I looked at those links and i didn't find them convincing, they are more opinion than fact and it was hard to pinpoint the actual data and studies behind the claims. A set of links to sites that share a common belief does not constitute evidence.

One quote that stood out related to faith, hope and willpower being essential to the healing process. This is a fair point but he then proceeds to suggest the natural 'doctor' listens sympathetically to the patient's problems before prescribing an alternative like homeopathy. I fail to see how this is convincing evidence that modern medicine does not save lives. Rather it is revealing of the authors aim i.e to extol the virtues of alternative treatments.

 Homeopathy, as far as i can tell, concerns giving water tablets to cure a variety of illnesses. I can't understand how such a dilute concentration of any substance can assist the healing process beyond simple willpower and optimism. Now the latter is very important, don't get me wrong, but it can also be used by people fighting diseases with conventional medicine. I do not for one second believe that an aggressive cancer can be cured with homeopathy. I was chatting to a lady with basilar migraine (rare form) the other day and her story sounded horrific- they finally stayed her hallucinatory symptoms, inability to walk and extreme vertigo with a high dose of Verapamil. Yes it took some playing around with the dose but she is now free from the symptoms.  Homeopathy would not have halted this rare and bizarre condition because pure optimism would not have done it either.

 I take my hat off to anyone willing to listen patiently to someone's concerns but if one is going to claim the tablet itself worked to cure a condition then there will need to be raw data in the form of clinical trials to support that claim. The same goes for amazing claims that less people die when doctor's pack up and go home. Try telling that to the man brought into hospital with meningitis on the day no doctor's were available!!! If those statistics are true then i would like to see the data analysed carefully and all factors considered before conclusions are drawn. If i  eat an apple, orange and banana a day for months then get a nasty cold and stop eating bananas only to find i no longer have the infection a few days later then it would be crazy for me to suggest giving up bananas cured my cold. I would need to look at a variety of things before i drew my conclusions.

 As for the cholesterol comments, i appreciate the link but so much evidence contradicts this article.  I will be sure to tell my work colleague that high cholesterol does not cause heart problems when he returns from his quadruple bypass surgery in several months. His cholesterol levels were very high and had happily damaged his heart in a silent fashion.