CONSIDER the LILIES

Foreword

In the historical collection of Notre Dame University Medical School Library, Sydney, are many books on cancer treatment that were subsequently suppressed.

Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2008, National Cancer Institute.

Approximate number of cancer deaths per day in US in 2010: one thousand six hundred. More than one every minute.

1. The Hippocratic Oath 20

2. Newspaper Announces Glover’s Cure for Cancer 28

3. Great Irish Biologist, John Tyndall, Thanks Scotland 42

4. The Multiple Wave Oscillator of Georges Lakhovsky 56

5. Editorials about Cancer in the The Lancet, Pre-Suppression 72

6. The Power List: Many Ways To Kick a Good Doctor 86

7. Writer Recommends: You’ll Need Your Pack 100

8. Constitutional Grants of Power to Congress 114

9. Egyptian Papyrus Not Keen on the Big Three 130

10. Rockefeller Boasts of Hiding the Cancer Cure 144

11. Who Flew Over That Cuckoo’s Nest? Not Jenner! 158

12. What Makes Eighth-graders in Kansas So Smart? 174

13. President Bush in Rose Garden: Roll Up Your Sleeve 192

14. Canary Party to Chronic Diseases: Get Outta Here 206

15. Possible Assassination of Microbiologists 220

16. When Men Were Men 234

13

Table of Exhibits

1885 Charles Creighton, MD: the elusive vaccina A, 252

1898 Alfred Russel Wallace, LLD, FRS: vaccination B, 256

1909 William Coley, MD: toxins as cancer cure C, 265

1911 John Beard, DSc: pancreatic enzymes D, 267

1920 Charles Higgins: vaccinating the military E, 270

1924 George Crile, Sr, MD: electric charge in cancer F, 275

1947 E Underwood, MD: Charles Creighton’s work G, 283

1950 Edward Rosenow, MD: polio H, 290

1953 Benedict FitzGerald, JD: report to US Senate I, 296

1961 Royal Rife: deposition in John Crane’s case J, 302

1965 Lionel Dole: dishonesty of Pasteur and the BBC K, 308

1970 Robert Olney, MD: ultraviolet light cure L, 312

1973 John Ott: reaction of plants and animals to light M, 314

1975 Gordon Thomas: career of Thomas Issels, MD N, 317

1985 Robert O Becker, MD: on silver O, 321

1993 Lida Mattman, PhD: cell wall deficiency P, 323

1994 Hiram Caton, PhD: misperceptions of AIDS Q, 326

1997 Harris Coulter, PhD: vaccination causes diabetes R, 330

1997 Jaak Panksepp, PhD: autism S, 333

1998 Carla Emery: unethical hypnosis T, 336

1999 Michael Goldberg, MD: immune problem in autism U, 338

2005 Richard Moskowitz, MD: natural immunity V, 341

2010 National Vaccine Injury Table of Compensation W 344

2011 Mary Efrosini Gregory; M Phil: GS-12 targets X, 345

2011 Claire McCarthy, MD: on one-sidedness Y, 350

2012 Joan Campbell: survey of Moms on vaccination Z, 351

Preface

Cancer is something of a joke. I am referring to our culture’s construction of the great demon cancer. If you are presently healthy I’ll bet this book will leave you laughing – laughing about how we deceived ourselves all these years. Of course if you aren’t feeling healthy today, if indeed you’ve just been told that you’ve got the dread disease, it may take a bit more of a jolt for you to get out of your state of fear and into a more feisty mood.

I shall try to give you that jolt. And it’s not out of kindness on my part. I am trying to recruit feisty people, and who better than you? You have more reason than most to be up in arms at what “The Powers That Be” have done to us (and to themselves, please note, O Powers That Be!).

My Mother, who was not particularly Bible-oriented, often murmered,

they grow: they neither toil nor spin, yet Solomon in all his glory

was not arrayed as one of these.” This book, on every page, considers

the lilies of the field, even when it may seem as though

I am off on a political toot. Fact is, God gave us an incredible

planet on which to live, lilies and all, and incredible bodies in

which to do our running around. Yes, the cancer demon is a joke.

The chapters of this book should definitely be read in order. No

skipping! No starting at the back! It contains a historical look at

what happened in the 20th century to suppress cures (loads of

them) that popped up when an individual scientist, brilliant and

driven, found his or her way. Note: persons like that will always

be with us; it’s impossible to stop them.

In organizing the chapters that deal with cancer cures, I’ve

given Virginia Livingston top billing because I feel I can trust

her right down the line. She was a conservative and disciplined

physician, like my late beloved spouse, George Maxwell. I do

believe that for him to have cheated on research, or neglected

a patient’s needs for his self-pursuit would have been, like, impossible.

I don’t claim that such doctors were saints, but the

15

medical culture of the day made this happen. Your reputation

meant everything. To be accused of fudging your research data

was to be dreaded approximately as much as being boiled in oil.

Dr Stanislaw Burzynski also gets high placement in the ordering

of the chapters, mainly because of what he has put up with! “Dr

B” has shown stamina that few mortals can match. Trying hard to

help his cancer patients, and using normal medical technique, he

has more than once been handcuffed by police for so doing. At this

very moment, in 2012, he is facing another ordeal in a Texas court.

In all, twenty cancer curers get discussed in this book.

Acknowledgements

I am deeply grateful to the many historians and biographers I’ve

relied on. The history of the Rife microscope came to my attention

through an article on rense.com, which led me to Barry Lynes’

that occurred ninety years ago, I had already been aware of the late

I thank him for his years at the library.

The first book I picked up concerning the shonkiness of the

American Cancer Society – and I’m being charitable there – was

controversy”). Next, I was happy to connect with Nat Morris’

(2009), but my book is not about alternative medicine.

The dishonesty – even that word is charitable – of the NIH is

Among the biology books that truly uplifted me were Hanna

work that I probably never would have found if I hadn’t

grown up on the wrong side of the tracks, that is, the sociobiology

Only near the end of writing this book did I acquire two essential

Midway, I got a huge emotional boost from finding the works

of Charles Creighton, Edward Rosenow, Sr, and George Crile, Sr,

and will pass this boost to anyone who’ll take it.

I thank, and I salute, the many scholars I quote in this book.

16

For personal support I thank the dear late parentals, Pat and John

Whalen. Of course I thank God for dropping me into a fortunate

time and place, and for inventing the Internet!

I particularly thank Dr. Alan Cantwell, a generous scholar willing

to share ideas. His very humorous emails kept me going.

Craigo fixed up the photos (whilst camping in Tasmania – is

nothing sacred?); Peter hauled books; Charles rode shotgun.

how a role-model can spur you on, isn’t it? As for Carol, Linda,

and Blanche, they know how they oped mine eyes – ’nuf said.

Concepts of intellectual property must adapt in relation to the

Internet. All mugshots here were simply lifted by me. While it

so happens that I am a maniac for protection of privacy, these

persons can hardly say I have invaded their privacy by printing in

my book a portrait of them that is already world-broadcast. I also

broke tradition, but not the law, in declining to ask certain men if I

could quote them. I have good reason to think they’d suffer pressure

if they gave me permission. So I just went ahead.

I hope you like the new post-Postmodern pagination. Since

many books travel by PDF, it seemed to me that calling the first

page “page 18” would save subtraction of roman numerals.

A pleasant caveat: don’t send money! Last year my gmail account

mysteriously discharged a request for $1200 to all my friends. One

friend actually sent that amount, into the wild blue yonder. Who

knows -- other messages may be sent out from “Mary Maxwell”.

Don’t fire till you see the whites of my eyes, OK?

Finally, to the requisite Disclaimer. I hereby state – with as much

sincerity as I can muster:

1. This book does not contain medical advice, just “educational

material.”

2. I, Mary W Maxwell, possess the following scientific qualifications:

nada, cipher, and goose egg.

3. If the reader has cancer, he is urged to go to his physician.

(Well, he probably wouldn’t go to the piano tuner, would he?)

4. The treatments described in most chapters have not won

FDA approval. (You can say that again!)

Adelaide, January 26, 2013 Mary Maxwell

17

18

Lexicon.

As everyone knows, body organs have fancy medical names:

Hippocrates thought cancer looked like a crab, for which the Greek

the blood,” but the H has been dropped -- as it was in anemia. The

with troubled white blood cells.

Come away from anatomical words for a moment to consider more

or nutrition, as in the trophic layers of the biosphere. However, don’t

is a hormone that directs itself toward the gonads.

Slightly more complicated are medical terms for biochemical action,

parts that were discussed earlier. (No credit if you find only three.)

19

have leukocytes (white cells), and erythrocythes (red cells). “Help! I

cut my finger and my erythrocytes are going all over the tablecloth.”

lympha, a goddess of water.

Greek word for “black.”

Don’t worry, the Greeks did not entirely corner the market in vocabulary.

everything in your abdomen.

“fall with” a particular illness. That’s all they do. You might say they

“happen to accompany” the real illness. Autistic boys bang their head

on the wall. Onlookers may think “That’s what’s wrong with him.

He’s mental.” Onlookers can’t tell the difference between a symptom

and the cause of the symptom. The child possibly has an infection

that is the real illness. (See Chapter 15.)

Is your illness acute or chronic? It’s chronic if long-term, from the

quickly, like the common cold.

The reason a doctor can often diagnose over the phone, is that each

a symptom. The real disease of cancer is probably constitutional.

That is, something has gone wrong in the normally well-functioning

chemistry and physics of the body, with the result that some cells

replicate uncontrollably.

in addition to the big theme which, as announced, is political.)

Thank you for listening, so far. And now, it’s eleven oclock. Do you

know where your peritoneum is?

20

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

PART

ONE

21

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Virginia Livingston MD Alan Cantwell MD

Gen George Crile MD Gerald Domingue PhD

John Ott

Royal Rife

Philippa Uwins PHD

Antoine Béchamp MD

Upbeat beyond Belief !

Niels Finsen MD

22

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

The Hippocratic Oath

I swear by Apollo the physician, and Asclepius, and Hygieia

and Panacea and all the gods and goddesses as my witnesses,

that, according to my ability and judgment, I will keep this

Oath and this contract:

To hold him who taught me this art equally dear to me as my

parents, to be a partner in life with him, and to fulfill his needs. . . .

I will use those dietary regimens which will benefit my patients

according to my greatest ability and judgment, and I will do no

harm or injustice to them…

Into whatever homes I go, I will enter them for the benefit of

the sick, avoiding any voluntary act of impropriety or corruption….

Whatever I see or hear in the lives of my patients, whether in

connection with my professional practice or not, which ought

not to be spoken of outside, I will keep secret …

So long as I maintain this Oath faithfully and without corruption,

may it be granted to me to partake of life fully and the

practice of my art, gaining the respect of all men for all time.

However, should I transgress this Oath and violate it, may the

opposite be my fate.

Translated by Michael North,

United States National Library of Medicine

23

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

-- James Boswell, The Life of Johnson, 1787

Welcome to Part One, which aims to bowl you over with good

news. Naturally, if you or a loved one has been recently diagnosed

with C-A, you probably can’t think straight. My first remark to

you is that there is hope, and I mean hope of finding proper scientific

medical cures. Your doctor does not know many of these, as

they have been kept under wraps for the last ninety years. Weird,

but true. I swear it.

This book, however, wasn’t written for patients. It is intended as

information for all citizens. I hope that the story of the suppression

of cancer cures will be eagerly looked at by young scientists

and legal scholars in particular. Eighteen cures will be sorted

through in these chapters. And please note the one-stop-shopping

feature at the back of the book: the 26 exhibits of concise articles,

many historic, half of them written by MD’s.

It is a scandalous fact that such science was deliberately hidden,

both from the public and from medical students! My late husband,

George Maxwell, who was an excellent doctor, must never have

heard of these medical cures, or he would certainly have consulted

a “curer” when he got esophageal cancer in 1999. Instead, he

signed up right away for surgery. (He died of complications from

the surgery, particularly kidney failure and septicemia.)

Come to think of it, when I had a routine mammogram in 1992,

and was diagnosed as having breast cancer, George unhesitatingly

advised me to have radiotherapy. He was an extremely devoted

husband, so it must surely be that he considered that treatment to

be our best option.

It luckily turned out that I didn’t have cancer; the mammogram

was improperly read. “The luck of the Irish” as my kinfolk call

Chapter 1

Introduction

24

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

it. Then, in 2010, when I had another cancer scare, as a widow, I

went to an oncologist and, without him pressuring me in any way,

I arranged to go under the knife if the tests were positive. (Faith

and begorrah, they were again negative!)

Sorry for dragging my case notes in front of you, but I want to

make the point that we Americans and Australians (I am both)

are remarkably untutored on this subject. And Yours Truly would

not have found out the dirt, even now, but for luck: some legal

research I was doing on AIDS and on autism happened to drift

into the adjacent study of cancer.

My Speciality: Indictments Galore!

There’s more to this book than a review of cancer cures. There

is a major statement as to where we find ourselves in this crazy

of sociopaths has had free rein to do things to us for a century.

cures out of our reach. What absolute creeps.

Other writers, too, say it was deliberate, but they chalk it up to

greed in the medical industry, or to the fact that people always

prefer the tried-and-true to the new. I chalk it up to a major coordinated

effort to destabilize society and keep folks power-less so

the few at the top can avoid challenges. The political scientist in me

says “That’s what I would do if I were they!”

Such legal insight as I can bring to bear on this is in Parts

Two and Four. Part One contains some cutting-edge material, all

perfectly understandable by the layperson. Part Three shows how

other diseases bring new illumination as to what cancer is. If you

are licking your chops at the thought of “bringing to book” some

people who have done unbelievably cruel things, this book won’t

is what it will take to make us reconsider our unwarranted toleration

of what’s been going on.

The Excitement of Scientific Discovery

That said, the main joy in this book has to do with the fact that

several of the cancer-cures to be discussed here carry other good

information with them. As far as I am aware, very few people are

working on these amazing things. I know that sounds ridiculous,

but to name just two names – Edward C Rosenow, Sr and George

25

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

W Crile, Sr -- there is a treasure trove of work by them that got

suppressed or fell by the wayside. I was shocked to come across

it, and it is absolutely “eligible” for revival.

Other persons are making connections. In Part Three, Lawrence

Broxmeyer will astonish you with his finds that connect Parkinson’s

disease to the tuberculosis microbe. For autism, Michael

Goldberg and John Walker-Smith have found multiple explanations

for neurological problems and bowel disease. Then there’s

the shocker from Tenison Deane about a syphilis-smallpox connection,

or should I say a vaccination connection.

Ah, have you already flipped through the exhibits and noticed

a bit of a skewing toward the topic of vaccination? Don’t blame

me; it’s not my fault! It is where the cancer research took me.

Honest. As for my becoming an “anti-vaxxer,” who would have

dreamed? But you go where the research takes you. By the way, if

you’re pro-vax and can hold out against this onslaught of data, I

am dying to meet you.

High Schoolers, and “The Shed Situation”

Good morning, Students. And to be young -- is it very heaven?

Great. Now let me ask you: have you ever heard what cancer is?

It’s portrayed as some sort of internal enemy, lurking, waiting

to pounce and destroy a life. Poppycock, balderdash, and horse

feathers is what I say to that. Come aboard and check it out!

High school students can use the cancer question to begin

brainstorming with one another. No matter how little training

you’ve had, you can get used to the important exercise of posing

a question. For example, you and your mates could make up entirely

fictitious “body parts.” Then imagine a patient who comes

down with a tumor of the what’s-it, and ask how many different

ways it could have happened. Since it’s fictitious, you won’t risk

Try setting up hypotheses that look at the broadest aspects of

the biological event, and think of ways in which you might test

that hypothesis. Dear Student, don’t let the “prestige” of the big

guns overwhelm you. Who invented the wheel? Freddie Flintstone,

right? There just weren’t any Nobel Prize scholars around to get

the wheel going.

Tell your mother you need to go out to the shed and formulate

a theory of cancer. See what she says.

26

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

Our 18 curers did a lot of their work “at the bench.” For those

with no background in this, here is a sketch of what goes on.

excretions or secretions, for example blood, urine, or sputum. By

performing tests, he may be able to advise the clinician as to what

is going wrong, or even identify the disease.

For other lab workers, the day’s labor is done in fulfillment of

a long-term research project and may consist of feeding mice a

certain chemical to see if that triggers a cancerous growth. (Note:

there is going to be a lot of that here. I apologize to the animals!

I was never an animal-welfare person, but when you hear how

many millions of mice, dogs, and rabbits are given cancer for

research purposes, you are going to be appalled.)

Instead of having live animals onsite, a lab may have only cultures.

Just as you can cultivate vegetables in your garden, you can

culture things, such as bacteria, in the lab. You’ll monitor the bacteria

be an inorganic chemical, or a biological “broth.”

These “media,” as they are called, can be purchased from a lab

supply company. The medium may be solid rather than liquid.

be grown on it is sort of swabbed onto it, in the shape of the letter

resistant to antibiotics. Hence, the syphilis bacillus, Treponema

pallidum, is not as curable by penicillin as it used to be.

strains of bacteria have formed a destructive blob of icicle-like

‘rusticles’ that are slowly eating the historic wreckage of the RMS

Titanic steamship.” [Good grief!] and:

“A group of University of Tokyo students programmed 16 strains

E is for Thomas Escerisch] to solve sudoku puzzles.”

puzzles, as the author at hand “wouldn’t have a clue.” -- MM

27

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Always Assume God Got It Right.

Although many folks live in fear of calamities regarding the body,

it doesn’t have to be that way. The bod is magnif. Even a fruitfly

body is something to write home about, but the human, oh my.

May I proffer just two examples of what your body has accomplished,

on the q.t., in the last few minutes?

1. For breathing, the intercostal [between the ribs] muscles of your

chest caused your lungs to expand to take in air. How did those

muscles know that you needed to take a breath? Easy -- the brain

continuously monitors the levels of carbon dioxide and oxygen in

the blood and sends a message.

2. When you blinked, your eyelid smeared lacrimal fluid over the

eyeball to keep it clean and moist. That fluid, containing, say, a bit

of dust, was then pushed off to the lacrymal canal where it will

make its way into the lymph and eventually exit the body.

Just think, such things go on 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. You

probably breathe and blink at least ten times a minute, hence you

perform 5 million of each of those transactions per year. Every

year. And it never fails. Most likely you won’t have to call the repair

shop even once in a decade. Not even once per half-century. So,

isn’t it reasonable to take comfort from that?

Lexicon and Epigraphs

It’s empowering to crack the code of medical lingo – hence the

lexicon at the front of this book. Occasionally a word will be defined

in the text, as we go. Three cancer terms that I once found

that an L-form bacterium isn’t shaped like an L; rather it was

with weight – it was named after a chap, Christian Gram. As for

fuschia-red color.) I trust you’ll find that the Exhibits are in plain

English.

As for the epigraphs from ancient Greek or Chinese sources,

’twas not I who gathered them, but Ralph Hovnanian and Wade

Frazier. I’ve loaded up on them as they are so consistent in their

message that cancer does not call for drastic action! When I had

my cancer scare last year, I phoned two surgeon friends, one age

80 the other 93. What did both of them say? “Do nothing.”

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

28

CHAPTER 2 LIVINGSTON

29

During the last hundred years, a surprisingly large number of

doctors have found ways to cure or alleviate cancer. These ways

the ones almost exclusively recommended by the profession.

If you had told me, a few years ago, about these cures, I am

pretty sure I would have scoffed at the idea, and would have felt

sorry for anyone who’d be foolish enough to use “backyard doctors”

instead of going to one of the fabulous big hospitals.

I would also have been in agreement with the sentiment “Snakeoil

salesmen need to be run out of town.” But the doctors that

will be covered in this book are hardly that. Indeed, I believe

many of them are persons of exceptional character and wisdom!

Some Happy Stories

Let’s begin with Virginia Livingston (1906-1990), a graduate of

Bellevue Medical School, daughter of Herman Wuerthele, MD

she claimed a success rate of 82%. Here are four cases:

D.K. – Age 71, operated on for carcinoma of prostate, followed

by removal of testicle, 1966. He had multiple spinal metastases

and arthritis of many joints. He was barely able to move around.

He was placed on autogenous vaccine and mandelamine, 1 gram

four times a day with dietary and vitamin adjuvants. Previous to

his prostatic surgery he had a bowel resection for cancer of the

colon. At the present time the spinal metastases have healed, he

says he has no evidence of arthritis, is in perfect health and works.

Chapter 2

Bacteria in Cancer? “Definitely,” says Livingston

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

30

3. J.M. -- Age thirty-five, had a left radical mastectomy March 3,

1965, when four months pregnant. Pathological diagnosis was infiltrating

carcinoma, scirrhus and medullary types. After delivery

of a normal child she had a hysterectomy May 28, 1965, and was

placed on estrogen therapy from August 24, 1966, through January

9, 1967. Autogenous vaccine was made which she took for a

(1972) with no signs of recurrence.

6. F.B. -- Male age twenty-seven from Utah, who was operated on

for severe headaches after a number of convulsive seizures. The

pathological diagnosis was astrocytoma, grade III to IV, infiltrating

the surrounding area. He received anticonvulsants, radiotherapy

and antibiotics. In 1966 when he was doing very badly and

and mandelamine, one gram four times daily, plus vitamins and

dietary supplements. He remained on this regimen for two years.

The vaccine was discontinued in October 1970. His physician

said there is no evidence of any tumor.

8. Longshoreman, age 46, operated 1967, for a mass on the right

side of his neck. Pathological diagnosis was malignant lymphoma,

resectable because they extended under the sternocleidomastoid

muscle. He received X-ray, 4500 R, in eighteen treatments. Since

then he has had no other treatment except autogenous vaccine

continuously with erythromycin 250 mgm twice a day. He says he

is completely well and works full time on the docks.

Leprosy the Clue

After World War II, Virginia worked in a New York hospital and

saw many cases of TB (tuberculosis) and leprosy. Note: every

physician’s experience is unique. It is incorrect to think that all

doctors possess the same knowledge; much depends on who

happens to walk into their office one fine day.

One fine day into Virginia’s office (she was a school doctor)

walked the school nurse, complaining of ulcers on the fingers,

a perforation in the septum (the piece of cartilage that separates

the two nostrils), and hardening of the skin. This was in

1947. Her own doctor had given her a diagnosis of scleroderma.

CHAPTER 2 LIVINGSTON

31

Virginia associated the symptoms with leprosy as the patient reported

that she could not feel hot or cold on the affected skin.

Virginia Livingston decided to do some lab work on this case.

She took smears from the woman’s nose and the ulcers on her

hands and stained them with the stain used for identifying both

leprosy and TB, namely a “Ziehl-Neelsen” stain. Peering into the

microscope, Virginia saw the same type of microorganisms one

sees in leprosy. She treated this patient with the medication used

for lepers, and the skin healed. Later, Virginia gave the same medication

to other scleroderma patients and it worked!

Whatever she saw in the microscope that day became central

to her later theory that cancer is explainable by bacteria. That

has not been widely accepted. But she made a separate discovery

that did later become standard in science. Namely, she found that

bacteria can and do secrete a hormone, human chorionic gonadatropin,

hCG, which is essential for human life. Hooray!

In a Nutshell, Livingston’s Theory

Virginia believed that cancer is not a foreign visitor. It is part of

our body from birth and it is never going to go away. Cancer is

characterized by mitosis, the dividing and replication of cells. Cell

division itself is not to be despised; it is the basis of our initial

growth in childhood, and occurs as part of the repair work that

steadily goes on in the body. When a piece of skin gets scraped

off, you just wait for it to regrow. We need cell division!

If cell division gets out of control, however, it may make tumors.

Tumors are bunches of new cells that don’t associate in the

normal manner with surrounding cells and have no purpose.

