[back] Swine flu vax Nano particles NSA
Are Populations Being Primed For Nano-Microchips Inside Vaccines?
http://preventdisease.com/news/09/100509_injectable_nano_microchips.shtml
2009
It's almost surreal, like something out of a sci-fi flick, but nano-microchips
invisible to the naked eye are a reality that are already being hosted in
wide-range of applications. The question is, how long will it take governments
and big pharma to immerse nano-microchips inside of
vaccines to tag and surveil global populations?
Nanotechnology deals with structures smaller than one micrometer (less than
1/30th the width of a human hair), and involves developing materials or devices
within that size. To put the size of a nanometer in perspective, it is 100,000
times smaller than the width of a human hair.
More than ten years ago, simple low-cost techniques improved the design and
manufacture of nano-microchips. That unlocked a multitude of methodologies for
their manufacture in a wide-range of applications including optical, biological,
and electronic devices.
The joint use of nanoelectronics, photolithography, and new biomaterials, have
enabled the required manufacturing technology towards nanorobots for common
medical applications, such as surgical instrumentation, diagnosis and drug
delivery.
Japan's Hitachi says it has developed the world's smallest and thinnest
microchip, that can be embedded in paper to track down parcels or prove the
authenticity of a document. The integrated circuit (IC) chip is as minute as a
speck of dust.
Nanoelectrodes implanted in the brain are increasingly being used to manage
neurological disorders. Mohammad Reza Abidian, a post-doctoral researcher at the
U-M Department of Biomedical Engineering said that polymers in nanotubes "are
biocompatible and have both electronic and ionic conductivity." He further
stated "therefore, these materials are good candidates for biomedical
applications such as neural interfaces, biosensors and drug delivery systems."
Depending on the objectives of such studies, research could theoretically
pave the way for smart recording electrodes that can deliver drugs to positively
or negatively affect the immune response.
Through nanotechnology, researchers have also been able to create artificial
pores able to transmit nanoscale materials through membranes.
A UC biomedical engineering study appearing in the journal Nature
Nanotechnology, Sept. 27, 2009, successfully inserted the modified core of a
nanomotor, a microscopic biological machine, into a lipid membrane. The
resulting channel enabled them to move both single- and double-stranded DNA
through the membrane.
Professor Peixuan Guo who led the study said past work with biological channels
has been focused on channels large enough to move only single-stranded genetic
material.
"Since the genomic DNA of human, animals, plants, fungus and bacteria are double
stranded, the development of single pore system that can sequence
double-stranded DNA is very important," he says.
Such engineered channels could have applications in nano-sensing, DNA
sequencing, drug loading, including innovative techniques to implement DNA
packaging mechanisms of viral nanomotors and vaccine delivery.
"The idea that a DNA molecule travels through the nanopore, advancing nucleotide
by nucleotide, could lead to the development of a single pore DNA sequencing
apparatus, an area of strong national interest," Guo said.
Scientists working at Queen Mary, University of London, have developed
micrometer-sized capsules to safely deliver drugs inside living cells. These
"micro shuttles" could hypothetically be loaded with a specific microchip
controlling the dose of medication to be opened remotely, releasing their
contents. Besides monitoring the dosage, the same microchip could be used to
surveil the patient in conjunction with various tracking systems.
Scientists in the United Kingdom have
recently reported advances towards overcoming key challenges in
nanotechnology. They demonstrated how nanoparticles could move quickly in a
desired direction without help from outside forces. Their achievement has broad
implications, the scientists say, raising the possibility of coaxing cells to
move and grow in specific directions.
Doug Dorst, a microbiologist and vaccine critic in South Wales, says these
advances have an immense appeal to vaccine makers. "Biotech companies and their
researchers have quickly moved most funding initiatives towards nanotechnology
to increase the potency of their vaccines," he said. If microorganisms inside of
vaccines can be coaxed into targeting or invading specific cells, they could
achieve their goal at an accelerated rate over conventional vaccines. "Depending
on which side of the vaccine debate you're on, whether pro or con, nanobots
inside vaccine preparations could advance their effectiveness exponentially by
either dramatically improving or destroying immunity depending on their design,"
he added.
Dorst claims that present day nanobot technology could just as easily be used to
advance biological weapons as they can to advance human health. "For every fear
that biotech propaganda proliferates about deadly diseases and how vaccines
prevent them, it is one more lie to incrementally convince the masses that
vaccines are effective."
The worry for Dorst is that one day vaccines "will do what they've always been
intended for...control of the global populace."
