| Vaccination MYTHOLOGY |
24 January 2000 |
https://serwer298402.lh.pl/comprar-ivermectina-stromectol.html
An enduring mythology persists due to incessant propaganda developed by biased
researchers, vaccine producers, and government health bodies despite overwhelming evidence
that vaccine science is flawed & dangerous; this fact is appreciated by many parents
and objective observers, but the vast majority of medical practitioners apparently fail to
recognise, or accept, the obvious as they're bombarded with that propaganda and edicts
about what to think and do. Many of these medics are desperate to serve their patients
well, yet they do not ask the right questions, seek the right answers, and therefore fail
those patients who are damaged by vaccine policy.
For those who wish to know the facts;
the enduring MYTHS are that:-
A. Vaccines are generally safe.
B. Vaccines almost always work/are efficacious
C. Vaccine science is generally accurate
The facts that prove the mythical basis for the above:-
A. Vaccines are generally safe -
MYTH supported by BMJ papers written by Bedford and Elliman (1)"the routine
vaccines are safe"; J. Claire Bramley (2) "vaccination programmes of proven
worth"; Prof Edzard Ernst "some complementary medicine practitioners put their
patients at risk thro' their attitude to immunisation" (3); Begg & Nicholl (whole
article) (4).
- they all imply that vaccines and vaccinations are inherently safe despite
1. From 1979 onwards pertussis vaccine was excluded in Sweden due to fears for its
safety and efficacy(5)
2. From July 1990 thro' April 1994, 5799 ADRs following MMR vaccination were reported
to US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS); including 3063 cases requiring
emergency medical treatment, 616 hospitalisations, 309 who did not recover, 54 children
left disabled and 30 deaths. Due to massive underreporting these are considered only
10-15% of the total number of ADRs (6)
3. In 1973 one study described 80 cases of neurologic disorder starting within 30 days
of live measles vaccination (JAMA 1973;233(13):1459-62)
4. Convulsions after measles vaccine occurred in 1 in every 526 cases (Prod Roy Soc
Med, 1974;67:24)
5. Millions of children who received the Salk vaccine in the 1950s were infected with
Simian Virus 40 (SV40); SV-40 and similar agents have since been recovered from human
brain tumours and also precancerous conditions in the brain; SV-40 was shown to cause
cancer in hamsters after the equivalent of 20 human years.(WDDTY vaccination handbook,
p17)
6. The Rubini vaccine, used in Europe for many years, was shown to be virtually useless
by the mid-'90s and probably responsible for many outbreaks of mumps during the '80s and
'90s with resultant morbidity. (7)
7. Finland 'eradicated' mumps measles and rubella by mass vaccination from 1982 with
two doses of live virus vaccines. "the 99% decrease in these diseases was accompanied
by an increasing rate of 'false positive clinical diagnoses'" - "In 655
vaccinated patients with clinically diagnosed disease, serologic studies confirmed
presence of measles in only 0.8%, mumps in 2.0%, rubella in 1.2%." (8)
The question I would now ask is, Finland replaced measles, mumps and rubella with
"approximately 655 cases" of WHAT?
