Janine Roberts

Medical writer and researcher, film maker and author
see www.hivaids.plus.com for not just AIDS but childhood vaccines... specialising in the polio vaccine...
also www.sparks-of-light.org  my original research on vaccines is up online at www.vaccines.plus.com
    My daughter is currently refusing to give her son this vaccination -and I think she is using homeopathy instead. She also maintains that she did not decide this because of my influence!  I have however done a great deal of research on some vaccine issues - and I recently read the minutes of a medical professional gathering on the submect of vaccine safety. At this a UK government doctor reported that the manufacturers could not meet the previous recommended levels of vaccine purity - and would be hard pressed to meet the new recommended levels - even though they now required ten times less purity! i will try to dig this up and will post it on my www.sparks-of-light.org website.
I wrote on health issues for the Independent - and after the MR campaign, over 2500 adverse reactions were reported with about 400 requiring hospitalisation. This campaign particularly targetted teenagers. It was claimed that this campaign prevented about 170 cases of normal measles.... so much more damage was done than the dubious benefit. (Especially as less than one in five possibles side effects get reported) The information on the results of the MR campaign comes from a Parliamentary Question that an MP kindly asked for me.~Janine

AIDS - the many causes - click To summary of second part.

HIV- the author's journey through the key research into HIV, the HIV Test and HAART. Click for more information on major coming article HIV blog

Polio - the hidden epidemic as pubished. Polio Myth- click. Polio science library - click. Polio Blog click

The above are pre-print summaries of two major new articles on HIV/AIDS now with their publisher and due out in print later this year. Readers are warmly invited to send in comments. The science in them has been carefully checked by many eminent scientists. Now it is time for you to have your say.

Web: www.fearoftheinvisible.com www.vaccines.plus.com  www.sparks-of-light.org  www.hivaids.plus.com

Articles
HPV VACCINE MYSTERIES: WHY WAS A NOBEL AWARD GIVEN FOR THIS ON DECEMBER 10,TH 2008?  By Janine Roberts

[2008 pdf] The dangerous impurities of vaccines by Janine Roberts

[pdf 2006] HIVGATE - JANINE ROBERTS

 
Janine Roberts on how they make the Measles vaccine

Quotes
When I dug back further, to the origins of virology and the great hunt for the poliovirus, I found the story was scandalously much the same. Powerful evidence was presented to Congress linking the summer polio epidemics to summer-used heavy metal pesticides. These scientists suggested remedies, reported curing polio – and were ignored. Instead parents were told to be scared of a yet undiscovered virus. Today thousands of children are still being identically paralysed in regions where such pesticides are heavily used – but all the World Health Organization (WHO) says is: ‘Don’t worry; we have nearly exterminated the dreaded poliovirus. We have checked. The paralysed children were not infected by it.’ As for childhood vaccinations, surely they have proved a great benefit? Introduction

High-level US governmental inquiries in the 1990s, guided by eminent scientists, explicitly reported the key foundation HIV research papers were riddled with grave errors and deceptively “fixed.” They documented these findings with great care – and I likewise do so here. But when the Republican Party gained control over the US House of Representatives at the end of 1994, it ended this most important investigation, buried its reports and left the scientific papers it found to be erroneous uncorrected. These same papers are thus still frequently used by unsuspecting scientists worldwide, who cite them as proof that HIV causes AIDS. I present clear evidence here that these papers were fixed at the last moment before publication. I also reproduce the original documents so you can judge for yourselves. Introduction

Book
Fear of the Invisible by Janine Roberts
    Introduction
    MMR Vaccine Contaminated by Janine Roberts
    Highly contaminated vaccines by Janine Roberts
    How 'Measles Virus' is isolated for a Vaccine.
    What then can cause Polio? an extract from the book "Fear of the Invisible" by Janine Roberts

This poster appeared during the time when they thought a still undiscovered virus was causing the polio epidemics - a virus that must be spread by flies. Such adverts led to a greatly increased use of insecticides - which tragically were found by leading scientists working for US government agencies to cause precisely the same kind of paralytic damage to the spinal column nerves that were found in cases of polio. Their research simply was ignored.

how isolation of this virus should be done so it can be used, say for a vaccine. It instructs, first obtain from the patient a small sample of urine or fluid from the nose or mouth.
    Next 'sacrifice' a marmoset monkey, take some of its cells, then make these cancerous, perhaps by exposing them to radiation, and then give them, on top of this, Epstein-Barr disease! Such extremely sick cells, the CDC informs us, are '10,000 times' more sensitive to the measles virus than are normal human cells.
    Now add to these cells a toxin called trypsin. The CDC tells us to expect some cells to fall off the sides of the vessel as if they have been poisoned. They have been. Now add nutrients and glucose and leave for two or three days so the cells can somewhat recover.
    Now add to the cells the sample gathered from the patient. After an hour, inspect the cells in the culture with a microscope to see if any of the cells are becoming distorted, or are floating free as they did when trypsin was added. If they are, the CDC says this is proof that measles virus is present and making the cells ill.
    This statement made me sit back and think. Why should this illness now be caused by a virus? They had poisoned the cells, made them cancerous..... and now the CDC was saying the cells must be ill because they had measles. Where was the logic in this?
    The next stage involves the addition of two antibiotics, Penicillin and Streptomycin, to the culture and leaving it alone for a day. Again the cells are inspected - and if small holes now appear between cells, it is now presumed that measles virus has caused these. If no sign of such damage, this process is repeated. If after this there are still no signs of damage, then the culture is discarded. However, if 50% or more of the cells are now seriously ill and distorted, the culture is set aside and kept in the fridge as 'isolated measles virus stock suitable for vaccines!' All this without actually detecting the virus itself!
 

From Teresa binstock

The first 90 or so pages of Janine Roberts' book (1) convey insights relevant to autism, vaccinology, and models of disease. I've read to page 96 thus far, and much of the rest of the book seems focused upon HIV. She documents most of her technical assertions, and the text would have benefited from a technical-writing editor. Nonetheless, Fear of the Invisible is important.

For instance, she presents a convincing argument (with citations and sources) that the viral model of polio was artificially enforced, that the viral model turned attention away from pesticides which produce polio-symptoms, that detox-like reversals of polio were ignored, that polio continues even as most of its symptoms have been redefined so as to make "polio" epidemiologically invisible, thus allowing official statements about polio vaccine efficacy.  This section of the book calls attention to models of illness. Since polio virus is common and generally harmless (cites in book) and since most children naturally have polio titers (without vaccination), why is there such strong enforcement of need for a polio vaccine - especially since polio epidemics coincide with pesticide use (cites in book)?

Smallpox vaccination seems to have worked, and upon that success, additional vaccinations (and patents thereon) have been the dream and basis of many careers. However, subsequent vaccines and vaccinations are fraught with problems, problems that the CDC, AMA, and FDA would prefer be ignored.

As I read towards p96 was that this book, I couldn't help but feel it makes an important contribution, as significant as Kirby's EoH summary of the thimerosal controversy.

Teresa Binstock
(Teresa C. Binstock, Researcher, Developmental & Behavioral Neuroanatomy, Denver)