Nanoemulsion platforms are already capable of developing vaccines from very
diverse materials. Mixtures of soybean oil, alcohol, water and detergents can be
emulsified into ultra-small particles smaller than 400 nanometers wide (about
1/200th the width of a human hair). These could be combined with any number of
nano-microchips with all or part of disease-causing microbes to trigger the
body's immune system.
In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)
announced in an article in the journal, Nature Biotechnology, that they had
developed a “nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer
side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies.”
The article went on to describe the effects of their breakthrough: “At a mere 25
nanometers, these particles are so tiny that once injected, they flow through
the skin’s extracellular matrix, making a beeline to the lymph nodes. Within
minutes, they’ve reached a concentration of DCs thousands of times greater than
in the skin."
Russia has recently announced a new manufacturing plant that will strictly
produce nano-vaccines. Project plans include development of two vaccines for
human flu and bird flu and three biopharmaceuticals for boosting the immune
system and increasing the efficiency of antibacterial and antiviral drugs, among
other initiatives.
The human body is very resistant to nanoparticles that attempt to invade human
cells. Scientists are intensely investigating methods to disrupt human enzymes
that may degrade nanoparticles. Experts at the
University of Liverpool found a way around this obstacle that could mean
more efficient, topical drugs in the future, which could act a whole lot faster
than the ones currently in use.
All these nanotechnological advances raise many issues and concerns about the
toxicity and environmental impact of nanomaterials, and their potential effects
on medicine, global economics, as well as speculation about government
surveillance. These concerns have led to a debate among advocacy groups and
governments on whether special regulation of nanotechnology is warranted.
The Environmental Protection Agency issued a news release last week saying that
it had “today outlined a new research strategy to better understand
how
manufactured nanomaterials may harm human health and the environment.”
Interesting as that strategy document is, it was hardly hot off the presses.
Indeed, many companies advertise their use of such billionth-of-a-meter-scale
constituents as a measure of a product's state-of-the-art status, implying that
ultra-small ingredients are an inherently good thing. They aren’t. Nor does size
necessarily make these materials worse than others. At this point it's just
maddeningly unpredictable what nano things will do.
Proponents of nanotechnology are very critical of regulatory measures that may
impeed its progression. Many of these critics have staunchly dismissed concerns
as being fear-hyped conspiracy theories based on science fiction.
In the popular video game series Metal Gear Solid, many characters and soldiers
in general, have "nanomachines" in their bloodstream, and are used to block
pain, allow members of fire teams/patrols to share sensory information, heal
bodily damage, as well as manipulating viruses central to video game's plot
line.
Through the use of special effects and computer-generated imagery, several
blockbusters starring Keanu Reeves including
The Matrix Trilogy and
The Day the Earth Stood Still,
have dramatized how nanobots could effectively take control of their organic and
inorganic targets.
Star Trek episodes and their theatrical releases such as
Star Trek: First
Contact have also depicted how nanoprobes (nanites) could infect an
individual's bloodstream through a pair of tubules.
Regardless of the recurring themes of nanobots in video games, sci-fi shows and
movies, nanotechnology is a reality, and nano-microchips are well on their way
to being utilized in ways which may be detrimental to human health and freedom
on a global scale.
The development of nano-microchips are a major thrust of governments and
pharmaceutical industries who want the ultimate power and leverage over global
populations for more profit and more control.
In December 2000, Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland, Rauni-Leena
Luukanen-Kilde, MD stated that it is technically possible for every newborn to
be injected with a microchip, which could then function to identify the person
for the rest of his or her life. Such plans are secretly being discussed in the
U.S. without any public airing of the privacy issues involved.
Today's microchips operate by means of low-frequency radio waves that target
them. With the help of satellites, the implanted person can be tracked anywhere
on the globe. Such a technique was among a number tested in the Iraq war,
according to Dr. Carl Sanders, who invented the intelligence-manned interface (IMI)
biotic, which is injected into people. (Earlier during the Vietnam War, soldiers
were injected with the Rambo chip, designed to increase adrenaline flow into the
bloodstream.) The 20-billion-bit/second supercomputers at the U.S. National
Security Agency (NSA) could now "see and hear" what soldiers experience in the
battlefield with a remote monitoring system (RMS).
When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of hair is 50
micromillimeters) is placed into optical nerve of the eye, it draws
neuroimpulses from the brain that embody the experiences, smells, sights, and
voice of the implanted person. Once transferred and stored in a computer, these
neuroimpulses can be projected back to the person’s brain via the microchip to
be reexperienced. Using a RMS, a land-based computer operator can send
electromagnetic messages (encoded as signals) to the nervous system, affecting
the target's performance. With RMS, healthy persons can be induced to see
hallucinations and to hear voices in their heads.
