Professor Sir Michael Rutter
[back]
Experts
"In Rutter's opinion, a possible serious adverse vaccine reaction in a child did not merit clinical investigation." ~ Dr. Andrew Wakefield, MD
[BIG PHARMA'S man completely exposed in Callous Disregard by Dr. Andrew Wakefield, MD. Same mould as Offit, Salisbury, Roy Meadow, etc.]
[2010 Feb/March] Counterfeit Law: And They Think They Have Got Away With It By Martin Walker
[2010 Jan] False Testimony Denies Lancet Doctors a Fair Hearing
Professor Sir Michael Rutter & The Drug Industry Connections
See: Prof Denis McDevitt Brian Deer MEDICOLEGAL INVESTIGATIONS LIMITED Dr Richard Horton DAVID HULL
See: Wakefield GMC Hearing 2007 Autism and genetics
Book
Callous Disregard
by Dr. Andrew Wakefield, MD
Quotes
This First Amended Complaint includes two
new Counts against
Professor Sir Michael L. Rutter. Count
VII alleges that he failed to disclose in at
least four papers published between 2005 and
2009 that he had a crucial conflicting
financial interest as a highly paid expert
witness for the vaccine industry (and for
the U.S. Government that defends industry in
Vaccine Court) in at least three major
litigation projects, U.S. litigation
concerning mercury (thimerosal) as a cause
of autism, the U.K. MMR litigation, and the
U.S. Omnibus Autism Proceeding (concerning
both MMR and thimerosal as causes of
autism). Although Professor. Rutter’s
non-disclosure of a conflicting financial
interest is precisely the same as that
alleged against Dr. Wakefield (involvement
in MMR litigation), the scope of Professor.
Rutter’s wrongful conduct is far worse,
involving multiple litigation projects, at
least four papers, and the more stringent
modern disclosure obligation.
Count VIII alleges that Professor. Rutter
gave false expert testimony in this FTP
hearing by stating his opinion that Dr.
Wakefield had a duty to disclose his
participation in MMR litigation in the
Lancet Case Series. In the alternative,
Professor. Rutter misled the Panel by hiding
his own non-disclosure of the same type of
conflicting interest for which he condemns
Dr. Wakefield. If Professor. Rutter doesn't
honestly believe (although this would
contravene the express language in the
modern disclosure guidelines) that acting as
a litigation expert on precisely the same
subject discussed in his published papers
(and on which he relies for his opinion in
litigation) is a disclosable conflict, then
he is falsely accusing Dr. Wakefield of
breaching a non existent duty. Or, if he
honestly believes this is a disclosable
interest, then his testimony is false and
misleading because he has concealed the fact
of his own pattern of non disclosure.
[2010 Jan] False Testimony Denies Lancet Doctors a
Fair Hearing
Psychiatrist Professor Sir Michael Rutter is a former (recent) Deputy
Chairman of the immensely wealthy Wellcome Trust (founded by the
Wellcome Foundation which is now Glaxo).
He is also one of the expert witnesses for Glaxo in the MMR litigation
(something he did not declare, for example, in the Honda/Rutter paper
denying MMR has any association with autism, but I do not see him before the GMC
over that)
Professor Sir Michael Rutter along with a troupe of psychiatrists now
or formerly associated with The Maudsley Hospital and The Institute of
Psychiatry at Kings have been working hard at telling the public autism is
solely genetic and denying there is a
world autism pandemic. .....Genetics
cannot account for the large rise we are seeing in autism since the mid 1980s.
So instead what we see are efforts by Rutter and the
King's Institute of Psychiatry other autism denialists to claim there is no
real rise in the prevalence of autism. This claim is unscientific and runs
counter to the facts documented in the formal literature.
The Institute of Psychiatry has or is home to more than its fair share
of doctors (psychiatrists mostly) who publish papers claiming autism is
genetic and denying there is an autism epidemic (the correct word is
pandemic - epidemics have far fewer victims). These doctors include Rutter,
Eric
Fombonne,
(now expert witness in the US in the thiomersal/autism
litigation when he had previously published nothing about it),
Simon Baron
Cohen. It is also home to controversial "Gulf War Syndrome" psychiatrist
Simon
Wessely, director of the Centre for Military Health Research at King's
College London and who had been claiming ME/CFS is not a physical condition
but a mental one contrary to the definition used around the world.
Sophia Wilson is
an example of an ME/CFS sufferer who died following this approach to
diagnosis, albeit not so far as I am aware a patient of any of the
psychiatrists or institutions I name here.
Also associated with The Institute of Psychiatry and the Maudsley is Dr Ben
Goldacre, who constantly attacks alternative medicine in The Guardian whilst
writing the "Badscience" column - yet Goldacre has no scientific
qualifications and does not tell everyone that he practises psychiatry - the
least successful branch of medicine in history and which has difficulty
finding two reliable pieces of science to rub together to support the wacky
quacky theories some of its proponents put out.
Rutter was also an expert witness in Malmo, Sweden in an MMR autism
case where the key question was whether
autism was solely genetic and not
environmental. Rutter's expert evidence was that it was genetic.
----Professor Sir Michael Rutter & The Drug Industry
Connections