[back]
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF:
RAYMOND OBOMSAWIN
PREFACE
ABSTRACT
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF:
RAYMOND OBOMSAWIN
Raymond Obomsawin was born in the United States on August 16, 1950 and
holds dual US and Canadian citizenship. He married Marie-Louise in August of 1976, and
they have three, vibrant children: Sunrise, Sunbeam and Sundown. These children--two are
still in their teens, and one is twenty-one--have never received the prescribed regimen of
childhood vaccines, and due to a healthful lifestyle have exhibited total immunity to the
diseases that are common to the childhood years. (Time and again they've been physically
exposed to those ill from some of these very diseases.)
Dr. Obomsawin holds over two decades of cross-cultural experience--both in North America
and internationally--in the primary disciplines which impact on human bio-social
development. He holds a Baccalaureate Degree in Health Education and Communications,
Masters Degree in Development Education, and PhD with concentrations in Health Science and
Human Ecology.
He is currently serving as President of the Circle of Nations Institute of Life
Sciences &Sustainable Development an international R&D institution
legally established in Hawaii, and has previously served as: Manager of Overseas
Operations for CUSO (Canada's largest International Development NGO); Evaluation
Analyst in the Canadian International Development Agency; Evaluation Manager with
the Department of Indian Affairs & Northern Development; Executive Director in
the California Rural Indian Health Board system; Director of the Office for
National Health Development NIB (Now Assembly of First Nations); Founding
Chairman of the National Commission Inquiry on Indian Health; and Supervisor of
Native Curriculum for the Government of the Yukon Territory.
Some key highlights of Dr. Obomsawin's professional experiences and achievements follow:
PREFACE
TO THE THIRD EDITION
(MAY 1998)
Dr. Raymond Obomsawin, PhD
This extensive report focuses on the current massive international effort to administer
artificial immunization to the children of the world. The actual launching of the World
Health Organizations's Universal or "Expanded Program on Immunization" (EPI)
occurred in the year 1983. Its overriding purpose was to ahcieve maximum immunization
coverage of the world's children. Under the influence of the WHO--which is a United
Nations created and sustained multilateral agency--all national political leaders (then
representing 158 nation states) made a commitment to achieve 80% immunization coverage in
their respective countries by the year 1990. In that year the WHO set a new standard for
the governments of the world, ie, a more intensified goal of achieving 90% immunization
coverage by the year 2000. As a review document, this report poses an open challenge to
the scientific, developmental, and humanitarian basis of this global public policy, in
turn urging national governments to establish a far more rational, effective and harmless
inter-sectoral approach in seeking to ensure that the children and families of our world
community enjoy lifelong natural immunity to infectious diseases.
The research covered in this document tackles the issue of universal immunization from a
very broad perspective, thereby going well beyond the more obvious realities of its being
a "medical racket" hatched by a pharmaceutical industry beholden to its
investors, and religiously dispensed and defended by allopathic medicine men. Through
employing trans-disciplinary and integrative analyses it draws upon wide-ranging
disciplines and fields of thought as it considers the purposes, policies and practices
surrounding mass immunization. The effort to research and pull together this report
occurred while I was serving as an Evaluation Analyst in the Evaluation Division at the
Canadian International Development Agency. My initial research began early in 1991,
contextual to conducting a field evaluation of the EPI component of a major UNICEF project
then affecting several hundred communities in Northeast Thailand. The report is being
distributed and or sold in its present form under the auspices of a non-profit public
health advocacy organization, the Health Action Network Society, Burnaby, British
Columbia, Canada. (As author, I will receive no royalties from either its sale or
distribution.)
Since the first edition came out in the early 1990s, the many serious issues and concerns
which are raised in this study have not by any means been properly addressed or resolved.
The medico-industrial complex has neither wavered nor modified its posture of providing a
white washed endorsement and promotion of what is largely an unproven technological fix of
dubious origin, which carries its own seeds of disease and death. For the most part, the
same can be said for the public sector policies whereby government such as that of the
United States place themselves in an untenable conflict of interest position by playing a
direct role in the development of new vaccines, the active promotion and enforcement of
mandatory artificial immunization, and the monitoring of vaccines for adverse side effects
thereby setting its own criteria and degree of liability in the compensation of victims.
(Only one in four vaccine injury victims, who apply for compensation under US law, are
compensated for their often catastrophic vaccine injuries. Government qualifying rules
require that the onset of adverse symptoms must have occurred within four hours of the
administration of the vaccine. Despite these severe limitations in legal liability, since
passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, up to February 28, 1998,
compensatory payments have totalled $871 million 800 thousand.)
Sad to say, the public sector's world-wide reliable monitoring for adverse side effects
(not excluding that of the US Government) does not appear to have noticeably improved from
its abysmal state since the initial issuance of this report. As well, multilateral
development agencies such as UNICEF continue to push this unproven and essentially
spurious technology on a largely uninformed and intimidated public throughout the
Developing World nations. On a positive note, within First World nations public awareness
of the problems and dangers associated with mass immunization programs appear to have
broadened and intensified. Vehicles of the information revolution, such as the Internet
have helped considerably. Even physicians themselves are at long last waking up to and
advocating the truth, e.g., in France, 200 doctors have called on their govemement to
immediately halt the hepatitis B vaccine program because of the many cases of neurological
disorders and multiple sclerosis being caused by this vaccine, and in Switzerland, 500
doctors continue to oppose their govemement's MMR vaccine campaign.