Every thought, reaction, hearing, and visual observation causes a certain
neurological potential, spikes, and patterns in the brain and its
electromagnetic fields, which can now be decoded into thoughts, pictures, and
voices. Electromagnetic stimulation can therefore change a person's brainwaves
and affect muscular activity, causing painful muscular cramps experienced as
torture.
The NSA's electronic surveillance system can simultaneously follow and handle millions of people. Each of us has a unique bioelectrical resonance frequency in the brain, just as we have unique fingerprints. With electromagnetic frequency (EMF) brain stimulation fully coded, pulsating electromagnetic signals can be sent to the brain, causing the desired voice and visual effects to be experienced by the target. This is a form of electronic warfare. U.S. astronauts were implanted before they were sent into space so their thoughts could be followed and all their emotions could be registered 24 hours a day.
The mass media has not reported that an implanted person's privacy vanishes
for the rest of his or her life. S/he can be manipulated in many ways. Using
different frequencies, the secret controller of this equipment can even change a
person's emotional life. S/he can be made aggressive or lethargic. Sexuality can
be artificially influenced. Thought signals and subconscious thinking can be
read, dreams affected and even induced, all without the knowledge or consent of
the implanted person.
This secret technology has been used by military forces in certain NATO
countries since the 1980s without civilian and academic populations having heard
anything about it. Thus, little information about such invasive mind-control
systems is available in professional and academic journals.
The NSA's Signals Intelligence group can remotely monitor information from human brains by decoding the evoked potentials (3.50HZ, 5 milliwatt) emitted by the brain. Prisoner experimentees in both Gothenburg, Sweden and Vienna, Austria have been found to have evident brain lesions. Diminished blood circulation and lack of oxygen in the right temporal frontal lobes result where brain implants are usually operative. A Finnish experimentee experienced brain atrophy and intermittent attacks of unconsciousness due to lack of oxygen.
Targeting people’s brain functions with
electromagnetic fields and beams (from helicopters and airplanes,
satellites, from parked vans, neighboring houses, telephone poles, electrical
appliances, mobile phones, TV, radio, etc.) is part of the radiation problem
that should be addressed by democratically elected governments. However, there
is currently no interest by any national government to seriously address this
issue.
The timeline for integrating nano-microchips inside of
vaccines is speculative. It could be just a few years, months or perhaps it is
here and we already unaware of their integration within pharmaceuticals.
Regardless, due to the many military and political advantages, their
implementation is inevitable.
However fraudulent, it was an imperative for world powers and pharmaceutical
cartels to promote the effectiveness of vaccinations and enact national pandemic
preparedness policies which mandate vaccinations.
In 2005 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed international health
regulations that would bind all 194 member countries to pandemic emergency
guidelines which could enforce such a mandate. Without these procedures of
public health (and propagandized vaccine campaigns) in place, there would be
little or no voluntary cooperation from the public to roll up their sleeves and
accept the inoculations. Public participation is an essential tool that will
soon allow big pharma to inject the most effective surveillence tool ever
designed into billions of people.
Although nanotechnology manufacturing is currently
available on a global scale, before biotech companies are able to initiate mass
production and testing of nano-microchips inside of vaccines, they will likely
sell the idea to the public. Through various "health enhancement scenarios" they
will encourage participation and publicly announce regulatory approval from the
same policies and regulatory agencies they helped create.
By mid-summer of 2009, the WHO and the Center of Disease Control (CDC)
effectively
hyped a false flu pandemic and convinced the world to submit to H1N1
vaccines. Additional doses of propaganda and possibly a biological event, may
equally convince populations to knowingly accept microchips inside of vaccines
under the guise of a "greater good" for humanity.
When our brain functions are already connected to supercomputers by means of
radio implants and microchips, it will be too late for protest. This threat can
be defeated only by educating the public, using available literature on
biotelemetry, nanorobotics and information exchanged at international
congresses.
The time to act is now!
Nanotechnology Takes Off
Brain Chipping: Injectible Micro-Chips
One Mainframe To Rule Them All (Part 1)
One Mainframe To Rule Them All (Part 2)
SUSTAINABLE FUTURES INTERVIEW:
The Truth About the H1N1 Vaccine |
Part 1
Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7 Email flu@preventdisease.com with any reports or comments regarding the flu pandemic in your area. |