What happens when you change the word "drug" to "v-a-c-c-i-n-e-s"?
What happens when a child gets
paralysed after a Cervarix vaccine, and
lands up in hospital? No-no. Vaccines
don't do anything worse than give sore
arms and itty bitty temperatures....
and if you die, your parents will
get the usual run around.
Funny though. The excuses of the
medical profession are getting ever more
ludicrous and they can't see it. Take
CSL's new Panvax Swine flu vaccine,
... it's not the vaccine that causes
side effects.... it's the needle! How
cute. And don't you love how dumbed
down, information pamphlets have
become? Do they honestly think that
thinking people who have had blood
tests, which are also a needle, are
going to buy this kind of nonsensical
rubbish? Obviously. Or they would
never have published it. Perhaps a
worse question should be asked. Are
people this stupid today? Just blame
the hollow metal tube, and not the stuff
coming down it?
When it comes to something that's got
the potential to be jabbed into every
baby, child, adolescent, adult and
elderly person, which involves so much
money, "truth" becomes a loose and
fast word game. The medical mental
shutters clang down, and wham... a
mother is accused of having munchausens,
and a child is cooped up in hospital
with a "learned" illness. Never mind
that there are lots of other girls who
have received either Cervarix, or
Gardasil with serious reactions, been
paralysed and died.
Ever since my eyes were opened to this
issue 28 years ago, the mantra has
always been, "When it comes
to vaccines, a serious reaction
is always something that would have
happened anyway, and can't have anything
to do with the vaccine."
Drugs however? ... That's another
matter. They can be honest about drugs,
after all.. patents come and go, new
drugs supercede old one, and not
everyone takes every drug, so "drugs"
are not the money spinner that vaccines
are.
How is it that a million or so children,
every year, are admitted to suffer
from reactions from drugs etc, yet when
it comes to the 4.4 million USA babies
who are vaccinated every year, most
reactions are listed as coincidental?
Why is this suddenly a serious issue?
For two reasons. The first is that
given half a chance, the whole world
will soon be vaccinated against swine
flu, because that crystal ball says the
second wave will wipe us all out. Isn't
world-wide vaccination, what the WHO has
been relentlessly moving towards since
25th February? Some countries have
already made the swine flu vaccine
compulsory. So the medical profession is
now scampering around, studying what
they say is
"normal" in the calamity stakes. How
will we know whether what they say is
even the truth? Why would they do this?
They have to get geared up for all the
parents, who are listened to seriously,
when their million or so children suffer
after prescription or OTC drugs....
suddenly start to say, "Oh my child had
the swine flu vaccine and now has X, Y,
Z."
Doctors are frantically trying to
develop a data base to show what are all
the nasty things that happen normally
without vaccines on the scene, so that
they can tell these parents that it
wasn't the vaccine... "Don't
blame the flu shot for all ills, say
officials"....."As
soon as
swine flu
vaccinations
start next month, some people getting
them will drop dead of heart attacks or
strokes, some children will have
seizures
and some pregnant women will miscarry."
As they say, you have to expect deaths
because people die every day
anyway....and there's much talk about
people dying and getting Guillaine Barre
Syndrome with the last swine flu vaccine
in 1976.
When a child has an adverse reaction to
a vaccine, what often happens is that
some doctors start out supporting
parents, and saying they think it was
the vaccine. After IMAC, or the Centre
for Adverse Reactions Monitorring has
had a word in their ear, parents are
presented with a sullen face, words of
denial, and no support. What else could
explain the doctor's attitudinal
flipflop? I've seen it so many times
now, that I warn parents before hand,
that if anything happens to their child,
and their child gets seriously sick,
that they will face a brick wall 99.99%
of the time. And if the parents get
stroppy about it, beware. Because it's
the parents who will be sent to the head
shrink for analysis, not the doctor.
Why this denial? It's very simple
actually. Money. No, I didn't say
conspiracy. I said "money". Big
Business. Big Bucks. And after all,
that's what businesses do isn't it?
Make their stakeholders and shareholders
happy.
There aren't too many journals or
newpapers which will admit this, but one
magazine which tells about
vaccines being ALL about money, is a
magazine no average parent would think
to look in. Take this piece
from the Wall Street Journal in
America.
"Vaccine
sales are growing faster than sales of
other prescription medicines and are
largely immune to the generic
competition that is already costing drug
makers billions of dollars in revenues
on their top-selling treatments.....
Vaccines
are expected to generate $21.5 billion
in sales by 2012.
....In
one of the deals, Johnson & Johnson paid
€302 million ($441 million) for
an 18% stake in Dutch biotech company
Crucell NV, in order to jointly develop
vaccines. In addition. Abbot
Laboratories confirmed it will acquire a
unit of Belgian conglomerate Solvay SA
for
€4.5 billion in a deal that
includes a vaccine-making business."
You work out for youself what 4.5 billion Euros is in dollars. No drug company is going to be spending this sort of money, unless they know that they are virtually guaranteed unfettered access to a captive market of every person, even in the remotest corners of the world... throughout their lives. You spend veryyyy big bucks, because you expect massive bucks in return. And this captive market is primarily healthy people, who are NOT sick and might never get X disease, or if they do, might also never get complications or die. Yes, some people will, but usually there is a reason.
Addressing those reasons though, isn't profitable, and, frankly, it's a whole lot harder than just sticking needles into people.
Denying the truth that vaccines can cause serious, denied damage, death and family carnage is essential.
The language of infectious diseases is all about WAR. "War against AIDs" "fighting the scourge of the flu". You've heard it all before. The language of vaccines is couched in war terminology.
And as in real war, the first casualty is always truth.
At all costs, parents must not see that the emperor has no clothes.