Under the sign of the Scorpion- the Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire
a book by Juri Lina
[Review] USSR Illuminati
Experiment Was "Social Catastrophe" by Henry Makow
Ph.D.
[Review] NWO Front for Cabbalst
Jewish Tyranny by Henry Makow Ph.D.
Contents
1.
Myths Concerning False Communists and Sham Christians
2.
The Illuminati - Triumph of Treachery
The Ideological Background of the Illuminati
The First Disclosures
The Murders of Mozart and Schiller
The Illuminati as Infiltrators
The Jesuits’ Totalitarianism as a Prototype
The Illuminati’s First National Coup
The Illuminati’s Way to World Power
3. Karl Marx –Evil’s Idol
Moses Hess – the Teacher of Marx and Engels
The Background of Marx’s View of Humanity
Incredible Admissions by Marx, Disraeli and others
Marx and Engels as Illuminati
1848: "The Year of Revolution" – the First Wave
March 1848 – The Prepared Plan
The Second Wave 1848-49>
The Illuminist Terror Continues...
The Truth Behind the Myths
Marx as a Publicist
The Moral Bankruptcy of Marxism
4. The Unknown Vladimir Ulyanov
Lenin as a Freemason
The First Freemasons in Russia
Lenin’s Nature
Lenin’s Terror
The Ideological Background of the Terror
Lenin’s Last Days
5.
Leon Trotsky - Cynic and Sadist
Trotsky as a Freemason
Trotsky’s Teacher Parvus
The Attempts at a Coup d’�tat in 1905
Trotsky Abroad
Trotsky as a Merciless Despot
Trotsky’s Comrades
The fall of Admiral Shchastny
The Kronstadt Rebellion
Trotsky as a Grey Eminence
Trotsky as an Anti-intellectual
The Murder of Sergei Yesenin
Stalin as Victor
The Murder of Trotsky
6.
How the Communists Reached Power
The Background of the First World War
Where did the Russian Jews originate?
The Coup in February 1917
Similarities to the Deposition of the Shah
The Return of Lenin and Trotsky
Revelations in the Press
Kornilov’s Revolt
The Take-Over of Power
The German Aid
The Beginning of the Government Terror
7.
Through the Labyrinth of Murder
8. The Bloodthirsty Wolf of the Kremlin – Lazar Kaganovich
Kaganovich as a Grey Eminence
Destruction of Russian Culture
The Great Famine and Other Crimes
The Great Terror
Beria’s Contribution
The Murder of Stalin
The Power Struggle After Stalin’s Death
9. American Aid to the Soviet Union
"Intervention" as a Diversion
Famine as a Weapon
Deals with the Bolsheviks
Collectivisation as a Weapon
Construction of the Soviet Regime
Increasing American Support
War Aid to Moscow
Foreign Slaves in the Soviet Union
Stalin’s Holy War
Aid During the "Cold War"
Dismantling the Soviet Union
Phasing Out of Communism in Eastern Europe
The United States Also Helped the Chinese Communists Gain Power.
10. The Communist Take Over in Estonia
Some Conclusions
Index
THROUGH THE LABYRINTH OF MURDER
It was the morning of the 30th of August 1918. A cyclist turned up in
Petrograd’s Palace Square at around nine o’clock. He stopped at house number 6,
the headquarters of the Commune Commissariat for Internal Affairs and the
Extra-Ordinary Commission, the Cheka. This terror organisation had been founded
on 7 December 1917, but officially it did not exist. Only on the 18th December
1927 did Pravda publish the decree officially establishing the Cheka. The
cyclist was a young man wearing a leather jacket and an officer’s cap. He left
his bicycle by the door and entered.
It was reception day at the Commissariat for Internal Affairs. The visitors were waiting in the hall and did not notice the young man who sat down near the outer door.
