Hilary Butler - Thursday, October 01,
2009
Vaccines protect. Vaccines are safe. Vaccines never cause harm. Vaccines save
lives. Got that? You stupid people who think that vaccines are to blame for
everything under the sun, need to get a life. When are you going to get it
through your heads that
the cervical cancer vaccine did NOT kill that UK girl??! Vaccines can’t do
that! The autopsy was quite clear. This girl had a
malignant tumour in the chest, which was a serious underlying condition.
That’s what killed her. The Cervarix shot, given two hours before
she died, had nothing to do with it - quite coincidental.... Got that?
Opening and adjourning the inquest at Coventry magistrates court, she
said: "It appears that Natalie died from a tumour in her chest involving her
heart and her lungs." The condition, it is understood, had become progressively
disabling. The inquest heard that the tumour had "heavily infiltrated" her heart
and extended into her left lung. The Home Office pathologist, Alexander Kolar,
explained to the hearing that Natalie's condition was "so severe that death
could have arisen at any point"
So shall we just move on please? NO WE SHALL NOT!
Why would a parent,
who knows their child has been poorly for some time, allow her to have a
vaccine? Why do doctors use every possible opportunity, even when children are
known to be sick, to jab them with everything under the sun?
"Stepfather Andrew Bullock said Natalie, who attended Blue Coat CofE
School, in Coventry, had been 'poorly for some time'.
She had been to see her GP several times and investigations into a mystery
illness had been under way, he said."
But lets think this through further...
Consider the 17 deaths from swine flu in this country, who have died, supposedly
because of underlying conditions.
EVEN THOUGH it’s underlying conditions which are said to be the main problem,
you can bet your next sunshiny day, that when the swine flu vaccine come out, we
will all be told to have them. You won't be told, "The vaccine is
unnecessary because it’s ONLY the underlying health issues that are the
problem." We will probably be told that everyone needs to have the vaccine, in
order to protect all those with underlying conditions!!
All these people ONLY died from Swine flu, because the swine flu virus
produces a serious health condition AS A RESULT of an underlying
condition.
Why is it then so far fetched to ask this question: “What might happen to
people with underlying conditions, who are given either Gardasil or Cervarix, or
any vaccine for that matter?”
After all, if swine flu can exploit underlying conditions, why can’t a
vaccine do likewise?
How about we enrol a large group of children in a vaccine trial who are
KNOWN to have tumours. Half can receive Cervarix and the other half
nothing. Lets see what happens! Would any ethics committee approve such a
study? My guess is that they would say, "It's unethical to vaccinate children
with cancer."
Besides which, what parent would allow their sick child to be vaccinated? If
there was even the possibility that such a vaccine would shorten such a child’s
life, no parent would want that.
And here’s the REAL rub. New vaccines undergoing the three phase trials for
licensing, never ever allow babies, children, or adults with known underlying,
or active health conditions to take part in safety or efficacy trials. Then
after the vaccines are licensed, suddenly we hear that these vaccines are
especially important for exactly that fragile group, ... yet where is the
scientific evidence to back up those statements?
Nowhere.
Don’t you think it’s about time that vaccine trials actually reflect the real
world in which those vaccines will be used?
What about the
soaring numbers of people who have drug side effects? Why are side effects
after vaccines always dismissed as "coincidental"? Is there not a huge
disconnect here?
Why are all the parents we hear from regularly, who complain of ongoing problems
after vaccines, treated as if they are insane? Why are
parents who consider their child vaccine damaged, accused of having
Munchausens, and their children put on an "at-risk" register? Just what is
going on here?
And don’t you think it’s amazing that while over
a million American kids land up in hospital with drug reactions and adverse side
effects from drugs every year, everything that happens after vaccines, is
always blamed on the parent, or the person, BUT..... never the
vaccine?
Or, as in this classic dumbed down piece of Australian consumer propaganda for
CSL's new Panvax swine flu vaccine ... side effects are caused by the
needle, not the contents.