Gardasil shot implications
Cervical Cancer Vaccine
A vaccine that is claimed to prevent cancer is causing damage that is a precursor to cancer?
Bronwyn Hancock 20 August 2007
In due course I will be writing an article about this vaccine, but in the
meantime I refer you to this site that has plenty of information including
many articles written by others: http://www.visainfo
But in addition, just before you go to that other site, here is some very
significant new information, that has just been brought to my knowledge
today by the discoverer of it:
Naturopath and Iridologist Michael Blake, of Natures Cure Pty Ltd in
Dandenong, Melbourne (web site
what he has seen in the irises of four girls recently and his conscience
will not allow him to stay silent.
In the area of the iris that corresponds to the uterus, in three of the
girls he saw tissue damage, and in the fourth he saw drug residue. In each
of the four cases, on reporting back to the patient what he was observing,
he was informed that the girl had recently received the cervical cancer
vaccine. All were virgins.
Tissue damage in the uterus is what he sees in women who have had such
things as abortions and prolapses, and can be a precursor to cancer. It can
also cause infertility - as it can prevent the embryo from being able to
hold on to the uterus wall. It also often results in lack of sensitivity
with sexual intercourse, pain, discomfort and/or frequent discharges.
Note that it has already been observed that one of the ingredients in the
vaccine, polysorbate 80, has been observed to cause infertility in mice.
Add to that borax, which is used to kill ants, add neurotoxic immune system
sensitiser aluminium hydroxyphosphate, and directly inject all of that and
any viral material (which is not proven to be in a harmless form) past the
very important natural lines of defence in the immune system, then what do
you think we are asking for, trouble or protection? I can't tell you what
to do - you must figure it out for yourself.
Note also that the primary owners of the main pharmaceutical companies,
including the manufacturer of this vaccine, are the extremely wealthy and
powerful Rockefeller family. It is well documented that this family prefers
to work behind the scenes, and they have also expressed a strong belief in
population control. David Icke in his book entitled, "... and the truth
shall set you free", wrote:
'In 1952, after decades of funding and supporting eugenics, John D.
Rockefeller III established his Population Council, which still exists
today. This Elite front has been calling for zero population growth in the
United States and, in the words of its 1979 annual report: ... "the spread
of the zero population movement... in the developed countries." '
In the population control agenda there does seem to be a particular
interest in reducing the population of those of what is considered "lesser
stock" (see http://www.thinktwi
the community are encouraged to receive the vaccine, but do you know which
schools and localities are getting which batches of vaccine? Something to
By the way, as all other vaccines, no proper placebo-controlled studies
have been done with this vaccine. The so-called placebo group receives an
injection of aluminium hydroxyphosphate "and everything else present in the
adjuvant", according to the contact researcher for the major trials. Why
don't they receive an inactive substance, which is what a placebo is
defined to be? Apparently because, in the understanding of this researcher,
"In vaccine trials,... (it) is usual, good clinical practice, to give
adjuvant to the placebo arm." So what are these researchers
proper placebo to the placebo group?