Moisei Uritsky (actually Boretsky) arrived in his car at around ten o’clock. He was the chairman of the Petrograd Cheka. Uritsky became infamous as the "Butcher of Petrograd". He threatened to kill all Russians who spoke their native language well. He claimed there was no greater pleasure than watching monarchists die, according to Igor Bunich ("The Party’s Gold", St. Petersburg, 1992) and Oleg Platonov ("The History of the Russian People in the Twentieth Century", Moscow, 1997, p. 613). Uritsky had executed 5000 officers with his own hands. Now he quickly walked towards the lift door. Suddenly several shots were heard. It was the young man in the leather jacket who had approached Uritsky and shot him in his head and body. Uritsky collapsed. The murderer ran out into the street, jumped on his bicycle and began pedalling as fast as he could.
When they began to chase him by car, he threw away his bicycle and ran into the British Representation. He left the representation after having donned a longcoat. When he saw Red Guards, he opened fire but was quickly overpowered.
This was the official description of Moisei Uritsky’s murder. The suspect was a 22-year-old Jewish student of technology, Leonid Kannegisser. This cock-and-bull story was published in 1975 in the book "The Elimination of the Anti-Soviet Subversive Movement" by D. Golinkov, who used to investigate especially important cases at the office of the Public Prosecutor of the Soviet Union.
The doctor of history, P. Sofinov, described the same event in a very different manner in 1960, in his book about the history of the Cheka. On the morning of the 30th of August, the Social Revolutionary Kennigisser, who was the freemason Savinkov’s agent as well as a spy for the British and the French, murdered the chief of the Cheka in Petrograd, Moisei Uritsky, in his office. Felix Dzerzhinsky (actually Rufin) gave orders to search the British Embassy on the 31st of August.
The Social Revolutionary Kennigisser had become the student Kannegisser in the meantime, and now he had murdered Uritsky in the hallway of the Cheka instead of in Uritsky’s office. Sofinov’s version probably seemed too contrived to be credible.
Grigori Nilov’s (Alexander Kravtsov’s) book "The Grammar of Leninism" was published in London in 1990. In this book the author gave neither theory credibility. Instead he claimed that the Bolshevik party and the central organisation of the Cheka with Lenin and Dzerzhinsky at the head were behind Uritsky’s murder.
The book "The Party’s Gold" by the historian Igor Bunich was published in St. Petersburg in 1992. Igor Bunich reveals that the murder of Uritsky was organised by Dzerzhinsky’s prot�g� Gleb Boky who later became Dzerzhinsky’s successor. The Jewish Chekist, Boky, used to feed the flesh of the executed to the animals in the zoo. Igor Bunich demonstrated that Lenin personally gave the order to murder Uritsky and also to stage an attempt on his own life to give himself a reason to immediately begin the mass terror against the Russian population. The murder was also Uritsky’s punishment for stealing some of the confiscated riches from behind Lenin’s back, together with V. Volodarsky (actually Moisei Goldstein) and the freemason Andronnikov (who was chief of the Cheka in Kronstadt). Everything was sold via certain Scandinavian banks – but more about that later.
The murder of Sergei Kirov (actually Kostrikov) on 1 December 1934 was in many ways similar to Uritsky’s murder. Kirov was officially murdered by Leonid Nikolaiev. Both of those high party functionaries had been murdered professionally and without obstacles. Both were warned in advance. Both murderers could freely gain entrance to the respective buildings.
It is clear today that Stalin was behind the murder of Kirov, despite the fact that there are no documents about this. There is no lack of evidence and logical arguments. Kirov’s bodyguard was prevented from accompanying him, so that the real murderer could shoot the Leningrad Party Secretary at exactly 4:30 in the afternoon. That event provided a good reason for Stalin to begin his campaign of mass terror. At least 7 million people were killed during that campaign and 18 million were imprisoned. 97 per cent of the participants at the 1934 Party Congress were liquidated.
Kravtsov presented some suspect circumstances in connection with the murder of Uritsky, who was also a member of the Central Committee. No analysis was made of Kannegisser’s revolver and ammunition. The Cheka did not seem to want the truth to come out. Kannegisser was never taken to trial, but was illegally killed. If Kannegisser had really been a Social Revolutionary, then a trial would have been a propaganda triumph for the regime. It would have been publicly announced who planned the murder. But not even the motive for Uritsky’s murder was ever revealed.
