Government
has not tested pyres for risk of spreading disease Sunday 15 April 2001 Sundaay Telegraph
By Robert Matthews, Science Correspondent
GOVERNMENT scientists have admitted they have no hard evidence that it is safe for
animals with foot and mouth to be burned in the open.
Official assurances that the virus is not spread by smoke from open pyres are based on
little more than guesswork, a Telegraph investigation has discovered. Many scientists and
farmers have expressed concerns about the possibility of worsening the epidemic through
such open burning.
When The Telegraph put the point to the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
(Maff), the official response was that the risk of spreading the disease in this way was
"extremely, extremely low", as the concentration of virus was diluted by hot air
in the pyres. The spokesman insisted that the factual basis of this assertion was
"established scientific evidence".
However, further questioning revealed that this consisted entirely of theoretical
calculations and estimates. After requests for clarification, a Government spokesman
admitted that no measurements or air sampling had been performed around the pyres. He
said: "It is paper-based research."
The studies are believed to be based on rough estimates and data drawn from studies of
purpose-built incinerators, which operate at far higher temperatures than open pyres. Any
conclusions based on such research could prove hopelessly misleading.
Experts on combustion point out that - in contrast to purpose-built incinerators -
there is no guarantee that when infected animals are thrown on a pyre the virus is exposed
to high enough temperatures for long enough to destroy it all.
Anthony Burgess, the visiting professor of combustion science at University College
London, said: "Anyone who has run a bonfire knows that the material at the edge
doesn't catch fire, and that the temperature drops very quickly."
Concern focuses on the fact that the virus is contained in an animal's body fluids.
These are released when carcasses explode in the heat of the fire, sending infectious
material into upward hot air currents. Any surviving virus could then be blown by winds
for miles.
Ken Tyrrell, who was in charge of Cheshire's Maff team during the 1967 foot and mouth
outbreak, said that the consequent inquiry had called for carcasses to be buried rather
than burnt because of the risk of spreading the virus. Professor Burgess called for urgent
tests to be carried out on a real open-air pyre to assess the risk.
The admission by the Government that pyres have not been independently scientifically
examined comes amid fears that the whole of Britain may be engulfed by the epidemic. Last
week, the virus "jumped" distances of tens of miles.
Then, in Northern Ireland yesterday, tests confirmed that the province has suffered a
fresh outbreak, despite having been given the all-clear. Maff, which says it has no
figures for the number of open-air pyres throughout Britain, would prefer disposal through
rendering, incineration and burial.
The scale of the epidemic, however, has proved too great for these methods. So far,
more than a million animals have been slaughtered - two and a half times the total killed
in 1967. The backlog of carcasses awaiting disposal is about 400,000.
Burning at Britain's biggest foot and mouth pyre - designed to dispose of 3,000
carcasses a day - was halted last week only three days after it began following protests
from neighbours about potential health risks. Maff officials are now awaiting a decision
from Nick Brown, the Agriculture Minister, about what to do with the massive pyre at
Hallburn airfield, near Longtown, Cumbria.
Peter Tiplady, Cumbria's public health director, called for a detailed study of the
affects of such large pyres. He said there was a risk, though very small, that they could
release into the air BSE prions - thought to cause variant CJD in humans - and other toxic
agents. |