Claus
Köhnlein
[back] AIDS critics
Claus Koehnlein, MD, was a specialist in internal medicine in the Dept. of Oncology, Univ. of Kiel, Germany between 1983 -1993. Since 1993, he has been in private practice, increasingly treating HIV- positive people who decline antiviral drugs. Dr. Koehnlein welcomes all correspondence, which may be addressed to him directly at: Koehnlein-Kiel@t-online.de. He may, at his discretion, publish selected letters (anonymously), along with his reply, on this web page. http://www.rethinkaids.com/body.cfm?id=76
[2006] How I Became a Dissident AIDS Doctor by Claus Köhnlein
[2006] The AZT Disaster by Claus KöhnleinBSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases? By Claus Köhnlein
Quotes
For the president of South Africa, Mbeki, the discrepancy between what
European and US newspapers write about his country (drastic population
reduction) and what´s actually happening in his country (doubling of the
population within the past 30 years), was striking, hence he refused to follow
the general (American) AIDS-politics and instead, called the meeting of experts
who had the task to examine whether or not HIV was actually the cause of AIDS.
Two things had particularly
startled him: First the extensive literature on AZT and the damaging effects of
this substance, and secondly a paper by Max Essex that was published in the
"Journal of Infectious Diseases" and which describes a strong cross reaction of
HIV tests with antigens, that can be found in the bacteria which cause
tuberculosis and lepra. That means, nobody in Africa or elsewhere in the world
knows whether a patient suffers from tuberculosis because he is HIV-positive, or
whether he is HIV-positive because he suffers from tuberculosis.
BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C
Infectious or Intoxication Diseases? By Claus Köhnlein
"Another problem of the AIDS epidemiology is the following: By now about 30 afflictions all of which were known before, are being renamed to AIDS in the presence of a positive HIV-test. This also is not an increase of diseases of course --but just a redefinition. This circular definition HIV+/TB = AIDS and HIV-/TB = TB makes the correlation HIV-AIDS appear 100%. For example, a patient who suffers from TB and who is also HIV-positive is an AIDS patient today, and a woman who suffers from cervical carcinoma is an AIDS patient today, and a patient with a lymphoma is today not a lymphoma patient but also an AIDS patient if he has antibodies against HIV. " ---- BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases? By Claus Köhnlein (BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases?)
"Kary Mullis, Nobel
laureate in chemistry 1993 and inventor of the polymerase chain reaction, needed
a reference for "the generally known fact" that HIV was the cause of AIDS. While
working on a project he became aware that he didn´t know a scientific reference
for the statement he had just written down: HIV is the probable cause of AIDS.
So he asked the next virologist at the table after that basic paper. The
virologist told Mullis, he wouldn´t need a reference in this case; after all,
everyone knows that HIV leads to AIDS. Kary Mullis disagreed and thought such an
important discovery should be published in some paper. He learnt soon that it
was impossible to find such a paper. Instead, he was pointed to the press
conference of 1983 over and over again.
One day, he got the opportunity to
talk to Luc Montagnier from the Pasteur Institute, the [claimed] discoverer of
the virus, during an event in San Diego. HE should know the answer. Confronted
with Mullis´question, Montagnier said: "Why don´t you cite the report of the CDC
(Centers of Disease Control)?" Mullis answered: "This report doesn´t address the
question whether or not HIV is the cause of AIDS" - "Right", Montagnier
admitted, "but maybe you could cite the SIV study (Simian Immunedeficiency
Virus, which is very similar to HIV)." That paper didn´t convince Mullis either,
because the monkeys developed different diseases, also because the virus wasn´t
the same one, and thirdly, because the paper had been published only a few
months before. He looked for the original paper that should demonstrate in
whatever form that HIV was the cause of AIDS. At that point, Montagnier´s answer
consisted of running away, to greet a group on the other side of the room.
