The Bilocation of Hillary Clone-Clinton
by Alcuin Bramerton
Sunday, January 06, 2008
http://alcuinbramerton.blogspot.com/2008/01/bilocation-of-hillary-clone-clinton.html
In 2008, during the American presidential election campaign, US Senator
Hillary Clinton's handlers began to get clumsy and she was seen in two different
places at once on a number of separate occasions. And not just in Iowa and New
Hampshire.
Someone sees Hillary Clinton at a function across town at, say, 1.30pm. And
then, when they compare notes with a Democratic Party co-worker later that day,
they learn that Hillary was also seen back at the hotel at 1.30pm, three miles
away. And her clothes were different, or her hair was different, or her makeup
was different, and the people with her were different. Or, after a speaking
engagement, the car drives Hillary Clinton away to Location A, where she is seen
to get out of the car at, say, 10.45pm. But a co-worker sees her at 11.00pm at
Location B thirty or forty miles away, except that Hillary Clinton and the car
have not left Location A. And they couldn't drive that fast anyway, and
Hillary's clothing or appearance is different, and the people with her are
different. And the next day, arriving for an early morning meeting somewhere,
Hillary comes from Location B, not from Location A. Meanwhile, she is seen
having a late breakfast at Location A with different people. And so on.
How many different Hillary Clintons are there?
It is suggested that over half the US Presidential hopefuls in 2008 were human
clones. There were several of each of them. Was Hillary Clinton one of these or
several of them? And how are the voters to discriminate?
A picture of the young Hillary Clinton can be seen
here. Notice the physiognomy: the smile musculature, the cheek pouches, the
placement of the nose bridge, the upper eyelid line. Now look at who the
official Hillary for President campaign site wanted you to vote for in New
Hampshire (picture
here). The same woman, but older? Look at the right hand side of her mouth.
Any moles visible? There are other pictures
here and
here and
here and
here. Same woman again, but older? Trick of the light maybe? Moles
there notice, but no moles
here. What about
here? Moles or not? Now for the mystery woman. Who is
this? Or
this? Recognise the smile? Know the name from somewhere? The same as
this perhaps? And where did
this one come from? Or
this, or
this? In that run of pictures, there were fifteen images of which three were
repeated. But how many different individuals were shown? Three? Four? When we
and others first began running this story, the Hillary for President campaign
immediately changed its lead picture from
this to
this. That image was then changed again after a bit. Their current favourite
official regulation version of Hillary Clinton can now be viewed
here.
And for afficionados, here is a picture of one of the Hillary Clinton clones taking instructions
from a clone-handler called George McGlaris in Dover, New Hampshire, on Monday
7th January 2008.
A quote from the Hillary Clinton for President website is germane: "President
Clinton writes about his life with Hillary and how she has been an agent of
change for 35 years."
What was the major issue in election-alert America in 2008? It was the
physiognomy, stupid.
The use of human clones in American political management is only now becoming
apparent. The last US President not to be cloned was John F. Kennedy. Usually,
when a President or major American public figure ceases to be compliant to the
demands of the controlling corporate elite, they are quietly killed, cremated
and replaced with lookalike, mind-controlled clones. These days, at the Camp
David human clone laboratories (Maryland) and elsewhere, it is possible to
produce an adult human clone from originator DNA and a lab-double in less than
36 hours.
The history of this covert human cloning technology is now emerging. By the late
1970s, using monochromatic laser light technology, researchers within the
Russian security community created a holographic apparatus which could record
the entire memory of the living brain of a chosen human individual and store the
data content of that brain on stable computer hardware. The Russians used
inaudible high-frequency sound waves to create a complete three-dimensional
picture of the brain. They discovered that their ultrasonic cerebral hologram
process duplicated and stored the entire memory of the person in a coherently
recoverable form. The Russians now had what they wanted to create working
lab-clones for deployment. The same technique could be used to download someone
else's memory into another (different) person, in this case a lab-double, and
natural doubles could now be reprogrammed to take on the full memory database of
the person being replaced. More background
here.