A cancer doctor has the title “oncologist” from the Greek word

surmised that a tumor happened because the person’s immune

system was not functioning as it normally does. As for the cancer

microbe that she believes to be ever-present in our body, she gave

The Livingston Program for Treating Cancer

More will be said below about her bacterial theory – which she

does not claim to have invented. Others such as William Russell

and Royal Rife, she notes, got there first. Now have a look at what

W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

32

son, is taken care of by the immune system. When your immune

system sees the cryptocides microbes going where they shouldn’t

go, she says, it treats them as invaders and acts to protect you. The

immune system is ever-alert for the non-normal, and can do what

must be done. Run-of-the-mill miracles.

One cancer patient, a physician named Owen Wheeler, was

cured by Virginia, and subsequently married her. They established

the Livingston-Wheeler Clinic in San Diego, and helped thousands

of persons.

But what if your immune system is not working well and can’t

call up the right response? Then a tumor may form. Stuff may

also travel around your body and metastasize. What should the

doctor do? She will try to get your immune system working again.

Her treatment program has two prongs:

fruits, vegetables, and nuts (nothing out of a can). No meat or

dairy until you are recovered. Lots of Vitamins A and C, and

vaccination comes from the patient himself; his urine is used to

culture the bacteria which are then made into an autogenous vaccine.

In some cases she also gives antibiotics. She often gives a

blood transfusion, from a family member.

you that you won’t find health advice in this book. I guess it’s well

accepted that fruits contain elements of a so-called balanced diet,

but I shall not be “showing you the way” to good health.

When I tell people I am writing a book on cancer, they say “Oh,

alternative medicine, how nice.” Wrong. Nothing in the chapters

CHAPTER 2 LIVINGSTON

33

that follow is outside of standard medical science. That includes

Livingston’s remarks on fruits and vitamins. As far as I am aware

she wasn’t into “the magic of fruit.” She used the science of nutrition.

The same can be said of Max Gerson, MD, who appears in

a later chapter. His “Gerson diet” is not based on “fervent belief.”

Possibly a lot of people benefit from having faith in a particular

diet or ritual. Good. That’s fine. Just don’t expect me to discuss it.

I completely lack the relevant psychology skills.

How about my skill in real medical science? Well …um ... er …

no skill there either! Is abdominal pain the sign of cancer? I have

no idea. Is 98 a good pulse rate? I don’t even know that! Still, I am

capable of researching what has gone on in the United States in

the last hundred twenty years or so, by way of suppressing normal

medical cures for cancer. I promise to do an honest job of reporting.

I declare I have no vested interests.

Which is not to say I’m neutral! My mission is overtly political.

I object to the suppression of good doctors because of what that

implies about power-holding. If overlords, secret government, or

whatever you wish to call them, have the ability to prevent us from

getting rid of our cancer, that’s disgusting. But more importantly,

in my opinion, it’s frightening for what it suggests as to their additional

capabilities.

Luckily, there is strength in numbers. I assume we, together, can

put a stop to this outrageous stuff. The physicians pictured on

the back cover of this book did not have the benefit of solidarity.

Most marched heroically through a very tough life. I hope people

come to understand the sacrifices that were made.

“Getting” Virginia Livingston

Virginia was still working at her clinic at age 83 when the government

closed it down. As we shall see, the feds and most states

do that to any doctor who dares defy the rule to use only the Big

Three cancer cures. A few months after that, she expired.

Dr Livingston constantly made her patient’s progress available

for inspection by the medical authorities. She also arranged for

a random survey of the records, going so far as to hire an outsider

to choose 62 cases under a meticulous set of guidelines. Yet

when she published the survey no one was wiling to read it. In the

back of her book you will find a section with the pitiful heading

“Ten Cases That I Wish Someone Would Investigate.”

In 2001, Saul Green wrote a bad evaluation of Livingston for

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

34

Sloan Kettering, making nary a mention of cures she wrought for

Doctors like Virginia are blacklisted, and those who fraternize

with them have reason to fear blacklisting as well. Keeping us

separated is the oldest trick in the books, is it not? The bishop of

Adelaide, wanting to isolate the maverick Mother Mary McKillop,

declared it a sin for other nuns to speak to her!

One physician who came to Livingston’s aid was Los Angeles

dermatologist Alan Cantwell, MD, a graduate of Cornell. He had

already published his clinical finding of a cancer microbe, in 1968,

networking that went on, to posterity’s very great benefit, amongst

Livingston and three non-physician scientists: Irene Diller, Eleanor

Alexander-Jackson, and Florence Siebert. All four women

went to their graves without receiving a thank-you.

that a doctor is persecuted. Here is a quote from Caleb Saleeby,

MD, who took that situation as a given -- in 1906!

“I know, as a matter of repeated personal observation, that the articles

which have brought me so much abuse from the Powers That Be in

this country, have directly led to such boon to a few stricken patients

as perfect ease instead of uncontrollable agony … If this book, serves

even in infinitesimal measure to hasten the end of this most damnable

thing, my life will have been worth living, though it should end upon

The prescription Saleeby used (of trypsin and amylopsin) was

invented by Johh Beard, whom we’ll discuss later. It’s the one

Gonzales uses today. You can ask your G.P. for it! It is legal, but

doctors simply don’t know about it. Their education, highly controlled

by the cabal, told them to refer patients to a surgeon.

Gentle warning: I sometimes speculate that a doctor was secretly

punished. Livingston got polio (but recovered). Perhaps Eleanor

Alexander-Jackson’s cancer, and radical mastectomy, were

punishment for her disobedience. (Yes, cancer can be “given.” A

hundred years ago E Rosenow could give an animal almost any

2 LIVINGSTON

35

about Livingston’s bacteriological discoveries!

Alan Cantwell and the Taxonomy of Microbes

Cantwell spends much time at an ordinary microscope using

an “oil immersion lens” that allows him to see what most pathologists

claim they don’t see. He credits a Spanish microbiologist

for giving him the clue to cancer’s similarity to tuberculosis:

“[Conrado] Xalabarder totally transformed my concept about

how tuberculosis-causing mycobacteria reproduce and grow and

drastically change their appearance.”

Ah, changing appearance – and behavior – and size, and --who

knows? maybe their species identity – is the name of the game for the

bacteria we are concerned with here. The pioneering taxonomist,

Carolus Lineaus, born 1707 in Sweden, grouped animals together

having a backbone. (Sigh. If only we had backbone, and not just

One particular class of bacteria is known as bacillus (plural,

bacilli). They are rodlike. What? We are naming a whole group of

for coil. (Would this help you to remember? the spiro in the syphilis

bacterium makes 14 turns as it screws in.)

Think of stayphlococcus, a bacterial species that is the scourge

of hospitals. The coccus part of that word refers to the shape

(coccoid, round) of individual bacteria, yet the bacteria huddle

together in a characteristic formation that looks like a bunch of

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

36

The “Heresy” of Pleomorphism

Often, Cantwell can’t get colleagues to acknowledge the microbes

either too big or too small to meet the orthodox criteria. For instance,

some items are too big to be viruses. (Gotta be small to

be a virus.) Clearly, expectations based on names can result in the

wrong diagnosis and treatment.

William Russell made a heartfelt speech in 1890 about his apparently

finding a cancer microbe. He wanted to say it was a bacterium,

but it was “too large.” Reluctantly he concluded that it

must be a fungus. (Wrong!) Subsequently it was realized that the

offending microbe has a capacity for changing. A virus is not always

a virus! A bacterium may be a fungus. They morph!

caused by tuberculosis-type bacteria” – but he can’t get that published

in a journal as pleomorphism is medical heresy. It’s taboo

city. (Note: Are algae plant or animal? Even that is disputed.)

Introducing Naessens and the Somatids

Gaston Naessens co-stars with Burzynski in the next chapter.

(Cancer sufferers may wish to pop along to that part now.)

Today Naessens lives in Québec, with his wife, Francoise. When

he was young, in Lille, France, during World War II, Gaston pondered

what he might come up with. The wheel having already

been invented, he came up with a microscope. Admittedly some

German technologists helped him make it.

Later, after he got arrested, convicted, and fined in Ajaccio,

Corsica, which is STANDARD OFFICE PROCEDURE for

cancer curers, he fled to Canada. There, helped by the special

microscope, he saw tiny creatures, which he named “somatids.”

He saw them going through a life cycle. Normally that lifecycle

has three stages, Naessens says. But in the context of the host’s

MD, using minimal equipment, had already come up with a very

similar hypothesis, in the very same town of Lille in the 1800s.

Naessens says he never heard of Béchamp -- but as David Hess

points out, such ideas were probably in the air. (Hess 1992: 45)

CHAPTER 2 LIVINGSTON

37

This is Gaston Naessens’ sketch of the somatids, from Christopher

Think how influenced we are by a word. The word “somatid”

does not match up with any item or idea we are familiar with, so,

naturally, we tend to dismiss it as false or silly. But check other

Personally, I don’t endorse the somatid cycle, but I think there

are clues here (especially the spores). See, in later chapters, the

writings of Edward Rosenow and Royal Rife. They believe in the

phenomenon of morphing, left, right and center.

At least, it’s something to think about.

.

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

38

living thing.” Nanobacteria have now been found! Queensland

geologist Philippa Uwins sees them in very old sandstone, swarming

around like there was no tomorrow.

Moreover, and this is hard to countenance, the human genome

want a better-than-Agatha-Christie whodunnit, may I suggest

googling “mitochondria, captured.” Perhaps an ancestral cell,

back around the Year Dot, enclosed an errant bacterium, which

then became our mitochondrion -- so vital to metabolism!)

Walls Do Not a Prison Make? Ask CWD Bacteria.

Finally, two more heroes of the pleomorph story (but they’re not

in the 18-count as they did not propose a cure for cancer): the late

Lida Mattman, PhD, and Gerald Domingue, PhD, an American

who has retired to Switzerland -- in fury, I’ll bet!

which includes articles by clinicians, has not been used to crack

the mystery of several diseases including cancer. Their fantastic

discovery is that some pleomorphic creatures act in certain ways

be a major jerk to conclude that this fact be irrelevant!

When a bacterium is not encased in the normal way by a cell

wall (that is, when it’s CWD – cell-wall deficient), it has potential

to sneak around and get up to no good. Harken to this:

“There is increasing evidence that CWDB and CWD fungi are often

associated with endocarditis, septicemia, meningitis, pneumonia,

and infections of bones and joints. When prompt diagnosis is

critical, it is helpful to include examination for CWD microorganisms

as part of the first laboratory study.”

That’s from an article that Lida Mattman, and her co-author

to its rather glaring potential for meningitis cases. I hope you’ll be

the first to get onto it. (Note: “CWD” is the same as the L-form

discovered in 1935 by Emmy Kleineberger-Nobel.)

CHAPTER 2 LIVINGSTON

39

Louis Pasteur, Germ Theory, and Koch’s Postulates

One person who slips off his plinth in this book is “the great

Louis Pasteur,” whose greatness escapes me. He flagrantly plagiarized

brought fear into people’s lives with his Germ Theory.

Robert Koch rubbed it in by holding that all major diseases are

caused by bacilli. He personally discovered, in the 1880s, the bacillus

of anthrax, cholera, and tuberculosis. (His assistant R. Pfeiffer

found the bacillus of flu. But mysteriously, in the 1930s the

flu was re-categorized as a virus.) It’s my guess that Pasteur and

Koch were both sent in by the Powers That Be (a.k.a. the cabal) to

control our perceptions about cancer. And yes, I do think that was

in aid of keeping the population unhealthy and afraid.

Koch delivered a paper outlining his “postulates’ when he was

only 39 years old. He preached an evidentiary proof of disease.

The scientist must see the bacillus under the microscope, in a

sample she took from an ill person. Then she must culture it in

a lab, then inject it into an animal, and wait to see if the animal

comes down with the disease. This “Koch cycle,” based merely

on his postulating it, gave him infallibility in cancer etiology!

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

40

Docs, Cantwell Is Pleading with You. Listen Up!

Alan Cantwell, at age 77, is a bit annoyed (did I say “a bit”?) that

physicians don’t look at the excellent photographs he uploads,

showing the bacteria in various cancers. (e.g, “string of pearls”).

I join with him here in saying: whatever has kept you afraid to

say what is going on in cancer, put it all behind you now. We can

forge ahead and forget the past. Granted, some patients’ families

may go troppo when they realize y’all missed the boat, but even

that’s no reason to demur. LOOK FORWARD NOW.

I add: if you are a medical student, demand to be taught the

truth about cancer. If you are a parent paying the tuition, put the

squeeze on the university. Go to the dean and fulminate over the

fact that your kid is being wrongly taught. Deans have probably

been wondering for years why you haven’t done that! Quite possibly

they are aching for you to do it.

Open Science and Brainstorming

Ever since Sir Francis Bacon got the ball rolling, it has been understood

that science is open and does not belong to an individual.

Around 1980 this view took a dip. Today universities acquire

“proprietary interests” in the results of faculty research. Manufacturers

that sponsor research consider the work a trade secret.

Too, there’s the familiar phrase “national security.”

know, and how does any human know anything if not by what

he picks up from the surrounding culture? Revert to 1979, I say!

I’ve mentioned “the shed,” meaning

space for thinking things out creatively,

but really the best stimulation

to new ideas is argumentation and/

or brainstorming. Be warned though:

people are afraid to state their best

ideas, as these may be stolen. No one

mentions that, but understandably

it’s a stumbling block, and so is jealousy.

I suggest you not worry about

it. Just be generous. Take a chance!

CHAPTER 2 LIVINGSTON

41

a device, substance, method or process.” In US the item must have

novelty and “non-obviousness.” Patent gives you exclusive rights to

sell the item for up to 20 years. You can license others to produce

it, say, for a royalty payment. You must make your patent public. It’s

not for trade secrets. The validity of any patent can be challenged in

court. Also, the owner can bring civil action against an infringer. See

any old patents at patentgenius.com, and new at freshpatent.com.

and Afton Livingston, and Eleanor Alexander-Jackson for the making

of an autogenous vaccine from the blood or urine of cancer

patients. Their application for the patent claimed:

“All cancerous bloods examined have revealed the cryptocides organisms.

[It] is apparently ubiquitous in nature, existing in a reservoir

in soil and water, and is found in all classes of animals…. It can exist

as a latent infection in host tissue without causing apparent ill effects.

However, when the immunologic barriers are lowered it can invade

the host in prodigious numbers and involve any or all of the host

tissues, causing various kinds and degrees of pathologic change.”

“Obtain a midstream clean-catch specimen of urine in a sterlized

screw-top glass container. Make up DiFco’s brain-heart infusion

agar: 37 grams of the agar base are added to a liter of distilled water

heated to melt and mix, and distributed into flasks or bottles of 95

ml amounts, and autoclaved. Five percent (5%) human blood … is

added when the melted agar has cooled down to 45-50 degrees C.,

and the mixture is poured into sterile Petri dishes. Streak the surface

of the blood agar plate with a sterile swab dipped in the urine. Incubate

plate to 37 degrees C. and examine after 24 hours.

If growth has appeared, note types of colonies, make duplicate

smears, and stain one by Gram’s stain and the other by Alexander-

Jackson’s modified Ziehl-Neelsen technique: flood slide with Kinyoun’s

carbolfuchsin for 3 to 5 minutes in the cold, wash, decolorize

briefly with 70% alcohol containing 1 to 3% HCl as these organisms

slide with Loeffler’s methylene blue and add 6 to 8 drops of normal

(4%) sodium hydroxide. Tilt slide to mix, and wash after 30 seconds.”

[The foregoing is only a small excerpt from Livingstone.]

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

42

FERMENTATION AND ITS BEARINGS ON THE

PHENOMENA OF DISEASE (1876)

I stand indebted, morally and intellectually, to the poets,

historians, and philosophers, of Scotland. ... One of the first

rootlets of my scientific life derived its nutriment from this city

as I studied a periodical then published in Glasgow, called

The Practical Mechanic’s and Engineer’s Magazine.

In it I read, with an interest unfelt before, a series of essays on

various departments of science—on anatomy and physiology, on

geology, on mechanics, on arithmetic, and on

natural philosophy and chemistry. …

It was there that I first learned what Leslie had done in Edinburgh,

and what Davy had done in the Royal Institution.

And I can now call to mind the day and hour when the yearning

to possess such apparatus as Leslie and Davy possessed, rose to a

kind of prophetic strength within me—

prophetic, for it has come to pass that my own studies as a

scientific man have been in great part pursued in that domain

which had been enriched by the discoveries of

THE POPULAR SCIENCE MONTHLY.

CHAPTER 3 BURZYNSKI AND NAESSENS

43

Now for two views of what causes cancer and how to treat it, one

proposed by Stanislaus Burzynski, MD, of Texas, and another by

Gaston Neassens of Quebec. Which of the two is more correct?

And does either win out over Livingston’s treatment program?

You may not need to pick only one. It seems there are many ways

Stanislaw Burzynski, MD and PhD (born 1943)

Burzynski’s nickname is Stash. I’ll sometimes refer to him as that,

or as “Dr B.” He invented a cancer treatment based on a naturally-

occurring substance in the body, an amino acid. It had curative

effect but he did not exactly know why. He had a treatment but

not a theory, so to speak. However, by the 1990s, he found that

gene-suppressors played a role in cancer cure.

growth of cells is called “neoplasia” -- new growth.

When Burzynski was but a medical student in Poland he noted

that a certain amino acid was found in the blood and urine of

healthy people, but not cancer patients. Bing! The bell went off.

It was not long until he discovered that by giving the patient antineoplaston,

he could fix them up. It is worth noting that his

biggest success has been with brain cancer. He thinks this may be

because most chemo drugs cannot pass the blood-brain barrier,

but his plain-old amino acids can! Stash was lucky to receive a

validation of his work when it was found that “a gene” = a protein.,

numbered “p53”, is responsible for suppressing a gene that

causes cancer. We did not know, in the olden days, that some of

our genes have, as their main function, the flicking on and off of

other genes. These ones are known as regulator genes, or in the

Chapter 3

Burzynski and Naessens, Legal Harassment, and DCA

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

44

case at hand, suppressor genes.

How the heck can I be sure that one gene suppresses another?

(or even that the things called amino acids actually exist? Duh.) I

have come up with the following policy: if something is already

standard science, as the p53 protein now is, not to mention amino

acids, I shall prattle away. If I get some parts wrong, I shall hope

to be corrected

Burzynski was lucky to find Thomas D. Elias to write his biography,

which was then made into Burzynski – the Movie. Below, I

mainly recount Dr B’s legal troubles. You’ll find cure testimonials

on Youtube. Indeed, if you’ve been following Stash’s legal case on

the Net, just skip our next four pages.

Any comment in parentheses is mine – MM.

1948 Stash’s brother is killed for resisting Communism.

1960s Stash goes to medical school, then works under biochemists

Irana and Juanita in chromatography. His job is to put organic

material, such as blood and mushrooms, into this equipment in

order to identify which amino acids are present.

1970 As one of only two young persons with both MD and PhD,

Burzynski is recruited by Communist Party, but declines the offer.

Thus he is drafted into Army, to help the VietCong (how odd to

think of it from the other side!), but escapes to US. He carries $20

and his chromatographs.

1970 Baylor Medical School in Texas hires him as a researcher

under Hungarian refugee Dr Ungar, for the study of peptides in

the brain that transmit memories. He also pals around with Dr

Georgiades at the M.D. Anderson Tumor Institute, who was trying

to isolate the leukemia virus.

the one that came up on his chromatographs from healthy people

but never showed up in the blood of men with prostate cancer?

1970s He manufactures peptide fractions from his own urine

and puts it into cancer cultures in Georgiades’ lab. He identifies a

3 BURZYNSKI AND NAESSENS

45

neoplaston L.” He cannot put time into it, as

he had found another one “A,” that works on a

broad range of cancer.

1976 With Dr. Carleton Hazelwood, he tries

“A10,” a subtype A, against breast cancer in vitro

(that is, in cultures in the lab, not “in vivo”

in animals or man). They conclude “there is a

neutral to slightly acidic group of medium size

eventually gets published in 1979. (Let’s not rush, Folks.)

1976 Dr B gives a paper at Federation of Associations for Experimental

Biology, announcing some of his findings. Associated

Press covers the story; thus patients seek him out.

1976 Baylor offers him a position at its Cancer Research Center,

on the condition that he give up his private practice. Says “No,

thank you.” He then gets a job in Dr Walker’s practice, part-time,

and sets up his own clinic in Houston.

1977 (“the Year of Urine River”) Burzynski purchases nine

freezer chests to put in his garage-laboratory and starts manufacturing

antineoplastons. This requires him to spend several hours

a day driving to places where friends – such as nuns – are collecting

urine for him. He needs about 400 gallon per day for his 30

patients. Note: by 1980, mass spectrometry enables him to skip

this step and make the antineoplastons synthetically.

1977 Stash’s attorney’s asks FDA if it is OK to make the antiplastons

for use only in Texas. Yes. The attorney also obtains

from the Attorney General of Texas a written opinion that it is

investigate the legislative history of that bill.)

1978 FDA visits Dr B’s lab and tells him he must not house the

mice in the same place as the manufacturing. He complies.

THE TROUBLE BEGINS (and still continues)

publicity, causing the Canadian drug-approval agency to

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

46

come to inspect. Then the Ontario Health Ministry sends two

doctors to snoop. FDA comes back and is unpleasant.

1983 FDA sues Dr B in order to put an end to his treating cancer

patients and making anti-whatchamacallits. As a result, his creditors

start to demand a return of loan money and some of the

health insurance companies stop paying for patients’ treatment.

(Do I smell a “cahoots”?)

1983 Dr B asks for an Investigational New Drug permit. They

give him the run-around for 6 years, always demanding more paperwork

and then ignoring what he sends.

1983 Judge Gabrielle McDonald turns down the FDA’s request

for an injunction to stop Stash; she issues only an order that he

must stop selling or shipping antineoplastons across state lines.

1984 Stash speaks at the International Cancer Congress….in Budapest.

American participant shun him. (cahoots, cahoots)

1985 FDA raids his clinic while patients are there, seizing his

documents. (Note: It is believed trauma can trigger cancer.)

1985 Before a grand jury he has to give oodles of information.

1988 He appears on the Sally Jessy Raphael show. This is followed

by the state threatening revocation of his license.

1991 Yet another grand jury. Dr B says “I wanted to speak to

them but was only allowed two minutes.” (Whence that rule?)

unadulterated no-holds-barred hatchet job about Burzynski

(could be used in an English writing course to teach ‘innuendo’).

1993 State Health authorities in Austin told him to destroy all his

anti-neoplastons and pay a fine of $25,000 per day. He gets help

against this from Dr Nicholas Patronas of NIH.

1995 Grand jury indicts him; 75 counts of interstate shipment of

a non-approved drug. (Dear Reader, I hope you are getting hot

under the collar....)

1995 Grand jury ends with an indictment against Stash on 75

counts: interstate shipment of a non-approved drug. In order to

be freed, Burzynski must agree to bail conditions. He must not

CHAPTER 3 BURZYNSKI AND NAESSENS

47

take any new patient unless the patient has already exhausted other

treatments such as radiation and chemo.

During the trial, experts from insurance companies are flown

to Houston and put up at the Hyatt – by the taxpayer. (Couldn’t

they have been billeted at the Superdome?) Three assistant US attorneys

work full time on the case for months. Natch.

On the matter of insurance fraud there is a hung jury, hence the

judge dismisses those charges. Burzynski had consistently over

the years given the correct code number. (I tend to think some

jurors were ‘got at,’ else why did they not acquit?)

On the matter of persons in other states going home after treatment

and then asking friends to fetch the drug from Dr B’s office

and courier it to them, there is Hollywood-type stuff in the court,

with government stating how its detectives followed the cars of

the miscreants from pillar to post office.

In 1997, the case ends; the accused walks. He then faces new

investigation by Texas medical board, but they reach some sort of

settlement and he has to pay them only 50K ‘costs.’

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

48

Gaston Naessens of Sherbrooke, QuÉbec

Naessens is the pleomorphist who sees “somatids.” He was educated

in Lille and hounded out of Ajaccio, Corsica, by the police.