I had a similar experience this
year [2000] in South Africa on the AIDS Advisory Panel, which had been initiated
by president Thabo Mbeki. Mbeki had invited 33 scientists from all over the
world in order to shed light on the AIDS problem in his country. Among them were
22 scientists who believed in the virus hypothesis, and 11 so-called dissidents
(which I belong to), who cast doubt on the virus hypothesis and rather assume
that AIDS in Africa is the result of increasing poverty, while AIDS in the
developed countries is the result of drugs, and above all the result of the
therapy against AIDS (AZT)
I asked Montagnier what convinced
him that AIDS is caused by a virus. Montagnier answered that over the years
apparently an effective treatment has been developed, and this was proof enough
for HIV leading to AIDS. In other words, the virologists have no virological
arguments for the theory that HIV leads to AIDS. Instead, they get the proof for
their hypotheses from physicians, who give a positive feedback by saying "Of
course AIDS is a viral disease that responds to antiviral treatment."
---- BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C
Infectious or Intoxication Diseases? By Claus
Köhnlein
"Tuberculosis has always been a good indicator for the weal and woe of a society (see the frequency of TB in Germany after the two world wars, Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden). Modern tuberculosis however is now, after the introduction of HIV-tests, called AIDS and is treated accordingly. In India they showed me patients who had tuberculosis and sold house and home, in order to get the cure (AZT) from the West. "----BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases? By Claus Köhnlein
"The therapy business: Antiviral medication, 3 or 4 or 5 fold combinations, AIDS can´t be topped in this department. ....... With intoxication hypotheses on the other hand you cannot make any money at all. The simple message is: Avoid the poison and you won´t get sick. Such hypotheses are counterproductive insofar as the toxins (drugs, alcohol, pills, phosmet) bring high revenues. The conflict of interests is not resolvable: What virologist who does directly profit millions from their patent rights of the HIV or HCV tests (Montagnier, Simon Wain-Hobsen, Robin Weiss, Robert Gallo) can risk to take even one look in the other direction."--BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases? By Claus Köhnlein
But if a toxin can speed up the outbreak of a disease, like alcohol can
contribute to liver diseases, then it can also be the sole cause. However, if
Phosmet would be declared as cause of BSE, compensation lawsuits in billions
would wait for both the British government and the manufacturer of the
insecticide. This is certainly not desirable for them, so they prefer to
surround the basically clear context in a fog of prions.
Intoxication hypotheses are easily
testable and in contrast to the virus or prion hypotheses also falsifiable. They
can be examined toxicologically and epidemiologically and then we can either
accept or reject them.
BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C
Infectious or Intoxication Diseases? By Claus Köhnlein
Epidemiological and toxicological data suggest that
chronic intoxication's are the real cause for the named diseases AIDS, Hep C and
BSE. Why these plausible hypothesis aren´t investigated further, this is a topic
one could write a book about which could have the title "conflicts of
interests".
Infection hypotheses can help making billions of dollars:
1. The antibody business: Millions
of screening tests are distributed, each blood sample needs to be tested (4
millions in Germany alone)
2. The therapy business: Antiviral
medication, 3 or 4 or 5 fold combinations, AIDS can´t be topped in this
department.
3. Possibly vaccinations: Here,
however, the concept of the new big plagues gets in the way of itself, because
this has brought up the central paradox of immunology. Since the beginning of
HIV they have told us: He who has antibodies to HIV, will die, instead of, he
who has antibodies to HIV will live, which would meet our vaccination concepts.
How many HIV antibody negative individuals would like to get vaccinated, in
order to have antibodies to HIV afterwards?
With intoxication hypotheses on the
other hand you cannot make any money at all. The simple message is: Avoid the
poison and you won´t get sick. Such hypotheses are counterproductive insofar as
the toxins (drugs, alcohol, pills, phosmet) bring high revenues. The conflict of
interests is not resolvable: What virologist who does directly profit millions
from their patent rights of the HIV or HCV tests (Montagnier, Simon Wain-Hobsen,
Robin Weiss, Robert Gallo) can risk to take even one look in the other
direction.
What physician who has treated AIDS
or hepatitis C patients over many years in good faith in the virus hypothesis
and with high personal input, can look in the other direction?
BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C
Infectious or Intoxication Diseases? By Claus Köhnlein