Lab-doubles are generated using DNA infusion. Here the DNA of the person chosen
to be duplicated is collected, amplified, processed and prepared for the
infusion process into the new host body. The DNA infusion completely overrides
the DNA of the living human host, physically transforming the host body into a
visual replica of the chosen body. However, the residual host body DNA can still
be detected, and identified, within the lab-double using sensitive DNA testing
procedures. Where do the human host bodies come from? Covert kidnap, abduction
and fake disappearance programmes. Many of the abducted human host bodies are
those of children. And, of course, any of these adducted human hosts can be
subjected to
brain programming manipulation as well as to complete ultrasonic cerebral
downloads.
In one curious incident, a Europe-controlled cell of US Rothschild minions
within the US security community learned that the Russians were using duplicated
clones for many of their leading Kremlin operatives. By this time the Americans
had obtained similar brain programming and ultrasonic cerebral download
abilities to the Russians. This technology had been fed to them from the
Rothschild clone labs in Europe. The US military tried to use identical
US-controlled clones to penetrate the Kremlin. Kremlin lookalikes were produced
in America and were secreted into Moscow via the US embassy. However, the
Russians were tipped off and became aware of the detail of the plan in advance.
They let the US clones through into the Kremlin, downloaded their memories and
programming and then reprogrammed them for Russian use. The Americans became
perplexed as to what had happened because their infiltrated Kremlin clones were
not carrying out their US programmed orders. It was an exotic case of
double-agent meltdown. For sometime, nobody in the US knew which Russian clone
was which. This engendered subtle difficulties for the Americans at
international conferences.
When President George Bush Snr left office in 1993, he was Clone Number 34 in
his DNA originator line. Most of his previous 33 clones had been used and
terminated at that point. When President Bill Clinton left office in 2001, he
was Clone Number 21 in his line. When a President is terminated and cloned, it
is standard practice to do the same with his close family members. If this is
not done, they immediately notice the difference and cause difficulties.
Human clones are not ensouled and do not, therefore, have access to the higher
dimensions through reflection, intuition and spiritual practice. No soul means
no God-connection. And no God-connection means that clones have an inherent
vulnerability to religious manipulation and deceit.
The higher dimensional data-links which ensouled humans have, help them to
appear quick, flexible and alert in conversation, particularly when stressed.
The absence of this potential for minute-to-minute inspiration or revelation in
clones gives rise to a simplistic body language and inappropriate physiognomic
responses in complexly nuanced situations (picture example here). It also means that when faced with metaphorated questioning or
elliptical comments, they can appear slow, dim or confused. Anything that human
clones are confronted with which falls outside their specific day-to-day
conditioning or expectation engenders childlike conflict-signalling and tantrums
(picture examples here and
here). For this reason, two or three clones are kept up and running for each
principal at any one time. They are very nearly identical in appearance, but
some look younger or more innocent than others, and some have superficial tissue
differentiations that cannot be concealed by makeup when viewed in close-up or
under strong light.
If two different clones of one individual are interacted with at a conference on
successive days by an ensouled human, the differences are often very evident.
"Which George did you speak to today, Tony?"
With regard to a clone's irrational conflict-signalling and out-of-comfort-zone
tantrums, Hillary Clinton can boast considerable previous form. Ask anyone who
has worked closely with her. She's not just scratchy; she can be hysterically
ballistic. The summer of 2009 provided a famous example. Hillary fractured an
elbow in a furious physical fight with a senior colleague at the US State
Department in Washington DC. On Wednesday 17th June 2009, the US Secretary of
State lost control of herself and lashed out viciously at the US Special
Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan,
Richard Holbrooke.
The argument and fight arose from a shouting match between the two concerning
North Korea. Holbrooke had just confronted Clinton with two facts about the US's
handling of the North Korea fiasco. First, he let Clinton know that he was aware
that agents of the US State Department, acting for Clinton, had tipped off the
North Korean government about the presence of the two Current TV journalists on
the Chinese border near North Korea. Second, Holbrooke told Clinton that he was
also aware that Clinton had personally sabotaged an effort by the Swedish
Ambassador, the Chinese Foreign Ministry and Albert Gore to secure a quick and
safe release of the two Current TV journalists from North Korean custody. As a
consequence, the journalists were unnecessarily detained in the North Korean
presidential headquarters known as the Puzzle Palace.
Richard Holbrooke and Hillary Clinton's screaming match then went physical.