I think Burzynski and Naessens are “examples” to scare doctors

In Québec, Naessens was charged with being accessory to a

murder when a widower claimed that his late wife, Mme Langlais

(!), had been pressured by Naessens to forsake her standard

treatment. Today Canadians can obtain Naessens’ medicine legally

from their GP. It is reportedly composed of camphorized

nitrogen. It’s called 714-X, a code for Naessens’ birth date: X is

the 24th letter of the alphabet and 7-14 means he was born on

Bastille Day (not a trick, I hope).

The point of the following section, in which I quote five witnesses

at Naessens’ trial, is to give the flavor of how a person

claiming to be cured of cancer can undergo cross-examination.

Surely, this legal method for establishing truth is on a par with

medicine’s method of “the clinical trial.” Each depends on the

honesty of members of the profession, legal and medical.

Why would a lawyer in the courtroom, or scientist concluding a

clinical trial, be honest? I presume they’re motivated to be honest

if there are rewards related to that, within the profession. Similarly

CHAPTER 3 BURZYNSKI AND NAESSENS

49

Patients as Witnesses at Naessens’ Trial

Helmuth Wallaczek, travelled from his home in Austria to give evidence

on behalf of “the accused.” He said he had been diagnosed, in 1978,

with a cancerous tumor in one of his kidneys and, after heavy doses of

radiation, was nevertheless found to have metastases to his liver. It was

through his brother that Helmuth had learned about Gaston Naessens.

He flew over to Canada for treatment. He had submitted to no other

form of medical intervention. The result? Ever since, he has enjoyed

perfect health.

“The strategy of the defense attorney Chapdelaine, was emerging”

wrote Bird. “... So far, he had lined up a doctor of medicine from France,

who had boldly committed himself to treating patients with 714-X; a

widely known Quebec writer; a US businessman; and an engineer from

central Europe, and the man from Austria.”

The next witness, had yet another unusual story to tell. Arnault de

Kerckhove Varent, a handsome man, had one dysfunctional eye. He

recounted that in the late 1970s, he had been diagnosed with a melanoma

of the eye. Cancer surgeons had recommended what technically

is known as an ‘enucleation’: cutting the eyeball out of its socket. Varent

asked what he could expect, by way of survival time, if he refused

the operation. ‘Nine to twelve months,’ he was told. ‘And if I submit

to it? he asked. ‘Then you begin to pray!’ He instead decided to seek

what he called ‘systemic’ treatment. Bird says:

“At last, he heard about Naessens’s product. Varent traveled to the

port city on the Gulf of Mexico, where, at the Andrade Clinic, he was

injected intralymphatically with 714-X … The diagnosis was melanoma.

Varent’s tumor was, as the Greek word mela denotes, ‘black’

in color, but, after the first set of twenty-one injections, it …turned

amber, “suggesting that the body’s immune system was destroying

[the malignant cells] in a natural way.”

“Varent also reported in court that, subjectively speaking, after the

first series of treatments had reached only its fifteenth day, he began

to feel a whole lot better than he had for months….”

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

50

For his second round of injections he learned how to

do it himself – as you can see on Youtube. He then

went to Ottawa to see a doctor friend, who introduced

him to an eye specialist colleague. The second

doctor, he claimed, was ‘utterly flabbergasted’ to learn

that Varent had survived melanoma for almost four

years. “I simply can’t believe it,” he declared, “You

should have metastases all over your body, by now,

right down to your big toes!” Bird writes:

“The physician asked Varent if he would consent to come to a special

meeting of eye doctors. At the meeting, he sat on a chair in the middle

of a room, his head covered to reveal only his affected eye, where every

one of the some forty specialists assembled took a careful look at it. All

agreed that they were witnesses to what amounted to an impossibility.”

Suzanne Berthiaume took the stand next. She had been diagnosed

with breast cancer on 5 December 1988, and a radical mastectomy

was recommended. Having been given no promise of cure, she opted

for Naessens’ method. Starting a week after she had got the first diagnosis

she took three sets of twenty-one injections of 714-X. That

was from 12 December 1988, to the end of April 1989, or just about

one month before Naessens’ arrest as a charlatan and a quack. “Since

then, I have had a tremendous feeling of well-being, even a renewed

lust for life.”… Berthiaume said, under oath.

For his final witness, Maitre Chapdelaine called a man who, when

asked what his occupation was, said “judge.” Bird observed:

“That a judge of the court of the province of Quebec had decided

to appear on behalf of a defendant accused of a crime that, might

incarcerate him for life seemed most unlikely. Moreover, it surely must

have imparted a general feeling that the whole weight of provincial

justice and law was by no means solely directed to proving Naessens’s

criminality.”

The Verdict

In summing up his case for the jurors, the prosecutor, Monsieur

Melancon, said that they must consider whether Naessens was

“peddling despair,” and abusing people’s confidence.

CHAPTER 3 BURZYNSKI AND NAESSENS

51

Judge Peloquin then spent five hours talking to the jury, reading

back the notes he had taken of every witness! His Honor repeatedly

emphasized for that for each one of the five charges, a verdict

doubt.”

After that, a well-known singer from France, Gilles Vigneault,

our words of love.)

It took the jury only an hour to decide the came the fate of the

somatid-discoverer who had healed many people (and not just of

cancer but AIDS and other life threatening ailments.) The court

Christopher Bird writes: “Francoise Naessens sat silently weeping,

her head bowed almost to her knees. As for Gaston Naessens,

he told me that, as each ‘Not guilty’ decision rang through the

courtroom, he felt as if five heavy stones, placed on top of his

body were, one by one, being removed.”

A Seat-of-the-Pants Evaluation

Before I found Bird’s book, I sought out “the public record.”

Let us not hesitate if that means going to Youtube. I went

there and typed “Naessens.” Got two videos: one by 20 year

old Kathleen Hartley, and one by 34 year old David Tromly.

I found them very persuasive re having had their cancer cured.

Both those persons have Massachusetts accents and I have to admit

to being able to trust “my people” (I grew up in Boston) in the

way that every ethnic group does. We’re best able to spot a faker

among our own, as we know what the agreed upon standard of

honesty is for “us locals.”

I do understand that every testimonial-giver could be straight

from Central Casting. Or, as the ACS loves to say, the person’s

cure may have come about by other means. Indeed. Still, one

one must ultimately form a judgment.

Of the curers ahead, I think Becker, Crile, Beard, and Gerson

did the great job of walking us through their thought processes.

Their written record makes it possible for their work to be duplicated

and/or criticized.

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

52

We Need To Analyze Disinformation, Every Time!

When I first wrote this chapter, I was gung-ho Stash and Gaston.

I now have doubts. This is not to say that their cures don’t work.

I assume they do! It is also not to say that they are bad guys. So

far as I know they’re just fine. But there are holes in their stories,

and this must be honestly confronted.

sketched out a chart showing each scientist’s theory and his cure.

It then dawned on me that the Naessens cure, the 714-X, has

nothing to do with his big discovery – the somatids! Also, I was

startled to read, in the obituary of Christopher Bird (the author

of the book abut Naessens’ trial), that Bird was CIA.

That changes everything. A US Intelligence officer has no business

helping a Frenchman or a Canadian “fight the Establishment.”

OSS had, as its unofficial members, the whole of the wealthy

class of America.) So what was Bird up to?

In his day job, Bird was a journalist. He claims that Naessens

asked him to attend the trial since he is bilingual. Mr and

Mrs Naessens had already hosted Bird for a few days when he

was making a world survey of pleomorphist theorists. (They also

hosted Ralph Moss and David Hess.) The subtitle of the Trial

book is: “The True Story of the Efforts To Suppress an Alternative

Treatment for Cancer, AIDS, and Other Immunologically

Based Diseases.” Hmm.

I am now re-thinkng Gaston’s younger days. He supposedly

made a truly sophisticated microscope. Could you make one? He

says some German technologists helped him. Ah, then there is

somebody else in on the deal. If they are in on the all-important

microscope, they are perhaps in on the somatid story.

Another thing that belatedly seems “off ” to me is the sworn

testimony by Witness 2, that he had sat in a room as 40 ocular

specialists came to look at his miraculously healed eye. Was that

on a Sunday? If a working day, how would so many doctors be

free to show up? Frankly, I don’t accept that part of the story.

And if it were perjured testimony, that’s a felony, you know.

Note: I feel bad blaming Chris Bird. His personality shines out

as that of a good man. Maybe he was forced into it. They say you

can never quit the CIA however much you want to. Sad!

CHAPTER 3 BURZYNSKI AND NAESSENS

53

human trait as working all alone, going against the grain, surviving

with no supporters, etc. (I should know?) But Stash did have

at least one secret friend. Recall Thomas Elias telling us how,

when Burzinski was getting conscripted into the Commie military,

someone came along with the documents for him to enter

US. You may think we do that for genius discoverers, as we do

for champion atheletes -- why not? -- but Stash was young and

hadn’t yet made any important discoveries. So why single him out

for emigration? Elias says the same man showed up later in Texas

just when Stash was in need of career advice.

I went to the excellent website: patentgenius.com, and found

some amazing patents by Stash that are not mentioned in Elias’s

1998 book. Did you know Dr B invented an anti-cancer toothpaste

in 1993? That patent has just expired. And one for autoimmune

diseases! By the way, there’s another website, freshpaptent.

com, which lets you subscribe to emails announcing new patents

in any area -- such as cancer.

of the doctor may be meant to be a tool of disempowerment.

After all, seeing a family lose a young child when a doctor

is capable of saving her, but is prevented by the bureaucracy, is

about as disempowering as you can get.

Many news stories have no basis at all. They are made up. The

purpose is to fill the canvas on which we see our world, the details

having been created by slaves working for the cabal.

Have you seen the M&M commercial in which a couple is having

quite a verbal fight, and furniture gets thrown out onto the

street? The alleged message is that they are “breaking up.” This

is supposed to tie in with the candy manufacturer trying to get

us to buy M&M in separate colors. They have “broken up” the

mixed bag of green, red, and blue M&M’s.

idiotic cabal wants to condition us toward tossing our spouse out

the door. They’d like us to be bereft of the security of family.

In Australia we say “Rupe (media magnate Murdoch) controls

everything.” But shareholders vote for his policies. And the

granting of licenses for TV broadcast is up to us, via parliament.

Fact is, we are all in this business together.

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

54

DCA and Evangelos Michelakis, MD, of Alberta

So far, we’ve met three cancer curers: Livingston, Burzynski,

Naessens, and now a fourth, Michelakis.

There’s a rumor that it used to be an independent life form, but

somehow took up residence in our animal ancestors. It has a role in

metabolism. Some children have “mitochondrial disease” in which

the signaling is faulty. A medication, dichloroacetate

--DCA -- is prescribed for them.

Professor Evangelos Michelakis, MD,

has found that DCA may helps cancer patients.

To get an idea of his pitch, I tapped

into Pubmed. This is an important source,

funded by Yankee taxpayers, as it gives you

an abstract for every medical article. Let’s see

associated with the resistance to apoptosis that characterises cancer.

[Note: Apoptosis is good. You want the cancer cells to die and this

natural phenomenon, apoptosis is called “cell suicide.”] … The generic

drug dichloroacetate is an orally available small molecule that ... reverses

by Eyal Gottlieb, PhD, of University of Glasgow. There’s

also a website called “thedcasite.com” -- it’s advocacy. On Youtube,

Michelakis obsequiously bows to the god-almighty requirement

that there be a double-blind (what the heck, make it a triple-blind)

clinical trial. There’s also a yelling session by Glenn Beck about the

fact that “we won’t be allowed” to get DCA because Pharma will

prevent us. He says a clinical trial costs a BILLION dollars.

Total nonsense. See how our brains have been turned off?

Dear Reader, do you have cancer today? I have a cure for you.

The cure is to get your neighbors to turn their brains back on.

A word about mammon. I do not subscribe to the popular idea

that money is driving the suppression of cancer. I think chatting

about that is a distractive technique. Anyway, isn’t “Big Pharma”

made up of millions of shareholders -- me and thee?

CHAPTER 3 BURZYNSKI AND NAESSENS

55

Joie de Vivre – Seriously!

Things don’t have to be negative. Maybe the 20th century went

downhill, but the 21st can be fantastic. Has there been joy in the

human species’ past? Then there can be joy again, since the basis

for the joy – our emotional apparatus – is still here, unchanged.

Some people, as we’ve seen so far, have done terrible things to

the health of the citizenry. And there are worse to come in this

book. Much worse. You’ll see that I am always trying to take their

crimes seriously, recommending that we show some muscle in

the punishment department. Nevertheless, the fastest way for us

to get on top of our problemos today is to imagine a marvelous

mañana. Or at least a mañana less ludicrous than the one being

planned for us!

56

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

The Multiple Wave Oscillator, invented by Georges Lakhovsky

Georges Lakhovsky (1869-1942)

57

CHAPTER 4 BIOELECTRICS

Chapter 4

Bioelectrics: Rife, Becker, Lakhovsky, Crile, Olney, Ott

How’re we doin’ on Part One’s title “Upbeat beyond Belief ”? In

this chapter we’ll witness some breathtaking cancer cures, by six

men. Three of them are doctors: Robert O Becker, an orthopedic

surgeon; General George Crile, (I mention his military rank so no

one will think I am referring to his son George Crile, Jr., the critic

of mastectomy); and Robert Olney, a GP from Nebraska. The

non-doctors are: Royal Rife, a man trained in optics; Georges

-- John Ott, a famous photographer.

Royal Raymond Rife (1888-1971)

The fate that befell Royal Rife is something we should protect

all scientists from in future. He did great work and then was cast

aside. His equipment was taken by government and his friend

John Crane was subjected to a lawsuit. (See Rife’s deposition in

Exhibit J.) Rife’s wife died young. Not that Lakhovsky fared better;

he was hit by a limousine, which I take to be murder. Crile was

left for dead in a small plane crash – but he survived.

In the 1930s, Rife was called upon by Milbank Johnson, MD,

a prominent physician, to strut his electric stuff at a pilot clinic

at the Scripps estate, San Diego. Sixteen very ill cancer patients

were brought in, and after Rife zapped their cancer microbes (yes,

microbes), 14 walked away happy. The other two are said to have

recovered later. You can’t beat that percentage, can you?

It is important to know that Rife is not an urban legend. Later

in this chapter you will see a 1944 piece from the Smithsonian

Institution. It is about Rife’s microscope and his pleomorphism,

not his cancer cure, but at least it anchors him in history.

full text is on the Internet and in Barry Lynes’ 1987 book. (I’ve

58

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

bolded the bits where I couldn’t control my excitement.):

some type of microorganism.… After the isolation of the filtered

virus the idea was conceived, that it would be possible to create

an electronic frequency that was in the correct coordination or

and to devitalize [it] with said frequency.

The initial frequency instrument of this nature was first used

virus …was an accomplishment with which I felt a great deal of

pride. Finally in 1931, I discovered the transformation of cancer

No tissue is destroyed, no pain is felt, no noise is audible, and

no sensation is noticed. A tube lights up and 3 minutes later the

treatment is completed. The virus or bacteria is destroyed and the

. …We believe and have proven to our satisfaction that the socalled

virus is in reality the premodal [?] cell of a micro-organism.

We also have proven that it is the chemical constituents and

The experiments of 1931 and 1932. After many attempts to

grow the cancer virus had failed, …the growth method of cancer

virus was found. A test tube containing a sample from the unulcerated

breast mass was sealed and placed in an argon gas filled

loop with 15 mm vacuum and activated with 5000 volts… (This

media was of tyrode solution and desiccated slime intestine). This

test tube was then checked for cancer virus, but at this point none

were visible. Then the test tube was subjected to a 2-inch water

vacuum and incubated for 24 hours.

Upon examination the solution in the test tube was teeming

with cancer virus which were the most highly motile and the

smallest in size of any of the viruses previously isolated. These

cancer viruses refracted a purplish red color. That proved that the

virus was pathological. We did this a hundred times with the same

results. We sincerely believe that this leaves no doubt as to the fact

hopeless cases were signed off as clinically cured by the staff of

five doctors and Dr. Alvin G. Foord, MD, pathologist.”

59

CHAPTER 4 BIOELECTRICS

James Clerk Maxwell Nicola Tesla Robert O Becker, MD

(1831-1879) (1856-1943) (1923-2008)

It Didn’t Start with Ben Franklin and Tom Edison, OK?

In 1825, Michael Faraday gave the London “Christmas lectures”

to an audience of rapt teenagers. Those lectures have been digitalized

by Microsoft. In the preface thereto, W Cooke writes:

“When God created the elements of which the earth is composed,

He created certain wondrous forces, which are set free

and become evident when matter acts on matter. All these forces

have much in common, and if one is set free it will immediately

endeavor to free its companions….We find that all the forces in

nature tend to form mutually dependent systems.”

Faraday had left school at age 14. He and James Clerk Maxwell

brought us the science of electro-magnetics. Another important

person, Nicola Tesla, had amazing insights into the nature of the

universe and the method by which lightning is made. Yes, lightning

as in what you thought only God could make. Everybody

and his cousin is making lightning nowadays. And “death rays”

are in most of the latest weaponry. So it’s important that we not

make the woo-woo noise when anyone mentions “rays.” See

Mary Efrosini Gregory on this. (Exhibit X - it’s hot stuff.)

Becker – Why It Pays To Be an Orthopedic Surgeon

Becker’s work as a cancer curer is presented in Exhibit O. Here

that phenomenon? It’s when God sends a message down the myelin

sheath of your peripheral nerves toward a hurt area of the

body. The purpose is to speed healing, electrically. (Think lily.)

60

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

Robert O Becker, MD, was an orthopedic surgeon at a Veteran’s

Administration hospital in Syracuse, NY. He had been fascinated

since medical school by the fact that only one vertebrate, the

salamander, can regenerate a limb. Spallanzani had reported that

fact in 1768! A question any intellectual might ask is “Why this

vertebrate, and not others?” If the intellectual works with disabled

soldiers, he might say “Betcha five dollars if we figure out

how salamanders do it, we can make humans do it, too.”

(Warning: if you were disgusted to learn that cancer is curable

will you feel on hearing that the code for regenerating bone is

also hushed up?) By 1961, Becker had figured out how the salamanders

do it, and by 1971 was able to do it for mammals. A

huge event, right? Hugely huge. Right up there with the garden

That Be wanted us to stay unaware of bio-electrics.

Becker’s 50-year-old article “Bioelectric Factors in Amphibian

Limb Regeneration” doesn’t help us with cancer. I’ve discussed

Becker here to show that he is a trustworthy scientist. (His assistant

Andrew Marino also wins my trust. He had to get a law

degree, on top of his PhD in physics, to cope with the onslaught

from National Institutes of Health, NIH, when he and Becker

found overhead power lines to be carcinogenic.)

Note: I am emphatically NOT endorsing magnets, but George

Crile made a remark about them and Becker said almost exactly

the same thing, as follows:

“With direct currents, the EEG continued to show delta waves

for as long as a half hour after the current was turned off….

It seemed to us that we’d discovered the best possible anesthetic,

allowing prompt recovery with no side effects. [Holy wow!]

We proposed getting bigger electromagnet to try this method on

larger animals and eventually humans, but we never even got a

reply…. Reactions by living things to magnetic fields were absolutely

out of the question in America at that time.” (1985: 114)

Becker lost his job (as they all do) when he was 56. Thus, soldiers

at the VA lost a caring surgeon. As you will see in Exhibit

O, Becker put a bit of time into curing cancer, via silver ions. I

don’t think he did enough in that area for us to say “Jackpot.” But

enough to say Let’s look further at the subject.

61

CHAPTER 4 BIOELECTRICS

The electrically generated silver ion was doing something more than

killing bacteria it was also causing major growth stimulation of tissues

in the wound. When we finally tracked down exactly what was

happening, we found that as human fibroblast cells (which are common

throughout the body) were exposed to the electrically generated

silver ions, they dedifferentiated. They were then able to multiply at a

great rate, producing large numbers of primitive, embryonic cells in

the wound even in patients over fifty years of age.

These “uncommitted” cells were then able to differentiate into whatever

cell types were needed to heal the wound. So what we were in

fact doing was turning on regeneration in human tissues, which I had

thought we would never be able to do. In our previous studies of regeneration,

we had found that in human beings, only bone-marrow

cells could dedifferentiate. … The dedifferentiation of the abundant

fibroblast cells by electrically generated silver ions may provide us with

the means to restore regeneration to human patients….

If the electrically generated silver ion dedifferentiated normal human

fibroblast cells, would it also dedifferentiate human cancer cells?

If so, we would have a way to duplicate, in humans, S. Meryl Rose’s

experiments… in which dedifferentiated cancer cells dedifferentiated

as normal cells. A lack of funds prevented us from completing this

work. However, we did find that some human cancer cells in culture

appeared to dedifferentiate when exposed to these silver ions.

I also had a patient with a severe, chronic bone infection who had an

associated cancer in the wound. He refused amputation, …and insisted

that I treat his infection with the silver technique. After three months,

the infection was under control, and the cancer cells in the wound appeared

to have changed back to normal. When I last heard from him,

eight years after the treatment, he was still fine.

It is important to realize that this is not simply an electrical effect,

but the result of the combined action of the electrical voltage and the

electrically generated silver ions. It is an electrochemical treatment.

While we do not have firm evidence at this time, what probably

happens is that the silver ion is shaped so as to connect with some

receptor group on the surface of the cancer-cell membrane. After that

connection is made, an electrical-charge transfer sends a signal to the

nucleus of the cancer cell that activates the primitive-type genes, and

the cell dedifferentiates. In that state it awaits instructions as to what it

is to become. The process is exactly the same as that in S Meryl Rose’s

[salmander] experiments except that in this case the dedifferentiation is

caused by the unexpected action of the positive silver ions.

62

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

to with the flick of a dial. But imagine if your radio let you tune

Radio waves have got the lowest energy on the electromagnetic spectrum.

But if you could crank up the energy in radio waves a bit, you’d

and you’d make those waves visible light, then …x-rays.

we tune into TV stations, we don’t talk about their energy but about

fre-quency. Your microwave oven has got a particular frequency (see

In the case of EMR, it’s how often you’d get hit by a wave of radiation

if you stood in its way. Right now you’re probably being pummelled by

radio waves and visible light. All radiation travels at the same speed —

the speed of light. Radio waves have the long wavelengths: a few

metres to miles long. And for every wavelength there’s a corresponding

frequency. Electromagnetic radiation is always produced in the same

produced when electrons drop to a lower energy level in an atom. Every

bit of matter in the universe emits radiation, including you. Warm

things like us give off body heat, and that heat energy travels as infrared

radiation. So you’re actually emitting higher energy radiation right now

than your remote control or microwave oven. But don’t get too cocky;

although we make higher energy radiation than our appliances, we don’t

pump out nearly enough of the stuff to do anything more useful than

hug with it. Just ask anyone who’s tried to boil an egg in their armpit.

THE ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM

The radiation behind radios, visible light and nuclear blasts is all exactly

the same thing, just with different amount of energy:

Radio Microwave Infrared Visible Ultra Violet X-ray Gamma ray

-- Bernie Hobbes, Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

63

CHAPTER 4 BIOELECTRICS

Georges Lakhovsky (1869-1942), Russian Engineer

Two Georges, Lakhovsky and Crile, were born in the 1860s. They

knew of each other’s work; they make reference to it. (Becker,

born in 1923, seems not to have heard of either.) They spoke of

the electric properties of all living cells. It seems that every cell is

both a receiver and transmitter of waves.

Ah, waves. How my mother used to loathe it when Dad set

up his big short-wave radio on the dining room table and had

to string wires up into the chandelier for “reception.” Little did

Mom or I know that we are all getting reception all the time,

much less that out health can be considerably affected by this!

Lakhovsky invented a Multiple Wave Oscillator, US Patent #

1,962, 565, which gave relief to arthritis sufferers. It’s a metal

antenna that is round in shape, and can be worn by animals or

humans. In the case of a cancerous geranium plant, Lakhovsky

encircled it with one of his MWO’s and within 3 weeks the tumors

fell off. Please see photo of this plant in the frontispiece.