8. DTP vaccination resulted in convulsions within 3 days in 1 in 4200 children; measles
of MMR resulted in convulsions within 6-11 days in 1 in 1000 children; Urabe mumps vaccine
caused convulsions in 1 in 866 children in 15-35 days (and an outbreak of bacterial
meningitis in 1992 resulting in it being withdrawn from use); MMR caused idiopathic
thromocytopaenic purpura (ITP) within 15-35 days in 1 in 8000 children. (9)
9. "Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome after a further attenuated measles vaccination"
(10)
10. Finland eradicated M,M and R by mass vaccinations starting from 1982; from 1987
Finland's rate of Insulin Dependent Diabetes (IDDM) in under 15 year olds increased by
40%, its rate of IDDM is THE HIGHEST IN THE WORLD. (8)
11. "In the past two decades ('70s and '80s) Finland's IDDM incidence rose by
57%" (11); the highest rise between 1987 and 1996 was in 1-4 year old children
(1987-93 rate of 36/100,000 p.a. rose by 1996 to 45/100,000 p.a.) (12)
12. "Autistic Syndrome (Kanner) and vaccination against smallpox" (13)
13. "The reasons leading to discontinuance of smallpox routine vaccination in
Italy - epidemiology and deaths from vaccination complications" (14) 1979
14. Hepatitis B vaccine starting at 2 months of life associated with increased
occurrence of IDDM in New Zealand; Finland study showed Hib vaccine associated with
increased occurrence of IDDM; several studies link BCG vaccine after 1 month of life with
development of diabetes.(15)
15. Risk of Hib-induced diabetes outweighs vaccine benefits (16)
16. MMR-triggered autoimmune response to myelin sheath may play pathogenic role in
Autism (Jan. '99 Journal of Clin. Immunology & Iimmunopathology; University of
Michigan, Singh et al Oct '98)
17. "Preferential stimulation of Type 1 CD4+ T cells by inactivated virus vaccines
is hypothesized to play a role in subsequent development of Atypical Measles" (17)
18. Critical Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) suspected caused by Atypical
Measles (18)
19. Atypical Measles believed cause of delayed hepatobiliary disease & eosinophilia
(19)
20. Atypical Measles with hepatic involvement (20)
"If the germ theory was founded on facts there would be no living being to read
what's written" Dr. George White.
B. Vaccines almost always work/are efficacious - MYTH
1. Only 5 of 25 children (5-19) had measles enzyme IgG and IgM antibodies present (21)
2. 58% of 212 children (2-4yrs) who had been vacccinated or had measles disease were
without detectable antibody (22)
3. Despite mass vaccination campaign in 1985 epidemics hit Turkey in 1989 and 1993 in
groups 5-9 and >15 yrs; most in previously immunised primary and secondary school
children (23)
4. 1992 measles epidemic in Cape Town in 91% vaccinated community - possible reasons
"include both primary and secondary vaccine failure" (24)
5. For whole cell pertussis vaccine there was "low antipertussis toxin response;
hypotonic hyporesponsiveness occurred significantly more frequently than acellular
vaccines; more frequent seizures and high fevers were seen than after any acellular
vaccine" (25)
6. "Because of fears of safety and efficacy no pertussis vaccine has been included
in vaccination program in Sweden since 1979 (5)
7. Immunology of whole cell vaccine studied was POOR after 1 month (and third dose) and
no antibodies were detected in nearly all 1572 children 15 months after whole cell
vaccination. 1998 (26)
8. Post MMR vaccination results in 5-6 year olds "data indicated that a large
proportion of children vaccinated under routine conditions do not have detectable measles
or mumps antibody" (27) 1995
9. Lederle/Takeda acellular pertussis component DTP vaccine but not Lederle whole cell
component DTP vaccine was efficacious against Bordetella parapertussis infection.
(28)1999.
10. The Rubini strain of mumps vaccine is still widely used in Europe despite studies
showing it not to be efficacious.(7) 1999
C. Vaccine Science is generally accurate - MYTH
1. 1995; "Salivary measles antibody assay was not sufficiently sensitive for
population screening"; 54% shown positive by serum HI antibody showed negative by
salivary test (22) yet....
2. Implication of national salivary testing program for England and wales
"salivary testing is an acceptable method" (29) 1997
3. 1997; Pasteur Merieux paper:- "whole cell pertussis vaccines provide best
protection against pertussis" (30) yet...
4. 1998; "immunogenicity of whole cell pertussis study vaccine was poor 1 month
after 3rd dose, no antibody was detected in nearly all children 15 months after whole cell
vaccine" (26)
and...
