that porno-chic is the new fashion statement. After all,
our society now runs on sex like a car runs on petrol. TV, films, ads for
everything from perfume to ice cream, are all sold on more and more explicit
sex. So since sex is no longer taboo, isn't it ridiculous to behave like Mrs
Grundy over pornography?
After all, the argument goes, English culture has always been bawdy and
debauched. Just think of Chaucer's Miller's Tale; or Shakespeare's prostitute
Doll Tearsheet; or, indeed, the pornography produced by the Victorians. Who now
would ban the works of DH Lawrence, Radclyffe Hall, James Joyce or Henry Miller,
all of whom were once considered obscene? Tastes change all the time, along with
standards of acceptability. Pornography is a legitimate form of expression which
may even do some good, say it's apologists .
Such an ostensibly sophisticated view is surely naive and self-deluding. It was
fashionable in the sixties and seventies to believe that if people were freed
from rules and constraints, they could be trusted to place limits on their own
behaviour. But as the feminist Germaine Greer has observed, porn is nothing to
do with freedom of expression. It is a ruthless industry which abuses not only
those who furnish its imagery but also the men who pay for its product.
The Graphic Detail.
Today's pornography is no longer a bit of full-frontal nudity and some explicit
bumping and grinding. What was illegal merely eighteen months ago - and could
only be obtained by means of a package slipped out from the back of some tacky
premises - is now legally on open display in licensed sex shops and available
through the internet. The spread of computers has hugely increased the
availability of pornography, which can be downloaded so easily from the web.
What was considered illegal material, amounted to cruelty, degradation and
humiliation of women through close-ups of penetration, ejaculation and
masturbation. Now such images are all legal.
The details are sordid, and will shock many. But it is surely essential that
people are aware of what is being tolerated in the name of freedom of expression
and of personal choice. For these legal videos do not merely show loveless, sad
encounters. They dehumanise sex altogether. There is very little view of faces
or indeed any part of the anatomy apart from the genital region. Women and men
are reduced to pieces of hydraulic machinery. The action consists mainly of
close-ups of anal and vaginal penetration, sometimes simultaneous. Sometimes the
girl undergoes double penetration while practising oral sex on a third man, or
with more than one man at the same time. The female genital region is always
shaved to produce a disturbing simulation of a child; worse still, it is often
pulled back so the camera peers right inside it. The impression that fills the
screen is of a carcass being rammed in every orifice.
What's even more revolting is that in many of these videos the men ejaculate
over the girl's face. In one, as the eight or so men she is servicing do this to
her, the girl's expression is fixed in a ghastly simulation of pleasure - but
for one brief moment when she thinks the camera isn't looking, the mask slips
and you see her utter disgust and despair before she resumes her pose. We are
told that such girls are consenting adults. But so what? Has our society really
arrived at such a pass that if a girl is so damaged that she allows herself to
be treated worse than any animal - in effect, as a thing - this is considered
acceptable because she is not doing it at knife-point?
Do we not care about the terrible degradation not only of the girl, but of the
men buying this material, and of our whole society? Are we all now so
de-sensitised that we have somehow persuaded ourselves that tolerating such
monstrousness is in our interests?
The answer is despairingly `YES.` Our societies, hearts and minds are truly in
the grip of the `Wicked One.`
An Expanding Industry.
Thanks to the internet, the sheer volume of pornography has exploded. Tapping in
the word 'porn' to one server alone brings up 24,522 sites. These legal websites
feature a huge amount of anal sex. This is all about pain and contempt. 'Watch
young teens bite their lips as they get it in the ass for the first time!'
invites one site. 'Amazing anal - the world's nastiest site', boasts another.
Yet another promises: 'It's hurting time: home to extreme pain hardcore'. This
displays hot wax poured onto and even pins stuck through women's genitals, and
asserts: 'These wenches do it because they love it', fuelling the murderous
fantasy that women want to be hurt.
There's also heavy emphasis on 'teen sluts'. These are almost certainly older
girls pretending to be children, but even so this shades into paedophilia since
the pitch is the stomach-heaving fantasy that these are children who will be
'split' open. And all this is legal. You look at these vile images and you
wonder what kind of a man could possibly find pleasure or release in them. For
it's no longer just the denizens of sleazy Soho who are consumers of hard-core.
It's the banker or the teacher or the advertising executive sitting in front of
his computer in his neat suburban house or up-market apartment, downloading this
viciousness from the web and then going out for a nice meal with his wife or
girlfriend.
These websites, however, are immensely repetitive and tedious. They invite a
credit card subscription on the promise of more extreme material, but then deny
access to it unless yet more money is paid. In this way they lead the man on in
the hope of finding the ultimate forbidden thrill. So when this doesn't
materialise, what could be more inevitable or easy for him than to get into an
internet 'chat room' and download illegal paedophile pictures of penetration or
oral sex with a child?
The illegal stuff on video and on the web is now confined to things like
paedophilia, bestiality, torture or coprophilia, which involves bodily waste
products. Yet such is the slide in norms of behaviour, the police expect that in
due course these taboos too will disappear. So how is all this being allowed to
happen? In the UK, the law controlling pornography is the 1959 Obscene
Publications Act, which outlaws any material likely to deprave or corrupt. The
first problem is the subjective nature of this definition and the absence of any
firm evidence of the harm such images can do.
