Dr. Judy Wood  911 false flag

9-11 "Terrorists" Used Secret Technology

January 15, 2012

Dr Judy Wood's book will change the world.
  It is easy to see from her photographic evidence
 that nothing about that day matches our
 limited understanding of the laws of physics.


by Jeff Besant   P.Eng

We know much about that day.  We know about the deaths.  We know about the controversy surrounding the official story and actual evidence.  We know how our society changed abruptly. 

What is interesting to me, as an engineer with over 20 years experience and having conducted countless forensic investigations, is how few people can see 1.2 million tons of concrete (3 buildings in total) turned to powder in 8 seconds and not wonder where all that energy came from. 

Where is the seismic data showing what happens to the earth when a 500,000 ton pile of steel and concrete falls to the ground at near free fall speeds?  We actually have bench marks to draw from on this topic because many large buildings have been collapsed--so we know what is suppose to happen.

Most engineers know that the study of blowing things up is a mature area of research.  There is lots of data.  Many men love blowing things up.  We can calculated the velocities of a shock wave from photos; we can calculate the energy needed to create the kind of event that took place on 911.

The problem is that using conventional physics and trying to fit the known data from that day into these models doesn't work.  No one has been able to do it! And no one has tried harder than NIST who have considerable resources to throw at this problem.

Dr Judy Wood is the only person to present a rigorous examination of the evidence.  She has written the most important book of this century on the topic ("Where Did the Towers Go?"). 

Finding insignificant flaws in some the data on her web site doesn't disprove the gnawing problem that there was virtually nothing left of the towers within seconds of the start of the catastrophic failures.

9-11 It is impossible to go into all of the evidence here.  I could but her web site ( www.drjudywood.com/ ) is easy to find and easy to follow.  She has done countless interviews.  No one has yet to refute one piece of evidence given in her recent book.  People have undertaken ad hominem attacks, but that just proves that they don't have anything to say about the evidence.


Here is a small sample of the unexplainable characteristics of the WTC collapse, taken from Judy's site:

The Twin Towers were destroyed faster than physics can explain by a free fall speed "collapse."

They underwent mid-air pulverization (dustification) and were turned to dust before they hit the ground.

The seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on a comparison with the Seattle King Dome controlled demolition.

The Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, not bottom up.

The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.

The upper 90 percent, approximately, of the inside of WTC7 was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.

One file cabinet with folder dividers survived. No toilets survived or even recognizable portions of one.

Windows of nearby buildings had circular and other odd-shaped holes in them.

Evidence of molecular dissociation and transmutation, as demonstrated by the near-instant rusting of affected steel.

Weird fires. The appearance of fire, but without evidence of heating.

Lack of high heat. Witnesses reported that the initial dust cloud felt cooler than ambient temperatures. No evidence of burned bodies.

Office paper was densely spread throughout lower Manhattan, unburned, often along side cars that appeared to be burning.

Approximately 1,400 motor vehicles were towed away, toasted in strange ways, during the destruction of the Twin Towers.


  I know John Huchtison, who Dr Judy Wood based some of her research on.  I have held is test specimens in my hand.  I don't know of one single engineer who could draw a free body diagram show how metal bars failed in his lab.  As a thought experiment, try to tell me how you jam a wooden pencil through a steel bar.

Dr Judy Wood's book will change the world.  It is easy to see from her photographic evidence that nothing about that day matches our limited understanding of the laws of physics.  This means something extraordinary to the planet.  It means that a technology exists and is being used at this time in a very destructive way, which is different from anything we have seen before.  Imagine, if we used this knowledge in a constructive way.

Comments for "9-11 "Terrorists" Used Secret Technology "

WW said (January 16, 2012):

Nothing about that day matches Judy Wood's limited understanding of the laws of physics.

If you don't read this PDF before you post anymore on this subject:


RD said (January 16, 2012):

Woods' book covers everything, from eye-witnesses to hurricane Erin. I BELIEVE HER.

Joseph said (January 16, 2012):

I have read Dr. Wood's book. It is astutely scientific, factually accurate, and thoroughly researched. The languages of mathematics, physics, and engineering are not subject to interpretation or opinion. Let Richard Gage, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and all other 9/11 truth seekers approach Dr. Wood's work on the same scientific level it is offered, instead of trying to cover over facts with unsupported opinions and theories. Science is the path to truth; vanity stands in the way.


