- CT
angiogram
Coronary angiography (heart) - Aortic angiography (the major artery from the heart)
- Renal arteriography (kidneys)
- Extremity arteriography (arm or leg)
- Cerebral angiography (head)
- Pulmonary angiography (lungs)
- Lymphangiogram (lymph vessels)
- Ventriculography (right side or left side of the heart)
- Fluorescein angiography (eye)
ThyroidChange PLEASE SHARE. We cannot emphasize this enough. A full
thyroid panel should include:
Free T3, Free T4, TSH, Thyroid Antibodies, Reverse T3
For more information on thyroid testing, please see this link:
http://www.thyroidchange.org/about-testing.html
[2015 May] 50 Human Studies, in Utero, Conducted in Modern China, Indicate Extreme Risk for Prenatal Ultrasound: A New Bibliography by Jim West 1) Supports Western critics who have long argued that ultrasound contributes to various neonatal and childhood diseases, and neurological epidemics such as ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) and eye diseases. 2) Supports and revives earlier Western animal studies that are critical of ultrasound, yet had been rejected or ignored. 3) Enables arguments for novel disease causation models, for example, chorioamnionitis, neonatal jaundice, bone and tissue malformation, immune dysfunction, and a wide variety of diseases related to broad-spectrum hormonal dysfunction.
[2012] Killing children with X-ray images - Death by procedure
[2012 June] HOW SWINE FLU WAS INVENTED By Jon Rappoport The test used to diagnose Swine Flu was useless. It was misleading. It was obvious it was misleading. But it was used. Why? Because it would provide cover. It would make it seem as if Swine Flu was everywhere on the planet.
[2011 Oct] Women endangered by high rate of false-positive mammograms
[2011 July] Widely used CAD mammography tool fails to find invasive breast cancer, causes needless tests and stress "In real-world practice, CAD increases the chances of being unnecessarily called back for further testing because of false-positive results without clear benefits to women,” said Joshua Fenton, assistant professor in the UC Davis Department of Family and Community Medicine. “Breast cancers were detected at a similar stage and size regardless of whether or not radiologists used CAD."
[2011 March] CT Scans Cause Coming Cancer Epidemic by PATRICK MALONE
[2011 April] 20 year trial shows prostate cancer test not worth having.
Brain Scans Show Whatever You Want to See
[2010 Nov] MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS: CONFUSION By JON RAPPOPORT
[2010 Nov] Lies, Damned Lies, and Medical Science Tatsioni doesn’t so much fear that someone will carve out the man’s healthy appendix. Rather, she’s concerned that, like many patients, he’ll end up with prescriptions for multiple drugs that will do little to help him, and may well harm him. “Usually what happens is that the doctor will ask for a suite of biochemical tests—liver fat, pancreas function, and so on,” she tells me. “The tests could turn up something, but they’re probably irrelevant. Just having a good talk with the patient and getting a close history is much more likely to tell me what’s wrong.” Of course, the doctors have all been trained to order these tests, she notes, and doing so is a lot quicker than a long bedside chat. They’re also trained to ply the patient with whatever drugs might help whack any errant test numbers back into line. What they’re not trained to do is to go back and look at the research papers that helped make these drugs the standard of care. “When you look the papers up, you often find the drugs didn’t even work better than a placebo. And no one tested how they worked in combination with the other drugs,” she says. “Just taking the patient off everything can improve their health right away.” But not only is checking out the research another time-consuming task, patients often don’t even like it when they’re taken off their drugs, she explains; they find their prescriptions reassuring.
[2010 May] Why men shouldn't rely on the prostate cancer test - by the doctor behind its discovery