[Paul Offit, M.D., chief of infectious diseases at the Children's Hospital of
Philadelphia and the Henle Professor of Immunologic and Infectious Diseases at
the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, is the Chief USspokesman/liar for vaccination. The Voice of
Sauron. On the board of
Every Child By Two.
Believes children can safely take 100,000 vaccines! He shares the
patent on the Rotavirus vaccineRotateq,
that looks to have made him millions.]
Dr. Offit lists that he is a consultant to Merck on an attachment to his OGE
450, but does not disclose whether or not he received any remuneration for his
services.
Dr. Offit shares the patent on the Rotavirus vaccine in development by Merck and
lists a $350,000 grant from Merck for Rotavirus vaccine development. Also, he
lists that he is a consultant to Merck.
Dr. Offit began his tenure on ACIP in October of 1998. Out of four votes
pertaining to the ACIP’s rotavirus statement he voted “yes” three times,
including, voting for the inclusion of the rotavirus vaccine in the VFC
program.
Dr. Offit abstained from voting on the ACIP’s rescission of the recommendation
of the rotavirus vaccine for routine use. He stated at the meeting, “I’m not
conflicted with Wyeth, but because I consult with Merck on the development of
rotavirus vaccine, I would still prefer to abstain because it creates a
perception of conflict.”
"Anyone who acquired their information in a
trance state tends to be more confident and sincere sounding as a witness
than a person who is relying on direct memory."---Secret, Don't
Tell: The Encyclopedia of Hypnotism by Carla
Emery p. 238
[2011 Dec] Paul
Offit Lies About Jake Crosby; Tara Palmore Throws Him Out and NIH Covers it Up
Despite the estimated $10 million Paul Offit earned from RotaTeq
vaccine sales and despite his Merck-sponsored chair at Children’s Hospital of
Philadelphia, his lecture began with his incredible claim that he has no
relevant financial disclosures. He even received a congressional reprimand for
taking part in voting on vaccine policies for which he is conflicted. Here’s
what he said instead: “I’m sorry. I have no financial conflicts of interest.
This is my only real conflict is that I am a Philadelphia Eagles season ticket
holder, which gives me an inability to actually effectively assess that team.”
.......Throughout Paul Offit’s lecture, he claimed that Andrew Wakefield said
that the MMR vaccine causes autism, including at the March 1998 press conference
at the Royal Free Hospital; a transcript of Wakefield’s talk proves otherwise:
“It’s a moral issue for me. I can’t support the continued use of these three
vaccines, given in combination, until this issue has been resolved.”......The
rest of the studies Offit cited were thrown out as uninformative either by the
2005 Cochrane Review, the recent 2011 IOM Report, or both. Indeed, all of these
studies were created to cover-up a link between autism and vaccines
.......Defending his institute’s bogus report, IOM President Fineberg lied on
Salon that none of the review panelists had ties to CDC or pharma when many of
them did.......Dr. Offit even lied that Kirby’s book was “paid for” by SafeMinds,
which he dubbed an “anti-vaccine group.”
[2011 Jan] Paul Offit
and the “Original Sin” of Autism By J.B. Handley OK, let me be clear:
I think Paul Offit is a blowhard liar, a vaccine profiteer and apologist, and
every time he opens his mouth he disrespects my son. When the final chapter is
finally written on this man-made autism epidemic, I will do everything within my
power to ensure that Offit is remembered by history as one of the most sinister,
dishonest, well-funded talking heads pharma ever produced, and that his efforts
served to afflict so many children with autism who may otherwise have avoided
it.
In one of the most absurd snowjobs ever put on the media,
Offit, a doctor who has never seen a patient with autism, never treated autism,
and never published a study about autism, is somehow considered to be an expert
on autism. Given his status as a multi-millionaire vaccine patent holder who has
had much of his career supported by Merck, this isn’t just absurd, it’s highway
robbery, and yet the media persists, and rarely even mentions Offit’s Mount
Everest-sized pile of conflicts.