In the caption of the photo, I say that I “do not vouch for it.”

That is to call attention of young students to the fact that any

picture can be deceptive. At the time I wrote it, the only book I

had tracked down on Lakhovsky was The Waves that Heal by

Mark Clement. The name made me wary, as I thought it may be

a pseudonym for Samuel Clemens (known as Mark Twain). He

palled around with Nikola Tesla and probably worked for British

Intelligence. Subsequently I got a hold of The Secret of Life

(1935) by Lakhovsky. It was translated by Clement, but contains

a Preface by the great physicist-physician D’Arsonval. He says

Lakhovsky’s cures were reported to the French Academy of Science

in 1928; you can verify that much.

There will be more about Lakhovsky in Chapter 12. For now

it’s enough to say that he had a cure for cancer, if only in plants.

Before we discuss Crile, please take a moment to ponder the

from an infinite distance to a given point.

unspecialized form. May occur in development of cancers.

64

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

George Crile, MD (1864-1943)

How many doctors do you know that go on

African safari for the purpose of being able

to measure and compare the weight of the

thyroid and adrenal glands of game-hunted

species? Not that many, huh? And of those,

how many attained the rank of general in

the army for laying out the best plan for

battlefield hospitals? Could any of them

perform surgery while temporarily blinded?

Meet George Washington Crile, born in Ohio. His theory of cancer

is laid out in its entirety in Exhibit F. This is a snippet of it

from his autobiography (1947: 430)

“When any cells are injured an increased stimulation or electric current

is induced, this “current of injury” being an important factor in the

repair of injured cells. Since all the tissues of the body are negative as

compared with the brain, this negative sign of charge being bestowed

upon the cells by the red blood cells which have the highest negativity

in relation to the brain of any tissues, when a current of injury reaches

the injured epithehelial cells, it raises their negative potential, their conductivity

and their capacity far above their normal status. The purpose

of this current of injury is to repair the injured cells, but if the cells

have been injured to the extent that their power to function has been

lost, only the power of growth is left.

Thus the injured cell in which the power of function has been lost

is stimulated to growth alone, and that power of growth and multiplication

is greater than that received by its uninjured neighbors….

the cancer cells would continue to multiply and because of their higher

potential, their greater conductivity and capacity, would invade neighboring

tissues or be carried by the blood and lymph streams to find

lodgment in distant tissues.”

Please permit a bit more bio from me. In 1976, when I was 29, I

was thunderstruck by a then hot-off-the-press book, EO Wilson’s

gobsmacked again, by a book published in … 1926! Well, that is

is an honor for me to be able to present his work, the suppression

of which has been a pretty gobsmacking thing in itself. There’ll be

more on Crile in Chapter 12.

65

CHAPTER 4 BIOELECTRICS

The Hyde Park Hypothesis

Interruption for good news! Maybe you already

know this but I’ve only just learned it.

I was in Sydney with my friend Trish Fotheringham,

who is an expert on dissociation.

As we strolled through beautiful Hyde Park.

I let out a plaintive cry about being unable

to share the cancer-cure ideas even with

friends, as everyone switches off. How is it

that they all do it the same? And why do it?

Isn’t it better to know?

Came back Trish: “There are more than just

the two ways that an animal deals with an attacker

– fight or flight. There is also ‘freeze.’

For a human this could be when something

comes into the environment that is completely

threatening. Merely an idea that upsets one’s

worldview has the potential to make everything

fall apart, so it must be resisted. The subconscious

tells you to freeze automatically.”

Well, that’s a help. I am now calling it the HPH, the Hyde Park Hypothesis

(Note: Fotheringham says it’s not original with her.) Frankly, I

had thought the entire population had been brainwashed by gremlins in

the TV. Or maybe in the computer. (Or the toaster? You never know.)

Introducing Robert Olney, Cancer Curer of Nebraska

One of the means by which “the baddies” can restrict a doctor –

other than the ones already mentioned, such as revoking his medical

licence – is to see that he loses his hospital privileges. I think this may

be why Robert C Olney, MD, founded his own hospital, in Lincoln

Nebraska, in the 1950s.

In Exhibit L you can see one of his cancer cures. The method he

used is called photopheresis today, but Olney called it “ultraviolet

blood illumination” – UBI for short. He did not invent it. He got it

from George Miley, MD, who published it in the 1940s. I list Olney

rather than Miley as one of the 20 curers in this book, as Miley used

UBI only for diseases other than cancer.

As for Olney’s theory of why it worked, he said he followed Otto

Warburg’s emphasis on oxidation. Warburg (1883-1970) won the

1931 Nobel Prize for “discovery of the nature and mode of action

of the respiratory enzyme.” I exclude him from coverage in this

book to show my disapproval of his uncles, Paul and Max. Sorry.

66

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

Beck, (not to be confused with Bob Becker) will be described

Unbelievably (but so what?), you can cure a person of disease

merely by applying light. You must draw a portion of the person’s

blood out – say 10% -- and then return to quickly to the body.

While it is outside (that is, “extracorporeal”), you subject it to

ultraviolet light. This causes pathogens to be killed. Why should

light work this way? A good answer is “just coz.”

If that does not meet your scientific standards, perhaps a Nobel

prize winner will persuade you. In 1903, the prize was awarded

to Niels Finson, MD. (Unfortunately, he died the next year at

age 44). He cured patients of lupus and tuberculosis (TB) with

the use of UV light. Finson lived in Denmark. No one rushed

to translate his work into English, but George Miley, MD, came

along in the 1930s and performed many cures (on sinusitis, polio,

and peritonitis) and published in proper journals. Robert Olney

copied Miley and used UBI on cancer patients.

Olney said he took inspiration from William Koch, inventor

of glyoxylide, as well as Otto Warburg, the man who discovered

anaerobic metabolism. Thus, Olney took great interest in how

much oxygen his patients had in their veins. The following are

some changes that were registered in the venous oxygen of

patients within 24 hours of Olney’s giving them UBI:

Note: being given a place on my list of 18 is not a sign that

the scientist is original. Presumably no scientist is truly original,

anyway. Robert Olney is expressly using the work of Miley, who

relied on Finsen. In 1997, Richard Edelson of Yale patented a

similar thing called photopheresis. Wm Campbell Douglass,

application did not credit the earlier discoverers.

67

CHAPTER 4 BIOELECTRICS

Introducing “Hopkins Relief”

While researching this book I neglected, at first, to surf PUBMED

(free, taxpayer-paid guide to all medical articles), as I thought

the subject of cancer-cure is always “backyard.” But when I

was writing the chapter on autism, I luckily came across a Johns

Hopkins study that supported my ideas. This was quite a relief.

Subsequently, I have referred to such finds as “Hopkins relief.”

As mentioned, the subject of UBI has a relevant Nobel scientist,

Finson. That’s wonderful Hopkins relief! And harken to this

remark by Sir William Bràgg, also a Nobel laureate, that he made

in a Christmas lecture (a la Faraday) at the Royal Institution. It

“Light is only a narrowly defined part of a far greater

phenomenon, that of radiation in general. Radiations which

are obviously corpuscular, such as the shower of electrons and

photons and atoms now produced so easily in our laboratories

are found today to obey in some measure the laws of light.”

Holy Toledo! I just found “Cancer immunotherapy comes of

discovered “mechanisms of epithelial cell polarity”:

“Activating the immune system for therapeutic benefit in cancer has

long been a goal [!] in immunology and oncology. After decades of

disappointment, the tide has finally changed due to the success of

recent proof-of-concept clinical trials [e.g.,] ability of the anti-CTLA4

increase in survival for patients with metastatic melanoma. In the

context of advances in the understanding of how tolerance, immunity

and immunosuppression regulate anti-tumour immune responses

together with the advent of targeted therapies, these successes suggest

a path to obtain a durable and long-lasting response.”

In Oz we say “It’s like all my birthdays come at once.” And now

FDA has given its approval to photopheresis in one type of

cancer, namely, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma! This is irrespective

Bet they do, though.

68

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

Big John -- Time-Lapse Photographer

How lucky I am to have found another hero: John Ott. He was

famous for his time-lapse photographs of plants – including microscopic

ones that revealed cell-level action of chloroplasts. I

inventing what was needed. Oz was a veritable shed city.)

Ott found that animals and humans are affected in behavior

of the spectrum it is from. He made precise measurements of

how the light we receive may deviate harmfully from the fullspectrum

light (sunshine) in which all mammals evolved. Ott saw

that if artificial light is used – be it incandescent bulbs or fluoro

psychiatric illnesses, such as anxiety or depression. Happily, the

disease may sometimes be corrected by changing the light.

I hereby state my enthusiasm (layperson that I am) about Ott’s

light. That means it is coordinated by electromagnetism. In some

species, the light is received in the pineal gland.

Ott knew that the poultry industry puts ultraviolet light over

hen’s cages to ensure the offspring be mostly female. He worked

with a breeder of chinchillas to vary sex ratio (getting mostly female

births) by using pink light. This worked even when used on

the pregnant mothers only late in the gestation!

can carry in your wallet if you are planning to make off-thecuff

speeches about cure-suppression. He made his discoveries

strictly as an outcome of his assignments in photography, then

earnestly presented them to any doctors or institutions he could

reach. (See Exhibit M). At one point, Charles Shilling, MD, who

wanted to help him, wrote to a mutual friend “I believe we have

something underway at the University of Virginia. But … if John

doesn’t quit curing cancer by shining a light in everyone’s eye, I

am not going to be able to accomplish anything for him.”

69

CHAPTER 4 BIOELECTRICS

…Dr. Royal Raymond Rife of San Diego, California, for many years, has

built and worked with light microscopes which far surpass the theoretical

limitations of the ordinary variety. The largest and most powerful of

these, the Universal Microscope, developed in 1933, consists of 5,682

with separate substage condenser units for transmitted and monochromatic

beam dark-field, polarized, and slit-ultra illumination, including

also a special device for crystallography. …The fine adjustment being

700 times more sensitive then that of ordinary microscopes, the length

of time required to focus the universal ranges up to 1 1/2 hours.

Working together back in 1931 and using one of the smaller Rife

microscope having a magnification and resolution of 17,000 diameters,

Dr. Rife and Dr. Arthur Isaac Kendall, were able to observe and demonstrate

the presence of the filter-passing forms of BACILLUS TYPHOSUS.

….

Dr. Rosenow has declared [it] leaves no doubt of the accurate visualization

of objects or particulate matter by direct observation at the

extremely high magnification. Viruses of primordial cells of organisms

which would ordinarily require an 8-week incubation period to attain

their filterable state, have been shown to produce disease within 3 days’

time, proving Dr. Rife’s contention that the incubation period of a micro-

organism is really only a cycle of reversion. He states:

“In reality, it is not the bacteria themselves that produce the disease,

but we believe it is the chemical constituents of these micro-organisms

enacting upon the unbalanced cell metabolism of the human body that

in actuality produce the disease.”

L to R: Arthur Kendall, PhD, Milbank Johnson, MD, Royal Rife

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

70

PART

TWO

CHAPTER 5 PRESSURES ON DOCTORS

71

Claude Bernard MD

Max Gerson MD

The Law Is Our Friend. Trust Me on This.

Lawrence Broxmeyer MD

Erik Enby MD

Senator C Tobey

Beth Maloney JD

Kate Baldwin MD

Dinshah Ghadiali

SH Shakman PhD

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

72

Survey of Recent Work Bearing on the Pathology

of Cancer and Sarcoma -- March 18, 1893

Parasitic Origin of Cancer -- March 11, 1893

The Etiology of Cancer -- April 14, 1894

The Contagion of Cancer -- Oct. 20, 1894

A Cure for Cancer -- April 6, 1895

An Antitoxin for Carcinoma -- May 4,1895

Alleged Cure of Two Cases by Sero-Therapy

-- May 11, 1895

The Carcinoma Antitoxin -- July 13, 1895

The Fungi of Cancer -- August 3, 1895

Treatment of Inoperable Carcinoma -- March 27, 1897

Dr. Doyen and the Microbe of Cancer -- Jan. 11, 1902

The Etiology and the Treatment of Cancer -- Feb. 1, 1902

Cancer Research -- Sept. 6, 1902

The Contagiousness of Cancer -- Feb. 21, 1903

The Etiology of Cancer -- Feb. 21, 1903

A New Serum for the Treatment of Cancer -- Nov. 14, 1903

Treatment of Inoperable Sarcoma with the Mixed Toxins of

Erysipelas and the Bacillus Prodigiosus -- May 19, 1906

CHAPTER 5 PRESSURES ON DOCTORS

73

Welcome to Part Two: The Law Is Our Friend. First, we’ll see

that the ACS and AMA don’t really have a leg to stand on, legally.

(Sure, they have brass knuckles but that’s a different matter.) Then

we have a chapter with 11 more cancer cures for you to shop, and

a chapter on health, whose cure for polio may have you reaching

for the Yellow Pages to look up “attorney.” The final chapter

proves the unconstitutionality of the FDA, the NIH, and the position

hilariously called “the US Surgeon General.”

The Big Three

There are three standard treatments for cancer in the United

States: surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. As stated in the introductory

chapter of this book, I was under the impression, until

recently, that there were no other choices. And so was my physician

husband, though that was 12 years ago. I was also completely

of The Big Three.

These arguments are: 1. that the act of cutting, in surgery,

makes the cancer spread, 2. that chemo wrecks the immune system,

and 3. that radiation causes genetic mutations that harm

the person’s health. Moreover, it’s a statistically proven fact that

treated patients do not live longer than untreated ones!

You’ll be astonished to hear that the medical profession does

not argue against those facts. They admit them! (Don’t believe

me? Hop to Chapter 16’s articles by J Armitage and J Weeks.)

Yet doctors don’t take what may seem to be the logical step and

say “So let’s abandon surgery, chemo, and radiation.” Perhaps this

is because they are not in a position to make policy for society as

a whole, but are faced with individual patients, and these naturally

expect their doctor to “do something.”

Chapter 5

Pressures on Doctors, and “The American Cancer Society”

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

74

“While oncologists tell their patients that chemo helps prolong

their lives, statistics have revealed that in the case of breast cancer,

chemo even shortened the median life span from 24 months to

22 months, in prostate cancer from 19 months to 18 months.”

-- B. Windham, (referring to U. Abel’s major study, “Chemotherapy:

“Among 41,109 women diagnosed with breast cancer between

1935 and 1982 in Connecticut, 3,984 developed a second cancer,

whereas 2,426 were expected. Women treated with radiation

were at higher risk of developing a second breast neoplasm.”

“We also found that cancer survivors had particularly high risks

of developing a second cancer that we know to be radiationsensitive.

These include breast, colon, lung, thyroid and bladder

cancers,” he said. – Julie Steenhuysen, Reuters, Sep 15, 2010.

“Taking a biopsy often aggravates and stimulates growth, and

does not indicate how any secondary tumors have developed.”

“There seems to be little doubt that cancer can be spread from

the primary site to distant tissues. There are numerous ways that

surgical manipulation could be responsible for this.”

-- Vincent Vita, Director, NCI, and Steven Rosenberg, MD, NCI,

Note, however, George Crile, MD’s interesting explanation, in

Exhibit F, as to why it pays to remove a cancer early.

CHAPTER 5 PRESSURES ON DOCTORS

75

The Pressures on Doctors

All doctors have pressures weighing heavily on them. For example:

1. I have a memory of my husband being in an absolute panic one

night, thinking he may have put on too tight (or too loose, I don’t

recall) the cast on the foot of an injured child. Doctors put on a

lot of casts, any one of which could spark worry. I suppose it’s

the same with every prescription they write. What if they omitted

a decimal point in the dosage?

2. Doctors stand ready to be sued over the most unexpected things.

So not only must they worry about actually making a mistake (e.g.,

putting the cast on too tight), they must expect the unexpected.

There’s nothing to prevent a patient make up from whole cloth an

accusation against a doctor. In fact it happens frequently.

3. Doctors now must worry that the patient will quote some advice

from the Internet (I mean poor quality advice) and that it will

be a delicate matter for the doctor to persuade the patient of the

incorrectness thereof. The doctor has to “watch what she says.”

4. Doctors get pushed around by hospitals. When I lived in NH

doctor, Elizabeth Sanders, who said that she and another local GP

were the only ones “not owned by the Concord Hospital.” I wrote

her a thank-you for her outspokenness. Her colleagues probably

hate being owned. (Hmm. So don’t put up with it!)

5. Doctors have the pressure of club loyalty. George Bernard

Shaw once noted “Every doctor will allow a colleague to decimate

a whole countryside sooner than violate the bond of professional

etiquette by giving him away.” This pressure is based on

instinct; loyalty to kin, though good, is irrational. It would be helpful

if we’d acknowledge the strength of the emotion of loyalty; we

could then see how we might be enslaved to it in a foolish way.

docs did not cause the problem of cancer-cure suppression, but

they had better stop maintaining it, or they will indeed be to blame.

Docs, we want a return to the precious doctor-patient relationship

(and nurse-patient relationship). Your financial dependence

on insurers and government may the main thing that has spoiled

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

76

Where Does the AMA Get Its Legal Power?

Ever since the New Deal of the 1930s, federal power has been

on the increase. However, the up-close-and-personal control of

doctors exerted by the American Medical Association is a creature

of the states. It results from the fact that certain lobbyists were

able to get the states to legislate a role for AMA. I’ll now quote

from the Code (that is, the law as codified) of Ohio, which is

probably quite similar to that of other states:

“4731.01 The governor, with the advice and consent of the

senate, shall appoint a state medical board consisting of twelve

members, eight of whom shall be physicians.

4731.22 [That] board, by an affirmative vote of not fewer than six

of its members, may revoke a certificate [in the case of] violation

of any provision of the code of ethics of the American medical

association.”

It is the Ohio legislature that made that law. However, that

legislature delegates power to a private group, the AMA, whose

subsequent decisions the legislature does not follow up on. That

is a virtual transfer of legislative power, over the people of Ohio,

to the AMA. In my opinion (MM), it ought to be corrected.

Betcha your state constitution has turf-protection for legislators.

The same Ohio law also says that the doctor could lose his

practicing certificate for “failure to maintain minimal standards

treatment of disease” I take that to mean that if challenged, a

doctor could argue his defense on broad scientific principles, as

against the dictates of a particular “school” of medicine.

Note from Fda.gov: Unapproved medical devices may normally

only be used on human subjects through an approved clinical study

in which the subjects meet certain criteria … However, there may

be circumstances under which [you] may wish to use an unapproved

device to save the life of a patient or to help a patient suffering from a

serious condition for which there no other alternative therapy exists.[!]

Patients may have access to investigational devices under one of these

mechanisms: Emergency Use, Emergency Research [be creative here!],

Compassionate Use for Single Patient or for Small Group.

CHAPTER 5 PRESSURES ON DOCTORS

77

a major health problem and diminishing suffering from cancer,

through research, education, advocacy, and service.” Oh yeah? So

what did they do about Robert Lincoln’s success with bacteriophages?

Or John Beard’s pancreatic enzymes? Hmm?

According to Charity Watch (2010) “John Seffrin, CEO of American

Cancer Society, received a $2.2 million salary package, the second

most money given by any charity to the head of it.”

Shame, shame, shame on the ACS, its directors and members.

Shame on any doc who see’s what’s going on and shuts her eyes.

What Is the Sloan-Kettering/ACS Connection?

James Ewing, MD, played many roles. He co-founded the Memorial

Sloan-Kettering Hospital. (Sloan was CEO of Ford.)

In 1913, Ewing started a business in radium that would, of

course, back the use of radiation treatment, first at SKM then

everywhere. Another director of ACS, Cornelius Rhoads, worked

for the Rockefeller Institute. Wikipedia notes: “Rhoads deliberately

infected patients with cancer cells. Accusations against him

however, later state that the writing was done in a moment of anger

-- his car had been vandalized – and did not reflect anything

he had actually done”

Why is Wikipedia revealing bad stuff now about Rhoads?

it’s to condition us to the idea of killing patients. I noticed that,

just before Abu Ghraib, Time began to chat about torture, and

by now Americans think torture has a place! Social psychology

teaches that you can condition people to anything, by showing it

as normal. Our brains absorb all culture this way.

Youngies, you’ll have to beat these bozos at their own game.

Want to have a better world? Decide what you’d like to have, then

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

78

“Emma’s right breast was removed in 1935. Eight years later she

was found to have cancer in many of her bones. While under

Revici’s treatment her pain disappeared completely. Her bones,

which had turned to jelly, “reconstituted themselves.”

“Francis contracted cancer of the tongue in 1942. The standard

treatment is surgical removal of the tumor, with a loss of part of

the tongue. This cancer is exquisitely painful. Under Revici’s care

the tumor gradually disappeared; he remained well for 13 years.”

“Robbie was brought to the Institute at the age of 6 in October,

1947 with many enlarged lymph nodes and a diagnosis of Hodgkins

disease. After 10 months of treatment she returned home to

Texas with only one small node in the neck.”

“Irving had lost 36 pounds after his surgery for stomach cancer

in 1950. Narcotics were ineffective in relieving the pain. It spread

to his chest. After seeing Revici he responded excellently and evidence

of lung involvement slowly disappeared.”

In a lawsuit similar to that of Langlais v Naessens, Mrs Schneider,

who had breast cancer, sued Dr Revici for luring her away from

conventional treatment. A state court in New York awarded her a

million dollars. Revici appealed, saying she had signed a Covenant

recognizes “a covenant not to sue,” Revici’s written agreement with

the patient was not worded strongly enough. However, it said the jury

“We see no reason why a patient should not be allowed to make

an informed decision to go outside currently approved treatment…

We believe an informed decision to avoid surgery and chemotherapy

is within the patient’s right to determine what should be done with

his own body.” Having expressly assumed the risk, Mrs Schneider

cannot recover damages.

is not injured.

CHAPTER 5 PRESSURES ON DOCTORS

79

Dr. Emanuel Revici treats cancer in a manner unlike any other doctor.

He uses his own medicines. Over the years he has developed over

100 different medications in his own laboratory.

I am a retired board certified radiation oncologist. My practice specialized

in the treatment of cancer with radiation. I have fought at the

front lines in the war against cancer all of my professional life. [While]

battling cancer for my patients, I gradually became rather frustrated

and unhappy with the little progress that has been made.

It became painful seeing my patients every day, knowing that most

of them had very little chance for a cure. On numerous occasions I

saw patients in tears. My practice produced a personal income for me

well into the seven-figure range annually. For four decades our offices

were technologically state-of-the-art.

I first became interested in Emanuel Revici M.D., not from the

medical literature, but from hard evidence - that is, X-rays taken at my

office of one of my patients. I knew his prior condition, because this

was a patient we had seen a year earlier. His cancer of the lung had metastasized

to his bones. The patient told me he had been undergoing

treatment by a Dr. Revici in Manhattan…. I arranged to meet with him

at his office. He was already 90-years-old.

He showed me enough before and after X-rays and CT scans…

Since those early meetings, I have reviewed the records, X-rays, CT

scans and biopsy reports of dozens of Dr. Revici’s patients. Often,

when Dr. Revici provided me with information on a patient I would attempt

to confirm it with the patients previous physicians. I soon found

out that every time Dr. Revici had provided me with information regarding

a patient it would turn out to be correct.

I must interject a brief story at this point. When I met Dr. Revici I

was sixty-two-years-old. My PSA reading, the screening test for prostate

cancer, was 6.2. I told Dr. Revici about my PSA score, so he gave me

one of his medications. After taking the medicine for a year, my PSA

reading fell to 1.6. There were no apparent ill effects. After a few years

of being off the medicine, my latest PSA score has inched up to 2.5.

I am now of the opinion that Dr. Revici has something worthy of

a thorough clinical trial. I made a presentation at the Congressional

hearing in March of 1988. At that time I proposed a study to test Dr.

