Jean-Claude Pressac
[back]
Holocaust
revisionism
[2005] Ten Years Ago, Jean-Claude Pressac's Capitulation by Robert Faurisson
[2002] Robert Faurisson Interview by Phil Sanchez
The Unreliability of Documents used by Jean-Claude Pressac by C. W. Porter
(with graphic links)
Graphic of Document BW/30/42
Graphics of "Vergasungskeller" Document
"La
Poca Fiabilidad de los Documents Citados por Jean-Claude Pressac, "Auschwitz:
Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers" por CW.
Porter
test (with these files, you never quite know what you're going to get)
Books by Pressac
[1994] The Crematories of Auschwitz
[1994 Review] Jean-Claude Pressac's
New Auschwitz Book by Robert Faurisson (The Crematories of Auschwitz)
[1989] Auschwitz. Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers
[Reviewed by Mark Weber] Auschwitz: Technique and
Operation of the Gas Chambers
[1991] AUSCHWITZ: TECHNIQUE & OPERATION OF THE GAS
CHAMBERS According to J.-C. Pressac (1989) by ROBERT FAURISSON
Quotes
Ken Wilson, a specialist in aerial photographs, had shown that the homicidal
"gas chambers" of Auschwitz and Birkenau did not have gas evacuation chimneys,
which would have been indispensable. He also showed that I had been right in
accusing Serge Klarsfeld and Jean-Claude Pressac of falsifying the map of
Birkenau in the Auschwitz Album (Seuil Publishers, 1983, p. 42). Those
authors, in order to make the reader believe that groups of Jewish women and
children surprised by the photographer between crematories II and III could not
go any farther and were thus going to end up in the "gas chambers" and those
crematories, had simply eliminated from the map the path which. in reality led
up to the "Zentralsauna," a large shower facility (located beyond the zone of
the crematories), where those women and children were actually going.
The Zündel Trials (1985 and 1988) by ROBERT
FAURISSON
(36) Garment workshop at Auschwitz. Jean-Claude Pressac claims that these sewing
machines were brought along with them by women deportees. The innumerable
photographs of the deportation show not one single woman carrying a sewing
machine on her back. Pressac’s interpretation is a perfect example of groundless
and deliberate misinterpretation.
http://www.cwporter.com/bild2.htm
(51) Hot air disinfestations chamber in the central sauna at Birkenau. The claim
was later made that the peepholes were proof of the existence of an execution
gas chamber. That this is not the case, was later admitted by J.C. Pressac.
http://www.cwporter.com/bild2.htm
GAS-TIGHT DOORS
Several German documents mention the delivery of ‘gas-tight doors’ to the
crematoria. Jean-Claude Pressac’s Auschwitz. Technique and Operation of the Gas
Chambers reproduces several of these documents.
Pressac believes that in so doing, he has provided proof for the criminal intent
in the construction of the crematoria. In reality, however, these are quite
ordinary doors or windows of finished wood, some of which may be seen in
illustrations 88bis to 92. The only difference between these and a ‘non gas-
tight’ door appears to be that a strip of felt has been nailed into the cracks
of the ‘gas-tight’ doors.
The doors delivered to the Kremas
were ‘gas-tight’, because, first of all, the temperature of a crematorium has to
be kept down, secondly, to prevent the escape of odors and finally, because
ventilation can only be effective if there are no counter-effective openings or
poorly closed doors.
It should be obvious to anyone who
has examined the doors of real execution gas chambers and delousing chambers,
that these doors and windows could certainly never prevent the escape of a
highly dangerous gas.
If the Germans had wished to use
poison gas in these areas, they would have ordered and installed doors which
were welded at the very least, such as those in the disinfestations chambers.
http://www.cwporter.com/bild2.htm
(88, 89 and 92) The legendary doors and hatches of the ‘gas chambers’ in which
thousands of people are supposed to have been killed on a daily basis.