ANIMAL RESEARCH T A K E S LIVES
- Humans and Animals BOTH Suffer
<< previous page | next page >>
contents | Chapter 5 index | index
Dr George Wilson, President of the British Medical Society said at the Society's AGM in 1899:
"I accuse my profession of misleading the public. Pasteur's anti-rabies vaccination is - I believe, and others with me - a piece of deception. The much-praised serum treatment does not even have the general approval of the doctors in the hospital in our capital city. The whole of bacteriological theory and practice is closely tied up with commercial interests."
(British Medical Journal.)
In the German medical news Selecta of May 16 1977, a German virologists' convention described Pasteur's rabies vaccine as "an archaic monster".
Hans Ruesch says in One Thousand Doctors (and many more) Against Vivisection:
"Medical students are taught that Pasteur produced a vaccine to cure rabies since he was a vivisector and vivisection is the foundation of modern medicine. Journalists also keep the public on the right track by perpetuating the myth. They keep public opinion shaped to the right pattern which rests on bigotry."
Hans Ruesch in Slaughter of the Innocent reveals that Pasteur's vaccine for rabies never saved one single human life, but that several deaths resulted from it.
The World Health Organisation Expert Committee on Rabies, 1973, claimed that evidence is accumulating that parenteral injection of anti-rabies vaccine causes human deaths "under certain conditions" and goes on:
"The Committee recommends that production of fermi-type vaccines, since they contain residual living virus, should be discontinued."
On page 27 of the report it says:
"The Committee emphasises that the most valuable procedure in post-exposure treatment is the local treatment of wounds. This should be done by thoroughly washing with soap and water."
On page 28:
"Immediate first-aid procedures recommended is the flushing and washing of the wound with soap and water."
This coincides with the advice of many homeopathic doctors and experts in animal diseases who claim that all-round protection of good health results from strict hygiene, a careful daily diet of natural foods, mostly eaten raw, and the use of disinfectant herbs.
Interestingly, Hans Ruesch reports in Slaughter of the Innocent that since Pasteur developed his vaccine for rabies the death rate from the disease has increased, not decreased. This is borne out in the article in the German Medical News weekly Selecta, May 16 1977 which goes on to say:
"The problems of rabies vaccine solved."
The article reported a conference of German virologists who disclaimed and contradicted Pasteur's alleged vaccine. Apparently Pasteur could not even keep his own body or the bodies of his own family healthy since historians reveal that he suffered from paralysis of the mouth in his later years and members of his immediate family died from various diseases.
In Vaccines: Vital or Vulnerable, Archie Kalokerinos and Glen Dettman say of rabies vaccine:
"In 1885 Louis Pasteur was proclaimed to be a hero for introducing a cure for rabies, alas the problem is just as great as it was then. We now know that most mammals 'carry' the virus associated with rabies and recent reports from H.E.W. (United States) support the endogenous seeding (microzymian) thesis of Bechamp. Note the case histories from Oklahoma and Kentucky, Epidemiologic notes and reports: Human Rabies.
If a likely source of exposure is not found, this man will be the fourth of 8 patients with rabies reported to CDC since January 1978 for whom no source of the disease was found. The most probable explanation for this was the inability of these four patients to communicate at the time rabies was considered as a diagnosis. Thus rabies should be considered as a possible cause of encephalopathy of undetermined etiology, despite a negative contact history.
The case reported here is the second one this year - and the fourth in two years - in which no potential bite exposure could be identified, despite intensive questioning of families and friends. There are three possible explanations: these patients knew of, but did not relate to others, an animal bite; the patients were unaware of a bite exposure (e.g a bat bite while sleeping); or the patients had a nonebite exposure to rabies."
It is further disturbing to read how the wife of a U.S. diplomat became paralysed after being routinely vaccinated against rabies. She was not warned of any possible side effects from the vaccine. The article describes her condition as similar to multiple sclerosis, the patient is permanently and totally disabled. The federal judge awarded her $469,051 and her husband $50,000. The article concludes by stating:
"This court decision serves as a reminder that a judicious assessment of risk factors must be made when deciding whether or not to vaccinate against rabies."
("Compensation for Vaccine Damage", The Lancet, November 24 1979.)
Doctors say that Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch did not deal with natural events, but with experimental artifacts. The experimenter does not produce nature in the laboratory. He could not if he tried, for the experiment imposes limiting conditions on nature: its aim is to force nature to give answers to questions devised by man.
The investigator, who dares to question the official brainwashing that human or animal health was in the past, or currently, or will, in the future be based on vivisection, can quickly and easily arrive at the truth, which is increasingly well-documented. If vivisection is to survive, the public must be kept ignorant of the truth. There is no money in hygiene or prevention. The unscientific and obscene institution of vivisection is protected and promoted solely by those in big business who make fortunes from it at the expense of true medicine.
(Refer also to the section on smallpox vaccinations in which evidence is given that smallpox (and other vaccinations including polio, tetanus, typhoid fever and tuberculosis) form the onset of multiple sclerosis.)
| "Zintchenko (1965) has reported 12 patients in whom multiple sclerosis first became evident after a course of anti-rabies vaccination." (British Medical Journal, 2:210-213, 1967.) |