Revici’s method for treating cancer. The fact that he has helped so

many people means its time for Mr. and Mrs. America to push for a

clinical trial of his method.

--Seymour Brenner, M.D., F.A.C.R., Foreword to William Eidem,

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

80

of the American Cancer Society to suppress cancer cures came

about from the simple device of writing to y’all to let you know

that the cure in question was an “unapproved method.” Aren’t

you able to make medical decisions on your own?

All their letters are alike. Typically, when ACS says the work

was investigated it gives no names of the investigators! The following

sample is from Wallace Janssen, who started the National

Congresses on Quackery. He also worked for the FDA, which

gives you an idea of that agencies mental life. I’ll italicize the bits

where psychological tactics are being used on physicians. Don’t

rule out that they may be using hypnosis here!

FDA has put hundreds of such “cures” out of business.

Koch claimed his medicine contained 1 part of a chemical called glyoxylide.

Moreover, there was no evidence that glyoxylide in any amount had any

The defense had 104 witnesses who said the products were effective

for 69 different diseases, with special emphasis on cancer, tuberculosis,

and coronary thrombosis.

Krebiozen is manufactured from the blood serum of horses inoculated

Krebiozen had an aura of high scientific prestige. It was sponsored by

Dr. Andrew Ivy of the University of Chicago, who had joined with

hero battling against the “medical trust.” -- Janssen 1977

CHAPTER 5 PRESSURES ON DOCTORS

81

Off-Label Prescribing

A doctor may have more leeway than she realizes, in regard to FDA’s

stranglehold on the cancer issue, thanks to the possibility of off-label

prescribing. She may prescribe for her cancer patient a drug that isn’t

Tabarrok:

“The FDA is the final authority on a drug’s approved uses, which are

indicated on its label. [Yet] once a drug has been approved for some

use, the FDA has almost no control over how that drug is actually

prescribed. The prescribing of drugs for non-FDA-approved uses, is

widespread.

“A number of studies have documented the extent of off-label prescribing

in a variety of medical fields. According to a 1991 study by US

General Accounting Office, 56 percent of cancer patients have been

given non-FDA-approved prescriptions, and 33 percent of all prescriptions

in cancer treatment were off-label.

percent) are prescribed drugs off-label…A survey of more than one

thousand patients receiving antidepressants found that a majority of

usage (56 percent) was for conditions other than those for which the

FDA had approved the drugs (Streator 1997).

“Similarly, a survey of fifty-five dermatologists found that every one

of them commonly wrote off-label prescriptions, even though many

believed (incorrectly) that they were at risk of legal action from the

FDA by doing so (Li and others 1998).

“Significantly, in the medical literature on off-label use, the main issue

discussed is not the utility of off-label prescribing, about which virtually

all physicians agree, but rather the issue of reimbursement. The

GAO (1991) found that 62 percent of doctors had admitted patients

to hospitals rather than treating them as outpatients solely in order to

circumvent these policies. Another 23 percent of doctors reported that

they had been forced to change their preferred treatment regimes.”

[That is outrageous!]

Bulletin: a judge of the Second Circuit federal appeals court ruled

in December, 2012 in favor of a representative of a pharmaceutical

firm in a way that supports off-label prescribing. It was pitched as a

First Amendment case in which the rep, Alfred Caronia said his free

’mazing!

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

82

Loads of Opportunity for Fresh Research

Note to medical students: don’t ever think the universe has been

conquered. There is so much that is waiting for your attention.

I bumped into a 1928 article while in Canberra at the National

Library, entitled “Cancer and Acquired Resistance to TB,”

by Thomas Cherry, MD. He noticed, in census records, that increases

in cancer deaths correlated spookily with decrease in TB

deaths. He figured that persons who got cancer late in life had

details about his son, Tom Cherry, FRS (1898-1966):

None could ever question Cherry’s sincerity in doing what he thought

right, even if unpopular. He was a man of principle. …Cherry was a

strong and fearless character. Yet he was also among the gentlest of

men. The furthest he ever went toward expressing displeasure was a

faint flicker of an eyebrow which rarely failed to quell anyone who ventured

too far in directions he did not approve of. He was a man of austere

integrity, He loved the Australian countryside. He tramped almost

everywhere in Victoria. He lived a vigorous and disciplined life with

few frills. His notes state: “My love of camping and mountaineering

connects in one direction with ‘do it yourself ’ and in another directionvia

the shapes of hills-with geometry and mathematics.” –obit by Prof

Keith Bullen, University of Melbourne

Tom was a professor of mathematics. His father, Thomas Cherry,

MD, is the TB-and-cancer man. Of that older man, Jill Stowell, a

grandchild says, “He had an extremely lively mind.” A physician,

he was also state director of agriculture. Holy cow!

Note that before research was “funded,” scholars with ideas

worked from the heart. Cherry had a mathematical mind, like his

son. Hence his noticing that cancer patients who hadn’t die of

TB might have a resistance thereto. Recall that Livingston gave

some cancer patients the BCG vaccine that immunizes against

TB. Hmm. And Tenison Deane, who’ll be discussed in the following

chapter, believed something was cooking with TB, cancer,

and syphilis. To follow up on Cherry, try the 616.99072 section

of the library. Could become your Master’s thesis….

Frankly, I brought the whole matter up just to showcase the

word “integrity.” That virtue was touted, pre-1970. Now it is a

lost treasure. Without it we are sinking, and will soon be sunk.

CHAPTER 5 PRESSURES ON DOCTORS

83

Doctors Unmoved by Rocky Hiding the Cancer Cures!

In 1989, Lawrence Dunegan, MD, stepped forward after 20 years

of silence to inform listeners to the Randy Engels radio show

that he was privy to a great secret.

Back in 1969 at a medical dinner in Philadelphia he had heard

a speech by Richard Day, MD, who worked for Rockefeller’s

“Planned Parenthood” organization. The speech is pretty jawdropping,

but even more astounding is the fact that the hundred

or more of doctors in the audience “took it lying down.”

[Dr Day said] “Congress is not going to go along with national

health insurance. …The days of hospital costs would be forced up

so that people won’t be able to afford to go without insurance. …

No longer would the doctor be seen as an individual professional

in service to individual patients. He’d be gradually recognized as a

highly skilled technician.

The job is to include things like executions by lethal injection [of

whom we might wonder].The image of the doctor being a powerful,

independent person would have to be changed…

The solo practitioner would become a thing of the past… Most

doctors would be employed by an institution. As the corporate image

of medical care became more and more acceptable, doctors

would become employees rather than independent contractors. And

along with that, is the employee serves his employer, not his patient.

Day said there would be new diseases to appear which had not

ever been seen before. Would be very difficult to diagnose and be

untreatable, at least for a long time. [Gulf war syndrome?]

He also said: “We can cure almost every cancer right now. Information

is on file in the Rockefeller Institute, if it’s ever decided

that it should be released. But consider -- if people stop dying of

cancer, how rapidly we would become overpopulated. You may as

well die of cancer as something else.”

Cancer treatment would be geared more toward comfort than toward

cure. Ultimately the cancer cures which were being hidden in

the Rockefeller Institute would come to light because independent

researchers might bring them out, despite these efforts to suppress

them. But at least for the time being, letting people die of cancer

was a good thing to do because it would slow down the problem

of overpopulation.” -- Dr Dunegan on Randy Engels’ radio show.

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

84

How Rockefeller Gained Control of Medicine in US

On Youtube.com, American historian Eustace Mullins says:

“I had been studying the monopolies such as the banking monopoly

and the legal monopoly, but I did not realize the medical profession

was also a monopoly. However I came to find out that in the

1800s almost every physician in the US was a homeopathic doctor,

prescribing natural medication. John D Rockefeller decided to

put a stop to that. He favored allopathic medicine, which was of

German origin; it made for three lucrative things: radical surgery,

the production of petroleum-based ‘wonder drugs,’ and lengthy

stays in hospital.”

When Mullins was asked by Bobby Lee how Rockefeller was able

to switch homeopaths to allopaths, he explained that it was a

simple matter of not letting any homeopath join the AMA. Soon,

by going to legislatures and getting control of the accreditation

of medical education, Rocky was able to dictate what would be

taught to every medical student. Wow.

From 1912 to 1947 the ACS was headed by the aggressive

Morris Fishbein. No fan of Hippocrates, he. Do you believe this

was accidental? That the AMA has a corporate plan to be good,

but made a “bad choice” of boss? If so, you are the problem.

The next page displays a simple form. It’s from Minnesota but

police station. The last line says “Execute in Minnesota only”

--you realize they are referring to execution of the arrest warrant.

CHAPTER 5 PRESSURES ON DOCTORS

85

CRACKING DOWN ON MISCREANTS IS AS SIMPLE AS THIS.

Individuals can file a criminal complaint, and so can a self-appointed

grand jury. The following is a Template from the state of Minnesota:

State of Minnesota. County of______Court of ____________

Plaintiff _________ Name and address

Vs.

Name, date of birth and address of defendant, and any aliases

The complainant, being duly sworn, makes complaint to the abovenamed

court and states that there is probable cause to believe that the

defendant committed the following offenses:

Charge 1 Minnesota statute_______ maximum sentence_________

Charge 2 (etc)___________

[Note: To find “Florida law of homicide” just google for that.]

Select complaint type: summons_ or warrant_. Order for detention?

Statement of probable cause:

The complainant states that the following facts establish probable

cause:_________________

Complainant requests that defendant, subject to bail or conditions of

release, be taken into custody pending further proceedings.

Subscribed and sworn to me before the undersigned this day of_____

****

Being authorized to prosecute the offenses charged, I approve this

complaint. From the above sworn facts, and any supporting affidavits,

I, the issuing officer have determined that probable cause exists to

support defendant’s arrest.

****

SUMMONS. Therefore you, the above named defendant, are hereby

summoned to appear at_______ on_________ If you fail to appear

a warrant will be issued for your arrest.

****

To the county sheriff. I hereby order the above named person to be

apprehended and arrested without delay and to be brought before a

judge not more than 36 later than the arrest.

Execute in Minnesota only__ Nationwide__ in bordering states____.

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

86

Ways To Control Any Medical Researcher Who Figures Out

How To Cure Cancer

1. Block her from publishing in “peer”-reviewed journals.

2. Deny his research grant application or request for tenure.

3. Have her state’s licensing board revoke her medical license.

4. Inform all doctors that his cure is a “Non-Proven Method.”

5. Offer a lucrative contract to her indispensable lab assistant.

6. See to it that his patients get the run-around from insurers.

7. Offer to buy up her patent, for the purpose of suppressing it.

8. Deprive him of the supplies he needs to carry out his cure.

9. Legally prevent other doctors from trying his new method.

10. Arrange for a patient to sue her; give this maximum publicity.

11. Smear his reputation, either by innuendo or false statements.

12. Completely misreport the case results she has achieved.

13. Prosecute him for violating FDA rules or for “mail fraud.”

14. Threaten or bribe any of his colleagues who associate with him.

15. Burgle her office, or sabotage her experiments via an accident.

16. Make some sort of attack on her loved ones.

17. Render him disabled.

18. Kill him or her.

CHAPTER 6 SOME GHOST CURERS, AND HAMER

87

The present chapter has, as its object all sublime, to find suitable

punishment for the way our curers are treated. First, additional

curers will be introduced: 9 men and one woman. Then we stir

up some ire about the crimes committed against them. Lastly, we

consider the “psychiatric” theory of cancer of Ryke Hamer, MD.

Ten Ghosts Are Pleased To Address You

Note: I’ve “asked them: speak in conversational style.

causes cells to replicate wildly in cancer is the same thing that was

used by the conceptus to burrow into the wall of the uterus to

secure the placenta there. Because embryology – in any animal

– is my specialty, I made some discoveries that a practicing physician

would not be likely to make. I know that when the human

embryo reaches the age of 2 months, it develops pancreatic enzymes.

These always turn off that conceptus-burrowing mechanism;

after all, the action is no longer needed. Later in life, for

whatever reason, a person might become deficient in pancreatic

enzymes and by golly, the old item, which had been turned off

in his pre-natal days, may kick into action again and start a cancerous

growth. For a cure, all you need to do is give the patient

a particular combination of pancreatic enzymes (I have showed

many doctors how to do it.)

previously of the United States. I got my doctorate in zoology in

1955. I invented Immuno-Augmentation Therapy. Many people

aren’t aware of the pleasant fact that we are built to deal with

our cancer cells! The tumor sends a notice of its existence, as it

were, and the immune system responds. However, in a way, the

Chapter 6

Let’s Hear from Some Ghost Curers, and Hamer

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

88

immune wants to protect those cancer cells, so we have to flip off

that particular switch.

I isolated four factors in the blood. The first two are simply

tumor antibody and tumor complement factor. The other two,

are called blocking and de-blocking protein. I study each patient’s

blood to see his immunity status and make up an appropriate

serum. I have a local doctor inject it every day. By the way it was

my research that led to discovery of TNF (tumor necrosis factor).

I once startled colleagues at a conference by injecting mice whose

tumors then shrunk instantly as they watched.

will take you for a walk in the sunshine so your

electrons can commune with the source. Yes I am

basic. People talk about me as the diet lady, and

indeed cancer thousands of patients have been

saved by the diet of flaxseed and cottage cheese,

but it’s not just that. It’s the beauty of photons

and the way we are tied into the universe!

York. By the time I died, in 1936, I’d already been using my method

successfully for over 40 years. After the death of a 19-yearold-

girl whom I had operated on for bone cancer, I went into the

archives of my hospital and looked up all the bone cancer cases.

All had died, except one man. He had a skin infection, erysipelas,

before antibiotics, so he had to wait it out.

Guess what. When he recovered, his tumors also disappeared!

So I decided, in 1891, to try this deliberately. I injected a patient

with live erysipelas germs. It caused a high fever and resulted in a

cancer cure. To improve the rate of success I mixed the strep with

Hodgkin’s, and melanoma thus enjoyed almost a two-thirds

success rate. I don’t know why the other third failed.

By the way I was close pals with John Rockefeller.

to call Yugoslavia. I believe that every living cell contains something

that regulates its replicating activity. The American Cancer

Society has made fun of my connection to a horse disease called

CHAPTER 6 SOME GHOST CURERS, AND HAMER

89

“lumpy jaw,” but you can call me Lumpy Jaw if you wish – I don’t

mind. I saw that some horses on my father’s farm got a facial tumor

from fungus; it was occasionally fatal. It occurred to me that

in the many cases that recovered, there must be something in the

horse that tackles the disease naturally.

Eventually I figured out how to withdraw, from the horses,

the substance that was doing this important job. After bottling

it as “krebiozen,” I sought the help of Professor Andrew Ivy in

the permeability of the cell, or the enzyme systems of the cells.

When it’s deficient, anaerobic oxidation increases. The result is

uncontrolled growth. Anyway, Krebiozen naturally occurs in the

body in the reticuloendothelial cells. I’m referring to the spleen,

lymph nodes, and so forth that support the immune system. It

may destroy your malignant cells; these are then are removed by

phagocytosis (pronounced fah-jo-sy-to-sis). By the way, I don’t

speak much English.

1967 at age 82.

(Please don’t confuse me with “Koch’s postulates”

-- that’s my Uncle Robert.) Removal of

the parathyroid gland is bad news. I noticed, in

dogs, that the urine after such removal contained

a lot of lactic acid. That told me that the process

of oxidation had been hampered, and therefore toxic substances,

such as methyl guanidine, accumulated in the body. Why?

Because when the parathyroid is injured, poisonous substances

develop from a previously useful substance, specifically from a

hormone, which I found to be methyl-cyanimide. I take seriously

the word of Otto Warburg, that an oxygen deficiency explains

I invented a compound called Glyoxylide. The province of British

Columbia lauded me for the good effect this had on farm animals.

Also many doctors used it with success on polio and cancer.

The mechanism? I told you: it delivers oxygen.

around 1911, everybody and his cousin thought cancer was

caused by a microbe. Therefore, my treating patients successfully

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

90

with a serum should not have come as a surprise, except that just

around that time the notion of the cancer microbe began to be

denounced. Be that as it may, I succeeded in many cases and they

were all registered and studied at the Stomach Hospital in Toronto.

Using Koch’s postulates, I took samples from cancer patients,

cultured them in the lab, injected them into horses, and then created

a serum from the horses’ blood. The fact that it worked

proves that cancer is bacterial in nature, wouldn’t you agree?

During my lifetime I did something that was a bit dishonorable.

I made use of the brilliant experiments created by my lab technician

Tom Deaken without giving him credit. Later, M. J. Scott, a

surgeon, carried on my work, as is excellently chronicled by Mark

J. Boesch. See my report, too -- 3,000 cases no less.

I was only 55 when I died “suspiciously”

in 1954.

Many of my patients had sinus infections, the

germs of which I decided to culture. I found two

Each of these, which I call Alpha and Beta, has

one and only one strain of virus as a partner. The virus treats the

staph as a refuge in which it can live and grow; then they go out

and harm the tissue of their choice. I note that Alpha can metamorphose

into a Beta strain and that the Alpha virus can destroy

not only its host (the Staph germ) but the Beta germ as well, but

the latter could not do the same. What the heck is that all about?

Clinically, I inject, every 48 hours, a virus. Not only does this

relieve the sinus problem, it gets rid of other ailments the person

may have, such as arthritis, angina, or deafness! Changes in weather

bring a change of symptoms. I believe that the nasal passage

is natural chamber of bacteriophages (eaters of bacteria), but the

obstruction by swollen mucous membranes hinders their work.

My success rate (non-cancer) is 95%. As it happened, I cured

a young man of cancer whose father was US Senator Charles

Tobey. In gratitude he sought (unavailingly) to get action against

those who were holding back such cures.

York in 1959, a sort of death you might want to look into if you

know what I mean. Arsenic was found in my body.

CHAPTER 6 SOME GHOST CURERS, AND HAMER

91

My theory of cancer can pretty much be said to be “We have

strayed too far from the natural way of life.” I require my patients

to eat mainly fruit and vegetables, supplemented by Vitamin C

and iodine. No processed foods. Coffee enemas are a must. I hear

you ask “Isn’t the normal method of excretion good enough?”

Glad you asked. The coffee enemas aren’t meant to assist the

colon, rather the caffeine stimulates the liver.

Way back I was having severe migraines and looked into diet

as a cure, and then tried it on some of my patients. It apparently

cured one man of skin tuberculosis. Then, in a carefully controlled

clinical study, my method cured 446 out of 450 patients

who had skin tuberculosis. Later, I found that diet worked well

on arthritis, and diabetes -- and on cancer, albeit with a lower cure

rate. I cured Dr Albert Schweitzer of his diabetes, and his wife

of lung tuberculosis. My diet aims to raise your level of potassium

and lower your level of sodium.

MD, a Romanian Jew. I

died in 1998, at age a hundred

and one. I stay up till

all hours studying the structure

of the molecule, and its

electron charge as it affects

adjacent molecules. You

know that guy who does

“Rappin’ the Elements” on

Youtube? He’s good.

I love studying lipids and

cellular metabolism. Man,

that’s where it’s happenin.’ Back in World War II, in Romania –

fighting on the Axis side, mind you -- I invented butanol, a lipid

substance, that could instantly stop the bleeding of soldiers. In

fact I patented it and many other inventions. In cancer, I look at

the pH of the lesion (it is different from that of the rest of the

body!). In other words, I care about the body’s balance of acid

and alkali. I prescribed selenium and Omega-3 fatty acids. My

main success was in relieving the pain of cancer, and also in curing

AIDS. I wasn’t afraid to put sulfur into lipids. Should you suffer

nuclear radiation I can help your tissues recover, with lipids.

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

92

Very nice. Thank you, Gentlemen, and Johanna., I note that

three of you support the infection idea – Glover, Coley, and Lincoln.

And two come in on the hunt for mechanisms the body

possesses for the turning on and off of growth, Beard and Durovic.

Koch concentrates on the role of oxygen. Another two,

Revici and Budwig talk lipids Burton refers to the immune system,

Gerson to the chemical balance of potassium and sodium,

Wow, that is an exciting range of approaches.

They Got What Was Coming to Them, Unfortunately.

And what, pray tell, was the fate that the above cancer-cure discoverers

met? They all got clobbered by “the authorities.”

Boston University Medical School cut off the supply of antibiotics

for his macrophages. US Senator Tobey wrote to 100 medical

schools asking them to send someone to investigate Lincoln’s

CHAPTER 6 SOME GHOST CURERS, AND HAMER

93

methods – to no avail. (Huh? Why not send someone and reveal all

Lincoln’s errors if there are any?)

that his product was falsely labeled. I quote Nat Morris:

“The district attorney then disclosed he had been ordered from

Detroit to set the bail high to prevent Koch from returning to

Brazil and finishing his researches there”.... “The oppression was

extended to those who dared to employ Glyoxylide. It became

dangerous for physicians to endorse the Koch method, for they

were immediately threatened with loss of their academic and professional

“A committee… reviewed the records of 86 patients but

claimed to be unable to find any scientific value in Gerson’s

treatment. Gerson was not allowed to defend himself before

these investigative boards.” His hospital privileges were revoked

and “in 1953 his malpractice insurance was discontinued”

against Thomas Glover saying:

“There is no micro-organismal cause of cancer and as soon as

the public learns this fact the less likely they will be deceived by

claims such as those Dr Glover makes. [Note the protect-the-gullible

theme.] The effective treatment of cancer is accomplished by

surgery, the Xray and radium in combination.”

to the US for an arrangement that then “fell through.” When he

was in his nineties, NY Medical Board “struck him off.”

Note: I want to query Steven Barrett who writes wholly unsupported

complaints about the likes of Revici. Please see Barrett’s

2003 obituarty of Victor Herbert, his fellow quack-hunter.

of punishing his spokesman, Professor Andrew Ivy. As stated by

Rep. Roland V. Libonati, in the Congressional Record in 1959:

“...Dr. Ivy, (is) the champion of the scientific doctrine of freedom

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

94

of research, which has suffered in recent years through the falsity

of certain politico-physician leaders of the AMA, who faked reports,

suppressed honest information, brutally slugged the opposition,

both physically and through pressures, used to prevent the

truth about Krebiozen reaching the American people.”

Minnesota, a “side-door” was used to put Lawrence

Burton out of business in the Bahamas:

“In 1985, in a speech by the Deputy Director

of the National Cancer Institute, it was mentioned

as if in an aside, that Burton’s IAT specimens

contained HIV. Supposedly two families

returning from his clinic to the us had brought

back 18 sealed IAT specimens. They were examined by a Washington

State blood bank and all of them contained hepatitis B

while some tested positive for HIV. Many feel that these tests

were faked. Especially since the families who had brought them

back into the US never contracted hepatitis B nor were they ever

tested to be HIV-positive. The Bahamian Ministry of Health and

Pan American Health Organization visited Burton’s clinic, and in

July of 1985 the Bahamian Government closed the clinic.”

(FDA forbids importation of Immuno Augmentation Therapy.)

“New conclusions were reached, one after the other, and in due

course these were published. Mankind in general, and medical

mankind in particular, were supposed to be waiting the advent of

some new scientific discovery concerning the nature of cancer….

The reception given to the new conclusions in Great Britain was

hardly in accord with that. The scientific investigator might have

been attacking some of the most sacred and deeply rooted religious

and moral convictions of mankind concerning cancer or

malignant disease.

The physical martyrdom was lacking; but there are, as I can

testify from experience, many more ways than one of burning a

scientific man at the stake.”

CHAPTER 6 SOME GHOST CURERS, AND HAMER

95

Your Responsibility

As Smokey the Bear once said, in so many words, “Only you can

prevent the persecution of cancer curers.” It’s pretty obvious that

no one except you can do it. There’s no point appealing to medical

schools (see Tobey re Lincoln), or courts, (see Koch) or the

Congress (see Gerson). Really that is a stunning thing to have to

say but let’s confront it.

a one-trick pony. No mater what the problem is, I say get with the

task of prosecuting. Those who have been the persecutors of our

curers must be under the impression that no matter how many

laws they break, they won’t have to pay a price.

