Television and Evil
Post#47674 10/27/03 djembemon
""...big brother really caring about the quality of picture on the boob tube."
That's correct. Big Brother could care LESS about picture quality but cares
greatly that your mental clarity and natural function be routinely interrupted
by more 'regularly scheduled programming'. You'll also remember that the new
digital tv was first instituted on a wide scale in Japan, and it was GW Bush's
father (elder Bush, while then President)) who signed into law the decree that
the US television system would be mandated to a digital switch by the coming of
the new millenium, or else broadcasters would loose their expensive (and very
lucrative) broadcasting licenses.
Push came to shove so to speak, and the rush toward media conglomeration was on.
The ability to insert VAST quantities and differing types of digital information
in the 'blanking' and 'data' areas (yes, these are the actual technical terms)
of a High Definition digital television image is unprecedented in human history,
but I don't believe that's what CBs is talking aobut here. He really is
referring to something very similar to SkyNet:
Sentient machine (logical, non-intuitive) intelligence lacking heart energy
(soul life). Non-human. In short, devastating in potential if it takes a dislike
toward human life.
For me, the more sensitive I become, the less television I can watch. The
negativity tends to seep in WITH THE PROGRAM -- whatever it is that I happen to
be viewing at a friend's house (since I don't have cable or dish tv). When I'm
more sensitive, I pick it up to the point of being able to determine that it's
attempting to deliver murderous or suicidal impulses to various people in the
room -- yes, as if it were a truly sentient entity and was 'playing' the
subconscious psyches of everyone in the room against one another for it's own
amusement. It's a difficult sensation to describe, but it's as if an
alternate-universe version of a digital video game were were being played
simultaneous with 'normal reality', and every human being in the room were a
Ahramin in action if you will. Very scary, deluded, potentially dangerous stuff
can happen in people's subconscious minds while they're otherwise passively
involved this trance-like state watching television.
No matter what is being watched, from ballgame to commercial to sitcom to drama
it makes no difference (odd point -- the only exception to this experience for
me seems to be cartoons -- anyone with a thought or observation as to why this
might be so?). When I'm in a relatively insensitive mood I feel uncomfortable
watching network or cable tv, but when I'm sensitive it's just absolutely
emotionally unbearable, and that sensation itself doesn't change UNTIL I REMOVE
MYSELF FROM THE SOURCE (essentially, turn the tv off or leave the room --
recharge my natural energy).
For those of you who have ever used or enjoyed essence of hemp, think of this
sensation I'm trying to describe as the common case of 'paranoia factor'. Now
multiply that sensation several times and imagine an 'absent-invisible-silent'
moderator from the underworld inaudibly and inaccurately narrating various
distorted life scenes for everyone in the room while they are otherwise
'hypnotized' or preoccupied watching the images and listening to the sounds
(audible cues, sound effects being buttons if you will) playing across their tv
screens and you'll begin to understand what some people experience whenever
they're watching network television in a sensitive state, with other people
present in the room.
And yeah, if you imagined it as being well past 'uncomfortable' then you've got
it. I'm certain the condition described, when sublimated by the individual (for
who wants to believe in a devilishly clever, anti-human version of SkyNet
palpably roaming through their homes and minds via the digital distribution
network?) is responsible for a great deal of individual chronic depression and
pharmaceutical drug dependence as in: drug a person 'down' enough and they'll be
capable of watching anything without discomfort, and thereby take their
'programming' without fuss.
And yes, the confusing part for me in the past is that I would get confirmations
in the form of other person's inappropriate behaviors or uncharacteristic
comments WHILE WATCHING SEEMINGLY INNOCUOUS TELEVISION PROGRAMS, and would not
know what to make of this 'disparate information' (see my post # 47330 , though
this is only one instance of what's spoken there). All the while I was audibly
picking up on bizarre subconscious 'conversations' among and between these same
individuals just prior to their abberrant behavior or outburst.
Talk about a mindf""k. After decades of these types of bizarre experiences with
network television, I've only recently understood that these weren't delusional
hallucinations but rather direct sensory experience of real phenomena and
subsequent bahavior (on the part of affected persons) in the 3D world.
The confusing part is that most Westernized people seem to really enjoy watching
television. I know I did, at least until somewhere around the late 1970s though
I will occasionallly see something now that doesn't affect me in a negative
manner. The other interesting notion is that people who work in television are
generally those who are most immune to it's negative side effects -- either PJ
or self-aware, self-moderated individuals. Whatever the reason, most of the
folks working in television are relatively smart people who consider themselves
to be 'well informed' regardless of other personal circumstances.