Hillary began to physically attack Holbrooke. Holbrooke defended himself and
during the altercation forced Hillary to the ground causing her right elbow to
fracture. After her fight with Holbrooke, Clinton was treated at The George
Washington University Hospital before going home. She later underwent surgery to
repair the damage on Friday 19th June 2009. This photograph
here, taken on Monday 22nd June 2009, shows Clinton's injured right arm. It
is said that much of the exchange between Hillary and Holbrooke was recorded by
State Department security cameras. Inside the Beltway, Richard Holbrooke
suddenly became the most popular person in town. More background
here.
Another celebrated Hillary Clinton tantrum occurred back in the 1990s during
Bill Clinton's presidency. Investigating unusual noises at the White House one
evening, a Federal Secret Service agent discovered the First Lady in a
well-lubricated lesbian sexual encounter with the regular White House prostitute
known as Susan. Clinton responded by attacking the agent with a heavy glass ash
tray. In fairness, it should be remarked that Susan was never exclusively
lesbian in the services she provided for the US governing class. Current CIA
Chief Leon Panetta and ABC talk show host George Stephanopoulos both caught
genital herpes from Susan at White House socials.
Having no soul and no God-connection means that human clones have no spiritual
processing power; they cannot function at the level of values, morals, ethics,
compassion, honour or decency. Indeed, they have nothing within their
intellection which energises or articulates such concepts in their
consciousness. Human clones do, however, have a very powerful survival instinct.
Under sustained pressure or threat they become amoral, manipulative fighting
machines without spiritual stops or conscience. What you can get away with is
what you do; lying is the core modus operandi; honesty about facts on the ground
is self-injurious weakness; a spectrum of alternative views on an issue is a
spectrum of aggressive enemy positions; unscrupulous elimination of opponents
replaces dialogue. Human clones are perfect for politics, banking, the armed
forces, religion, schooling and theft. Easily mind-controlled by the hidden
negative elite, clones are the visible drivers of systemic evil.
Human clones are also prone to making extraordinary bloomers when speaking in
public, and not noticing their mistakes. George Bush Jnr has an extensive back
catalogue of such infelicities. For example, speaking on Australian television
in September 2007 about the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre in New
York on the 11th September 2001, one of the Bush Jnr clones said: "And I believe
those of us who live in liberty have a responsibility to promote forms of
government that deal with what causes nineteen kids to get on airplanes to kill
three thousand students." (See 3.44-3.55 on this YouTube video clip
here)
Later in the same month, the same Bush Jnr clone was reported by CBS News as
follows: “He (President George Bush Jnr) dismissed concerns about lack of
political progress in Iraq, saying people there are still recovering from the
brutal rule of Saddam Hussein. Then, pounding his lectern, the president said,
'I heard somebody say, "Where’s Mandela?" Well, Mandela’s dead because Saddam
Hussein killed all the Mandelas.' The actual former South African president, of
course, is still very much alive.” (CBS 20.09.07)
A university-educated, experienced and ensouled politician would not regularly
make grotesque slips of this kind. But if he did misspeak occasionally, he would
notice immediately and correct himself. In the later clone years, Bush was never
able to do this.
One thing, however, which George Bush Jnr was able to maintain to the last was
his suspiciously consistent clone-smile. He always had a switch-on perfect smile
ready for the camera. Switch-on perfect, switch-on perfect, switch-on perfect;
it never changed. Ensouled human beings - even experienced actors - cannot do
this; their smiles are always moderated by the 'spiritual' circumstances and
context of the camera-call. Their physiognomies betray a slight change of
texture, a strained tension, a fuller or slightly less full beam. And the eyes
often say something the smile does not. They still smile well, but they smile
differently each time. This is not the case with clones. Clones are robotically
identical each smile.
US President Barack Obama furnishes a good example. On Wednesday 23rd September
2009, Obama hosted a reception at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.
During this event, he stood for 135 separate photographs with visiting foreign
dignitaries who were in town for a major UN meeting. As
this rapid-fire slideshow from Eric
Spiegelman demonstrates, the US President had exactly the same smile in every
shot. Spiegelman put his compilation on Vimeo shortly after the Met event and
gave it the title: "Barack Obama's amazingly consistent smile." The 135 raw
photoshots he used can be found on Flickr
here.
But what about Hillary Clinton? Is she really a tribal subset of mind-controlled
clones? Follow the DNA. It's there in the lavatories, handkerchiefs, discarded
nasal tissues, cosmetics applicators, bedroom dust, cutlery, drinking glasses
and coffee cups. And look out for the little black box under the clothes. It's
smaller than it used to be in the famous George Bush Jnr photographs (here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here and
here, plus comments
here), but it can still be seen on a windy day.
