Looking
where it ain't
[back]
Medical Mind Control
[back] Medical study ploys
[One classic is the way the industry are only doing MMR
autism epidemiology studies (See: Government/industry),
which they can easily fiddle, instead of actually studying the children.
While the drug and charity industry
keep looking for drugs to cure symptoms, a gravy train that will run
forever, they hope. Another is
Autism and
genetic studies over the truth--environmental/vaccines.] Government/industry MMR studies
Mercury levels
Autism and
genetic
Autism Speaks Spends $27.4 Million on Genetics Studies since '06
[2012 Oct] Vaccine
Research Conflicts of Interest: Vaxxed & Unvaxxed Kids Not Compared
The elephant in the vaccine research room is the comparison of health between
vaxxed and unvaxxed people. That research simply isn’t being done, in spite of
being the obvious way to determine whether vaccines are safe or lead to better
health. There’s one near-sure way to avoid finding something, and that’s
not to look for it. The lack of research that could end the question of whether
vaccines are safe simply isn’t being done. The reason is obvious: Those who
could do it won’t because it would conflict with their careers and financial
status.
[2012 Feb] Scientists
with Starving Brains By J.B. Handley scientists and the press,
continue to publish and report on useless studies that insult the intelligence
of integrity of both parents and well-meaning professionals alike.
BOYD HALEY comments: IOM To Hold Workshop on Autism (& not
vaccines)
This is the old ploy of "looking were it ain't" if you don't want to
find something. I have encouraged parents of autistic children in the USA
to get urinary porphyrin profiles done to determine if their child shows
signs of mercury toxicity. It is almost 100% that these children, at least
those that have reported back to me, are moderate to extremely mercury toxic
with regards to this clinical testing procedure. Just where would children
less than 7 years of age obtain enough mercury to inhibit their porphyrin
pathways? So the IOM suggests looking everywhere except where the most
logical place would be, in the vaccines given to these children that
contained thimerosal. The IOM ought to be ashamed of itself, if not for
doing something scientifically dishonest, then for being so inept as to
think vaccine exclusion from consideration of exclusion for autism causation
would be accepted by the American public. Most importantly, while they are
looking everywhere else these children lose time before an acceptable
treatment for mercury toxicity can be developed---and at least a significant
number of autistic children are definitely mercury toxic. Boyd Haley
[May 2007]
The mercury, autism debacle: How stupid do they
think we are? by Michael Wagnitz
If one was really interested in determining the body burden of
mercury they would perform the urinary porphyrin profile analysis (UPPA).
Porphyrins are precursors to heme, the oxygen carrying component of
blood. Mercury inhibits the conversion of specific porphyrins to
heme. This test is backed by decades of published research. Recently
it was shown in two published, peer-reviewed studies, that mercury
inhibited porphyrins were significantly higher in autistic patients
when compared to age matched controls (1)(2). The other way to test
for mercury in the body is by using a provoking agent and measuring
mercury in the urine. ...... Dr. Fombonne refers to the amount
of mercury in vaccines as "trace". Again, if he were a toxicologist
or chemist, he would realize that the concentration of mercury in a
multi-dose vaccine vial is 250 times higher than what the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifies as hazardous
waste.
I discuss the British findings, briefly, in Chapter Twelve, pg 250. A highly
regarded British laboratory, Scientific Analyses Ltd. (SAL Ltd.) in Manchester,
tested samples of British-made anthrax vaccine for the Granada Television
network and found a thirty-six parts per billion concentration of
squalene in two lots of the British vaccine.
That is a fairly close match for the concentration found in one of the five lots
confirmed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to contain squalene. Lot #FAV
043, according to the FDA, contained forty parts per billion. What is also
noteworthy is the specific test used by SAL Ltd. to detect squalene in anthrax
vaccine: flame ionization/gas chromatography. This is the same test used by the
FDA. Interestingly, a laboratory the U.S. Army sub-contracted to test the
vaccine, SRI, used a much less sensitive analysis called liquid chromatography,
which would have been incapable of finding squalene in the concentrations
present in either the U.S. or British anthrax vaccines. SRI has a long
business association with the Department of Defense and an unanswered question
is whether SRI deliberately chose to use a test that would invariably fail to
find low concentrations squalene in the vaccine and thus allow the U.S.
Department of Defense to declare its anthrax vaccine squalene-free, which it
did. Gary Matsumoto
http://www.vaccine-a.com/forum.html