Afghan Info WarAs of mid-December 2009 it is estimated from the latest UN Population Division data that in Occupied Afghanistan post-invasion non-violent excess deaths total 3.4 million; post-invasion violent deaths total 1.1 million (assuming expert US-Australian advice that the level of violence has been 4 times lower in the Afghan War than in the Iraq War); post-invasion violent and non-violent avoidable deaths total 4.5 million; and post-invasion under-5 infant deaths total 2.4 million (90% avoidable and due to US Alliance war crimes in gross violence of the Geneva Convention – Articles 55 and 56 of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War demand that an Occupier must supply life-sustaining food and medical requisites “to the fullest extent of the means available to it” but according to the WHO the “total annual expenditure on health per capita” permitted in Occupied Afghanistan is $29 as compared to $6,714 in Occupier US and $3,122 in Occupier racist, white Apartheid Australia).
[2010 Jan] Brasscheck TV: Permanent war "Nothing lies ahead in Afghanistan, no success of any sort will be lasting once American troops leave. I am sure President Obama has been told this, as Johnson and Nixon were before him (Vietnam). They are not going to get effective operation out of Afghan troops from any number of years. We have been training them for 8, 8 more years, 80 more years will not provide foreign troops with the motivation to fight againts their own countrymen, against the independence of their own country for a foreign power, and we are a foreign power in Afghanistan......Americans are kept totally ignorant about the bloody side of war."--Daniel Ellsberg, fmr US Military analyst
DO NOT USE photos on page 1A showing civilian casualties from the war on Afghanistan .... DO NOT USE wire stories that lead with civilian casualties .... They should be mentioned further down in the story. If the story needs rewriting to play down the civilian casualties, DO IT.-----instructions a Florida newspaper issued to its staff, October 2001 [during the bombing of Afghanistan]. Nemesis, The Last Days of the American Republic by Chalmers Johnson, p30
[2009 Dec] Welcome
to Orwell's world 2010 by John
Oceania, truth and lies are indivisible. According to Obama, the American attack
on Afghanistan in 2001 was authorised by the United Nations Security Council.
There was no UN authority. He said the “the world” supported the invasion in the
wake of 9/11 when, in truth, all but three of 37 countries surveyed by Gallup
expressed overwhelming opposition. He said that America invaded Afghanistan
“only after the Taliban refused to turn over [Osama] bin Laden”. In 2001, the
Taliban tried three times to hand over bin Laden for trial, reported Pakistan’s
military regime, and were ignored. Even Obama’s mystification of 9/11 as
justification for his war is false. More than two months before the Twin Towers
were attacked, the Pakistani foreign minister, Niaz Naik, was told by the Bush
administration that an American military assault would take place by
mid-October. The Taliban regime in Kabul, which the Clinton administration had
secretly supported, was no longer regarded as “stable” enough to ensure
America’s control over oil and gas pipelines to the Caspian Sea. It had to go.
"Since the Bush-Cheney Administration took office in January 2001, controlling the major oil and natural gas fields of the world had been the primary, though undeclared, priority of US foreign policy... Not only the invasion of Iraq, but also the toppling of the Taliban in Afghanistan, had nothing to do with 'democracy,' and everything to do with pipeline control across Central Asia and the militarization of the Middle East.". William Engdahl
One might agree with John Ryan who argued that if Washington
had left the Marxist Taraki government alone back in 1979, “there would have
been no army of mujahideen, no Soviet intervention, no war that destroyed
Afghanistan, no Osama bin Laden, and no September 11 tragedy.” But it would be
asking too much for Washington to leave unmolested a progressive leftist
government that was organizing the social capital around collective public needs
rather than private accumulation.
US intervention in Afghanistan has proven not much different from US intervention in Cambodia, Angola, Mozambique, Ethiopia, Nicaragua, Grenada, Panama, and elsewhere. It had the same intent of preventing egalitarian social change, and the same effect of overthrowing an economically reformist government. In all these instances, the intervention brought retrograde elements into ascendance, left the economy in ruins, and pitilessly laid waste to many innocent lives.
