Dr. Diane Harper
[2010 Feb] Gardasil Warnings Ignored Says Researcher Why, when Dr Harper asked the MoH not to promote Gardasil as a 'cervical cancer vaccine' because, in her words, this is simply not true, did the Ministry of Health ignore her request?
[2009 Dec] Critique of Dr. Diane Harper’s Comments on Gardasil By Judy Wilyman
[2009 Oct] Clarification Re: Gardasil Bombshell "I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn't help but question why we need the vaccine at all," said Joan Robinson, Assistant Editor at the Population Research Institute.
[2009 Oct] Gardasil Researcher Drops A Bombshell “I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all,” said Joan Robinson, Assistant Editor at the Population Research Institute.
[2009 Aug] Gardasil Researcher Speaks Out "One of their teenage daughters became severely ill after her first dose of Gardasil. Dr. Ratner says she’d have been better off getting cervical cancer than the vaccination. “My daughter went from a varsity lacrosse player at Choate to a chronically ill, steroid-dependent patient with autoimmune myofasciitis. I’ve had to ask myself why I let my eldest of three daughters get an unproven vaccine against a few strains of a nonlethal virus that can be dealt with in more effective ways.”
[2009 Oct] CERVARIX AND DR DIANE HARPER - CORRECTION
[2009 Oct] JAB 'AS DEADLY AS THE CANCER' THE cervical cancer vaccine may be riskier and more deadly than the cancer it is designed to prevent, a leading expert who developed the drug has warned. She also claimed the jab would do nothing to reduce the rates of cervical cancer in the UK.