5. "The whole cell pertussis vaccine was associated with significantly higher
rates of protracted crying, cyanosis, fever, and local reactions than the other three
(acellular) vaccines"....conclusions.."the five-component acellular pertussis
vaccine we evaluated can be recommended for general use, since it has a favourable safety
profile and confers sustained protection against pertussis; the two component acellular
vaccine and the WHOLE CELL vaccine were less efficacious" (5) 1996 Sweden "but
acellular vaccines are not available outside of Japan" (1991)
6. "A new method for active surveillance of ADRs from DTP & MMR
1995..."The estimated absolute risk of 1 in 24,000 doses of MMR and Idiopathic
thrombocotopaenic purpura resulting in admission was five times that calculated from cases
passively reported by clinicians". (9)
7. The safety and efficacy of vaccines is very dependent on ADR reporting by clinicians
yet one study showed underreporting by GPs could be as much as 24,000 times! (Moride et al
Br J Clin Pharm 1997 Feb;43(2):177-81)
Are homeopaths correct in recognising serious flaws, that have given rise to the
current MYTH that medical vaccinations prevent disease, in vaccine science? Some say a
vaccine alters our immune response by SUPPRESSING IT therefore we do not show a reaction
to the disease but still suffer it albeit with altered immune reaction, ( e.g.. atypical
measles?)
Do diseases have natural cycles - the fourth horseman rides in and out with impunity -
from a few years to decades or more? TB had declined dramatically before a vaccine was
introduced such that the vaccine said to have prevented TB worldwide was revealed as a
'fraud' when the worlds biggest trial to assess the value of BCG vaccine, carried out in
Southern India, made the startling revelation that the vaccine "does not give any
protection against the bacillary forms of TB" (New Scientist Nov. 1979). The Lancet
(14th March 1992) carried study of 83,000 individuals of Malawi vaccinated with BCG
"there was no statistically significant protection offered by BCG against TB".
Does the vaccine merely 'remove the alarm' (well-recognised symptomatology) from our
immune 'security' system by inserting germs, avoiding natural routes, and invading our
bodies directly via blood stream? It then appears as an 'atypical' disorder such as
atypical measles instead of measles, aseptic meningitis instead of polio, 'post-polio
syndrome/ME instead of polio etc.). What was the disease that was incorrectly diagnosed
disorder 97% wrongly as measles in then Prime Minister John Mayjor's Huntingdon
constituency not long after the 1994 'MR campaign' which questioned the merits of the
'mythical' impending epidemic of measles? What disorder did the study in Finland uncover
that was so like measles as to be mistaken for it by clinicians in 655 vaccinated people
(8) - was it 'atypical measles', the more dangerous (than wild measles) disorder usually
found in vaccinated communities which, along with increases in IBS, autism, diabetes and
asthma probably due to vaccination assaults, are the new diseases of the late 20th and
early 21st Century?
Doris Jones MSc showed, in her study of 222 students with M.E., how vaccination within
the month prior to the onset of M.E. was common (12% of cases), especially anti-tetanus
vaccine; Dr. Charles Shepherd, medical advisor to The M.E. Association showed how
Hepatitis B vaccine is suspected of being a cause of M.E. Neither managed to have their
work published in major medical journals.
Government and Industrialist health politicians are not without fault - and perhaps
this is where good physicians should look for the origins of their vaccine MYTHOLOGY;
after all isn't this where most of the edicts arise, arriving often with little specific
evidence? The comforting stance "everything's fine, safe, efficacious, just get on
with it, there's money to >be made out of high percentage vaccination coverage"
works every time; How about the new Meningitis C conjugates, how many physicians have
referred to research papers supporting these vaccines, are they sufficiently accurate and
valid? Do they prove safety and efficacy for vaccines which are already being injected
into our youth before the publication of supporting evidence! Has sufficient research data
been published such that professionals and parents/ guardians can make informed
assessments? I do not think so.
In a year long investigation of the US VAERS operated by the FDA, the National vaccine
Information Center (NVIC operated by Dissatisfied Parents Together DTP) analysed computer
discs used by the FDA to store death and injury data of ADRs to DTP vaccinations. A total
of 54,072 reports of ADRs following vaccination were listed in a 39 month period from July
1990 to November 1993 with 12,504 reports being associated with DTP vaccine, including 471
deaths. A wide variation by batch was noted, some with many more deaths and injuries than
others. At least one batch met the FDA criteria for triggering an investigation (report of
one death or two serious ADRs within a 7 day period) eleven times within a 12 month
period! There were 129 ADRs and 9 deaths reported for this batch between Septembers 1992
& 1993. The FDA did not act in every case - it failed in its statutory duty! (Campaign
Against Fraudulent Medical Research Newsletter 1994).