C said (January 16, 2012):

How did all that steel and concrete vanish so as to leave such a meager seismic impact upon collapse? Another interesting question: Where was the stench of decaying flesh in the days and weeks following 9/11? Close to 3000 dead should have caused a nauseating pall spreading throughout ground zero and it's imediate vicinity, yet clean up workers toiled for months without the aid of gasmasks.


These questions, among other interesting items and theories, have been discussed on the "Let's Roll" forum. One theory is that both towers were essentially gutted and ready to go for demolition prior to 9/11, which to tell the truth makes sense, considering that standard procedure of demolition companies has always been to empty the structure of as many contents as possible so as to minimize flying projectiles, minimize the resulting debris pile, and last but not least, to keep the building from falling outside the planned demoltion perimeter.


And how many people know that alleged North Tower plane, American Airlines Flight 11, had on board as passengers the wife of Anthony Perkins of Psycho fame, and a man called David Angell, the creator of the hit TV show "Frazier" along with his wife? Quite a special flight this was....no? Oh, did I mention that Seth McFarlane creator of the hit FOX cartoon Family Guy (each episode loaded with degenerate humor) just missed the flight due to sleeping late with a hangover? You really cannot make this stuff up.

Here is a link to the Mark Bingham discussion thread for anyone interested -


Dan said (January 16, 2012):

It wasn't complicated. It was planned at least 40 years before 2001. The WTC was a David and Nelson Rockefeller project from day one in 1961. The buildings were loaded and wired for demolition during construction. It's real simple. They got away with it because they controlled the narrative, and they still do to this day.

There's nothing mysterious here. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth). The organization cites evidence that the official FEMA and NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) reports provide incomplete and contradictory accounts of the towers’ destruction. AE911Truth points in particular to the destruction of the third skyscraper, World Trade Center 7, a 47-story building which was not hit by an aircraft, yet came down in pure free-fall acceleration for at least 100 feet according to the official government engineering investigation (NIST), and in the exact manner of a classic controlled demolition. The implications are startling. The group bases its conclusions solely on forensic evidence and does not speculate as to who may have planted the explosives. (See my footnote)

AE911Truth’s conclusions are shared by thousands of scientists; senior-level military, intelligence and government officials; pilots and aviation professionals; firefighters; scholars and university professors; 9/11 survivors and their family members; and other professionals around the world

9/11 Blueprint for Truth presented by Architect Richard Gage, AIA
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth)
1:59:38 - 4 years ago


(www.journalof911studies.com, , www.firefightersfor911truth.org, www.patriotsquestion911.com).

[Footnote] In 1961 David Rockefeller proposed that the Port Authority build a World Trade Center in Lower Manhattan. At the time the governors of both New York and New Jersey had to approve the project, and New Jersey Governor Robert B. Meyner refused. After Meyner was replaced by Richard J. Hughes, the deal was sewn up by 1966 under Rockefeller owned mayor of New York City,. John Lindsay. The deal bankrupted Manhattan in the 70's, incidentally. New York City was the first 'bailout' by the Federal taxpayer in 1975 by President Gerald Ford...who had chosen Nelson Rockefeller as his unelected Vice President.
The location and design of the WTC brought objections from the American Institute of Architects as a monstrosity of 'Urban Renewal' poor planning. It's been suggested by skyscraper construction professionals that structures were pre-wired for future demolition when they were built - as that is a common practice in skyscrapers built after the Seagram's building.

9/11 - Worlds Largest Controlled Demolition


RG said (January 16, 2012):

I feel Dr. Judy Wood's DEW theory to be a mixture of truth and lies. Though no one can say for sure, there is a Russian nuclear officer Dmitri Khalezov who's theory about no planes, underground nuclear explosions beneath the twin towers and a soviet Granit missile carrying a nuclear warhead hitting the pentagon is more realistic.

No time to address specifics but I say there were NO PLANES, the TV was FAKED, there are NO reliable eye-witnesses to the planes. TV fakery has been working well since the faked apollo moon landings, it's what they do, TV is fake. Tv is in the business of being fake and projecting fake, selling us on an idea that helps their agenda, be it advertisers or governments.
There were NO holograms, NO 'directed energy', No haarp.

Dmitri Khalezov's free ebook can be seen here http://tinyurl.com/khalezov and the interview can be viewed here http://tinyurl.com/khalezov1



Whether a directed energy weapon, or a nuclear weapon was used, clearly it was an advance on box cutters, and was technology unavailable to bin Laden and his Merry Band of Men.