Check items 14-18 on the Power List in the frontispiece of this

chapter. These are undeniably crimes. Threatening, burglarizing,

attacking and killing If you did those things you would be listening

for the police siren, would you not? Why have we stopped doing

what has been routinely doing since ancient times? Every society

creates punishments

to deter “sin.” Please note

that harsh punishments are

typically invented if the sin

is one that is likely to occur

and can cause much harm.

So, where the community

depends on livestock, you

can expect draconian measures

against theft of livestock.

Look what they did

to hog thieves in colonial

Virginia. I got this from a

high school History website:

“Persons convicted were either fined 10 pounds or lashed 25

times at the whipping post. If a person was caught again, he or

she would be locked in the pillory with his or her ears nailed to

the frame. When the thief was released, the nailed part of the ear

was torn off. A third conviction was punishable by death.”

Let us look at the pillory and the stocks. In a pillory you had to

stand in a position in which your head went through a block of

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

96

wood and usually your arms were locked as well. This was all

done in public, the main punishment being the disgrace involved.

Members of society were urged to jeer at the person, or perhaps

pelt him with objects. After all, he harmed society, right?

Half a million Americans died of cancer last year. Say 25%

would have had their cancer cured, if our curers had not been put

out of business. So the suppressors killed 125, 000 folks.

Culling Three of the Ghosts from the List of 18 Curers

Burton, Koch, and Durovic did not leave their recipe for us. This

strikes me as peculiar. Granted, journals taboo’d them, but why

not put the details in a book, or a patent? Burton was awarded

five patents circa 1980. These do specify how he isolated the

proteins that he calls “blocking and de-blocking,” by centrifuging

mammalian blood, but they don’t tell of his protocol. The website

Quackwatchers.org provides the following, in their general putdown

of Burton, dated 1990:

“Tumor antibodies are ‘alerted to the presence’ of tumor cells by a

protein produced by the tumor cells themselves. This induces the

tumor antibodies to destroy them. If the tumor cells are destroyed in

an unregulated manner, however, a person’s liver may become overburdened

, so a blocking protein … regulates the rate of tumor kill.”

A citizen named Suzanne Caum wrote a very thorough book

a year!) I take her to be genuine. Amazingly, Koch’s glyoxylide

worked miracles on may illnesses including polio. If patients’

tales of cures are true, there be a simple substance in existence

My guess is that Burton, Durovic, and Koch worked for the

cabal, possibly unwittingly, very likely against their will. I am of

the opinion that their cures really did work. For now, I shan’t put

them on my list of curers, as I don’t what those cures are.

psy-op, including all the sadness of Professor Andrew Ivy being

persecuted. The hoopla about the mistreatment of the curers is

itself an important show: it stops other doctors speaking out.

Senator Paul Douglass defended Ivy. That make me think he,

too, was part of a psy-op! That senator’s Mom died when he was

young. This is often done to make a person “capturable.”

CHAPTER 6 SOME GHOST CURERS, AND HAMER

97

Rejected, But Respected

were able to find medical solutions to cancer. Still, I’ll mention

some in the bioelectric field who did not make the list, and why:

has reportedly saved lives of lung cancer patients

by putting electrodes directly into tumors. I

Nordenstrom is well received in China because

he can explain Yin-Yang electrically! That could

be major and I mean majorly major.

Australia. (Why would anyone live so far away?)

He made innovations in the use of radiation

treatment for cancer. I shall not discuss this, as

my book excludes treatments whose aim is to

attack the tumor, rather than to get at the cause

of the cancer.

and met his end in a jail. He claims to have found

orgone energy and to have cured cancer patients

not doubt him. The subject is just too exhausting

to cover! (Was he a bit “teched”? Maybe, but that

did not harm his theorizing!)

Isaac Newton’s 1666 idea about the way a prism breaks sunlight

up into the colors of the spectrum: violet, indigo, blue, green,

yellow, orange, and red. He found ways to radiate colors onto

machine to cure cancer as well as burns. I learned of them from

to put them on my list. Douglass himself claims a cure based

on enhancing the light intake via consuming hydrogen peroxide.

Says he used it successfully on AIDS patients in Africa.

.

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

98

Ryke Hamer, Psychiatrist, Is the Eighteenth Curer

Each of our curers must have a theory of cancer

and a solution that works. Hamer’s theory is that

emotional shock triggers a cancer. His cure is

psychiatric help. It was successful in at least one

testicular cancer after realizing it was his son’s

death that shocked him. I see no reason to rule

out his explanation, as many have done.

(1973: 63):

tip end of a leaf is singed with a flame, the shock is greater, and the

reaction can be seen as it travels through the entire plant. The singed

leaf first folds up quickly, then the plant collapses. The shock wave

travels in two seconds through the main stem to the other branches.”

As for corroboration, Bernie Siegel, MD, of Yale says he has many

documented cases, in which the patent decided to forgive some

person in her life (perhaps just because she expected to die) and

Dear Reader, I am tired of trying to figure out how much of the

bad-mouthing of each cancer curer is true, how much is “smear

city,” and how much is a game in which the curer cooperates. If

you look for Hamer on the Internet, you will find him accused of

the same deed as Naessens: luring a patient away from standard

treatment, but Naessens won acquittal from a jury. An unusual

legal feature of Hamer’s case is that he sued Norway for not

letting him practice medicine. I think it helps society for doctors

to seize the moral high ground like that.

I might add that if the bad-mouthing team, which has infinite

resources, can come up with something from the man’s personal

life to make you doubt him, don’t let that make you throw his

work aside. Rather, ask: if they’re going to this trouble to make

you give up your interest in his cure, instead of arguing against the

cure on its merits, doesn’t that indicate a good cure?

I chickened out of naming H Sartori as a curer (he used cesium

chloride the way Revici uses selenium) as he has done criminal

things. Now I am thinking maybe he is not the inventor of the

cesium cure, but was asked to put it forward so it could then be

shot down, with bad odor rising from his personal life.

CHAPTER 6 SOME GHOST CURERS, AND HAMER

99

Agricola, addressing his troops at the Grampian, near Aberdeen, in 84

A.D. (from Oxford translation of Tacitus’s report, at bartlebys.com)

“My fellow soldiers, under the high auspices of the Roman empire, by

your valor and perseverance you have been conquering Britain. In so

many expeditions, in so many battles, you have been required to

exert your courage against the enemy. We have proceeded beyond

the limits of former armies; and are now become acquainted

with the extremity of the island, by actual possession with our

arms and encampments. Britain is discovered and subdued.

How often, on a march, when embarrassed with mountains,

bogs, and rivers, have I heard the bravest among you

exclaim, “When shall we descry the enemy? When shall we

be led to the field of battle?”

As in penetrating woods and thickets the fiercest animals

boldly rush on the hunters, while the weak and timorous

fly at their very noise; so the bravest of the Britons have

long since fallen. The remaining number consists solely of

the cowardly and spiritless, whom you see at length within

Well, I guess you know who won, and it wasn’t the British. As

(Amscray, Cabal!) Come on, men, it would only require that you

Don’t you know an easy prey when you see one? Our poor old

cabaliers may have a million drones, and a million bioweapons, but

they don’t have, and can’t have, what only a functioning society

can have. They don’t have balance, and they lack the ability to

take on new arrangements – as they have painted themselves into

I suspect they have got quite a large portion of us hypnotized.

Don’t roll eyes, please -- hypnotism is now all the go in industry.

It’s accepted as training. Note: when I ran for Congress I was

invited to go for “training.” (Didn’t go. Still have my noodle.)

The non-hypnotized don’t have to be put off by the fact that

that so many are out of commission at the moment. It really only

takes a few to do the needful. Just buddy up in pairs. OK?

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

100

Now this is the Law of the Jungle

-- as old and as true as the sky;

And the Wolf that shall keep it may prosper,

but the Wolf that shall break it must die.

As the creeper that girdles the tree-trunk

the Law runneth forward and back

-- For the strength of the Pack is the Wolf,

and the strength of the Wolf is the Pack.

CHAPTER 7 HEALTH AND VALUES

101

Chapter 7

Good Health and the Creation of a Society’s Values

British Yearbook of International Law, 2010

The present chapter offers some basic information for the young.

If it is too basic for you, just go out for a beer and a smoke and

meet us later at the ranch. K?

Good News from the Autism Front

Bulletin! Ladies and Gentlemen, e’en as I write (on March 8,

2012), a judge in the UK has restored the medical license of gastroenterologist

Dr John Walker Smith, who helps autistic kids.

He, along with Andrew Wakefield, had been thrown to the lions

by the Powers that Be. Was Androcles hiding in the lion’s den?

What Is Natural Good Health? “I Feel Good.”

Picture us as hunter-gatherers, the life for which our biological

traits have best suited us. Conjure up an ideal of more or less

perfect health. Note the typical things that may interfere:

blow, or get bitten by a snake.

may freeze or get sunburned, may eat poisonous food by mistake,

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

102

may be pestered by other species.

pregnancy, headaches and hot flashes during menopause.

Apart from that, everybody is “medically” happy, as long as the

necessary food, water, air, and sunshine is available. Not too bad,

eh? Of course that list has to do only with things that happen after

birth. Some come into the world already handicapped, thanks

hunter-gatherer is unlikely to get diabetes, Alzheimer’s, kidney

failure, or cancer.

Consider These Lilies: the Inflammation Response

Say you have been stung by a bee, or scraped your knuckles on a

rock. Instantly other parts of the body are called in to perform

get rid of whatever foreign item got in, to cart off any destroyed

cells, and to start rebuilding.

The carting-off requires production of mucus to act as a roadway,

and cilia that beat like little brushes to shove the debris along.

your capillaries to make transport quicker! Bewdy.

Decomposition is not to be despised. We come and we go. The

greats of previous centuries have gone, but they are still with us.

that book for his daughter Alice when he heard she was being

taught in high school that microbes are out to get us!)

Just think, a few millennia ago before the Egyptians got the zany

idea of building pyramids and the Romans decide to knock up a

colosseum, there was hardly anything that bacteria couldn’t break

down and recycle. And there were no man-made chemical compounds

until very recently in history. I hear you ask: Where is Boss

Cocky in all this? Who organizes the decomposing work of the

CHAPTER 7 HEALTH AND VALUES

103

zillion microbes? I do not know, but a thoughtful source on this is

Antoine Béchamp. He believed a pre-animal, the “microzyme” is

living everywhere and can develop into any organized body.

“After death, it is essential that matter be restored to its primitive

condition, for it has only been lent for a time to the living organized

being. In recent years (1870s) an extravagant role has been

assigned to the airborne germs. The air may bring them, it is true,

The spokesperson for putrefaction today is Erik Enby, MD, of

Sweden, who learned it from Günther Enderlein, his mentor, who,

in turn, credited Béchamp. Enderlein and Enby see how bacteria

break down the chemistry of the cell, as a result of which new life

can then arise. Our blood is like the soil, he says, microbes thrive

there. (See website enby.se) As it happens, scientists have recently

discovered that our blood is not sterile; it’s teeming with microbes.

Enby appears to be validated by new work called the Biome Project.

Watson and Crick cracked the genetic code in 1954, discovering

that DNA is made up of certain amino acids. We may think

Béchamp must therefore have been wrong in his ontology. But

don’t put your life savings in it, OK? Also there may be certain

“scholars” in circulation today whose covert job is to ridicule the

old-fashioned views of Bechamp and of Charles Creighton.

In any case, are you thinking to die soon? If you must, that’s fine,

but I wish you’d stick around and help us out of our cabal-made

crisis. And please consider this feisty approached to death, penned

by the great sociobiologist Bill Hamilton ere his demise in 2009:

I will [ask in my] last will for my body to be carried to Brazil and to

these forests, to be laid out in a manner secure against the possums …

bury, will live on my flesh; and in the shape of their children and mine,

I will escape death. No worm for me nor sordid fly, I will buzz in the

dusk like a huge bumble bee. I will be many, be borne, body by flying

body out into the Brazilian wilderness beneath the stars, lofted under

those beautiful and un-fused elytra. So finally I too will shine like a violet

ground beetle under a stone. -- William Hamilton

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

104

Three Cheers for Edward C Rosenow (1875-1966)

Good health! How blessed that a cure for polio was found. You

can see it in Exhibit H -- which is the quiet thunder of this book.

relief and of hope over what has just happened at Davenport,

Iowa. An epidemic of infantile paralysis in that city has ended

with a banquet and an ovation.” The headline ran:

Dr. Edward C. Rosenow of the Mayo Clinic Tried His Serum on

Children with Brilliant Results During Epidemic in Davenport,

Iowa. Remedy for Infantile Paralysis Successfully Tried.”

Rosenow, not to be confused with his namesake grandson, was

a miraculous bacteriologist. We met him earlier, as Rife’s friend.

Hear what Rowntree, chronicler of the lives of greats had to say:

“Edward Rosenow had made a considerable reputation in Chicago

earlier in life during his association with Dr Frank Billings. On coming

to the [Mayo] clinic in the teens of the century [he got into]

the study of mutations of bacteria. Personally I feel he was always

denied due appreciation of this…He was an ardent student of the

streptococcus. By intracerebral injections, he set off syndromes in

rabbits the exact counterparts of the clinical manifestations… especially

tics. When the patient and the rabbit were placed side by

side[Rowntree is presumably being figurative here!] the resemblances

With meticulous work he was able to find and culture the bacilli

of many illnesses, including schizophrenia and arthritis! (See SH

Shakman’s helpful 1996 review.) But as with our 18 cancer cures

the public has not been allowed to benefit. You need to fix that!

Now please see, overleaf, a collection of data about TB and

Parkinson’s that lives up to Rosenow’s promise, IMHO. It’s by

Lawrence Broxmeyer, MD. He has a free-ranging mind – when

the data speak to him, he does not feel he must answer back in the

terminology of the current textbooks. Broxmeyer is finding clues

as to what illnesses are “viral” and which are “bacterial.” I weep

for medical students who remain unaware of this work.

CHAPTER 7 HEALTH AND VALUES

105

2. Guam, where TB meningitis runs rampant, has epidemics of

neurologic disorders, including Parkinson’s.

4. Deprenyl (Eldopril) a Parkinson’s drug, comes from a class, the

MAO inhibitors, originally designed to cure TB.

5. Clinical and epidemiologic studies link Parkinson’s to TB-like germs

e.g., nocardia, corynebacteria (diptheria) and mycobacteria.

6. Burn isolated a germ resembling Alexander-Jackson’s mycobacteria/

7. Alexander-Jackson found acid-fast forms in Burn’s bacillus that may

cause Wilson’s disease, a cause of Parkinson’s in the young.

as tubercles in the brain, to discharge bacilli into the meningeal spaces.

10. Kohbata and Shimokawa, using blood serology, connected nocardia

and mycobacteria in 20 of 20 Parkinson’s patients.

11. Gao linked Parkinson’s to mycobacteria in blood through diagnostic

heat shock proteins.

12. In AIDS-related Parkinson’s, Berenguer reported mycobacteria as

the most common CNS pathogen.

substances that act as mycobacterial growth factors in the laboratory;

such occupational exposure is associated with PD.

14. Oxidative stress to the substantia (from catecholamine toxic

dopamine; hydrogen peroxide, and free radical byproducts) are also

made by mycobacterial metabolism and cell-respiration.

15. Dopaminergic neuron loss, an active Parkinson’s process, is just the

sort of chronic process that characterizes tuberculosis.

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

106

Infection and All That

This book has a subplot about infection.

I think Robert Koch and Louis

Pasteur worked in tandem even

though they were famous opponents.

Pasteur was French; Koch was

Prussian. The Franco-Prussian war

of 1870 being still in memory, they

could have had a nationalist dislike

for each other. But as Greg Hallett

says, in the spy world, “blown cover is good cover.”

Koch’s job, IMO, was to stymie laboratory research. Pasteur’s

job was to make sure we all believed the germ theory; he thus

diverted our l’il ol’ cerebra from other explanations for disease.

(Why am I suspicious of Koch? Because when he needed to

study sheep anthrax, there was an outbreak of it right near his

farm. “Do you think I was born yesterday, Dr Koch?”)

Re Pasteur, the mausoleum tells me all I need to know. Not that

I fail to see that germs --microbes – do in fact get into us and

may cause harm. Let me paraphrase an old textbook, with a bit

tract or digestive tract and through the urogenital system. Skin is a

barrier to invasion, unless broken. Saliva protects against invasion; it is

germicidal. Same for hydrochloric acid of the stomach.

defenses! If the defenses are insufficient, the invaders will infect. But

where? Picture a pneumococcus. It gets in via inspiration. It won’t

have too much choice about which organ to infect; it will be the lung.

Note: the pneumococcus is not a demon that exists to give people

pneumonia. It is a bacterium looking for accommodation. Once in its

new home, Joe’s lung, it has the effect of messing up Joe’s breathing.

The infection in this case creates a mechanical problem for the host.

It’s first noticed by “general symptoms,” e.g., headache and malaise.

the body, it predictably settles on one organ. Probably that organ

has “receptors” for the germ’s particular chemical make-up. The bacterium

may have the matching “ligand..”

CHAPTER 7 HEALTH AND VALUES

107

I do not claim that the germ theory is all wrong. Rather, I think

we should consider some of the unfashionable theories.

It may be that health varies according to the geological formations

we live near. Lakhovsky marshals wonderful evidence that

cosmic rays (radiation from stars other than our “domestic” star)

are kept at bay differently by different soils and rocks. Charles

Creighton went to India to check on the cholera epidemic and

found – with his own eyes – that the illness was striking people

who lived on certain kinds of ground! By the way, Robert Koch

also went to India to check on that epidemic. My guess is that

he was inspecting his handiwork. I realize that’s an extreme accusation,

but was not cholera delivered to Haiti, following the

earthquake of 2010 (itself a mischief)?

One should also consider Claude Bernard’s insistence that the

interior milieu is what counts. A bug won’t bring you down if

your body and mind are in good condition. Another explanation

for disease is “miasma” theory, common until 1850 and still held

in China. It attributes outbreaks of disease to “bad air.”

My mentor taught me, by example, to state all the possibilities,

even weak ones, rather than get all married up to a faved hypothesis.

may surprise you to know that your teachers are dying for you to

knock on their door. I was lucky to get instant comradeship from

EO Wilson. I then got to share the joy of each of his new books

now quote:

The leaf [ant] colony is a superorganism. The queen is not in any sense

the leader or the repository of an organizational blueprint. No command

center directs the colony. The superorganism’s

brain is the entire society.

Through a unique step in evolution, taken millions

of years ago, the ants captured a fungus,

incorporated it into the superorganism, and so

gained the power to digest leaves. Or perhaps

the fungus captured the ants and used them as

a mobile extension to take leaves into the moist

underground chambers.” -- (1984: 27-37)

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

108

Dear Cabal, Beware Jewish Mothers!

Never underestimate the power of a determined Mom. Beth Maloney

is a Jewish mother, in the sense in which all mothers, indeed

all women, are “Jewish mothers.” When her son developed

OCD (obsessive compulsive disorder) at age 12, she wasn’t about

to sit and watch it happen. She chased all around until she found

two doctors who told her of the connection between OCD and

– wait for it -- streptococcus.

That bacillus isn’t supposed to cross the blood-brain barrier,

but it does. A prescription that combined Augmentin and Strattera

cured Sammy. Maloney’s book is marvelous. She is furious

that NIH had the effrontery to tell her they could help only if

her child were younger, or if he’d been diagnosed closer to onset.

At one point, when someone told Sammy the family wouldn’t

win, he said “You don’t know my mother.”

We JMs need to pool our resources. You don’t know us! By the

came across a review of it by a woman who thinks Sammy’s hallucinations

(he saw lasers coming out of power points) may not

have been hallucinations! Maybe he had a heightened view of

reality. This would accord with Becker’s theory.

Please note: Robert O. Becker tried to warn people that the use

of cell phones by children is a big mistake as it irradiates their

brains. Of course, Yours Truly does not think it is happening

Charlotte Iserbyt as well as books by Beverly Eakman and John

Gatto. Three Jewish mothers. See? Gender is no bar!

Someday it may be gratify the parents of autistic children to

know that their persistence aided people with other diseases as

well. Below we’ll see Lisa Goes’ demand that CDC hand over

info that she needs for her child’s health. CDC had privatized a

taxpayer-funded database to evade Freedom of Information law!

A lot of professors in America are sitting on a cancer cure

today. Any JMs out there want to deal with that? Should be easy.

Material-witness law allows us to arrest persons who are harboring

vital evidence. Some of them may be hoping right now that

you will use legal means to force the revelations, thus sparing

them from the difficult role of whistleblower.

CHAPTER 7 HEALTH AND VALUES

109

Is It OK To Have Values? Will I Stick Out?

At a conference in 1991, I heard a professor mention that when

he starts his ethics class each year, he first has to explain to the 18

year olds that there’s a difference between right and wrong. Wow.

Later I heard Bev Eakman explain that pupils in the last few

decades have been given “ethical questions” to discuss in class,

and anyone who takes a principled position fails. Each student’s

opinion is supposed to be equal to any other. No guidelines allowed.

Perfect way to destroy a culture!

The Standard Values Are Mathematically Inevitable!

Hmm. That must mean they evolved because they

were adaptive. Humans with values cope well.

Here is a list of things that we had drummed into us as kids,

just about identical to what our grandparents had drummed

into them. We were told that in order to be acceptable, and win

friends and admirers, we must consistently be seen to be:

agreeable, appreciative, clean, considerate, dignified, fair, hardworking,

honest, kind, loyal, modest, neighborly, patient, patriotic,

punctual, reliable, respectful, tolerant, and trustworthy.

It doesn’t matter that we didn’t fulfill all of that. What matters

is that there was a very widespread belief that those virtues were

desirable. Thus everyone around us gave praise if we did good

and the cold shoulder if we flouted the rules. Result? “Niceness”

pervaded everyday social interactions. You could count on it.

And who had the effrontery to nominate those behaviors as

the desirable ones? Our ancestors. Or just plain mathematics. If

you start with the knowledge that the human animal would live

free and pursue his own survival selfishly, you’ll realize it would

be hard to have a group beyond the family.

Then, the cabal organized a changeover, for Generation X. The

goal – admirable if you like that sort of thing – is for us to have

– mixing populations that don’t know each other. Another

way is to destroy respect for one’s parents and elders.

Most societies come up with the above list of desirable traits.

The alternative would be to “breed us” in the direction of the fur

seal species, where one Alpha has his way at all times. Not nice

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

110

for him! “Uneasy lies the fur-seal head that wears the crown.”

I recently met two persons who are set on making the leap from

a situation in which social relations have been turned off to one

in which they burn bright again. The first is Micha Kurz (see him

on Youtube), an Israeli solder who couldn’t

quite stomach what he was asked to do to

folks in the Occupied Territories. Kurz

thought “Hey this is stupid. I’m a Jew, we

can behave better then this.” He now coordinates

the grassroots.

The other man is Kevin Annett in Canada.

The two guys could be twins, value-wise.

Kevin saw Canadians doing nasties to First

Nations children and said “Hey this is ridiculous.

The civilized people of Canada are

not murderers and torturers.”

A People’s Court in Canada? Psychedelic!

A friend sent me a Youtube video of Annett’s proclaiming that

the genocide involved (which I won’t go into here) was simply

not going to be tolerated one more minute thank you. He has

thus set up a sort of International Grand Jury to deal with it. I

had never heard of him but I cried when he said “Let justice be

done though the heavens fall.” Boy, you don’t hear that said very

I believe he has accurately identified a terrible issue: that our

courts simply do not function if the baddy is a member of the

protected institutions, such as church and state. The Royal Canadian

Mounted Police do not “get their man.” Instead, they protect

that man -- against that man’s victims! That’s TRAGIC.