In contrast, it is known now that Lenin became furious when he received
reports from Alexander Parvus in Berlin in which it was revealed that someone in
Petrograd had stolen from Lenin. Just before Dzerzhinsky had travelled to
Switzerland to investigate the situation. It turned out that not all the cargoes
had reached Berlin; not all the money had ended up in the Swiss bank accounts of
Lenin and his approved comrades. Some cargoes of "nationalised" goods had been
sent to Sweden, including many valuable icons (some of these are still on
display in the National Museum in Stockholm), the money had gone into the hands
of other people than Trotsky and Lenin. The guilty parties were soon found, in
June 1918. The main suspects were Uritsky, Volodarsky and Andronnikov (the chief
of the Cheka in Kronstadt). They had stolen whole cargoes and sold everything
through different Scandinavian banks. 78 million roubles in gold had vanished in
this way. (Igor Bunich, "The Party’s Gold", St. Petersburg, 1992, p. 41.) The
thieves (others were also involved) had stolen goods worth a total of 2.5
billion roubles in gold. At various auctions in Stockholm in the autumn of 1995,
Russia began buying back valuable antique furniture which had been illicitly
transported to Sweden.
This came as an unpleasant surprise for Parvus, since Uritsky and Volodarsky
had been his favourite disciples. Parvus had founded a Yiddish newspaper,
Arbaiter Stimme (Worker’s Voice) for Uritsky in Copenhagen, on which Grigory
Chudnovsky and Nikolai Gordon (Leiba Alie Hael Gordon) had also worked. The
latter was a Latvian Jew and a close collaborator with Grigory Zinoviev (Ovsei
Radomyslsky).
In Moscow, Lenin promised to solve the problem. And indeed, Volodarsky was murdered in the same month. Uritsky led the investigation and learned the truth, upon which he also was murdered.
Kannegisser declared that he had acted alone. The Social Revolutionaries denied all knowledge of Kannegisser. He had never been a member of their party.
Even the circumstance that Kannegisser was wearing an officer’s cap was peculiar when others had hidden their caps to avoid being executed. It seems he wanted to draw attention to himself. The fact that he ran into the British Embassy to change was also surprising. He only took off his leather jacket and put on a longcoat. Why, then, did he run away from the site of the murder at all? It was also very odd that he managed to approach Uritsky unhindered and that he was able to escape with the same ease after shooting him. It was impossible to enter without a special permit, since there were armed guards at the door. Unknown persons could not even speak to Uritsky on the telephone. This has been confirmed by Mikhail Aldanov. Why did no one react? They saw and heard everything!
Mikhail Aldanov demonstrated in his study that Kannegisser could not shoot. Aldanov knew both him and his family well. How then, could Kannegisser hit Uritsky in his head like a sharpshooter when the latter was walking quickly towards the lift? It appears that Kannegisser was used as a shadowman, just as Leonid Nikolaiev was later used in Kirov’s murder.
Moreover, Lenin, on the afternoon of the 30th of August 1918, sent Dzerzhinsky a short letter, where two people who had shot Uritsky were named. Why has nothing been mentioned about these two later? Who were they?
The fact that Kannegisser admitted to the crime is irrelevant, since the
Chekist torturers could make anyone admit to anything. In this case, the
opportunity was taken to accuse the right wing of the Social Revolutionaries of
the murder.
It has now been confirmed that the central organisation of the Cheka, headed
by Gleb Boky, was behind Uritsky’s murder. (Igor Bunich, "The Party’s Gold", St.
Petersburg, 1992, p. 47.)
So the motive was to exact revenge on Uritsky for his thefts. The main purpose
was to be given a reason to begin the mass terror. The murder of Kirov had the
same motive. But was there not also another reason to dispose of Uritsky now
that he had solved the mystery of another murder?
V. Volodarsky (Moisei Goldstein) had been murdered under puzzling circumstances on June 20, 1918. He was the people’s commissary for press, propaganda and agitation. His murderer was at once stamped as a right wing Social Revolutionary, despite the fact that he was never caught.
