British Chief of Staff Critical of War on Terror
by Christopher Bollyn
December 19, 2001
Britain's top military officer warns that the "war on terrorism" will
"radicalize" friendly states and lead to increased terrorism.
While Secretary of State Colin Powell visited Britain, the United State's
closest ally in Afghanistan and only ally in Iraq, on the three-month
anniversary of the Sept. 11 terror, significant differences surfaced on how to
proceed with the "war on terrorism."
British Chief of Staff Admiral Sir Michael Boyce revealed a significant
divergence between the allies' military and political branches on what to do
after the defeat of the Taliban. Boyce said that America's determination to use
military might in a wider war was certain to "radicalize" friendly states whose
support Britain and other nations need.
Speculation is growing that the United States will attack Iraq as part of its
"war." Powell will not rule out war against Iraq. An attack on Iraq would
further destabilize the region, experts on the Middle East warn, drawing in
neutral countries and stretching the allied coalition to the breaking point.
Britain will have to lay down "red lines" beyond which it would not go, Boyce
said. Whatever is done must be legal, the admiral said, because to do otherwise
would jeopardize its legitimacy. The alliance must beware of "exporting
terrorism," which had been the experience of the United States in Colombia,
Boyce said, where military operations against the guerrilla movement, FARC, had
forced it into Mexico and Guatemala.
Boyce also warned of "excessive optimism" about successes against the Taliban
because the war was not conventional and could not be measured in territory
won. Osama Bin Laden's al Qaeda network remained "a fielded, resourced,
dedicated and essentially autonomous terrorist force, quite capable of atrocity
on a comparable scale" to the Sept. 11 attacks, Boyce said.
Boyce criticized the massive U.S. bombing campaigns saying that lack of
constraint and proportionality could simply "radicalize" opinion in the Islamic
world in favor of al Qaeda. Terrorism could only be defeated by winning "hearts
and minds," Boyce said. You cannot win the "war" by bombing and military action
could have precisely the opposite effect to the one intended, he warned.
"Washington is making it quite plain that after bombing Afghanistan and toppling
the Taliban, it wants to get out of the country as soon as Mullah Omar and Bin
Laden are captured, or presumed dead, leaving others to clean up the mess,"
wrote Richard Norton-Taylor of the Guardian. Politicians and the media should
take a longer-term view of events on the ground where the situation could often
be tenuous, he said.
The international community must attack the causes, not the symptoms of
terrorism, Boyce said. The enemy is not just Osama Bin Laden. This was not a
"high-tech 21st century posse in the new Wild West," he said. Boyce, however,
did not mention the presence of American bases in Saudi Arabia, or America's
failure to apply pressure on Israel to recognize a Palestinian state—"absolutely
central issues raised only in private by senior officials" in both the British
military and political establishments, wrote Norton-Taylor.