How's this for 9/11 Foreknowledge?

By Henry Makow Ph.D.
May 21, 2002

You don't need to work for the CIA or the FBI to have had foreknowledge of the events of Sept. 11. Historians of the elite conspiracy have been predicting them for years.

Recently, I came across the following quotation from a book published in 1995 that has gathered dust in my basement since then.

"According to William Cooper [see] the Third World War is planned for the middle of 1996. He got this information from secret papers he had seen during his time as a Naval Intelligence officer. Thus it is planned to destroy one of the three largest American cities (New York, San Francisco or Los Angeles) with an atom bomb. Extremists from the Near East crisis area (Iraq?) will be blamed to have a reason to start the Third World War. Was the bomb that exploded at the World Trade Center perhaps just a test to see how the masses would react? Think about it!"
(Jan van Helsing, Secret Societies and their Power in the Twentieth Century, p.263)

This quotation reflects certain assumptions that provide us with a new roadmap.

If you want to learn more about the 9/11 deception, I recommend the following web sites:;; and For more on the big picture,, (see their bookstore), or any of the sites linked at For more background and the relationship to feminism, read my archives at

We are in the uncomfortable position of being held hostage by our own ruling class. This is disheartening but if it's any consolation, it's been happening for a long time.

Dick Cheney says another big terrorist attack is almost a certainty. How much credibility does the Bush administration have when it refuses to investigate September 11? The head of the congressional panel recently resigned. We hear constant reports of stonewalling from the Dept. of Justice and the CIA. What could be more incriminating?

Certainly when another attack comes, we will know who is responsible.