[2010 Sept]
Autism Speaks Mangles the Poling Decision: NYT Blog Adds Insult By J.B. Handley
“This message pertains specifically to Alison Singer. Every once in a while
something is sent to me that really just burns me up. There is NOTHING more
irritating than people who pretend that they have some sort of inside
information that makes what they say meaningful on a topic. You, Alison Singer,
appear to be one of those people…at least when it comes to my daughter, Hannah
Poling. While you may feel that your daughter was destined to be autistic, I
would never pretend to know the first thing about why your daughter has the
issues that she does. And you would do well to stop acting as though you have
ANY credible knowledge about my child.
Nothing makes you look more like a puppet on a string than to spill out the
garbage about Hannah having an encephalopathy PRIOR to the July 19, 2000
vaccines. The ONLY person ever saying that has been PAUL OFFIT, your employer.
And, this is only his wishful thinking. Paul needs to use his MD to practice
medicine. I think he forgot and thinks it stands for marketing director.”
[2009 Oct] Dr. Paul Offit, The
Autism Expert. Doesn't See Patients with Autism? By J.B. Handley
Not only is Ms. Pisani’s conflict hidden from the reader, but her actual
quote is a complete fabrication. Ms. Pisani has been advocating vaccines
for children for YEARS, everything in her quote is a lie -- she wasn’t
questioning the right thing to do when Offit’s book came along. A liar
with a conflict of interest -- how perfect!
....The lack of humanity, the lack of interest in recovering children,
is this guy really a doctor? It would be like the Marlboro man shitting
on a non-traditional treatment for lung cancer, because the treatment
uses natural substances to pull tobacco tar out of people’s lungs. It’s
horrible, repugnant, and so profoundly disrespectful of parents who ARE
seeing recovery through biomedical treatment, I really don’t have the
words to castigate Offit to the proper degree. In fact, it’s even worse
than that. Offit and his comrades are actually rooting AGAINST recovery
for our children, because if recovery from autism is actually possible
through biomedical intervention, then autism is environmentally caused.
And, if it’s environmentally caused, then the guy who will die known as
“Mr. Vaccine” is in very deep kimchi, and his tombstone may actually end
up reading, “Mr. Autism Epidemic Facilitator.”
.....Offit made up a conversation that never took place and blended
something I wrote on a public message board for an entirely different
reason to serve his own purpose......Our case wasn’t a slam-dunk. We’d
proven Offit had lied, that was easy.
[June 3, 2007 Letter] Boston Globe Publishes Bunk by
Paul OffitIn this article today Paul Offit claims measles would kill 3000 children every
year in the USA. Regrettably and as you can see from the attached graphs, that
is wholly incorrect. This kind of misinformation is putting childrens'
lives and health at risk
NOTE:
The article on Wall Street Journal (WSJ) did not mention that:
1) Dr. Offit shares the patent on the Rotavirus vaccine in development by Merck
(Application number 353547 ). He had a $350,000 grant from Merck for Rotavirus
vaccine development.
2) Dr. Offit is a consultant to Merck (listed on an attachment to his OGE 450),
but does not want to disclose whether or not he received any remuneration for
his services. (see http://www.vaccinetruth.org/paul_offit.htm)
Quotes re Offit Paul Offit defending vaccines is like
Charles Manson arguing the merits of
religious cults, and reporters and gossip
columnists across the country are Googling
away and learning about the extreme
conflicts, Congressional reprimands, vaccine
patents, paid spokesperson gigs, and
underhanded book deals that characterize
Offit's dealings.[July 2008] The
Parasites Thank You, Amanda Peet
I have offered on
several occasions by recorded delivery and mail to debate Dr. Offit in public at
any time in any place of his choosing and that he has never taken me up on. And
I don't suppose that he is going to. Let's
just characterize Dr. Offit's sense of proportion and
due diligence in what he says. For example, in his book about false prophets,
Autism and False Prophets, he claimed that I had made the recommendation to
use single vaccines in the UK in February 1998 when the single vaccines were not
available. They were. I would not have made the recommendation had they not
been. If you Google that. If you put in 'withdrawal
single vaccines UK' into Google, the first website
that comes up gives you the precise date on which they were withdrawn in the
fall of that year; six months beyond what I had said. That is all Dr. Offit had
to do to check his facts. That was all he had to do.He did not do it. Instead, he decided to go into his book, go into print
and defame me by suggesting that I would make a recommendation which was in
effect unethical. So that is a measure if you like of Dr. Offit's
application to the task at hand.
