Dr Miriam Stoppard, M.D, D.Sc, FRCP,
DCL
Unauthentic journalism
Experts
[Dr Miriam Stoppard, who writes for the Daily Mirror, is married to Sir Christopher Hogg, the former chairman of MMR manufacturer and defendant Glaxo SmithKline. Which would explain her absurd (insane) belief in Dr Offit's 'kids can safely get up to 10,000 vaccines' statement (was 100,000 Ref), along with her other Allopathic beliefs.]
[2009] MMR vaccine: The jab that kids need to have this autumn By Miriam Stoppard
Quotes re Stoppard
I will end this report with a clear example of the criminal
misinformation indulged in by the British press. Not having lived in the US, I
have no idea of how the media deals with the matter of vaccines, but I fear that
most North Americans can have no understanding of the unmitigated rottenness of
the British Media, and without such an understanding they might find it hard to
grasp how this tidal wave has crashed down upon Dr Wakefield.
A report appeared this morning in
the Mirror newspaper, a vaguely Labour leading tabloid, quoting Dr Miriam
Stoppard who is a septuagenarian columnist in the paper. Stoppard has campaigned
against alternative medicine, in favour of Hormone Replacement Therapy and in
favour of MMR, in everything from the most immature teen girl's magazines to the
Mirror newspaper.
On Friday morning, previous writing
of hers was repeated in the Mirror newspaper. Stoppard is just one of the many
medical hacks that keep the wheels of vested interest turning inside the UK
pharma-soaked media, but I think for reader world wide a brief look at the
inanity on the morrow of the verdict against Andrew Wakefield, Professor Murch
and Professor Walker-Smith might help readers outside the UK understand how the
GMC is presently getting away with its lamentable corruption.
Miriam Stoppard writes an agony
aunt column for the Daily Mirror Newspaper. She has a company, Miriam Stoppard
Lifetime through which she sells her books and health products. After training
as a doctor she began working for the drug company Syntex and eventually
becoming one of the companies a managing directors. In 1997, she married Sir
Christopher Hogg, who until 2004 had been Chairman of GlaxoSmith Kline, the
vaccine manufacturer.
Here are Miriam Stoppard's remarks
on Dr Wakefield's work, read on Friday morning by thousands of Mirror readers.
Knowing the MMR was probably one of the most highly tested vaccinations
ever, I was shocked by Andrew Wakefield's words in 1998. I looked at his paper
and I found it was very badly researched with lots of holes. It certainly didn't
constitute any kind of cause or relationship between the MMR vaccine and the
appearance of autism. I was astonished it was even published. Shortly after, I
wrote a big piece for the Mirror about how it was flawed and irresponsible. I
tried to reassure parents it didn't show a connection between MMR and autism,
the jab was safe and they should vaccinate their kids. However, a lot of the
media came out and emphasised the autism connection and my attempts at
reassurance were ineffective. Parents were driven towards single vaccines. But
single vaccinations aren't licensed in this country so we don't even know if
they're safe or effective. And while you're giving children single vaccinations,
they're not protected against the other illnesses. So there is absolutely no
reason, science or logic in using them. And the argument that the MMR overloads
a baby's immune system is rubbish. It can take more than 10,000 doses of the MMR
vaccination and not turn a hair. Wakefield and his bad research have an awful
lot to answer for'.
Although it is hardly necessary, here is a brief rebuttal
MMR was probably one of the most highly tested vaccinations ever - not
true.
I was shocked by Andrew Wakefield's words in 1998 - which words?
I looked at his paper and I found it was very badly researched with lots of
holes - evidence?
It certainly didn't constitute any kind of cause or relationship between
the MMR vaccine and the appearance of autism - the paper
didn't claim to show any causal link between MMR and autism - how did you
read it and miss this?
I was astonished it was even published - Thank God you're not the
editor of a medical journal.
Shortly after, I wrote a big piece for the Mirror about how it was flawed and
irresponsible - How much were you paid for this article. Did you declare
any conflict of interest?
I tried to reassure parents it didn't show a connection between MMR and
autism, the jab was safe and they should vaccinate their kids - The paper
didn't claim to show any connection between MMR and autism, however to assure
parents without any evidence to the contrary is a disgusting abdication of
medical responsibility, do you still have your doctors practice certificate?
Single vaccinations aren't licensed in this country, so we don't even know
if they're safe or effective. And while you're giving children single
vaccinations, they're not protected against the other illnesses. So there is
absolutely no reason, science or logic in using them - How is possible to
pack so many mistakes into 3 sentences? Single vaccines were licensed at the
time of the publication of the Lancet paper. We do know that they are safe and
effective because in the case of measles they were used from 1976 onwards. In
the case of mumps, the NHS advised against vaccination and in the case of
Rubella, vaccination was suggested only for women likely to become pregnant.
Interesting that you say that we shouldn't be using single vaccines. Is this the
case for say, malaria, I mean if it doesn't also protect people against measles
I think you must clearly be right! [2010
Jan] Eye Witness Report from the UK GMC Wakefield, Walker-Smith, Murch
Hearing By Martin Walker