The war against Afghanistan, a battered impoverished country, continues to be portrayed in US official circles as a gallant crusade against terrorism. If it ever was that, it also has been a means to other things: destroying a leftist revolutionary social order, gaining profitable control of one of the last vast untapped reserves of the earth’s dwindling fossil fuel supply, and planting US bases and US military power into still another region of the world.  Afghanistan, Another Untold Story by Dr. Michael Parenti
Because of its egalitarian and collectivist economic policies the Taraki
government also incurred the opposition of the US national security state.
Almost immediately after the PDP coalition came to power, the CIA, assisted by
Saudi and Pakistani military, launched a large scale intervention into
Afghanistan on the side of the ousted feudal lords, reactionary tribal
chieftains, mullahs, and opium traffickers.
A top official within the Taraki government was Hafizulla Amin, believed by many to have been recruited by the CIA during the several years he spent in the United States as a student. In September 1979, Amin seized state power in an armed coup. He executed Taraki, halted the reforms, and murdered, jailed, or exiled thousands of Taraki supporters as he moved toward establishing a fundamentalist Islamic state. But within two months, he was overthrown by PDP remnants including elements within the military.
It should be noted that all this happened before the Soviet military intervention. National security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski publicly admitted--months before Soviet troops entered the country--that the Carter administration was providing huge sums to Muslim extremists to subvert the reformist government. Part of that effort involved brutal attacks by the CIA-backed mujahideen against schools and teachers in rural areas.
In late 1979, the seriously besieged PDP government asked Moscow to send a contingent of troops to help ward off the mujahideen (Islamic guerrilla fighters) and foreign mercenaries, all recruited, financed, and well-armed by the CIA. The Soviets already had been sending aid for projects in mining, education, agriculture, and public health. Deploying troops represented a commitment of a more serious and politically dangerous sort. It took repeated requests from Kabul before Moscow agreed to intervene militarily.  Afghanistan, Another Untold Story by Dr. Michael Parenti
The Soviet intervention was a golden opportunity for the CIA to transform the tribal resistance into a holy war, an Islamic jihad to expel the godless communists from Afghanistan. Over the years the United States and Saudi Arabia expended about $40 billion on the war in Afghanistan. The CIA and its allies recruited, supplied, and trained almost 100,000 radical Mujahideen from forty Muslim countries including Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Algeria, and Afghanistan itself. Among those who answered the call was Saudi-born millionaire right-winger Osama bin Laden and his cohorts.  Afghanistan, Another Untold Story by Dr. Michael Parenti
Upon taking over Afghanistan, the mujahideen fell to fighting
among themselves. They ravaged the cities, terrorized civilian populations,
looted, staged mass executions, closed schools, raped thousands of women and
girls, and reduced half of Kabul to rubble. In 2001 Amnesty International
reported that the mujahideen used sexual assault as “a method of intimidating
vanquished populations and rewarding soldiers.’”
Ruling the country gangster-style and looking for lucrative sources of income, the tribes ordered farmers to plant opium poppy. The Pakistani ISI, a close junior partner to the CIA, set up hundreds of heroin laboratories across Afghanistan. Within two years of the CIA’s arrival, the Pakistan-Afghanistan borderland became the biggest producer of heroin in the world.
