I take issue with Horowitz - in my book I research his earlier claims of conspiracy over HIV - and take issue with him.  I do not like the para below.  He presumes far too much.  In the reference (text attached to his video)  he writes...

the virus "could only have ended up in Mexico via the United States from Britain in care of the CDC. The CDC had to have sent them to Novavax, where Rick Brights team is now implicated in a conspiracy to commit genocide—the mass killing of people for profit."   Not at all sure he can justify his final words.  I would rather say it is extremely poorly executed science where profits rule over safety..  He jumps too quickly to perhaps legally discreditable claims of genocide - a great shame when much that he says on profits and vaccines is very good.

The part of our statement that I do not like is

H1N1 is an entirely unique strain, never seen before with all the hallmarks of a laboratory-produced designer virus, 'Author of Emerging Viruses: AIDS And Ebola: Nature, Accident or Intentional?, Horowitz says the swine-bird-human flu strain, reported to be found first in Mexico in late-March 2009, could have only come from Dr James S. Robertson and his colleagues in association with the US Centre for Disease Control and vaccine manufacturer Novavax, Inc, which was ready to profit from the release he says. Nobody else takes H5N1 Asian-flu infected chickens, takes them to Europe, extracts their DNA, combines their proteins with H1N1 viruses from the 1918 Spanish flu isolate, additionally mixes in some swine-flu genes from pigs, then reverse engineers them to infect humans, he said.
http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/04/30/dr-horowitz-mexicanswine-flu-made-in-lab/

 I also question some of his virology - especially that cited in above.   PCR is the basis of this science and whole viruses are often not involved.  He presumes too much that virologists can do what they claim. On all sides there are too many presumptions.  Errors with PCR identification of molecules as from viruses - and the presumption of pathogenicity -  may be at the root of this.  However we do not need to make his allegation - the document is very strong as it is.   I  love its start and its end... . I could have given some very juicy quotes from scientifically impeccable sources to strengthen this eg - a top UK government scientist Dr Phil Minor saying on record that the vaccines are "primitive" and made with "crude materials"  and filled with animal viruses - and I could add some science on how aluminum poisons immune cells and has been linked to paralytic illnesses.

Perhaps it would also be good to add a reference to how parents and concerned citizens in the UK previously refused vaccination, went to prison and incurred heavy fines, in order to end compulsory smallpox vaccination? They won us this freedom and it is important to give this a major historical precedent


But is this all too late now?


with every good wish, 


Janine