Decades ago, in Italy, Lelio Basso founded a People’s Court

for such things as war crimes, and now Eagle Strong Voice (a

name given to Annett by some First Nations people) has set up

something like that. He demands that the accused show up to

Note: “Crime against humanity” is written up all fancy-like

in the Rome Statute of 1998 that engendered the hugely cynical

International Criminal Court in 2002.

Now please see, on next page, a flagrant ploy by the cabal to try

to make us yield our natural helpfulness.

CHAPTER 7 HEALTH AND VALUES

111

Do-gooders can be resented because they ‘raise

the bar’ for what is expected of everyone,

psychologists believe.

They probably think their selfless behaviour

makes them popular but the truth about ‘dogooders’

is nobody really likes them, according

to new research. A series of studies found that

those who volunteer to take on unwanted tasks

or who hand out gifts without being prompted,

quickly alienate themselves.

Psychologists believe this is because it makes

the rest of us feel guilty and puts pressure on us

to behave in an equally selfless fashion.

Researchers say do-gooders come to be

resented because they ‘raise the bar’ for what is

expected of everyone.

Social psychologist Professor Craig Parks said: “The fear is that this

new standard will make everyone else look bad. It doesn’t matter that

the overall welfare of the group is better served by someone’s unselfish

behaviour. What is objectively good, we see as subjectively bad. The

do-gooders are also seen as deviant rule breakers. It’s as if they’re

giving away Monopoly money so someone can stay in the game, irking

other players no end.’”

Parks led the research entitled “The Desire to Expel Unselfish Members

from the Group.” [He said]: “They frequently said ‘the person is

making me look bad’ or is breaking the rules. Occasionally, they would

suspect the person had ulterior motives.” Further research is planned

to look at how do-gooders themselves react to being rejected.

-- dailymail.co.uk

MM’s Quiz on the Above:

Q. Why is that girl so pretty? A. So the young audience will “identify.”

Q. Why is she advised to give up her “bad habit” of kindness? A. So

we can have a mucked up society.

Q. Why is the audience so willing to believe that we are not naturally

kind? A. Because other media pieces have conveyed the idea that we

are serial killers.

If you got all 3 correct, U R ready for a career at Hill & Knowlton.

Dailymail.co.uk

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

112

cabal gleaned the basics of it just by observing how we act:

1. We obey. (Yes, sheep are not the only sheepish species.)

2. We take up any new behavior if it’s identified as a “trend.”

3. We almost never deviate, as we can’t bear social disapproval.

Talk about a piece of cake! Those wanting to control, need only:

1.Tell people what to do (and they’ll obey),

2. Announce that such-and-such is the way we’re all going

The cabal controls some people by bribery and intimidation,

but mostly just calls on our emotional human nature, as above.

But two can play that game! Look at Kevin Annett. He puts

his pals on the landscape as the trendsetters. He announces, in a

strong masculine voice that his five judges have been sworn in,

thank you. As such, he can have a tremendous effect.

had the distinction of making their living for over three centuries

(ending 1603) as livestock rustlers. Raiding and murdering

were the norm. It was the only option they could see. They and

a few other clans lived on the border between Scotland and England.

of this area! The story is that a wife would hand her husband

a dinner plate with spurs on it, meaning he had to go out and do

some raiding or there would be nothing to eat.

In civilized societies, people know to do the right thing – so

long as there are ways to get food, and ways to settle competition

without simply murdering one’s neighbors. The Border Reivers

(raiders) had to follow the logic of greater and greater violence.

One day a fellow started to see the light. Two clans, the Maxwells

and Johnstones, had been feuding for ages with many, many

deaths. The Maxwell chief called a meeting with Johnstone to

negotiate a solution. No more

feuding! Unfortunately, during

the meeting, Maxwell killed

Johnstone. Talk about dumb.

I guess he had had too much

CHAPTER 7 HEALTH AND VALUES

113

1. VL. Culture the microbe from patient’s urine; make vaccine.

2. SB. Infuse intra-lymphatically the missing amino acid.

3. GN. Infuse intra-paranodularly 714-x nitrogen-in-camphor.

4. EM. Consume dichloroacetate to help mitochondria signal.

5. RR. Track a cancer microbe and zap it with radiofrequency.

6. RB. Put electrode-generated silver ions into the cancer.

7. GL. Use antennae or oscillator to neutralize cosmic rays.

8. GC. Equalize the negativity of cancer cell and adjacent cells.

9. RO. Treat blood with UV light; this helps immune system.

10. JO. Get the correct part of the light spectrum into eyes, skin.

11. JB. Consume pancreatic enzymes: trypsin and amylopsin.

12. JB. Consume flaxseed with ricotta cheese to help lipids.

14. MG. Get nutrients from veggie juice; detoxify with enemas.

15. TG. Culture cancer microbe, make serum in horses, inject it.

16. RL. Inhale germs in order to evoke natural bacteriophaging.

17. ER. Manipulate the acid or alkaline imbalance; stop the pain.

18. RH. Psychologically undo effects of emotional shock or loss.

Recap of the Mission of This Book and Its Themes

Advising anyone what to do about his/her cancer,

Specifying what a healthy, anti-carcinogenic lifestyle requires,

Identifying cancer cures other than ones explainable by science,

Discussing methods of attacking the tumor, e.g., the Big Three.

Fuming to the max, and begging the reader to fume,

Encouraging young scientists to think freely,

Inviting doctors to get with the program,

Sorting out cancer cures by their theoretical premises,

Reminding the baddies that their future is bleak -- guaranteed,

Smiling at the number of (heretofore hidden) remedies for ills,

Thanking the sloggers who did the work, often with no support,

Analyzing how the hell we ended up in such an absurd situation,

Digging up any actions that can now be taken with help of law,

Declaring without embarrassment that fixing this is URGENT.

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

114

The Congress shall have Power 1. To lay and

collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises to

pay the Debts and provide for the common

Defence and general Welfare of the United

States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout

the United States; 2. To borrow money on the credit of the United

States; 3. To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the

several States, and with the Indian Tribes; 4. To establish an uniform

Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies

throughout the United States;

5. To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and

fix the Standard of Weights and Measures; 6. To provide for the Punishment

of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United

States; 7. To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;

8. To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for

limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective

Writings and Discoveries;

9. To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

10. To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high

Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

11. To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make

Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

12. To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that

Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

13. To provide and maintain a Navy; 14. To make Rules for the Government

and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

15. To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the

Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

16. To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and

for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of

the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment

of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the

discipline prescribed by Congress;

17. To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such

District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular

States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government

of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places

purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the

Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-

Yards, and other needful Buildings; And 18. To make all Laws which

shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing

owers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government

of the US, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

CHAPTER 8 LAYING DOWN THE LAW

115

Chapter 8

Laying Down the Law: Why Tolerate This Criminality?

This chapter will discuss how you can stop America being destroyed

(it’s easy).

Diarrhea

As noted, many heroes of cancer-cure tried to go it alone, but

your help would have made the difference. Solidarity is the winning

strategy against a bully. That’s the long and short of it. You

have to go on the offensive against the people who are taking

over America. I said above that it’s easy to do this. It is an outand-

You’d block the incredibly easy passage that our overlords have

had. The following seems to be what their tutors told them decades

ago: “Have no concern that the citizens will rise up. They

Once conditioned into slavery they always adjust to it. Moreover,

But the joke is that we actually do have rationality! I know

that created me with a different kind of brain from the rest, was

there? Looks like the poor devils at the top are talking themselves

have woken up!

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

116

The Prosecution Does Not Rest, Thank You.

Let’s identify what can be done. We begin by returning to the

“power list” described in Chapter 6. Having pointed out the bad

things that happened to our ghost doctors, I said that some of

the acts against them call for retribution. Someone needs to be

rounded up by the police, or by citizen arrest if necessary, for the

three crimes: threatening, burglarizing, and assault-and-battery.

We know it can’t be “authorities” committing those deeds, as

the job description of an official never says he may commit crime.

So who are the baddies? …They are the ones enforcing a regime

of illness and death via cancer.

In Chapter 5 we did a bit of searching into the ACS and the

and death via cancer. Does this mean the “personnel” of the

ACS? Well, yes. And if they say they are innocent, let them join

with us in feeling angry toward the ones who are not innocent.

They can march shoulder to shoulder with us, right? We welcome

them.

How about you write to the ACS today and ask how it happened

that Cornelius Rhoads (“I zap Porto Ricans”) got appointed as

director. Was there a “search committee” for that job? Was he

interviewed? You need not even send the letter – just composing

it would put you in the driver’s seat.

The Basic Right of Self-Defense

It may be wise to consider here the most

desperate measures available for legal redress,

before looking at the calmer ones.

First, the law of self defense. Centuries ago,

Sir Edward Coke identified the right of the

person to repel any threat against himself

or against another whom he chose to defend.

in the American Colonies! Coke’s work is

now entwined in common law in 49 states.

(The excepted state is Louisiana; it follows

the Code Napoleon rather than common

law.) If you harm someone in self-defense

CHAPTER 8 LAYING DOWN THE LAW

117

you do not commit a crime. Obviously. This is to be distinguished

from instances in which you have committed a crime but then

try to offer the exculpating excuse that you were provoked. The

right is protected by common law in countries, such as the US, of

which Britain was the mother country. In Australia, a 1986 High

“The question to be asked… is quite simple. It is whether the

accused believed upon reasonable grounds that it was necessary

in self-defence to do what he did. If he had that belief and there

were reasonable grounds for it … he is entitled to an acquittal.”

But what about the fact that the police have been granted the

exclusive authority to wield violence against baddies? Didn’t that

close the door on the old (“wild west”) behavior known as selfhelp?

No. Self-help is a basic instinct and is everywhere accepted

as a right. The opposite would be to “Just lie there and take it.”

force against an attacker is your right even if it turns out that the

attacker is a law enforcer who did not properly identify himself.

Well, yes, but the cleverness of those who would thwart law is

pretty impressive also. In pre-civilized society, it was expressed,

says: “Fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. As he has

injured the other, so he is to be injured.” But as law became more

This is really the heart of the matter. I am saying that we are too

easily impressed by, and overwhelmed by, legalisms.

The Law of Treason

There is also the fact that government wrongdoing, on the scale

of murder, is just not part of our vocabulary. Thus we have to

make it part of our vocabulary. That is the message of my book

To harm an enemy is not a crime. It is considered a virtuous,

nay glorious, thing to do. But harming one’s own people is seen

as repulsive. There may be a question as to who is “one’s own

people” but no one has, so far, challenged the designation that

co-nationals are one’s own people. Hence for Americans to harm

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

118

Americans is repulsive. And luckily, the law proscribes it.

“Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against

them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within

the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer

death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under

this title but not less than $10,000….” [18 USC 2381]

There is very little case law on this but in an early episode, the socalled

Whiskey Rebellion in Pennsylvania, in 1798, men who had

attacked the tax collectors were tried for treason and were found

guilty. President George Washington later pardoned them.

If it is government personnel who are committing treason, this

adds a distracting notion. Many people seem to have the impression

that prosecutions cannot happen owing to “sovereign immunity.”

No, that’s incorrect. All officers of the state or federal

government are vulnerable to prosecution. (And my advice is,

too wussy – indict them for the plain crimes they committed.)

The ACS Is Private; The USPS and DHSS Are Public.

What if a crime is committed by such entities as the FDA and

the CDC? How would justice get done? Actually, it cannot be an

abstract entity that commits a crime. It is the office holder. And

what if she were following orders? Or being bullied by a mafia? Is

that sufficient to relieve her of liability? No way in hell.

Ah, but in the case of personnel working for the executive

branch of government, can we expect that the very same branch

will come out with a warrant for the arrest of its own people?

citizens (within a state) to lay appropriate charges. At the same

time, we charge the holders-back with the crime of obstruction

Charles Pixley Went To Jail for Your Cancer.

In Canada, Gaston Naessens has been legally distributing his

714-X cancer cure since 1989, thanks to a certain “compassionate”

clause. The US forbids its importation. A US citizen named

Charles Pixley, son of the Minutemen so to speak, defied FDA’s

law: he distributed 714-X with gay abandon. Furthermore, he accused

those who made the law, of genocide, in regard to the reign

CHAPTER 8 LAYING DOWN THE LAW

119

of cancer (as I call it).

Where were we when Pixley needed us? He was sentenced to

jail and did time. After he got out of jail, he blogged something

of great interest. He said that the late Harris Coulter, a medical

historian of the first rank, had ascertained that the rule related to

Pixley’s “crime” had never been gazetted in the Federal Register,

and so was unenforceable. I have not checked it out, but it may

thus have been a false arrest. There are all sorts of penalties for

that! His conviction was affirmed at Circuit Court level. (As for

Coulter’s brilliance, and his stalwart efforts to help us all, please

see our Exhibit S, in which he speaks of Type-1 diabetes.)

Consider how easily we assume that government is within its

rights to chase after doctors who try a new medicine. Sure, there’s

a law stating that the FDA must okay a new drug. But why do they

go after violators? Is it so patients won’t receive bad medicine?

Almost certainly that is not the reason. Several of the scientists

we have discussed were persecuted. What is really going on? I

stated my opinion at the end of chapter 6, namely that “they” are

against “us.” They want us to suffer cancer.

Dancing the Knockback Polka

Law students may be coaxed to do something about the fact that

plaintiffs are at a great disadvantage when seeking restraining

orders against governmental incursions, for example, the spraying

of harmful chemicals. Recently, in Vermont, a citizen named

Thabault brought an action regarding chemtrails. These are allegedly

trails of barium and aluminum being placed in the sky. (Not

the same as Centerfold, where no aircraft is involved.)

The plaintiff ’s case was dismissed without the defendant ever

having to “defend” himself. So much for Americans’ belief that

if you are willing to pay for a fight in court you can at least be

heard. It doesn’t happen that way. First, you may find that no lawyer

will take the case! Then, if you file on your own (as a “pro se

litigant”), you may get gobbledeegook from the judge.

On the next page you see the easy dismissal of Thabault’s case.

I do not know if Judge Murtha was too afraid to listen, or too set

in the ways of court precedent, but he sure did disappoint. The

“highest law” for him was the fact that the Federal Aviation Act

did not provide for private suing. He even managed to deploy the

civil rights law against the plaintiff. Imagination really counts!

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

120

LOUIS W. THABAULT, PLAINTIFF v WILLIAM SORRELL, ATTORNEY

GENERAL, STATE OF VT, DEFENDANT.

[Here is the opinion and order of the court, as delivered by J. Garvan

Murtha, United States District Judge August 13, 2008]:

Plaintiff Louis Thabault, proceeding pro se, brings this action claiming

that Vermont Army National Guard (“Guard”) airplanes spray harmful

chemicals in a “deliberate assault on the people below.” For relief, he

seeks an injunction barring the Guard from “any spraying of chemicals”

……The defendant has moved to dismiss, arguing… that Thabault has,

at most, alleged a state common law assault or nuisance claim that does

not arise under federal law. The Court turns first to the question of

whether the FAAct creates a private cause of action. A plaintiff alleging

violations of a federal statute does not state a claim “arising under the

Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States” . . . when Congress

has determined that there should be no private, federal cause of action

for the violation.” Merrell Dow Pharm. Inc. v. Thompson, U.S. (1986)

If the FAAct does not create a private cause of action, this Court has no

subject matter jurisdiction over Thabault’s claim. In Vorhees v. Naper

Aero Club (2001), the Seventh Circuit noted that “the Federal Aviation

Act has no civil enforcement provision or any provision allowing a private

resident to sue for the property torts of an airline pilot or airline

operator.” Similarly, the DC Circuit Court concluded that the FAAct’s

“extensive and detailed scheme of administrative enforcement complete

with civil and criminal penalties” belied any claim that Congress intended

to create a private cause of action.

Thabault cites 49 U.S.C. § 40103(a), which provides that “the US Government

has exclusive sovereignty of airspace of the US.” There is no

provision in this portion of the statute creating a private right of action

for violations of either the FAAct or related regulations. In the absence

of any such provision, some plaintiffs have tried to bring suit under 42

U.S.C. § 1983, which authorizes private actions for “deprivations of any

rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws . .

. .” The Second Circuit, however, has expressly rejected this approach,

holding that “the comprehensive enforcement scheme provided in The

Act manifests congressional intent to foreclose an action under § 1983.”

In light of this unequivocal language from the Circuit, and based upon

the absence of any express provision in the FAAct providing a private

cause of action, the Court finds that the complaint has failed to set forth

a valid federal claim. Consequently, Thabault’s suit is ripe for dismissal

due to the Court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [Also] the Attorney

General has no legal authority over the Guard. See 3 V.S.A.§§ 151-

53… IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHAPTER 8 LAYING DOWN THE LAW

121

A judge can always reach into his quiver and pull out a bench warrant

to arrest relevant criminals. Is this power ever used?

States also have Proceeds of Crimes Acts, and Asset Forfeiture

laws (an Aussie recently had to forfeit 12 million in gold bullion!)

and we tend to forget the Equity remedy “disgorgement of illgotten

gains.” Main thing: if you’re knocked back, don’t quit. The

court may hit you with ripeness, standing, political question, and

other chestnuts. You’ll feel hurt. Humiliated. But so what? Just

turn up the music and play the knockback polka.

Law of Genocide

Pixley opined that he got off with a lenient jail sentence because

he had raised the word “genocide” regarding cancer-cure suppression.

Genocide is a domestically punishable crime in US.

of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial

part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such --

(1) kills members of that group;

(2) causes serious bodily injury to members of that group;

(3) causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of

members … through drugs, torture, or similar techniques;

(4) subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to

cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part;

(5) imposes measures intended to prevent births within the group;

or (6) transfers by force children of the group to another group;

shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).

under subsection (a)(1), where death results, -- by death or

imprisonment for life and a fine of not more than $1,000,000, or

both; and (2) a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or imprisonment

for not more than twenty years, or both, in any other case.

another to violate subsection (a) shall be fined not more than

$500,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

to commit an offense under this section shall be punished in

the same manner as a person who completes the offense.

may be found, or information instituted, at any time without

limitation. [Yeah, man.] -- 18 USC 1091

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

122

Troy and Pat: This Is Not Off-Topic.

My hope for the American judiciary was devastated on September

21, 2011. That is when the state of Georgia killed a good fellow,

Troy Davis, whom it had already “killed” for the preceding

20 years by way of incarcerating him on false charges of murder.

The US Supreme Court played the top role in this. Hence, we are

in trouble, the more so as hardly anyone understands that our

court has effectively disappeared. People still think the structure

– as it is written on paper – will save us.

You are unprotected – except by Society. My husband, who was

a man of few words, used to say “Society protects.” He meant

that outsiders are expected to step in where they see cruelty to

children. But social protection is a fact of life in all settings.

The Orwellian cabal brilliantly figured out how to take away the

various cues that tell us we’re part of something, and have obligations

to it, and can rely on its protection. People born after 1990

their local friends will grant succour. Frightening!

maybe hundreds of times before! We therefore have the biological

makings for it. Nothing material stands in the way. People are

longing for it, even if they don’t consciously realize that.

Troy knew he was going to be killed and he said “Please don’t

forget me.” We must remember him. And Pat Tilman must not

be forgotten. The death of the football star, who was serving in

the US Army in Afghanistan was not by “friendly” fire. Rather,

a sharpshooter gave him 3 bullets to the forehead at close range.

detail of this remarkable (or maybe not so remarkable?) event.

Congress, ever happy to aid a coverup, held hearings about the

so-called friendly fire. A soldier, Bryan O’Neal, testified:

It didn’t take long before those in the GMV… open[ed] up on

us with the 50-caliber machine gun basically shot at us in waves,

or bursts of rounds. [We were]… yelling, screaming. … [Then]

sir, they moved into a better position, and started shooting at us

again. And at that time, I could hear Pat calling, “Stop shooting.

I’m Pat f-ing Tillman. Stop shooting,” you know … And

CHAPTER 8 LAYING DOWN THE LAW

123

it abruptly stopped, with him calling for help.... But when our

medic came up to come assist us, he asked what happened, and

I tried to let him know. CHAIRMAN WAXMAN: Who is he?

Could you identify the name? O’NEAL That would be Sergeant

Anderson. I tried to let him know, but our squad leader told me

basically just don’t say anything…

That is where the matter rests. Although the lad said the above

in front of a live audience, and although his sworn testimony is

now in the Congressional Record (August 1, 2007), there was no

follow-through! That does not mean we have to throw up our

hands. There’s no statute of limitations on murder (or treason).

In 1935, world-class journalist George Seldes showed how the

Italian public was ready to “enforce the law” against its leader

Mussolini for arranging the killing of a beloved citizen. They had

all the evidence they needed -- with eyewitnesses to the killing,

just as for Tillman, but they let it slip away. They nattered on,

in Parliament, about all the “difficulties” that could arise if they

took action -- instead of the fantastic difficulties that could – and

did – arise if everyone did nothing!

I label that a “Mussolini moment.” For Troy and Pat we should

not now be having a Mussolini moment. Agree?

Troy Davis

(1968-2011)

Pat Tillman

(1976-2004)

Died young, for lack of society’s protection

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

124

Why Would FDA Wish To Quash Cancer Cures?

In the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, Congress gave the executive

branch of government the power to police the manufacture

of certain goods. Right then and there Congress erred, as it is not

in the federal government’s power to intervene in manufacture.

That is a state power.

At first, the Pure Food and Drug Act limited interventions to

those cases where the goods crossed state borders. In Burzynski’s

earlier career, the FDA forbade him to mail any of his antineoplastons

to Americans outside Texas, but “allowed him” – as some

might put it -- to sell them in Texas. What then changed? The

FDA didn’t change; Texas did! It re-legislated. (I mean the guy was

curing cancer; we can’t have that, can we?)

Permit me a cynical moment regarding the actual founding of

had muckrakers, such as Ida Tarbell and Upton Sinclair? These

whistle-blower types and left-leaning persons allegedly led the

move toward “social reform” via law. I had suspected that the

muckraker movement was done by You-Know-Whom, and just

now when I googled to find the beginning date of the FDA, look

what popped up on the fda.gov homepage: a sepia-colored poster

that was used in 1913 to advertise the movie version of Upton

There ya go! Who had the money to make a movie?

The same website tells us that the 1906 Act “prohibited the

interstate transport of unlawful food and drugs under penalty of

seizure of the questionable products and/or prosecution of the

in later by Congress, as it be crucial for medical tyranny.

Please go to 21 USC 355 if you want to see the drug-approval

process. (What do you bet the big drug companies have permission

to bypass its more Kafkaesque points?) Note: For any federal law

you need only google the letters “USC” plus the subject, e.g., FDA.

Delmonte Fruits recently turned the tables by suing FDA, as

the agency had ordered a recall of cantaloupes. I suppose the

Constitution does allow such policing. Article I, section 8, clause

3, grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce.

(Please read that commerce clause now, in the frontispiece of this

chapter.) “Trafficking” in tainted products could – perhaps, but

CHAPTER 8 LAYING DOWN THE LAW

125

I’m not enthusiastic – fall into that clause’s legitimate authority.

Nah, come to think of it, I reject it.

Granted, Clause 3 permits federal overseeing of commerce, but

“commerce” means trade; it is something above and beyond the

manufacture or the sale of particular items. To ask “Should regulation

apply to interstate traffic in anti-cancer serums?” should be

the same as asking “Is there constitutional authority to regulate

interstate traffic in washing machines?” The answer is No. When

talking about washing machines we have no trouble seeing that the

The reason the states surrendered that power to the feds, back at

the Constitutional Convention in 1787, was so that no one state

would be able to harm the trade of others.

Please don’t give serums a sacred aura! Their safety is, constitutionally,

only on a par with that of washing machines.And

Will the state legislature of Montana act irresponsibly and allow

harmful serums? It might. In that case, Montanans will suffer, and

that’s sad. But it’s a lot sadder to burn the Constitution. (Let’s see,

who was that Montana patriot who said “Give me bad serums or

give me death”?)

See What Came in with the Cat?