[2010 April] Andrew Wakefield Interview by Dr
Mercola
Now we come to your specific question about the use of 10,000 which I think
he's now revised to a hundred thousand vaccine
antigens on one day. This is based upon a theoretical study that he did looking
at the sort of genetic variability of the genes responsible for antibody
production and saying, well, based upon the number that we have available; we
should be able to produce this number of antibodies. That is an entirely
theoretical mathematical piece of jiggery pokery. It has absolutely nothing
whatsoever to do with the real world and it's bizarre
that he would go out there and say that. That really, really worries me from a
safety standpoint. If you just take for example, MMR
and you add in the varicella vaccine, the chickenpox vaccine, MMRV as ProQuad
what happens is you double the rate of convulsions as an adverse reaction. So
just adding one and not 999,000 but just one extra vaccine in, you double the
rate of an adverse, a potentially serious adverse reaction. To the extent that
that ProQuad vaccine had to be withdrawn. So the notion that you could give a
child a hundred thousand vaccine antigens on one day is utter nonsense. And what
is extraordinary, what is telling I suppose is that no other immunologist or
vaccinologist or any other person with any credible standing has stood behind
Dr. Offit and said yes, you can go for it.
[2010 April] Andrew Wakefield Interview by Dr
Mercola
It appears Paul Offit joined the ACIP to ensure he could influence the
approval of the Rotavirus vaccine, from which he would later benefit greatly
when his own version of rotavirus vaccine was approved. Not surprisingly, Paul
Offit voted yes on every action he could relating to the approval of Wyeth's
vaccine. But, when the vaccine was being pulled from the market, Offit abstained. [2009 Jan] Dr. Paul
Offit: Fox in a Henhouse, the ACIP Years (1998-2003) By J.B. Handley
"There are two reasons why people perpetuate a lie,
even if they are not the original creators of it. Some do it out of ignorance or
carelessness. Others do it deliberately with full knowledge. Sometimes it is
difficult to determine whether facts are falsified deliberately or out of
ignorance. Whatever the case, it is important to set the record straight when
distortion of facts perpetuate a lie, especially when the lives of human beings
are at stake.....Paul Offit attempts to rewrite
history when he argues that the DPT vaccine does not cause brain inflammation
and permanent brain injury in some children....Offit
is entitled to his own opinion but not to his own facts. We have only ourselves
to blame when we believe everything he says." -
At Risk: Truth About Vaccines, Lawsuits & Shortages by
Barbara Loe Fisher
[Nov 2007]
Dissecting A Thimerosal Studyby Heidi Stevenson So, the expert quoted has made a statement that
has nothing to do with the study and he holds a patent on a dangerous vaccine
being pushed on tiny babies for a disease that holds almost no risk if they're
healthy. Is this the sort of person whose opinion on the issue—especially
considering the fact that his statement has nothing to do with the study in
question—is worthwhile?
It is unfortunate that most of the public are of the opinion that their
physician has an in-depth knowledge of how the body works. For example, most
parents assume that the pediatrician understands the immune system and therefore
knows all about vaccine effects. Nothing could be further from the truth. In
most medical schools, the basic sciences are taught during the first year.
Medical students, in general, hate the basic sciences and see them as useless to
the practice of medicine. Kevin worse, there are certain subjects that receive
little or no coverage in medical education. Many people are aware that nutrition
rarely receives any attention i n the curriculum. Yet, of the basic sciences, it
is immunology that gets little more than a footnote.
As you will discover in this book, even people making
decisions concerning the vaccines your child will receive have admitted they
know little or nothing concerning immunology. This is appalling. Anyone with
even a basic understanding of immunology or having read the available research
on the effects of excessive vaccination on the developing brain, would know that
the present crowded vaccine schedule is extremely destructive to the child's
brain. Likewise, there seems to be little concern as to the effects of multiple
immunizations on the developing child's immune system. Pediatricians and public
health authorities are of the opinion that they can give an unlimited number of
vaccines to babies and small children without risk. Our neuroscience proves this
is insane. Almost every year, these vaccine enthusiasts add another set of
vaccines to the schedule, despite the growing list of neurological and other
health disasters occurring in our children.