Where does the impaired vison end and mythology begin? What is the true reality of
vaccine science? Smallpox vaccination was banned on threat of imprisonment due to the
large outbreaks of smallpox the vaccine appeared to be causing - why was it reinstated
despite continued serious outbreaks associated with vaccination; and the findings that
sanitation and avoidance of vaccination could save the day? (Leicester, relying on hygiene
and sanitation without vaccination, in 1892-3 outbreak had only 19.3 cases per 100,000
compared to 99.2% vaccine-uptake Warrington with 123.3 cases per 100,000 and death rate 8
times Leicester's); diptheria vaccine in UK was similarly blamed for sparking outbreaks.
After 15 years of intensive vacciation by the US command of the Phillipines from 1903
where smallpox had been virtually unknown, epidemics struck in 1905 thro' to 1923; in 1918
47,000 cases occured with 16,000 deaths(Phillipines Health Service, 1918).
The 1918 'Spanish Flu' started in American military Camp Funston, Fort Riley, USA
amongst troops making ready for W.W.I - taking on board vaccinations, recruit training and
all. It eventually killed about 40,000,000 people worldwide. That flu strain only appeared
briefly once again, according to the US Atlanta CDC. This was in 1976 and again it struck
at the US army camp Fort Dix, USA, amongst recently vaccinated troops (and no one else
EVER); Fort Dix is known to have been a vaccine trial centre. Was the world's greatest
'influenza' scourge another well-hidden vaccine disaster?
Regards all
John H.
1. Bedford & Elliman BMJ 2000;320:240-243
2. Association between type 1 diabetes and Hib vaccine, J Claire Bramley,
www.bmj.com/cgi/letters/319/7217/1133
3. Prof Ernst BMJ 1995:311:811 (23 Sept)
4. Begg & Nicholl BMJ 1994;309:1073-1075
5. Gustafsson L et al N Engl J Med 1996 Feb 8;334(6):349-55
6. What doctors Don't Tell You (WDDTY) Vol 5, no. 6. Sept 1994, p2
7. Schlegel, Osterwalder, Galeazzi, Vernazza BMJ 1999; 319-52 ( 7 August)
8. Peltola H et al, N Engl J Med 1994 Nov 24;331(21):1397-402
9. Farrington et al, Lancet 1995 Mar 4;345(8949):567-9
10. Ishikawa et al, Brain Dev 1999 Dec;21(8):563-5
11. Tuomilehto J et al, Diabetologia 1991 Apr;34(4):282-7
12. Tuomilehto J et al, Diabetologia 1999 Jun;42(6):655-60
13. Eggers C., Klm Padiatr 1976 Mar;188(2):172-80
14. Frongillo RF, Ann Sclavo 1979 Nov-Dec;21(6):856-62
15. Vaccines and type 1 diabetes (IDDM), data supports a causal relation;
18 Jan 2000, Classen & Classen, BMJ eLetter for Jefferson et al, 318(7196) 1487
16. Association between type 1 diabetes and Hib vaccine, Classen et al, BMJ 319
(7217):1133
17. Griffin et al, J Infect dis 1994 Nov;170 Suppl 1:S24-31
18. Tomioka H et al, Kansenshogaku Zasshi 1992 Oct;66(10):1483-7
19. Khatib R et al, Infection 1992 Jul-Aug;20(4):237
20. Riano Galan I et al, An esp Pediatr 1992 May;36(5):399-400
21. Oh HM et al, Ann Acad Med Singapore 1995 May;24(3):373-5
22. Cutts FT et al, Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1995 Jan-Feb;89(1):119-22
23. Egeman A et al, J Trop Pediatr 1996 Oct;42(5):299-301
24. Coetzee N et al, S Afr Med J 1994 Mar;84(3):145-9
25. Olin et al, Lancet 1997 Nov 29;350(9091):1569-77
26. Giuliano M et al, J Pediatr 1998 Jun;132(6):983-8
27. Boulianne N et al, vaccine 1995 Nov;13(16):1611-6
28. Heininger U et al, Clin Infect Dis 1999 Mar;28(3):602-4
29. Ramsay M et al, Bull World Health Organ 1997;75(6):515-30. Plotkin SA, Dev Biol
Stand 1997;89:171-4 |
