Junk Food

http://cme.medscape.com/viewarticle/717006

From MedscapeCME Clinical Briefs

Soft Drink Consumption Linked to Pancreatic Cancer

News Author: Roxanne Nelson
CME Author: Désirée Lie, MD, MSEd

February 16, 2010 — The regular consumption of sugar-laden soft drinks could boost a person's risk of developing pancreatic cancer. The results of a new study found that individuals who consumed 2 or more soft drinks per week had an 87% increased risk for pancreatic cancer, compared with those who did not.

Even after taking factors such as smoking, caloric intake, and type 2 diabetes mellitus into account, the authors found that consuming soft drinks might play an independent role in the development of pancreatic cancer.

The finding is reported in the February issue of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

Both soft drinks and fruit juices have a high glycemic load relative to other foods and drinks, and it has been hypothesized that both are risk factors for pancreatic cancer. The high levels of sugar can increase levels of insulin in the body, and this can contribute to pancreatic cancer cell growth, the researchers explain.

Association Not Seen With Fruit Juice

However, this study did not find an association between consumption of juice and an increased risk for pancreatic cancer.

"There are several plausible explanations why fruit juice was not significantly associated with pancreatic cancer," said first author Noel Mueller, MPH, a research associate at Georgetown University Medical Center in Washington, DC.

One reason is that the finding was based on a relatively small number of cases, so there might have been too few cases to detect an effect with fruit juice, he explained. Another is that there are differences between soft drinks and fruit juice — fruit juice is lower in sugar, includes many nutrients, and is typically served in smaller portion sizes.

A third explanation is that fruit juice intake is associated with healthier lifestyle characteristics than soft drink intake, he said.

The consumption of soft drinks coincided with a number of other unhealthy lifestyle characteristics, making it somewhat difficult to separate smoking, caloric intake, body weight, and type 2 diabetes mellitus from soft drink consumption. "But the findings from our study suggest that soft drinks may play an independent role in the development of pancreatic cancer," Mr. Mueller told Medscape Oncology.

"The influence of soft drink intake on the risk of pancreatic cancer remained virtually unchanged after adjustment for smoking status, energy intake, body weight, and type 2 diabetes mellitus," he added.

Results Statistically Significant for Soft Drinks

The current study examined the association between the consumption of soft drinks and juice and the risk for pancreatic cancer among Chinese people residing in Singapore. The data came from the Singapore Chinese Health Study (n = 60,524), and information regarding the consumption of soft drinks, juice, and other dietary items, along with lifestyle factors and environmental exposures, was collected at recruitment to the study. The participants were followed for up to 14 years.

At the start of the study, 9.7% of the participants consumed at least 2 soft drinks per week and 10.2% consumed at least 2 servings of juice per week. The authors note that, compared with those who did not consume soft drinks, those who consumed 2 or more soft drinks per week were younger, were more likely to be men, and were more likely to smoke cigarettes. They also had higher levels of education, alcohol consumption, and total energy intake; lower levels of physical activity; and consumed more total carbohydrates, fat, added sugar, and red meat.

Individuals who reported consuming 2 or more juice drinks a week had lifestyle and dietary habits that were similar to those who consumed soft drinks. However, there was no association between juice intake and cigarette smoking, and body mass index (BMI) was comparable across different categories of soft drink and juice consumption.

At 14 years and a cumulative 648,387 person-years of follow-up, 140 incident pancreatic cancers developed in people who were cancer free at baseline. After adjustment for confounders such as BMI, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and fruit juice intake, the authors found that those consuming 2 or more soft drinks per week experienced a statistically significant increased risk for pancreatic cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10 - 3.15).

Although people who consumed 2 or more juice drinks a week had an increased risk for pancreatic cancer of approximately 30%, elevated HR was not statistically significant after adjustment for variables.

However, in an age-adjusted analysis, smoking was also a risk factor. After excluding former smokers, the authors found that current smokers had a 49% increased risk for pancreatic cancer, compared with never smokers (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.98 - 2.27). This risk factor remained unaffected after adjustment for diabetes and BMI.

Can Be Extrapolated to United States and Europe

Singapore is a highly industrialized nation with lifestyle and nutritional patterns reminiscent of many westernized countries. In that sense, these findings could be extrapolated to the United States and Europe, explained Mr. Mueller. Soft drinks are the leading source of added sugar in the American diet, the authors note.

