The Government's scientists will often ask for conclusive proof when they are challenged. It is a word often used when you wish to win your side of the argument. Scientifically conclusive proof is impossible to obtain – let me explain.
    I was at a legal hearing in Torquay representing a community and the barrister representing the communications industry said "there is no conclusive proof that these microwaves will cause damage". I argued: if somebody stood up and shot me in this courtroom there would be three levels of proof. You would have everybody as a witness and that would be accepted in a Court of Law. A pathologist could perform a post mortem, decide that the bullet killed me and that would be a second level of proof. If, however you wanted conclusive proof that the bullet killed me, you would have to argue that at the split second the bullet went into my body every system in my body was working perfectly because there are thousands of reasons why I could drop dead on the spot before the bullet went in and you would have to prove conclusively that all of these systems were working perfectly before the bullet went in. Clearly, this is scientifically impossible; there is no such thing as conclusive proof, yet it is what is demanded by government scientists when challenging their decisions. Confidential Report on TETRA for the Police of England and Wales by B Trower

1. Homeopaths support vaccination:
"Vaccines are the only disease prevention option available...For instance, the position of the Faculty of Homeopathy at the Royal London Homeopoathy Hospital on immunisation is very simple and encapsulated well in the following statement by it's president Dr DS Spence: "When there is no medical contraindication, immunisation should be carried out in the normal way using conventional tested and approved vaccines".http://www.micro.unsw.edu.au/Natalia/MYTH8.HTM

Survey shows that some homoeopaths and chiropractors advise against MMR "The table shows that only a few professional homoeopaths and a quarter of the chiropractors advised in favour of the MMR vaccination. Almost half of the homoeopaths and nearly a fifth of the chiropractors advised against it."

"The Faculty of Homoeopathy acknowledges this and recommends the use of conventional vaccines.  Hahnemann, the founder of homoeopathy, was a supporter of smallpox vaccination."---Helen Bedford & David Elliman

Comment:
"The Faculty of Homoeopathy speaks for a medically qualified minority. The more numerous medically unqualified homoeopaths belong to the Society of Homoeopaths, the Institute of Complementary Medicine, or the Homoeopathic Medical Association, totalling some 2000 practitioners. None of these bodies supports vaccination."--Peter Morrell

And reading a homeopathic MD--Dr Jean Elmiger MD is enough to put anyone off the BCG vaccine along with the rest.

2.  Use images to sell vaccines and vaccination

3. Maintain that only "double blind studies" are valid proof of a therapy, and clinical studies/observations are worthless until proven this way.

Eg: "Case studies are anecdotes. Nice try.....These are anecdotes. DUH. Not data."--Putz  

Cawadias (1953) has said that "the history of medicine has shown that, whenever medicine has strayed from clinical observation, the result has been chaos, stagnation, and disaster."--British Medical Journal, Oct 8th, 1955, p.867 (Quoted in Clinical Medical Discoveries by Beddow Bayly)

Examples of clinical work ignored this way.

4.  Attack non-allopaths over their beliefs on vaccination under guise of upholding "government policy"