It’s not just the FDA’s ability to monitor commerce or productlabeling

that thwarts our ability to get cancers cured. It is also the

federal government’s wholly unconstitutional build-up of the socalled

National Institutes of Health, which fund the majority of

medical research in America.

The Constitution was written in 1787, and came into effect in

’89. The first Congress (1789-91) was hardly seated when it passed

“An Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen,” establishing

a Marine Hospital Service for merchant seamen.

Stop right there! Is that legal? No. Can’t the US spend its national

treasure on charitable efforts, if it sees fit? Absolutely not. The

legislature can pass laws only on the subject matters for which it

granted the powers listed in Article I, section 8 of the Constitution

to tell federal legislators what they could legislate about. It’s really

quite restrictive! Go to the frontispiece once again, and memorize

it if you can. Perhaps set it to music?

MARY W MAXWELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

126

Why the US Has a Surgeon General

Do you see any hint in Art I, section 8, of a federal prerogative

to legislate in matters of health? No. Then how is it that we have

a US Surgeon General? As mentioned, we

started a hospital for seamen. From there

it took only one more flick of the pen to

say that the hospital would have a boss, to

be called “the surgeon general.” Yes, that’s

how he got his start; federal “health authority”

came in with the cat, so to speak.

Congress does this all the time. It lets

very unconstitutional things in with the cat.

I’ll now inventory some things that came in

over the years thanks to that charitable seaman’s

hospital. (Alarm bells! Always be wary

about large institutions performing charity… They know you won’t

criticize, as “nice people” would never say a negative thing about

charity.) “March of Dimes” a scam? Wash your mouth out! Die!

In its first century, the nation had many people on the lookout

for breaches of the Constitution and they would put up quite

a shout. Hence, law stayed fairly proper. A century later however,

Congress gave the Marine Hospital the authority to perform

quarantine, “interstate.” In 1878, it had passed a Quarantine Act

“to prevent the introduction of contagious or infectious diseases

into the United States.” That was a set-up for the 1890 move in

which Congress strengthened quarantine, on the pretext of concern

about the outbreak of cholera in Europe. Ah, the pretext of

emergency, the route for many a foul law. Caveat!

In 1899, Congress ordered the Marine Hospital Service, which

would soon be renamed the US Public Health Service, to study

leprosy. That initiated a trend, which we see in the National Cancer

Institute of our day, of the feds “owning” a particular disease.

Do you recall a First Lady helping to federalize mental health?

Soon the USPHS had a “reserve corps” to act in emergency,

thanks to the 1918 flu pandemic. (What did I tell you?) In 1930,

the Surgeon General was tasked by Congress to investigate narcotics

and –“relatedly” – (let the cat in quick!) the cause and treatment

of mental disorders. Sure, the Soviet Union was adept at using the

psychiatric profession for social control, but we knew such a thing

could never happen in the land of apple pie....

CHAPTER 8 LAYING DOWN THE LAW

127

Conclusion of First Half of Book

1. Cancer is the uncontrolled replication of cells. There are several

different causes (things that get it going).

2. As cancer is a constitutional disease, rather than a local one, the

remedy is likely to be a systemic one.

3. When a tumor blocks a function (such as breathing or urinating),

surgery may help, but can’t prevent a recurrence.

4. There are many proper, scientific medical cures for cancer.

Ones with documented success include: Coley’s hypothermia,

Livingston’s autogenous vaccine, Naessens’ 714-X, Gerson’s diet,

Burzynski’s antineoplastons, Beard’s pancreatic enzymes.

5. There was massive propaganda in 20th century for Big Three.

6. Radiation and chemo are acknowledged causes of cancer!

7. On average, patients live longer by refusing those treatments.

8. ACS was formed in 1913 to control research, treatment, and

public perceptions about “this terrible scourge of mankind.”

9. Doctors are unaware of medical cures that were normal before

1920s. Those were cut out of textbooks, and doctors who persisted

were made examples of, via sacking, smearing, death.

10. FDA unconstitutionally decides which drugs are marketable, as

health is a state power -- and so is business, unless inter-state.

11. By funding, Congress gave control of research to the NIH.

12. Medical persons control each other by silencing heretics who

dare to utter that microorganisms can be pleomorphic.

13. Crimes are committed with impunity against errant doctors, and,

when this happens, medical associations do not protect victims!

14. Citizens shrink from the happy news that cancer is curable,

perhaps because it’s a threat to beliefs (“Hyde Park hypothesis”).

15. False cures are often touted, perhaps to muddy the waters.

16. Worldwide, there were ten million new cancer cases in the year 2000

17. Medical education was reformed by Rockefeller circa 1910.

18. Medical schools do not teach nutrition. They teach students to

treat symptoms not causes, and to rely on pharmaceuticals.

19. It’s kept secret that the immune system can deal with cancer!

20. Congress, when told of murder of Pat Tillman, looked away.

21. State medical licensing boards collude with malpractice insurers

to create an arbitrary standard-of-practice re treatment.

22. Doctors find it safe to obey the AMA and the ACS blindly.

23. Medical journals won’t publish articles that challenge the party

line. Fathom it!

MARY W MAXELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

128

PART

THREE

CHAPTER 9 REVICI ON CANCER AND AIDS

129

Barry Marshall MD

Robert Strecker MD Thabo Mbecki MA

John Walker-Smith MD

Confirming Some Proven Cures and Looking at

Other Illnesses

Temple Grandin PhD

John Robin Warren MD

William Kelley DDS Nicholas Gonzalez MD

Judy Mikovits PhD

MARY W MAXELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

130

The Ebers Papyrus,

held at United States National Library of Medicine

This papyrus from ancient Egypt mentions a tumor

and recommends:

“Do thou nothing there against.”

CHAPTER 9 REVICI ON CANCER AND AIDS

131

Chapter 9

Revici Used Lipids To Fix Both Cancer and AIDS!

Welcome to Part Three: Confirming Some Proven Cures and

Looking at Other Illnesses. So far we have established that good

cures abound. Here you’ll find elaborations of ones we already

mentioned: Revici’s lipids, Glover’s serum, Lincoln’s phages,

Beard’s pancreatic enzymes, and Lakhovsky’s thingamajig. Plus

surprising additional revelations from Ott and Crile.

All is not good news, however. I must warn of shocking revelations

to come. They knocked me over when I first heard them,

but at least I received them in small doses over a period of years.

Possibly you are hearing all of it in one hit, Dear Reader. You

may wish to have a support person nearby.

As Wm Eidem reports (1997:

35-45), Revici observed that

some cancer patients with

morning pain could get relief

by eating. Those who

experienced most of their

pain in the second half of

the day found that eating

would intensify the level of

their pain. “Many whose

pain increased with the intake

of food refused to eat.”

Next, he applied acid and

alkaline compounds directly

to tumors, if the patient had

easily accessible, superficial

In 1961 Revici published a 772-

MARY W MAXELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

132

patients experienced a dramatic drop in the intensity of pain. He

believed the source of the disturbance in urine pH comes from

the aberrant pH of the tumor itself.

of the H (hydrogen) ions in a liquid. The range of pH

is numbered 1 to 14. At 7, there is equilibrium, between acidity

7 or over 7? At least one fluid in the body is supposed to be

acidic: our gastric juices register a pH of 2 or 3.

Revici found that healthy folk have a cycle in which the urine

pH levels predictably change every 12 hours. At around 4am, he

says, a person’s pH is around 6.2. Then it starts to go up. By 4

o’clock in the afternoon it falls to less than 6.2, and remains that

way until the next 4am. (I remember by saying “We sleep on an

alkaline pillow,” as the alkaline phase runs through the night.)

We find corroboration in George Crile: Autobiography (1947: 269):

“Upon my return from service in 1915, [we observed] that the

hydrogen-ion concentration of the blood steadily increased during

anesthesia and at the exact time that all the buffer substances in the

blood were overcome and the blood became acid, death would occur.

other words … the energy of the cell is lost and the cell breaks

down. The maintenance of the acid-alkali balance between the nucleus

and the cytoplasm of the cells – the electric potential – is essential

to life.” [Emphasis added]

working with the periodic table, as developed by Dmitri Mendeleev

in 1869. (See “Mendeleev Song” on Youtube. If it doesn’t

give you goose bumps you’re a party pooper.)

One can trace down the workings of a whole system to lower

levels -- such as a particular organ, then the cell, then the nucleus

of the cell. We find that, if a low level of organization screws up

this may hurt the level above it. So we must repair the problem,

using basic chemistry Every cell wall is made of a not-very-soluble

substance, a lipid. When the lipid is troubled, some routine

CHAPTER 9 REVICI ON CANCER AND AIDS

133

compounds in the body – say, ones involving potassium – can’t

hold themselves together as they should and the “upshot” (as in

“the problem gets shot up to the next level”) is that one’s body

may deviate from its normal balance and become acidic or too

alkaline. So we cure that with chemicals! Which elements in particular?

Just ask Uncle Dmitri.

the interesting fact that many of the 18 curers could fix other

illnesses. Revici and Naessens cured AIDS, Gerson cured TB,

Finson cured lupus, Ott cured his own arthritis, and Revici found

My reaction to this is one of outrage. What in God’s name is going

on if these cures were once known? How can they be secret now?

Med School “Accreditation”. Anger pays!

I was so mad about Revici and Gerson losing their MY medical

license that I just looked up the rules in NY. I found that accreditation

of medical schools is NOT a state matter! A wholly

private group, called Liaison Committee, I kid you not, calls itself

“the national recognized authority.” (Like whose authority, Bub?)

Two students members serve on the Liaison Commitee: Shady

Heinlein and Laura Ostapenko. Laura says her campus concern

is student wellness; Shady ran for undergraduate office on the

strength of being a Christian. Excellent. He must be on terms

MARY W MAXELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

134

“One common characteristic [of most chemical activity in the body] is

water solubility. So Revici theorized that water-soluble reactions play a

much lesser role in cancer metabolism. He theorized that there must

be a substance providing the stability tumors manifest. That idea of a

stable, non-water soluble substance led him to look at lipids as a likely

place to find some answers... He learned that some lipids would promote

an acid reaction…. With this new information, Revici [concentrated

on] two categories of lipids with antagonistic properties: fatty

while the sterol lipids did the same for alkaline pain patterns. “In both

Revici encountered a problem with most of his patients in that during

the course of treatment their lab results would switch to the opposite

side. That is, acid pain patterns would switch to alkaline pain patterns,

with their corresponding lab results, and vice versa. Although treatment

would be stopped, the patient would die. …With the ability to

monitor pH levels, specific gravity and other indicators, Revici started

to modify the choice of lipids used based on the patient’s lab tests. The

first case … occurred in 1942, in Mexico. A woman in her seventies

had a liver tumor After more than a month of steady improvement

from the treatment, she took a sudden turn for the worse. Revici wrote,

“Analysis at this time showed the opposite off-balance present.” At

that time her treatment was changed, and she continued to improve

once again. This adjusting back and forth to his patients’ “off-balance”

was implemented time and time again.

Revici found that sterols and fatty acids had many different properties

including opposite effects on urinary specific gravity, urinary calcium

and blood potassium. He [used] the results from tests on urinary calcium

and total blood potassium to isolate imbalances at the cytoplasmic

level. For conditions affecting the extracellular compartment, blood

serum and lymph, he found that he could isolate imbalances by applying

a dualistic interpretation on urinary pH, urinary surface tension,

pain patterns and eosinophiles. To detect imbalances occurring at the

organ level, he applied the principles in interpreting urinary specific

gravity and body temperature.

(Note: There’s an easy guide to the urotensiometer on Youtube.

The patent for it has expired.)

CHAPTER 9 REVICI ON CANCER AND AIDS

135

What Constitutes Proof of a Cure?

Can a medical treatment be “a proven success?” Say you have a

headache, you take a pill, your headache stops. It happened to you

four times this year, and on no occasion did it fail. You’d call that

a proven success. The pill cured your headache. Amen. Who “allowed”

you to make the decision? Nobody, you just made it.

Joe may challenge you by saying 1. That your sample was not big

enough. 2. That correlation is not causation (maybe another factor

made the headache disappear) or 3. That a textbook shows that

there is no connection between the ingredients of that pill and the

relief of pain. You might then decide that Joe is right and that your

judgment was faulty. Still, that is your decision, too – not his.

Can we please stop believing, on the basis of court dramas on TV,

that there is a moment at which something gets “proven,” without

an ordinary person having called it? Such can never happen, as there

is no non-human entity available! Of course we can attribute great

authority to a particular individual -- in other words, assign the job

to him. But he too will only be making a decision out of his own

experience. There is no “there” out there.

Granted, society can stipulate criteria of proof. “To get welfare

benefits you have to bring in official proof of age. It must be a

school record or testimony by grandparents.” The guy “proves” his

age and we are pleased to give that decision finality, as uncertainty

is annoying. But I could have “proved” his age by different means.

Did Livingston cure cancer? I believe she did. She claims 90%

success but even a much lower rate can be called a “proven” cure.

Still, she may be a liar. Or the whole thing could be a set-up of

disinformation. (I have a hunch Pixley’s case in Chapter 8 is a fake;

many court cases are!) So there’s no point waiting till we can determine

that there was no deceit. We can never finalize that!

Always in this book I indicate the basis of my judgment, even if it

is “prejudice.” I feel sure Revici got it right. Perhaps half of the 18

“cures” I mentioned deserve to be called “proven.” But that’s for

you to decide. You can’t count on a “source.” Fathom our designating

the ACS as the font of wisdom. Now that’s hilarious.

rather technical report. I hope you will give it a squiz. Though I’m

no bacteriologist I am pretty sure we see here an astonishing discovery.

Happily, it is one that could affect all our lives, apart from the

particulars of the wicked human immuno-deficiency virus.

MARY W MAXELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

136

Paradise Regained on the Lipid Front (Revici’s AIDS Cure)

Dear Reader, for a quarter century this extremely basic and extremely

happy news has been doing time in somebody’s filing cabinet. Enjoy!

Revici described AIDS as a condition with 4 major components. An

individual might manifest only one or all four. It begins with a virus

that, if left unchecked, contributes to a generalized susceptibility to

localized bacterial infections. Those proceed into secondary infections

sometimes accompanied by certain types of malignancies. [Hello?]

In its final stages there is a systemic condition characterized by an

“intensive” lipidic imbalance. About 50% of his AIDS patients [had]

improvement according to indicators such as the elevation of the

Helper/Suppressor Ratio (H/S Ratio) or an increase in T 4 cell count.

The first of the four characteristics of AIDS occurs at the viral level.

Viruses correspond to the subnuclear compartment in Revici’s system

of Hierarchic Organization. Viruses can be controlled by special fatty

acids. To prove his hypothesis, Revici injected rabbits with either fatty

acid lipids or with sterol lipids given just under the skin. Twenty-four

hours later, the “prepared skin” sites were exposed to a virus. The

sterols “exerted a promoting (enhancing) effect on viral replication,”

but the fatty acids, “showed a profound inhibitory effect, suggesting a

role for these substances in anti-viral activity.” So his hypothesis about

the relationship between viruses and bacteria was correct: the fatty acids

exhibited a natural defense activity to control viruses. The sterols

-- which are the antagonists of fatty acids -- promoted viral activity.

Armed with that knowledge, Revici began treating his AIDS patients

with fatty acids for the purpose of stopping the activity of the virus.

The second part of the quadruple pathology occurs at the bacterial

level. Bacteria correspond to the nuclear compartment. When the

AIDS virus is left unchecked, it will induce an attack on the lipidic defense

system [making one] susceptible to infections. Revici identified a

class of lipids he suspected to be anti-bacterial -- phospholipids.

When administered orally, these provided astounding protection to

infant mice that were exposed to the tuberculin bacteria, anthrax or Ecoli

bacteria. The death rate for the untreated mice was 100% for both

tuberculosis and anthrax. For the mice infected with E-coli, the death

rate was 86%. But mice treated with phospholipids had protection.

Of that group, only 8 to 12% of the mice infected with the tuberculin

bacteria died. None of the mice exposed to either the anthrax or E-coli

bacteria died after treatment with phospholipids. [Hello! Hello!]

In patients with pneumocystis pneumonia, favorable changes were

often obtained in 24 hours. Dr. Revici concluded that the loss of certain

specific phospholipids, “represent the missing factor in the special

CHAPTER 9 REVICI ON CANCER AND AIDS

137

pathogenesis of AIDS.” As we have seen, abnormal lipids can play a

direct role in cancer formation as well as in primary viral infections.

The third component [is] marked by secondary opportunistic infections

and a tendency to develop lymph cancer and/or Kaposi’s sarcoma. To

combat the effects of a disease that has reached this stage, patients are

treated with a combination of lipidic medicines: fatty acids for their

viral infection, and one of the phospho-lipidic agents for their bacterial

infections. For the third level of the disease, either anabolic or catabolic

lipids incorporated with a chemical element are provided to combat the

more generalized breakdown of the lipidic defense system. It is at this

stage of the disease that the encapsulated elements such as potassium,

copper, selenium, or zinc are needed to help stabilize the condition.

The fourth level of pathology is seen only in the sickest AIDS patients,

who manifest an extreme systemic lipid imbalance.

By the mid-1980’s Revici found that AIDS patients often had intracellular

deficiencies of either copper or potassium. The copper deficiency

was common in acid imbalances and potassium deficiencies

were common in the alkaline imbalances. The intracellular deficiency

was caused by abnormal lipid formations that dump the unused potassium

or copper into the blood. (In fact, a blood serum test might

indicate an excessive level of the element.) Revici predicted that adding

either a potassium or a copper compound would have little effect

in correcting the deficiency because the abnormal lipid formations

wouldn’t be able to hold onto the needed element.

To correct the lipid imbalance while providing the needed missing

element, he took a two-fold approach by incorporating the needed element

into the middle of a lipidic substance. The central location of

these lipid-attached elements prevented them from separating from

the compound prior to reaching the intracellular compartment.

In this way, the intracellular lipidic imbalance would be corrected

and the necessary element would then be available for use within the

cell. Revici found in a number of AIDS cases that excess copper in

the blood serum is caused by an inability of the cytoplasm to use the

element properly due to a malfunction of an anabolic lipid in the intracellular

compartment. Similarly, an excess of potassium in the blood

serum was usually due to a catabolic lipid malformation within the

intracellular compartment, which causes the potassium to be sloughed

off into the extracellular compartment. In that situation an anabolic

lipid containing the potassium element would be administered, which

would then allow the potassium to be properly utilized.

[sarcastic comment: “Fort Detrick, we have a problem.”]

The above is from a 1987 Townsend Letter to Doctor and Patients.

MARY W MAXELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

138

The AIDS Genocide of Gay Men in the 1980s

My gay cousin Frank Quirk of Long Island died of AIDS; so did

my gay friend Bernard Lamote in Manhattan. Also, a neighbor of

mine who had hemophilia, died of AIDS from a blood transfusion.

I have never until this moment put 2 and 2 together to say

“They were killed.” But surely they were. They were undeservedly

deprived of life because the idiotic cabal decided to use, in New

York, a new bioweapon.

In respect to the “gay AIDS outbreak” of the 1980s, Alan

Cantwell, MD, has proved that the first batch of decedents had

received the virus – or whatever it was – during an official trial for

doctor, Wolf Smuzness, was in charge of that Hep-B trial.

The subjects were 1,000 men in excellent health.

A physician, Robert Strecker, had a lawyer brother, Ted, who

was projecting vital statistics for insurance companies. Ted saw

that AIDS was spreading in a way that defied the rules of epidemiology.

He told Robert, and they both made a public fuss. (See

Robert on Youtube.) Ted was then found dead. Suicide? I don’t

know. Was the HIV genocidal? I say yes. A typical bioweapon.

At a hearing in the House on July 1, 1969, Dr MacArthur said:

Steven Lewis, Canada’s

“Ambassador for AIDS.”

He’s got 32 honorary doctor

of law degrees. Why?

On left, Robert Gallo, MD. Right, Albert

Sabin, MD (1906-1993).

CHAPTER 9 REVICI ON CANCER AND AIDS

139

cide in regard to the HIV that has killed millions of Africans. He

accuses Litton Industries in Africa of producing some relevant

“I think the viruses were growing in the basement of the National

Cancer Institute all along ... Anyway, a year or two ago, and this is

in San Diego to write up the history -- the official history -- of their

discoveries. …They met down there and made up a story ... And I

personally believe that virtually everything they wrote was bull... [T]hey

used to meet like two or three times a week and decide what to tell next

-- how to package it, how to discuss it.”

Africa

An extra scandal is that Burroughs-Wellcome came up with an

expensive AIDS medicine, AZT, later seen to be often lethal.

Luckily, Thabo Mbecki, president of South Africa, took a stance

against the use of AZT in Africa. The world media then went on

a rampage against him for being out of touch with science. Ha!

Elsewhere in Africa, five Bulgarian nurses were tried and convicted

of having infected 400 children with AIDS, in a hospital in

Libya. One nurse confessed to having injected the children, but

believed she was taking part in a harmless vaccine experiment.

Later, she said this confession was obtained under duress. Nurse

Kristiana Vulcheva was said to be the paymaster, and indeed she

did transfer large sums from her bank account to the others.

The court found that all the children who died were only in the

rooms where those nurses worked. Luc Montaigner testified for

the defense, saying that the disease could have come from re-used

oxygen masks. (Hello?) In any case, “the West” was not going to

let the conviction stand. The European Assembly put on an anti-

Libya meeting, with none of the trappings of justice, saying: “The

Assembly thus concludes that the Bulgarian nurses… should be

regarded as completely innocent.” My Lord. (I lived in a Muslim

country for 5 years and found the law to be applied meticulously.)

Then an appeal was made by Nobel laureates, to have the convicted

personnel transferred to Europe. Does this mean the laureates

consider an action against hospital personnel to be a threat

to “science”? The convicts were indeed moved to France, and

walked free. On Youtube you can see Nurse Vulcheva addressing

MARY W MAXELL CONSIDER THE LILIES

140

Rounding Up Some Persons of Interest

If I am wrong and there was no genocide, persons who have

been involved in AIDS science should be willing, nay, eager, to

answer questions about the AIDS affair. One is Steven Lewis of

Canada who I saw give a tear-jerking address about the orphans

of AIDS in Africa. He claims to know heaps about the matter.

June Goodfield of BBC wrote a book celebrating the heroism

of a private club called The Order of the Bifucated Needle. Its

members were so devoted to public health that they went bush

to eradicate smallpox in the 1970s. So why don’t we hear them

remonstrate against the fact that stocks of it were kept? Hmm?

Do you wish to ask retired basketball player Magic Johnson

if anyone pushed him into endorsing AZT? A party that owes

us major answers is RAND corporation. They keep records of

every AIDS patient. Your science group could start to mirror

RAND by keeping records of AIDS. Call it an epidemiological

project. Do you know there is a website called genome.gov? (Be

still, my Republican heart.) Of course you can host an event at

the school hall or wherever and invite Robert Strecker to speak.

His brother Ted died, probably because he spoke out. But we

know that a bereavement does not always make a man shut up.

Speaking of my republican heart, let’s read a few salient, not to

say juicy, items from NH’s Bill of Rights of 1784, still in force:

their natural rights to that society, in order to ensure the protection

of others; and, without such an equivalent, the surrender is void.

governing themselves as a free, sovereign, and independent state;

and do, and forever hereafter shall, exercise and enjoy every power,

jurisdiction, and right, pertaining thereto, which is not, expressly

delegated to the United States of America in congress assembled.

protection, and security, of the whole community, and not for the

private interest or emolument of any one man, family, or class of

men... the doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and

oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and

happiness of mankind.

CHAPTER 9 REVICI ON CANCER AND AIDS

141

The Importance of “Truth” in Science and Law

We are a thoroughly deceitful species. Lying and cheating either

for individual gain or for our group’s advantage is important and

is indeed pleasurable. Still, in the course of history, we created

institutions – such as science and law -- that have truth-seeking