The Bolshevik leadership in Moscow wanted to begin the massacre immediately. Moisei Uritsky, who investigated the murder of Volodarsky, refused to agree to this. He suspected the hand of the central leadership behind this murder. That was why it was impossible to use this murder as a pretext. Lenin was beside himself with rage. This is clear from Lenin’s angry telegrams, sent on the 26th of June 1918 to Grigori Zinoviev, the chairman of the Petrograd Party Committee. Lenin wrote, among other things: "We in the Central Committee heard today that Piter’s workers want to respond to Volodarsky’s murder with terror but you (not you personally, but Piter’s civil servants) held back. I protest strongly!"
The only one who could ignore the demands to begin the terror was
Petrograd’s 45-year-old chief Chekist, Moisei Uritsky. According to Alexander
Kravtsov, this telegram clearly shows that the murder of Volodarsky was planned
and organised by the Cheka under orders from Lenin. This was confirmed by the
historian Igor Bunich.
Review
REVIEWED: Swedish book "Under Skorpionens tecken: Sovjetmaktens uppkomst och
fall". ("Under the Sign of the Scorpion: The Rise and Fall of Soviet Empire"),
Referent Publishing, Stockholm, 2002.
"Under the Sign of the Scorpion" is a fantastic book. Even its subtitle, "The
Rise and Fall of Soviet Empire" seemed to promise just too much. The present
reviewer was not disappointed, however. In the comparatively small space of 447
pages the author has succeeded in giving the reader that wealth of details (the
index of persons mentioned in the book comprises more than 1200 names) as well
as that necessary survey which together make a historical account alive, in the
highest degree.
Lina starts by following, in two chapters, the history of communist thought from
18th century Illuminates up to Moses Hess and his disciples Marx and Engels. The
subsequent chapters on Lenin and Trotsky, respectively, afford a lot of little
known facts. For instance, how many people know that both Lenin and Trotsky and
Marx and Engels were high-ranking freemasons?
Thereupon Lina concentrates on the course of events leading up to the November
coup of 1917, the so-called Russian Revolution. Beside generally known facts
about the aid given by the German government, Lina gives a detailed account of
the financial aid that bank circles in Germany, Great Britain, and the United
States gave the Bolshevik leaders. He also exposes that network of family and
other personal relationships which made it possible for very influential,
chiefly Jewish financial groups to operate across the borders of the two
combating blocs of the First World War.
Lina proves to be a skilful pedagogue when demonstrating how the implacable
mutual hostility that was enacted between the financial and revolutionary
interests, was just a show to deceive the masses: "The Revolution as a business
venture."
His description of the time after 1917 is chiefly devoted to the nameless mass
terror, which the Soviet Power directed against the defenseless population,
including the destruction of the Russian intelligentsia, and the annihilation of
the Russian culture.
Why did the Bolsheviks nourish such a deep-set hatred of everything Russian,
desiring to destroy it even to the extent that it threatened their own material
existence? According to Lina, the reason for this was that the majority of the
Bolshevik leadership were not Russians at all but extremist Jews. This is a fact
that some debaters feel is controversial. Lina, however, presents detailed
evidence that is very difficult to dismiss.
Still, many a reader may find it very difficult to conceive the fact that a
powerful empire in our century could so easily fall prey to ruthless gangsters
who immediately set out to slaughter tens of millions of innocent people,
organized mass famine (Ukraine and Northern Caucasia, in 1932-33), to say
nothing of the rest. Anyhow, the facts are there.
The fall of Soviet Power on 24 August 1991 made it possible, for the first time,
to publicize lots of secret materials about this power and its abusers during
more than 70 years. One strong point with Lina's book is that he gives us what
appears to be a rich summary of what has hitherto been published by Russian
historians but which has not reached out of Russia except than in small
rivulets.