Legal Aid.
In May 2000, a decision by the UK courts dramatically undermined the restraint
the law did offer. Mr Justice Hooper turned down a legal challenge by the
British Board of Film Classification, to a decision by its own appeal panel that
the Board had been wrong to insist on cuts of explicit sequences before it would
license a group of porn videos. As result, the BBFC had to rewrite its own
guidelines, which until then had outlawed explicit penetration or ejaculation
from the videos it licensed. When board members asked the public for their
views, they were told - to their horror - that the public wanted to make their
own decision whether or not to view such material.
The outcome was that the Board had no option but to issue revised guidelines
which they feared would open the floodgates. Just as they predicted, they found
themselves licensing the kind of highly disturbing pornography that had
previously been illegal. Moreover, these new guidelines rapidly became a
benchmark for everyone else. So porn sites on the web started to circulate
equally explicit material; top shelf magazines stocked by corner newsagents,
started to include equivalent pictures; and TV stations such as Channel Four and
Five are now also pushing to take advantage of this shift in practice.
A Harmless Diversion?
The argument is that pornographic images don't harm anyone as they are merely
fantasies. But fantasies of what? Of hurting women? Of humiliating them? Of
treating them as dehumanised objects?As the philosopher Roger Scruton argues in
his book `Sexual Desire,` fantasy has a tendency to remake the world in its own
image. So the 'harmless' porn voyeur can turn into a rapist with a gun. For his
fantasy is governed by monstrous myths and illusions - that women wish to be
raped, that children are waiting to be awakened to sexual pleasure, or that
violence is a natural right.
Pornography objectifies women and reduces them to a commodity. Such
dehumanisation affects the man's behaviour, ranging from withdrawal of intimacy
through to harsh treatment of women, to outright abuse. Dr Trevor Stammers, a GP
who has often written about sexual problems, says most women he counsels whose
husbands are into porn claim this has destroyed their marriages. The husband
prefers to find sexual release from a computer because this doesn't require any
personal engagement by him. So he chooses physical sensation without love.
'There is no doubt', says Dr Stammers, 'that as a result of using pornography
such men become far more callous towards women. What they are seeking from porn
is the illusion of power and control over them'.
Research studies back up the suggestion that using pornography badly affects
behaviour and relationships. American academics Dolf Zillmann and Jennings
Bryant have shown that pornography can diminish a person's sexual happiness,
that it damages beliefs about sexuality and attitudes towards women, and that it
desensitises people to rape as a criminal offence. An American survey last year
showed that more than 200,000 people were effectively addicted to porn through
websites and associated chat-rooms. Victor Cline of the University of Utah has
documented how men who become addicted to pornography, begin to want more
explicit or deviant material, and end up acting out what they have seen.
Isn't that to 'deprave and corrupt' by any reasonable understanding of those
terms? Yet far from being outlawed, porn is becoming mainstream behaviour. Sado-masochism
has its own fashionable clubs. In Britain, Sodomy was made legal for women when
the age of homosexual consent was reduced to 16yrs; what was once considered an
intolerable assault on women, from which the law should protect them, has now
become their 'right.' And urination during sex - the 'golden shower' is even
discussed enthusiastically in teen magazines.
Conclusion.
What we once believed righteous has been dethroned by that which we once knew to
be evil. A world turned on it's head. The very mention that Christianity, or
Islam, are the last bastions of virtue and morality causes the majority of
people here in the West to `short circuit, ` and close down. The family unit is
an endangered species. How many young men and women today even consider that a
life of devotion and duty to each other, as man and wife, and to their would be
offspring, as parents, is an end in itself? The whole concept of what was not so
long ago taken for granted, has become somehow irrelevant and even to a degree
redundant.
By gratuitously portraying immoral and lewd acts, pornography undercuts or
sabotages a persons efforts to discern between what is good and what is not. It
is nothing less than a loss of God! There is nothing harmless about pornography.
It is exploitive and corrupting. It can and increasingly does destroy
relationships, perverting the natural expression of sexual intimacy into a
voyeuristic activity. It poisons the mind and spirituality of the voyeur. It
promotes selfish, greedy attitudes and teaches people to view others as objects
fit only to satisfy their lust. It undermines all efforts to do good and
maintain a clean conscience.
Truly, pornography is Satan's scourge against mankind, and a major `siege gun`
in the Illuminati's plan to dehumanise and depopulate. How far away they are
from the setting up of their New World Order with it's `New Feudal` social model
and reduced serf class it is hard to say. What is for certain though is that our
best hope and defence against this evil scheme is our faith in God and a renewed
commitment to the institutions of marriage and family.
For it is surely in these we can begin to build the `fortress` of our
resistance.
Comments to :
http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/2 ... oying.html
Reference:
1]
http://righteousalliance.blogspot.com/2 ... -evil.html
2]
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_s ... depopu.htm
3]
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/bloodlines/index.htm
4]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Whiting
5]
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/J._Edgar_Hoover
6]
http://www.google.com/search?q=Dr+Judit ... osoft:en-g
b:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7GPEA_enDK310
7]
http://www.divorcewizards.com/Divorce-S ... raphy.html