Of the general viewing population, usually PJ people and addicts of all kinds
seem particularly susceptible to the negative effects -- hence the need for our
cultural machinery to create more PJ people and addictive behaviors among the
population at large. Aware or sensitive people can be affected in numerous ways,
from self-sabotage to depression to carrying a near-constant victim mentality.
Marshall McLuhan tried to warn us about this decades ago, and yet the technology
has only progressed since his now seemingly simplistic yet still very true
observations about the negative effects of using television as a sole
informational source -- since by definition television is one of the WORST
sources of information a person can have, if informational accuracy and memory
retention are at all relevant.
McLuhan would probably flip at the notion of Ahrimic overlays embedded in
conventional television encoding while at the same time I doubt he would find
the revelation surprising. Why? Because it's the same entities / agencies
pushing for 'standardization' that were behind getting people AWAY FROM READING
newspapers during the 1960s and 70s and watching more television in the first
It's also those same entities and agencies which have been actively cultivating
fields of 'couch potatoes' from a once highly-literate society of well-read,
well-spoken individuals who could at least express themselves in complete
sentences and have lives 'outside the tube', lives which were measured in real
physical experiences and not the result of shared cybernetic simulations.
BTW, "shared cybernetic simulations" is yet another clinical definition of the
collective mental state created by people habitually watching televised
programming: that of having a 'simultaneous shared experience' with someone
else, though in reality the only shared experience was the watching of the
program itself -- all else about the 'shared' aspect being fictionalized at
best, and 'fictionalized' because THE EXPERIENCE DID NOT 'HAPPEN' IN ANY WAY TO
THE VIEWER and yet, as MacLuhan warned, the viewer actually went through a
physical process of neurons firing in their bodies and brains AS IF IT HAD BEEN
A REAL INCIDENT (read McLuhan for a thorough analysis of this phenomenon).
Another word for the delusional state describing the sensation of a commonly
shared cybernetic simulation with other (absent) viewers would be that of 'vivid
hallucination'. The reason we BELIEVE these vivid hallucinations as real however
is because WE CAN GO OUT ON THE STREET IN MOST ANY CITY IN THE LAND AND SPEAK
WITH OTHERS ABOUT THESE SAME HALLUCINATIONS (programs) -- and to our surprise
and enjoyment, these near-total strangers will be able to recount details of the
program similar to those we ourselves 'experienced' while watching.
In a word, 'hallucination' (something which did not happen, or does not exist).
In short it's a false sense of 'community' and the near-total hijacking of a
culture's collective dream energy, since watching television creates very much
the same physical states that a person experiences while actively dreaming. And
I'm pretty sure I don't have to get into any discourse on the secondary meanings
of "regularly scheduled programming" with most of the people at this board.
Reading can't do that for a person, since each person get's to paint their own
'visual picture' while reading. But television can, and since 'seeing is
believing', television is also incredibly hypnotic in it's affects on people of
all pursuasions and from all walks of life.
"Thinking outside the box" could just as easily be describing someone shutting
off their television set. Life doesn't happen on a screen -- unless of course
you're talking about a soulless, collective AI artifice with semi-sentient
Witness the election of Herr Schwartzennegger to the highest post in the state
of California: What exactly are Californians trying to tell the rest of the
world about their willingness to embrace cybernetic dominance via willingly
being 'governed' by the lead actor in the Terminator movie series? Are we not
asking for trouble?"
Post# 47681 10/27/03 Cbswork
"In the Terminator series, Skynet becomes self-aware. In reality, Ahrimic
consciousness takes over ELECTRIC FIRE with its own cold, logical consciousness,
pushing out the proper custodians of that, elementals and the like.
And this consciousness pervades every computer, power line, TV, Survellience
Camera, et al. The more systems it connects into, the more fuller its
incarnation on the physical plane.
The Luciferic densifies into a human form. The Ahirmic densifies into a
This is the first time - speaking of the three anti-christs - that Ahriman can
densify beyond carnal sedimentations and statis. In truth, the first two were
aspects, but not actual incarnations of the One Dark.
Densification, as it relates to consciousness and form, deals entirely with
expression upon the physical plane. As we all, when we are born and our
personalities "emerge" and take control of the form for the coming life
Sol/Sun has tried to stop this. It tries to send liberating frequencies here.
Then HAARP and Chemsoup of a kind kick in and its all lost, except in those
areas where there are cloudbusters.
What DJ mentions regards digi data is completely accurate. But the real danger,
as he also points out, lies in the "quality" of the animating consciousness
BEHIND that TV or Radio signal, which is, well, the Beast.
Turned off the TV in 1987 and never looked back."