Largely created and funded by the CIA, the mujahideen mercenaries now took on a life of their own. Hundreds of them returned home to Algeria, Chechnya, Kosovo, and Kashmir to carry on terrorist attacks in Allah’s name against the purveyors of secular “corruption.”  Afghanistan, Another Untold Story by Dr. Michael Parenti
Given their control of the immense gas resources of Turkmenistan, Maiman, Merhav, and the Mossad would all profit if and when the U.S.-led coalition were able to "pacify" and control Afghanistan so that the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline could be built allowing the gas of Turkmenistan to be sold to energy-hungry India. The TAPI pipeline project would bring billions of dollars into Mossad coffers every year. This is the real reason for the war in Afghanistan and why the Zionist-controlled Obama administration has increased the war effort in Central Asia. It has nothing to do with terrorism or 9-11. [2009 Sept] Why Afghanistan? By Christopher Bollyn
Hekmatyar, with ISI and CIA protection, began immediately to
compensate for his lack of popular support by developing an international
traffic in opium and heroin, not on his own, however, but with ISI and foreign
assistance. After Pakistan banned opium cultivation in February 1979 and Iran
followed suit in April, the absence of legal controls in the Pashtun areas of
Pakistan and Afghanistan ‘‘attracted Western drug cartels and ‘scientists’
(including ‘some "fortune-seekers" from Europe and the US’) to establish heroin
processing facilities in the tribal belt."
Heroin labs had opened in the North-West Frontier province by 1979 (a fact duly noted by the Canadian Maclean’s Magazine of April 30, 1979). According to Alfred McCoy, ‘‘By 1980 Pakistan-Afghan opium dominated the European market and supplied 60 percent of America’s illicit demand as well.’’ McCoy also records that Gulbuddin Hekmatyar controlled a complex of six heroin laboratories in a region of Baluchistan ‘‘where the ISI was in total control.’’
The global epidemic of Afghan heroin, in other words, was not generated by Afghanistan, but was inflicted on Afghanistan by outside forces. It remains true today that although 90 percent of the world’s heroin comes from Afghanistan, the Afghan share of proceeds from the global heroin network, in dollar terms, is only about ten percent of the whole.
In 2007, Afghanistan supplied 93% of the world's opium, according to the U.S. State Department. Illicit poppy production, meanwhile, brings $4 billion into Afghanistan, or more than half the country’s total economy of $7.5 billion, according to the United Nations Office of Drug Control (UNODC). It also represents about half of the economy of Pakistan, and of the ISI in particular.
.......Just as the indirect American intervention of 1979 was followed by an unprecedented increase in Afghan opium production, so the pattern has repeated itself since the American invasion of 2001. Opium poppy cultivation in hectares more than doubled, from a previous high of 91,000 in 1999 (reduced by the Taliban to 8,000 in 2001) to 165,000 in 2006 and 193,000 in 2007. (Though 2008 saw a reduced planting of 157,000 hectares, this was chiefly explained by previous over-production, in excess of what the world market could absorb.
No one should have been surprised by these increases: they merely repeated the dramatic increases in every other drug-producing area where America has become militarily or politically involved. This was demonstrated over and over in the 1950s, in Burma (thanks to CIA intervention, from 40 tons in 1939 to 600 tons in 1970), in Thailand (from 7 tons in 1939 to 200 tons in 1968) and Laos (less than 15 tons in 1939 to 50 tons in 1973).
The most dramatic case is that of Colombia, where the intervention of U.S. troops since the late 1980s has been misleadingly justified as a part of a "war on drugs." At a conference in 1990 I predicted that this intervention would be followed by an increase in drug production, not a reduction. But even I was surprised by the size of the increase that ensued. Coca production in Colombia tripled between 1991 and 1999 (from 3.8 to 12.3 thousand hectares), while the cultivation of opium poppy increased by a multiple of 5.6 (from .13 to .75 thousand hectares). [2009 May] Afghanistan: Heroin-ravaged State by Prof. Peter Dale Scott
Al Qaeda was created by the CIA in Afghanistan, and it has been maintained by the CIA as a kind of military capability in the Arab and Islamic world. Look at the history of Al Qaeda, they have attacked countries like Bosnia, when the US was attacking Bosnia, Al Qaeda attacked Bosnia. When the US was attacking Libya, Al Qaeda attacked Libya1 and tried to kill Qaddafi, the dictator of Libya. The US in attempting to bust up the Russian Federation, Al Qaeda provides terrorists for Chechnya, so, the target list for US imperialism and the target list for Al Qaeda are exactly the same.  Webster Griffin Tarpley on 'Synthetic Terror'