[2013] Another rejection but parents maintain vaccine is linked to their son's death  1. The long legal discussion about whether or not Christopher met the “minimum 80% of disablement” test before his death needed for the case to go ahead. This discussion involved the two legal teams but not Christopher’s parents. 2.  The audio recording equipment was not working and no stenographer was present. The official record was therefore taken in handwritten notes by the judge.  3. The video link with the Coulters’ expert witness in America was of poor quality with audio and time delay problems.  4. Late evidence from one of the government’s expert witnesses was accepted just two working days before the hearing. This enabled him to attend an act as an additional expert witness at very short notice and gave little time for the Coulters to read and respond to his report.  5. The two experts who gave evidence on the government’s behalf have strong links with the government’s vaccination programme. Dr Baxter did not declare this to the panel in advance.