Is there an honorable place in the work for blind imitation?
by Don CroftEW Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:19 pm Post subject: Is there an honorable place in the work for blind imitation?
There are a
few very persistent unfounded claims
that have survived the exposure of
their proponents' lack of personal
integrity.
In a smaller number of cases
persistent unsubstantiated claims,
caveats and recommendations are
still being made by otherwise
reputable folks and I've let that
slide for a long time but the
subject comes up so often in private
correspondence that I feel it's time
to address it in a post.
I'm so reluctant to harm anyone's
good reputation or rub the noses of
the disreputable ones in their own
messes that I'm a little shy to even
name anyone specifically but please
bear with me, okay?
The receding paradigm is
schizophrenic by nature and design
and most of us still have at least
one foot firmly planted in that
retreating matrix. It used to be
impossible for anyone who has
intellectual integrity to find a
proper niche in human society or the
market place because the schizoid
element of at least western cultures
was too virulent to comfortably
allow it, hence events like the book
burning, imprisonment and murder of
Dr Reich during the most blatant of
America's fascist period, the
Eisenhower administion.
So, how can I tiptoe around this
issue and still let you know what I
now consider to be persistent
obstacles to the free expansion of
this network?
Carol and I won't make any
recommendations or strongly hold to
our expressed opinions unless we can
provide plenty of corroborative
evidence and/or support it with
balanced, rational argument. The
rest (most of the contents of our
reports) is freely offered as no
more than our subjective
observations. I won't allow anyone
to advance unsubstantiated claims
and opinions in my presence without
challenging them, as anyone who's
familiar with me has learned.
Okay, I'll just bite the bullet:
Fancy coils, gems and crystals
generally have no place in orgonite
devices which get placed or tossed
into the field nor in
cloudbusters,
either, unless you're sleeping with
them, invite them to the dinner
table every day and haul them along
on your gifting missions and visits
with the in-laws.
The possible exception to this is
when orgonite devices are placed in
energy vortices where various
hyperdimensional entities and
species have a vested interest in
the success of your gifting effort,
so they continue to interact with
the enhanced orgonite devices.
In most cases the only concession we
make to this field device
interactive dynamic is to add a
simple spiral cone coil to the
single quartz crystal in the tip of
a HHg. An exceptional effort
was when we put a dozen of
Cesco's
coils
among the 26
earthpipes we used to
ring the caldera at Yellowstone and
DB, Carol and I have left
solar-powered 15Hz generators with cloudbusters and other trick devices
in wilderness vortices before.
Most of our vortex gifting is done
with simple HHgs, in fact, and it's
been handy for all of us that the
occult/corporate rats predictably
erect tower arrays, not single
towers, in vortices.
The reason we don't encourage anyone
to add fancy stuff to every orgonite
devices is because all of this stuff
is interactive in nature;
interactive with US, not with the
environment so the fancy stuff is
generally wasted out there and the
belief that it's necessary ensures
that the gifter won't make as much
orgonite as he would if he realized
that the stuff isn't needed. Why not
get the most bang for your buck?
Busting the death towers with cheap,
funky TBs will show you how powerful
bare orgonite is. Doing it with
fancy, expensive TBs will leave you
with some doubt whether you got it
done with orgonite or with arcanery.
It's more empowering to realize that
you did it with orgonite.
The proper use of fancy additives,
we believe, is in the orgonite
devices we wear, work with every
day, keep in our cars or sleep next
to, over and/or under.
As far as we've been able to tell,
adding magnets to orgonite devices
doesn't do much at all. The only
exceptions we've found is adding a
magnet to our Terminators and DB's
inclusion of a magnet in his Implant
Killer. It's the magnet in that
devices that destroys the
nanocircuitry in implants, of
course--the orgonite and gems just
make the process more user friendly.
The only generally discussed coil
forms which we've found to have any
innate, consistent credibility are
the SBB one (including a few
intelligent variations), the cone
spiral and Cesco's designs. The few
chest pounders out there who
vigorously promote other coil forms
but can't substantiate their claims
need to be held accountable as long
as you feel compelled to imitate and
even promote their offerings, don't
you agree?
We're always happy to be held
accountable and to discuss our
findings and if anyone runs from
that or insists that they have
'authority' so don't need to support
their claims you should ask yourself
why and meanwhile stop blindly
imitating them.
32 Hz only feels good to potheads.
Babies and little children cry when
you play that frequency through a
speaker and animals flee but they
find 'C,' 15Hz and some other freq's
comfortable and even envigorating.
Wax has not been shown to be an
adequate replacement for resin,
though the proponents of wax
orgonite have had plenty of time and
open opportunities to substantiate
their claims.
Cesco and Laozu Kelly have
apparently developed a way to
energize water and keep it energized
in a form that excedes any other
available energized water but I'll
leave it to them to decide when it's
ready to be introduced. Unlike the
insistent, unsubstantiated energized
water claims that were made a couple
of years ago in an apparent effort
to sabotage the gifting network,
this is something that anyone can
replicate. Some more testing will be
done.
Boathulls are made of fiberglass,
which is glass fibers embedded in
resin. It's not necessary to put
ocean orgonite gifts in glass jars
because resin is functionally
waterproof. If that weren't so, then
all fiberglass boats would need to
also be put in glass jars. Here's a
case where simple, rational argument
can dispel an unreasonable
assumption. Some of the cetaceans
apparently love colorful jars for
orgonite gifts, though.
DB's fine little towerbusters are
capable, singly, of disabling a
death tower but perhaps only if he's
the one who tosses it, we believe.
Otherwise, Carol and I recommend
that you toss two or three of these
in the vicinity of a single death
tower or HAARP tower if you want to
feel confident that you've
successfully turned that tower into
a life force generator, unless you
have the same etheric prowess and
energy sensitivity that DB has, of
course, in which case one will
perhaps be enough for you, too. The
nice part of his approach, for me at
least, is that these much smaller
ones are a little easier to hide.
Since nobody's done any supportive
field experiments, yet, using the
smaller towerbusters the above
paragraph is only our subjective
impression. In our own field work we
demonstrated that at least 3oz of
orgonite with a small xtal in it can
be relied on to take out an average
death tower and lots of folks have
repeated the experiment, then gotten
their own requisite confirmations
for this simple protocol.
There really is no line between
subjective and objective reality
because the 'objective' part is
conditional on our own awareness and
progress as a specie and perhaps
even as individuals. On the other
hand, we can have confidence that
substantive recommendations can be
supported by others' experimentation
and that's the little band of
reality that Carol and I choose to
work within. That doesn't obligate
DB or anyone else to do things our
way (I've often witnessed my own
little personal paradigm bend,
twist, compress and expand in his
presence
) but I reserve the right to answer
any published claim within this
network that hasn't yet been
substantiated because I feel that
this is the most constructive
approach in the long run.
We've seen a gradual shift over the
past year or so within the network
from mostly blind imitation to
mostly substantive contributions but
I still have an itch to encourage
everyone to reach for high
intellectual standards in our
individual efforts and examinations.
Dr Reich wasn't shy about this issue
and I feel encouraged by his
example, don't you?
~Carol's Old Man
_________________
"We shall no longer hang on to the
tails of public opinion or to a non-
existent authority on matters
utterly unknown and strange. We
shall gradually become experts
ourselves in the mastery of the
knowledge of the Future."
~Wilhelm Reich