SUPREME COURT "BUYS" VACCINES. SUPREME COURT DECISION UNDER THE RADAR IN A MEDICAL DICTATORSHIP
by
Jon Rappoport
JUNE 9, 2011. It happened in February. The media gave it brief attention and
moved on.
The US Supreme Court decided that parents whose children are severely damaged by
vaccines can't sue the manufacturer.
The case was Bruesewitz v. Wyeth. In 1992, Hannah Bruesewitz, six months old,
had a hundred seizures after receiving the DPT vaccine. She was never the same.
Her parents tried to sue the manufacturer, Wyeth, but there was already a
federal law on the books which stated that the only recourse was through the
government's labyrinthine Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
Appeals were lodged, and the case finally wound up the Supreme Court's lap. The
Court essentially ruled that no suit can be brought against a manufacturer for
"design flaws" in the vaccine, because the architecture of a vaccine implies
there will be "unavoidable adverse effects." It's a fact of life.
This decision sets a new practical standard for crime without punishment. Unless
the plaintiff can show that an alternative design of a vaccine would have
eliminated the adverse effect, without diminishing the "positive benefit" of the
vaccine, it's a no-go.
Aside from derailing all attempts to sue vaccine companies based on design
shortcomings, this Supreme Court decision opens the door to a spillover in the
entire arena of pharmaceutical drugs. Today, vaccines. Tomorrow, drugs.
It can now easily be argued that the design of any drug delivers inherent and
unavoidable harm to some patients.
And clearly, the drug companies know they can make this case.
So what could they do? Copy the vaccine-compensation system created by the
government. You apply for a hearing, you enter a wilderness of red tape, mostly
you lose, and when you win, the payout is miniscule compared with the potential
judgment a court could award. No punitive damages. The $$ paid out in government
compensation are funded by a tax bump on the price of all drugs sold in the US.
The government protects the drug companies all the way down the line.
A fundamental right to justice is erased.
Years from now, people may remember Bruesewitz v. Wyethas the watershed moment,
when the whole system took a universally visibleturn to into overt criminality.
"Yes, there were 50,000 heart attacks, but the drug has helped many people. And
there was no way to design it in a way that would have avoided these unfortunate
effects without destroying its benefits. If you think another design was
possible, prove it."
"Well, I don't have the $50 million I'd need to prove it."
"Your problem, not ours."
As the federal government and state governments try to close the door on parents
seeking to opt out of vaccinating their children, we may also be looking at the
day when official policy and law render the following reality:
You are forced to accept a product (vaccine) manufactured by a company. If the
product injures or kills you or your child, you can't take legal action against
the company. You can only appeal to the governmentfor compensation.
Finally, keep this in mind. The 1986 law which the Supreme Court upheld in its
recent decision, the law that exempts vaccine companies from financial
liability, made it possible then, and makes it even more possible now, since the
Supremes have spoken with finality, to guarantee that epidemics will be
profitable enterprises.
Did you get that?
All the phony epidemics that I've been documenting for some years now? West
Nile, SARS, Bird Flu, Swine Flu? All those duds? They wouldn't have been
possible to launch as PR fabrications, unless the vaccine companies could make
and sell the vaccines that were touted as sure-fire prevention.
Well, in 1986, those companies went to the federal government and struck a deal,
based on the threat that they (the companies) were going to get out of the
vaccine manufacturing business, because the successful law suits (for harm, for
injury, for death) were draining them of money.
The deal was inked. A law would be rammed through to protect these companies
from major financial exposure. And thus the way was cleared for the ensuing wave
of "epidemics."
Everybody would win, except the public. The vaccine companies would ring up huge
profits, there would be no law suits, and the government would have another tool
for frightening the population and increasing its level of control.
Based on nothing. Based on the invention of the idea of "killer germs on the
loose everywhere"--which is what you see when you go to the movies and sit in
the dark and eat popcorn.
Yes, I bring you news you won't find elsewhere.
JON RAPPOPORT
www.nomorefakenews.com
qjrconsulting@gmail.com
By
Jon Rappoport
www.insolutions.info
qjrconsulting@gmail.com
www.nomorefakenews.com