[The only reason for this
(SatanicPsychopathic)
racket is to increase cancer
levels through radiation (mammography and radiation therapy), increase cancer
cases they can then treat (10 times what it
should be,1 which also helps
greatly with their 'cure' stats) by the perpetual cash machine called
Cancer Inc, along with its seen to be doing
something propaganda value, while they have suppressed dozens of cheap, non-toxic,
fear removing real
cures such as
Hamer,
Kelley,
Gerson,
Nichols,
Zapperetc.
and real, harmless, diagnostic tools such as Breast
thermography and
Electronic testing. They will continue
poisoning, burning, mutilating and terrorising
women (along with their families), while earning themselves a huge amount of (blood)
money, forever, if they can get away with it. See:
Depleted Uranium
to see the Beast behind mammograms.]
[2011 July] Widely used CAD
mammography tool fails to find invasive breast cancer, causes needless tests and
stress "In real-world practice, CAD increases
the chances of being unnecessarily called back for further testing because of
false-positive results without clear benefits to women,” said Joshua Fenton,
assistant professor in the UC Davis Department of Family and Community Medicine.
“Breast cancers were detected at a similar stage and size regardless of whether
or not radiologists used CAD."
[2011 June] The FDA assaults
breast thermography while protecting mammography industry First of
all, it slanders the breast thermography industry and the multitude of
mainstream medical journal articles supporting its value. As a point of
interest, the FDA approved breast thermography as an adjunct to mammography in
1982. You would think that there just might be a reason or two supporting its
value that they appreciate but fail to mention....There is an abundance of
scientific evidence in the mainstream journals supporting that breast
thermography as a superior tool to mammograms because it is more sensitive and
makes fewer errors when used properly, particularly in women under the age of
50, where there's tremendous controversy about the validity of mammograms as a
primary screening tool for breast cancer. The final embarrassment for the
FDA and Journal Watch, is that three of the five people voting against bringing
breast thermography forward into clinical practice in that fatal meeting in
2004, had a serious conflict of interest connecting them to the mammography
industry. Wow!
.png)