"However, there are inherent differences between Singaporean Chinese and Caucasians, which is why one must be cautious when generalizing these results to the United States and Europe," he said. "But it is important to note that other studies in Caucasian populations have suggested that soft drink intake may increase risk for pancreatic cancer."

Because pancreatic cancer is a relatively rare disease, the number of cases in this study was relatively small, the authors point out. This limited the statistical power of the study. Another limitation was the inability to collect repeated dietary measurements during the course of the study; therefore, they could not account for changes in consumption of soft drinks and juices.

However, this study adds to the evidence that soft drink consumption plays a role in the development of pancreatic cancer, they conclude, and that "clinical studies examining biomarkers for glycemia and insulinemia and taking a mechanistic approach to the question of soft drink consumption and pancreatic cancer are warranted."

There is "still much to understand on the link between sugar-sweetened beverages and pancreatic cancer," the authors write.

The study was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute. The researchers have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19;447-455. Abstract

Clinical Context

Carcinoma of the pancreas has high metastatic potential and poor prognosis because of lack of good treatment options and late presentation, with a 5-year survival time of less than 5% and no specific primary preventive strategies available. Smoking, obesity, and diabetes mellitus have been reported as risk factors for pancreatic cancer. Also, high glycemic foods that may predispose to diabetes may predispose to pancreatic cancer.

This is a prospective, 14-year cohort study of Chinese people living in Singapore to examine the association between consumption of soft drinks and fruit juice and the risk for the development of pancreatic cancer.

Study Highlights

  • The Singapore Chinese Health Study is a population-based, prospective cohort study of diet and cancer risk conducted in permanent residents from government-built housing estates where 86% of the population resided.
  • This study involved 2 dialect groups: the Hokkien and Cantonese originating from the southern part of China.
  • Participants were men and women aged 45 to 74 years without preexisting pancreatic cancer.
  • Recruitment was by letter, and staff went from door to door inviting participation with each subject.
  • A trained interviewer then interviewed the participants face-to-face using a structured scanner-readable questionnaire.
  • The interviewer asked subjects about demographics, lifestyle, diet, and medical history.
  • Diet was elicited with a semiquantitative 165-item food frequency questionnaire.
  • The questionnaire included commonly eaten food from Singapore, with 3 portion sizes and frequency in 8 categories ranging from never or hardly ever to 6 or more times daily.
  • Photographs of foods were presented to identify the food groups.
  • The questionnaire was validated against 24-hour recall in at least 1000 participants.
  • Soft drink portions were defined as 1 glass.
  • 1 glass was designated as 237 mL and was equivalent to 1 cup.
  • Juices were categorized into specific drinks that included sugarcane, honeydew melon, apple, watermelon, carrot, pineapple, star fruit, and lemon juices.
  • The Singapore Food Composition Table was developed to analyze the nutritional content of food types.
  • Other risk factors for pancreatic cancer were assessed, including BMI, smoking, and physical activity.
  • Pancreatic cancer cases were ascertained by linkage to the population-based cancer registry and registry of births and deaths.
  • 142 incident cases were identified, of which 56.4% were histologically confirmed, 38.8% were by clinical and radiologic findings, and 4.8% were identified by death certificates.
  • Rate of loss to follow-up was only 0.03%.
  • Mean age was 56 years, 55% were women, mean BMI was 23 kg/m2, 30% were ever-smokers, and 10% had type 2 diabetes.
  • At baseline, 9.7% of participants consumed at least 2 soft drinks per week and 10.2% consumed at least 2 servings of juice per week.
  • Those who consumed 2 or more soft drinks or juices weekly were likely to be younger, men, smoke, have higher levels of education, consume alcohol, and have higher energy intake and lower physical activity vs those who consumed no soft drinks or juices.
  • They also had a higher consumption of total carbohydrates, sugar, and red meat.
  • After 14 years and 648,387 person-years of follow-up, invasive exocrine pancreatic cancer developed in 140 persons .
  • Smokers had a 49% increased risk for pancreatic cancer.
  • BMI and a history of diabetes were not associated with an increased risk for pancreatic cancer.
  • Results for all risks were similar for men and women, and analysis was combined for the 2 sexes.
  • Drinking 2 or more soft drinks per week was associated with more than 80% increase in risk for pancreatic cancer after adjustment for other risks (HR, 1.87).
  • This risk was independent of diabetes and smoking and persisted after excluding those who had pancreatic cancer within 5 years of baseline.
  • After adjustment, juice intake of 2 or more drinks per week overall was not associated with increased risk, but when smokers were excluded, there was an association between juice intake and pancreatic cancer risk (HR, 1.60).
  • The authors concluded that soft drink consumption was positively associated with pancreatic cancer risk but that juice consumption was associated with risk among nonsmokers only.