Vaccine
Safety Manual by Neil Z. Miller. (Preface)
"Many, many people are under mind control and have been working for
them for years - men and women who are dentists, attorneys,
stockbrokers, doctors, psychiatrists, psychologists, politicians,
bankers, corporate heads, engineers, newspaper editors or owners,
nurses, teachers, principals, etc. etc. etc. And all these programmed
people are used to further "the cause," each placed in strategic
positions for use by the Council.The
technology available is so advanced that most people couldn't even dream
of it. It far surpasses anything yet seen on sci-fi movies or read about
in books -- total automation, even of people."---Thanks
for the Memories by Brice Taylor
Offit bollocks quotes:
The whooping cough vaccine didn't cause permanent brain damage (see:
DPT vaccine
damage)....I think the vaccines that have been hardest hit have been the
hepatitis B vaccine, I think in large part because it's given to children in the
first day of life. The human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV)
has been a big target because it prevents a sexually transmitted disease, and I
think at some level people see that as dirty and don't like to give it to
adolescents. I think hepatitis B vaccine suffered the same thing. I think there
are some vaccines that suffer more than others, but I think at some level when
one suffers they all suffer.
Offit, Paul A.
Paul Offit on the Dangers of the Anti-Vaccine Movement
"In fact, Dr. Offit's studies show that in theory, healthy infants could
safely get up to 100,000 vaccines at once." [Ref]
"I
think questioning vaccines is perfectly reasonable. But I thinkthat when one looks at the data, and sees that vax are safe and effectiveand...still...says, 'Well, I think there's a conspiracy to sell vaccines'
or'I think my doctor's
lying to me,' I think that's
when you cross some sortof critical line," says Offit.
"What I'm asking is that people trust theirexperts.
And that's sort of a hard thing to politically accept."(CBS) 60 MinutesOctober 20, 2004
"If they were
willing to look at all the studies that were done with
vaccines, they would find that they are, I think without question, thesafest, best-tested thing we put into our bodies," says Offit. "I thinktheyhave a better safety record than vitamins.
(CBS) 60 MinutesOctober 20, 2004
[Draw dropping lie that one. No
one has found any safety study over 2 weeks for MMR, and that was done by the
maker, and $1 Billion in compensation to vaccine victims, when at the most only
1 in 4 get compensated, certainly well under 10% of vaccine reactions ever get
reported. I'd love to see a list of vitamin victims under professional (doctor)supervision, like the vaccine victims.]
"If they were willing to look at all the studies that
were done with vaccines, they would find that they are, I
think without question, the safest, best-tested thing we put
into our bodies. I think they have a better
safety record than
vitamins." (60
Minutes, October 20, 2004)
"I think without question the
smallpox vaccine has severe
adverse events that occur at a rate far greater than any
of the other vaccines that we use today. Which means that
the
smallpox vaccine, is I think, without question, our
least safe vaccine. But it is absolutely safe if one defines
'safe' as benefits outweigh risks in a situation where the
disease is present. When the disease isn't present, then one
only is frankly aware of the risks, because there are no
benefits." (PBS,
2002)
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/health/july-dec02/offit_smallpox.html
"...there was some very poor research done in
England by a
surgeon named
Andrew Wakefield. His findings have not been reproduced
by anyone who has tried. It was bad science that,
unfortunately, got a lot of press." (May 25, 2001)
The rationalization "There has been a fair amount of study
which I think has clearly shown that the disease is at least
– or at least has a genetic basis.......So
that sort of takes out the environmental influenza and just looks at genetics I
think and has – and there has been study after study that has shown that there's
at the very least a genetic."--- [March 2006] Paul Offit Briefs Media On Vaccine Safety
Concerns
[Paul Offit, M.D., chief of infectious diseases at the Children's Hospital of
Philadelphia and the Henle Professor of Immunologic and Infectious Diseases at
the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, is the Chief US