Lawsuits for vaccine damages have as well become increasingly common. In the summer of
1997, various news reports in the Commonwealth countries reported that Dawbams law firm in
Norfolk, England is carrying forward a major class action lawsuit for widespread damages
arising from Britain's 1994 MMR campaign. In a public statement issued by this law firm it
is affirmed that:
We know of hundreds of children who were fat and well before being vaccinated, but who are now chronically ill or seriously mentally or physically disabled. Of some 600 cases: the most common are autism (202); serious digestive problems (110); epilepsy (97); hearing and vision problems (40); arthritis (42); behaviour and learning problems (41); ME (24); diabetes (9); paralysis (9); blood disorders (5); brain damage (3); and death (14).
Bolstering the firm's case is the fact that the affected children's
pediatricians and neurologists continue to state in British radio and TV documentaries
that the children's varied injuries were in fact caused by administration of the MMR
vaccine.
Additionally, growing numbers of affected parents and professionals have been instrumental
in the emergence of multiple research and activist organizations such as the Immunization
Awareness moni Society (IAS), New Zealand; Vaccine Awareness Network (VAN), Australia;
Association for Vaccine Damaged Children (AVDC), Canada; Global Vaccine
Awareness League (GVAL), California; and the National Vaccine Information Center
(AWIC) in the Greater Washington DC area. This phenomena tells us that there are still
some heroic and honest hearted people left in our world who are willing to stand together
for the right, and make personal sacrifices of their time, resources, and reputations in
the face of the combined efforts of government and industry to both slander and silence
them. In fact, in recent weeks a prominent member of the IAS has been in touch with me,
and shared information which included the fact that a 1992 survey by their organization
found an almost 500% greater incidence of asthma among New Zealand children who've
received routine childhood vaccines, than among those who haven't.
It is also of interest that on September 13-15, 1997, more than 500 parents, physicians,
university scientists, health officials, legal experts, ethicists, journalists and
activists from 34 states and five countries convened for the First International Public
Conference on Vaccination. This historic session was organized under the auspices of the
National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC). According to information provided by the NVIC,
the Conference inter alia examined issues such as vaccines and infant dealth; biological
mechanisms of vaccine injury; vaccines and learning disorders; hepatitis B vaccine
injuries; viral vaccinces and chromosome damage; polio vaccine contamination; and vaccine
regulation. A number of the more important observations made by the presenters at the
conference further corroborate and complement the alarming findings that are raised in my
report. Some key observations follow:
The general consensus among research scientists in attendance was that
current immunization programs are causing injuries and deaths because of inadequate
vaccine safety research, testing, manufacturing and monitoring for long term effects.
What's new? (Conference proceedings are available to the public from the National Vaccine
Information Center: #206-512 W. Maple Avenue, Vienna, VA, USA, 22180, Telephone:
1-800-909-SHOT.)
It also bears mentioning that I recently came across a June, 1995 interview with an old
acquaintance, the veteran physician to the Aboriginal People of Australia, Dr. Archie
Kalokerinos. The interview was published in the International Vaccination Newsletter
(Krekenstraat 4, 3600 Genk, Belgium). Archie is in many ways a man deserving of great
recognition for his brave struggle with the establishment forces in his country, who
attempted to block his efforts to expose and reverse the massive death rates (as high as
50%) being caused by mass immunization in a population at great risk to its dangers. In
this interview he states that it was this "extreme hostility" that:
. . . forced me to look into the question of vaccination further, and the further I looked the more shocked I became. I found that the whole vaccine business was indeed a gigantic hoax. Most doctors are convinced that they are useful, but if you look at the proper statistics and study the instances of these diseases you will realize that this is not so . . .
My final conclusion after forty years or more in this business [medicine] is that the unofficial policy of the World Health Organization and the unoffical policy of the 'Save the Children's Fund' and ... [other vaccine promoting] organizations is one of murder and genocide. . . . I cannot see any other possible explanation. . . . You cannot immunize sick children, malnourished children, and expect to get away with it. You'll kill far more children than would have died from natural infection.
Although the public sector in Canada hired a biomedical protagonist of
artificial immunization to attack and undermine the original findings and observations
contained in this document, nothing was effectively challenged or disproven in this
determined effort, nor has there been any challenge from any other quarter since.
Furthermore, I've received some very good news from a reliable source in Montreal, Canada,
that a number of practicing physicians in that city have ceased using vaccines in their
practice after having read this report. I fully trust that it will prove of lasting value
in informing and influencing other professionals, parents and interested lay persons who
may be honestly seeking to explore both sides of the controversy for the first time.