Clinical Implications

  • Consumption of 2 or more soft drinks weekly is associated with an increased risk for pancreatic cancer in the Chinese population.
  • Consumption of 2 or more fruit drinks weekly is not associated with an increased risk for pancreatic cancer overall, but the risk is increased in nonsmokers.

CME Test

Questions answered incorrectly will be highlighted.

In this study by Mueller and colleagues, which of the following factors is most likely to be associated with an increased risk for pancreatic cancer?

( )Consumption of 2 or more soft drinks weekly

( )Increased BMI

( )History of type 2 diabetes

( )Consumption 1 or more servings of red meat daily

Which of the following patients is most likely to be at risk for pancreatic cancer?

( )Smoker consuming 1 fruit drink per week

( )Nonsmoker consuming 3 fruit drinks per week

( )Male smoker consuming 1 fruit drink per week

( )Female smoker consuming 2 fruit drinks per week

[Save and Proceed]

This article is a CME certified activity. To earn credit for this activity visit:
http://cme.medscape.com/viewarticle/717006

Authors and Disclosures

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC, requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.

Medscape, LLC, encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.

Author(s)

Roxanne Nelson

Roxanne Nelson is a staff journalist for Medscape Oncology.

Disclosure: Roxanne Nelson has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Editor(s)

Brande Nicole Martin

CME Clinical Editor, Medscape, LLC

Disclosure: Brande Nicole Martin has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author(s)

Désirée Lie, MD, MSEd

Clinical Professor, Family Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California; Director of Research and Patient Development, Family Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Rossmoor, California

Disclosure: Désirée Lie, MD, MSEd, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationship:
Served as a nonproduct speaker for: "Topics in Health" for Merck Speaker Services

CME Reviewer(s)

Sarah Fleischman

CME Program Manager, Medscape, LLC

Disclosure: Sarah Fleischman has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Disclaimer

The material presented here does not necessarily reflect the views of Medscape, LLC, or companies that support educational programming on www.medscapecme.com. These materials may discuss therapeutic products that have not been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and off-label uses of approved products. A qualified healthcare professional should be consulted before using any therapeutic product discussed. Readers should verify all information and data before treating patients or employing any therapies described in this educational activity.

Send press releases and comments to news@medscape.net.

MedscapeCME Clinical Briefs © 2010 MedscapeCME

This article is a CME certified activity. To earn credit for this activity visit:
http://cme.medscape.com/viewarticle/717006

CME Information

CME Released: 02/16/2010; Valid for credit through 02/16/2011

Target Audience

This article is intended for primary care clinicians, gastroenterologists, endocrinologists, oncologists, and other specialists who care for patients at risk for pancreatic cancer.

Goal

The goal of this activity is to provide medical news to primary care clinicians and other healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care.

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  • Describe the association between consumption of soft drinks and the risk for pancreatic cancer.
  • Describe the association between fruit drink consumption and the risk for pancreatic cancer.

Credits Available

Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

Family Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AAFP Prescribed credit(s)

All other healthcare professionals completing continuing education credit for this activity will be issued a certificate of participation.

Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Accreditation Statements

For Physicians

Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

Medscape, LLC designates this educational activity for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Medscape News CME has been reviewed and is acceptable for up to 300 Prescribed credits by the American Academy of Family Physicians. AAFP accreditation begins September 1, 2009. Term of approval is for 1 year from this date. Each issue is approved for .25 Prescribed credits. Credit may be claimed for 1 year from the date of this issue.

Note: Total credit is subject to change based on topic selection and article length.

Medscape, LLC staff have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

AAFP Accreditation Questions

Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact CME@medscape.net

Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

1.     Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.

2.     Study the educational content online or printed out.

3.     Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. MedscapeCME encourages you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates by accessing "Edit Your Profile" at the top of your Medscape homepage.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

Hardware/Software Requirements

MedscapeCME is accessible using the following browsers: Internet Explorer 6.x or higher, Firefox 2.x or higher, Safari 2.x or higher. Certain educational activities may require additional software to view multimedia, presentation or printable versions of their content. These activities will be marked as such and will provide links to the required software. That software may be: Macromedia Flash, Adobe Acrobat, or Microsoft PowerPoint.

 

 

http://cme.medscape.com/viewarticle/717006_print