Jüri Lina is an Estonian, living in Sweden since 1979 when he, like Alexander
Solzhenitsyn, was forced into exile after recurring conflicts with the political
police KGB. The last chapter of his book he devotes to the fate of his
fatherland under Soviet Power, 1940-41 and 1944-1991. Here, too, "the Jewish
connection" is very clearly seen. To cite just an instance: When Soviet Russia
occupied Estonia for the first time, in 1940, this was preceded by diverse
underground activities by the Estonian Communist Party. These were without much
effect, however, mainly because the party was so small in numbers. Out of the
total of 133 members in 1940, however, 67 were also members of two Jewish
"cultural" associations. That is to say, there was a majority of Jews in the
Communist fifth column that attempted to overthrow the Estonian Republic, while
at the same time the Jews were not more than 0,4 per cent of the total
population.
This last chapter on Estonia is very interesting to read also because the wealth
of details of the destinies of individuals who "chanced to escape the anonymity
of the great terror waves". Here, Lina bases his presentation on his own
research into the archives of Estonian KGB, now open to researchers. It is also
very upsetting to read about this mass of human suffering - what else could we
expect?
In the opinion of the present reviewer, Jüri Lina's book "Under the Sign of the
Scorpion: The Rise and Fall of Soviet Empire" is one of those rare books that
must leave a profound and lasting impression on every reader.
Reviewed by S. D. Savallar
If people were left unemployed and given time to think, the Illuminati's violent regime might be endangered...Under the sign of the Scorpion- the Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire by Juri Lina
Marx and Engels were freemasons of the 31st degree. (Vladimir Istarkhov, "The Battle of the Russian Gods", Moscow, 2000, p. 154.) In 1847, Marx and Engels became members of The League of Just Men, one of the Illuminati's underground branches where the Jew Jakob Venedey played an important role.....Hess and Marx hoped to exploit the jealousy of the stupid proletariat to enforce a hell on earth where fear, suffering, terror and treason ruled supreme - Communism.1 Under the sign of the Scorpion- the Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire by Juri Lina
According to the most famous myth, Marx had no money and was economically dependent on his "friend" Engels. In reality, Nathan Rothschild financed him. This was revealed by his close associate Mikhail Bakunin in his "Polemique contre les Juifs" ("Polemic Against the Jews"). Bakunin broke away from Marx and his companions, because "they had one foot in the bank and the other foot in the socialist movement". Under the sign of the Scorpion- the Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire by Juri Lina
Hess and Marx hoped to exploit the jealousy of the stupid proletariat to
enforce a hell on earth where fear, suffering, terror and treason ruled supreme
- Communism. This is why Moses Hess suggested
transforming The League of Just Men into a communist party in November 1847.
Together with Engels, Marx reorganized (Soviet term) the League before the end
of the year. Moses Hess, Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Wilhelm Weitling, Hermann
Kriege, Joseph Weydemeyer, Ernst and Ferdinand Wolf played important roles.
Marx was commissioned to write the
manifesto of the Communist Party, according to the Soviet-Estonian
Encyclopaedia. It was Moses Hess who made him work out the religion of the
socialist revolution. Marx did this with the co-operation of the slave-trader
Jean Lafitte-Laflinne.
"The Communist Manifesto" was
published in London. In this document, Marx had only further developed the ideas
of the Illuminist leaders Adam Weishaupt and Clinton Roosevelt. He had at the
same time used the conspiratorial experience of the Utopian communist and
Illuminatus Francois Noel Babeuf (1760-1797) to show the way to the socialist
(Illuminist) revolution.
In this way, Communism and
Socialism became the code names for the Illuminati's program, which was to
extinguish all moral principles, whereupon everything was allowed.
Under
the sign of the Scorpion- the Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire
by Juri Lina
The holy book of the socialists, "Das Kapital", published on September 2, 1867, is especially revealing since this work shows not only that the author was a careless and incompetent theorist, but also that he was a downright liar. Paul Johnson demonstrates this in his book "The Intellectuals". Under the sign of the Scorpion- the Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire by Juri Lina
Marx tolerated no ideas but the Illuminist ones which were later known as Marxist. Marxism merely gave the dark Illuminist powers a hypocritical method and a verbose phraseology, which they could use to justify any kind of enormity they committed. Since this doctrine was unscientific, they would never in all their attempts be able to put the Marxist theories into practice.Under the sign of the Scorpion- the Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire by Juri Lina
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/signscorpion/signscorpion.htm