Finally, it is my sincere hope that the re-issuance of this document will provide a
considerable source of valuable documentation and commentary for those who are at the
forefront in the battle for biomedical truth and right in a world largely beholden to the
bottom line of capitalists who value their profits above seemingly everything else. In the
end, the truth with prevail.
"Discovery Consists In Seeing
What Every body Else Has Seen
And Thinking What Nobody
Else Has Thought . . . "
Albert Szent-Gyorgi
Introduction
Despite the widely accepted view that millions of children now enjoy freedom from various
life threatening infectious diseases, and thus improved health, because of highly
effective and safe vaccine programs, at the outset of the 90's an Evaluation of
Canada's International Immunization Program Phase I (CIIP--I), concluded that in fact
there are "many pressing questions which remain to be investigated within EPI
(Expanded Programs of Immunization) and Primary Health Care." A range of critical
issues relative to Universal Childhood Immunization (UCI) and EPI programs have been
examined and responded to in the main report. These follow:
The Unresolved Issue of UCI/EPI Effectiveness and Impact
The verifiable measurement of UCI/EPI effectiveness and impacts, has been pervasively
deficient in the major immunization programming investments made by The Canadian
International Development Agency (CIDA)--approaching $150 million--in the 1986-1991 time
period. The aforenoted CIIP--I evaluation study further noted that the actual impact of
UCI/EPI on mortality levels remain essentially undetermined and unsubstantiated. To quote:
"at present it appears that there is no conclusive evidence on the impact of
immunization on child mortality from all causes. . . . It may be that EPI's effect is
merely to bring about replacement mortality, whereby children . . . succumb to other
diseases instead. The uncertainty over the impacts of EPI remain a major question in PHC
[primary health care] programming." In light of the compelling need for the proper
and periodic evaluation of the impacts of publicly financed programs, this deficiency
remains a very serious one.
Unexpected and unexplainable outbreaks among "immunized" persons, have led
immunologists to now seriously question whether their current understanding of what
constitutes reliable immunity is in fact trustworthy. For example, the admission is being
made that immunity (or its absence) cannot be determined reliable on the basis of history
of the disease, history of immunization, or even history of prior serologic determination.
There is as well an emerging body of mathematically based epidemiological research which
suggests significant problems with UCI/EPI targeted efforts for the control and
eradication of measles in the Developing World, where in spite of high measles
immunization coverages, measles epidemics are being reported with surprising frequency.
Vaccine failures in the Oman polio epidemic could not be explained by failures in the cold
chain, nor on suboptimum vaccine potency. It was further observed that the efficacy of OPV
in inducing humoral immunity has been lower than expected, and that primary reliance on
routine immunization may be inadequate to achieve the goal of eradicating polio by the
year 2000. (Similar polio outbreaks have been occurring in other highly vaccinated
populations, e.g., the Gambia, Brazil, and Taiwan.)
The Unresolved Question of Potential Adverse Effects
Another basic issue that has never been addressed in UCI/EPI programming is the need for
the effective monitoring and evaluation of potential vaccinal adverse effects. Past
estimates on the degree of adverse reactions are both unreliable and optimistic since
actual monitoring efforts have generally been negligible. Furthermore, many physicians and
nurses are not cognizant of the importance of reporting untoward reactions, and or remain
unaware of their clinical features. Overall, the evidence strongly suggests that the
chronic underreporting of vaccine-induced morbidity, disability, and mortality is in fact
the norm, whether in the Developing or Developed Worlds. The first definitive policy
statement on this issue by the World Health Organization (issued on April 1991) indicates
the WHO's recognition of the significance of this problem. It should be considered as a
priority issue in future UCI/EPI research, monitoring and evaluation.
The Unresolved Issue of Long-Term Adverse Effects
A minority of qualified scientists are now postulating that the full vaccine schedule as
routinely employed in early childhood vaccination inevitably weakens the immunologic
system of the child, leaving this system crippled in its ability to protect the child
throughout life, and in turn opening the way for other infectious diseases due to such
immunologic dysfunction. It is also being postulated by such scientists that mass
immunization is directly contributing to the now widespread escalation of various
auto-immune, degenerative disease and allergic conditions.
The Unresolved Issue of Safer and More Effective Alternatives
Sufficient evidence now suggests that an increasing awareness of the potential dangers
that are being increasingly associated with mass vaccination programs, will serve to
precipitate public demand for greater research investments in the further exploration and
testing of promising and danger-free alternative prophylactic methods. A considerable body
of literature on lifestyle (especially nutrition) based prophylaxis and treatment for both
bacterial and viral infectious diseases suggest that this is the optimum alternative to
the artificial immunization dilemma.
The Unresolved Question of Ethics
UCI/EPI--as presently conceived and executed--represents two major departures from the
time honoured ethics and traditions of medicine:
Conclusion
The foregoing observations indicate that there is a genuine need for world governments to
reconsider their policies with respect to universal childhood immunization, ensuring
particular focus on clarifying the vital issues of the short and longer term impacts of
UCI/EPI, and the pressing need to establish far safer and more effective alternatives.
[next section]