More information about the use of human clones in American political management
can be found
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here,
here and
here.
But it is not just politicians, military people, finance professionals and
religious leaders who have been cloned. Human clones are found in the show
business world, too. And they feature prominently in the mainstream media's
presentation of celebrity culture. Consider the much-discussed case of
the
two Paul McCartneys. Look at McCartney's left ear lobe here
(in 1964) compared with his left ear lobe (in 1974).
The
murder and cloning of Beatle Paul McCartney by agents acting for the Tavistock
Institute (London) in 1966 is a story which has been revisited again
recently. It is sometimes referred to as The Two McCartneys Conundrum.
For many decades people have taken the view that the original pop star Paul
McCartney of the Beatles, a
Tavistock Institute band, is dead. He died in a car accident in 1966 which
was reported by several media outlets before being hushed up. The car accident,
like Princess Diana's thirty years later, was an arranged murder or cover for an
arranged murder.
After 1966 it was widely noted that Paul McCartney had changed. He was
considerably taller, and his physiognomy, voice and mannerisms were different.
And evidence is emerging which suggests that the Beatles didn't even write some
of the music accredited to them after that date.
On this view, the Beatles were planned by the shadow controllers of the sixties
music industry. The purpose of the Beatles was social engineering. The
phenomenon of the Beatles was not a spontaneous rebellion by youth against the
old social system. It was a carefully crafted plot to introduce, by a
conspiratorial body which could not be identified, a highly destructive and
divisive element into a large worldwide population group targeted for change
against its will.
New words and new phrases prepared by the Tavistock Institute mind-moulders were
introduced to America along with the Beatles. Words such as "rock" in relation
to music sounds, "teenager," "cool," "discovered" and "pop music" were a lexicon
of disguised code words signifying the acceptance of illicit drugs. The subtext
beneath this vocabulary arrived with and accompanied the Beatles wherever they
went. It had only to be "discovered" by teenagers. The word "teenager" was never
used until just before the Beatles arrived on the scene, courtesy of the
Tavistock Institute for Human Relations.
It was important at that time for the Shadow Government (controlling the USA
from Europe) to affirm illicit drug use in the youth culture. This would enrich
the drug barons worldwide who paid for the private armies and bribes necessary
to maintain hidden power. And now, in 2009, the USA is in Afghanistan to protect
the illicit drugs trade. And now, in 2009, most major US banks have only been
able to stay afloat by bringing illicit drugs money on to their books by using
counterfeit source of funds documentation.
One persistent idea is that in September 1966, Paul McCartney was replaced with
a double called William Shepherd or William Campbell. McCartney was terminated
and replaced because he refused to go along with the pro-drug agenda of the
Beatles' Tavistock controllers.
After 1966, the new Paul McCartney started doing frank interviews about his LSD
habit. McCartney's murder not only eliminated someone who wouldn't go with the
program, it served as a warning to others in the circle not step out of the
Tavistock line.
It is more likely, however, that Paul McCartney was cloned before being
terminated, samples of his originator DNA having been obtained, cultured and
amplified before his accident. Human clones, such as the Bushes, the Clintons
and the Obamas, are not ensouled. They have no souls - no innate communication
with positive influences among the
Higher Evolution in the higher dimensions. They are intelligent,
mind-controlled meat-machines, programmed by those whose negative agenda they
implement. Might Paul McCartney be the same? Clones are not aware that they are
clones. Such information is not permitted to occur to them or to enter their
mind-programming.
More about the various Paul McCartneys can be found
here,
here
and here (YouTube
video - 3 minutes). And more about the Tavistock Institute (30 Tabernacle
Street, London EC2A 4UE) is linked here
and
here.
Many of these women have themselves cloned unknowingly. Others enjoy sexual adventures with their exact duplicates. Even though their souls are not the same, everything else is. God puts souls even in the clones, so they are not God-less.
Nicole Kidman has had several clones of herself made, and they all live on a ranch in Australia.
Their twin daughters have also been cloned. Jenna Bush reportedly has up to 30 of her in existence.
I believe that Laura Bush has around 100 of her in various chambers around Washington D.C. They often dress exactly the same on any given day.