Pedophilia  Jimmy Saville

Death of a Showman: Jimmy Saville 1926-2011

T Stokes – October 31, 2011

The death of Jimmy Saville marks the end of the line for a man who lived a Jekyll and Hyde like existence.

On the one hand Jimmy was the flamboyant pop presenter who appeared regularly on TV and radio and seemed to personify much of the Swinging Sixties. On the other was a far less well known man who inhabited a hidden world where figures from politics and entertainment mixed alongside criminals to gratify their perverted lusts.

In the early seventies a young boy just into his teens was picked up for stealing sweets in a Hampstead supermarket. The boy had already been warned by staff previously so the police collected him and took him to the station where under questioning he disclosed the of names of various men, many in the public eye, who took boys out from the care home where he lived.

The boy had a sexually transmitted disease and the police doctor refused to let the matter drop. Under questioning the boy revealed that others from the home were meeting men on Hampstead Heath for pocket money at a well-known place for homosexual pickups.

He told how one young boy, small for his age with a large mop of curly blonde hair would loiter around public toilets on the Heath, and when a man approached him a group of other boys who had been hiding behind bushes would jump on the man, beat and rob him.

Known as “poof bashing” the boys thought themselves safe from prosecution, as their victims would be unlikely to report the crime to police.

At the time a secret investigation into sexual abuse by priests called Operation Templeman uncovered widespread sexual abuse by the clergy.

It was said that paedophiles thought they had it made if they joined the clergy, although at the time no one thought to ask why the church had drawn such people into its ranks.

However, the abuse wasn’t confined to the Catholic clergy. A well-known IRA man during a deathbed confession sacrament told of kinky parties in Dublin and London, where young boys were brought by a well-known figure in the underworld who, my sources affirm, was East End gangster Ronnie Kray.

Apparently Kray had access to many London care homes and would have boys delivered to parties at DJ Alan ” fluff” Freeman’s large flat over a music shop in East London. There they would meet with show biz types and DJs including Jimmy Saville, Joe Meeks and on occasion Beatles manager Brian Epstein.

Saville was among several men well known to local police, in fact Saville instigated the DJ disco genre solely to gain access to boys, and at that time, many of the DJs wanted access to androgynous scooter riding boys with their make up and Carnaby Street clothes.

The old beat policeman who patrolled the streets around my central London flat told me told me that the whole the eastern region crime squad based at Rigg approach, East London was being disbanded at the time through corruption, homosexuality and funny handshakes.

Now I have worked with many freemasons over the years and most of the lower degrees are fine. However, the higher in degree the more morally questionable they become. Until the very senior Masonic degrees all have an unhealthy interest in the occult and sexual perversion.

The eastern crime squad knew about the Kray gangsters and the sex parties known as ” Pink ballets ” with young lads but let them continue,

I have often wondered why? In much the same way that Fred West held kinky parties over the years often with high flyers. Social workers and the police were well aware of Fred’s activities but looked the other way. Why? Who were they covering for?

The Krays endeared themselves to the British public after the IRA bombed the East London waterworks, when Reg Kray announced that if the IRA bombed once more every Irish pub and club the length of Britain would be destroyed.

Such was the Kray’s fearsome reputation that for some time after there was no more bombings.

There is a saying in intelligence circles that; “only the enemy is in front of you, and every other bugger is behind you”. The Soviets were so successful in recruiting beautiful women to honey trap intelligence operatives, politicians and key personnel working far from home, that they decided to employ homosexuals.

This, they discovered was a big mistake as most homosexuals are very promiscuous. Rothschild’s Cambridge apostles for instance, were almost all of this type and easy to lead astray, blackmail or threaten with exposure. Guy Burgess is on record as saying that single sex boarding schools and universities were a breeding ground for such homosexuals; where bullying or “fagging” the younger boys gave rise to the term “faggot”.

When Guy Burgess himself defected to Russia his hosts were horrified to discover that he had brought with him his collection of Jane Austen books, together with a poke bonnet and a dress from the period for himself.

Indeed the British establishment has had more than its fair share of such characters: some who have been elevated to national heroes while others, like Burgess, have been condemned as traitors.

In the end analysis however, whether heroes or traitors, they both have the same perverted lusts, which have been used as a means to control them by their masters.

Winston Churchill’s original Sandhurst file, for example, described him as an idle layabout and a confirmed sodomite who was a menace to the younger boys.

Meanwhile the young boy caught shoplifting in the Hampstead supermarket disclosed the names of many top people using the boys, but an angry senior detective told me that Sir Anthony Blunt, the Keeper of the Queen’s pictures had the inquiry squashed from the highest levels.

There’s a saying in Intelligence circles: “a socialist will only promote another socialist and a homosexual will only promote another homosexual“ and there is some truth in this. A case in point being Maurice Oldfield: who was installed as intelligence chief on the recommendation of Lord Rothschild. Once Oldfield took the post he in turn promoted other homosexuals in the service, before being sacked by Margaret Thatcher in 1980 as details of visits by young boys to his home reached her.

People ask why all these care home abuse scandals are being hushed up? And what about the missing kids who, some estimates number in the hundreds?

It may be because Tony Blair’s Children’s Minister Margaret Hodge (Oppenheimer)  was said to be totally incompetent; or that Peter Mandelson who is chief Trustee of the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty Children also seemed to be looking the other way.

Yet their pal Rupert Murdoch was tapping the phones at these homes so if he knew why didn’t they? The whisper in some circles is that they were all in place to keep a lid on rather than expose goings on.

Young persons counselor, Karen Porter, said last night: “many young boys in various care homes can sleep easier in their beds now that Jimmy Saville has gone”

T Stokes London