The Murder of Beverly Eckert, Flight #3407 – Part 1 Like John F. Kennedy, Jr., Beverly Eckert was murdered. No more convenient way to do so than through an evening plane crash. The plane was either destroyed with a missile or a pre-placed bomb, which was detonated upon descent. That would necessitate the involvement of the Israeli Mossad, the same perpetrators who blew up the World Trade Center. Numerous local people initially reported a plane already on fire in the air, with various noises indicating the engine system was faulty, actually, destroyed. Her lawsuit would reveal the truth about 911, which is that, in fact, there were no outside forces, like Islamic people or others: just Israeli moles, the Rockefellers, the various high agents of the Port Authority, the Bush administration, Dick Cheney, George Tenet, Paul Wolfowiz, Larry Silverstein, Frank Lowy, Jerome Hauer, Michael Bloomberg, Dov Zakheim, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Billy Kristol, Normon Podheretz, Donald Rumsfeld, the Annenberg crime syndicate, the various Israeli moles caught with detonator devices, gunpowder residues, and even bombs, and similar murderous Zionist agents. That surely couldn’t happen because of a mere 911 widow. Thus, she was eliminated.
911 Witness Beverly Eckert Murdered
Friday, December 19, 2003
My Silence Cannot Be Bought
by Beverly Eckert
I’ve chosen to go to court rather than accept a payoff from the 9/11 victims compensation fund. Instead, I want to know what went so wrong with our intelligence and security systems that a band of religious fanatics was able to turn four U.S passenger jets into an enemy force, attack our cities and kill 3,000 civilians with terrifying ease. I want to know why two 110-story skyscrapers collapsed in less than two hours and why escape and rescue options were so limited.
I am suing because unlike other investigative avenues, including congressional hearings and the 9/11 commission, my lawsuit requires all testimony be given under oath and fully uses powers to compel evidence.
The victims fund was not created in a spirit of compassion. Rather, it was a tacit acknowledgement by Congress that it tampered with our civil justice system in an unprecedented way. Lawmakers capped the liability of the airlines at the behest of lobbyists who descended on Washington while the Sept. 11 fires still smoldered.
And this liability cap protects not just the airlines, but also World Trade Center builders, safety engineers and other defendants.
The caps on liability have consequences for those who want to sue to shed light on the mistakes of 9/11. It means the playing field is tilted steeply in favor of those who need to be held accountable. With the financial consequences other than insurance proceeds removed, there is no incentive for those whose negligence contributed to the death toll to acknowledge their failings or implement reforms. They can afford to deny culpability and play a waiting game.
By suing, I’ve forfeited the “$1.8 million average award” for a death claim I could have collected under the fund. Nor do I have any illusions about winning money in my suit. What I do know is I owe it to my husband, whose death I believe could have been avoided, to see that all of those responsible are held accountable. If we don’t get answers to what went wrong, there will be a next time. And instead of 3,000 dead, it will be 10,000. What will Congress do then?
End of interview