Labour (Satan's party)
[back] Fascism Political Mafia
“The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.”-Tacitus
"In our country the lie has become not just a moral category, but a pillar of the state."---Alexander Solzhenitsyn
See: Drugs Wars Political Terms The covert war Common Purpose
[The visible face of UK (covert) Fascism. Closed 600
police stations, tied up police with paperwork and took them off the streets.
Tax at well over 50% with 700 stealth taxes at last count--global warming is the
latest excuse to tax us. 24 hour drinking introduced while most NHS beds are
tied to alcohol abuse, and 10% of the population are currently alcoholic!
Attempt to have 40 Supercasinos!--just legalised robbery with estimated 300,000
more gambling addicts. Foot and mouth
fiasco---billions throw away, many businesses broken,
over 50 farmers died from suicide while the chief architect of the scandalous
contiguous cull terrorism, Anderson, went
on to head up one of the inquiries, with another headed up by a food baron,
while another food baron, Sainsbury, was science minister!, so no surprise local
shops are vanishing while new supermarkets are all over the place and
GM foods are
promoted even though they don't work, are toxic, and threaten organic farming
(no doubt one of their targets).
Murdered 500,000 Iraqi children
with sanctions, and 700,000 Iraqi civilians for a
lie (supported by the Tories!--bit of a giveaway that), while turning a 'blind
eye' to 1 million Rwandan murders, if not
complicit in the genocide.
Lying has become the pillar of the State, with a lie monger as Prime minister--Blair. Huge breakdown in family and communities---huge numbers of playing fields lost, trying to close over 2,000 post offices, and kill off small farmers and shops. While poverty levels at 27% for children. When you know what it really is then it seems obvious. At least two great whitewashes, eg Kelly, Diana. Political correctness is just subtle State terrorism. All following the script as revealed by John Coleman.]
How they voted on Iraq
Fluoride Dr. John Yiamouyiannis
Jowell, Tessa Gambling
[2013 Jan] Casino Britain: The deprived town where a staggering £340 for EVERY man, woman and child is pumped into gambling slot machines in a year Labour loophole from 2001 generates huge profits for bookmakers, who deny targeting the poor
Jimmy Savile and how the liberal left encouraged the sexualisation of our
children Back in 1978, an organisation called the Paedophile
Information Exchange affiliated itself to the National Council for Civil
Liberties — known today as Liberty. PIE — whose members were reportedly
attracted to boys and girls — set out to make paedophilia respectable.
It campaigned to reduce the age of consent and resist controls on child pornography. Until it excluded PIE in 1983, the NCCL thus backed this disgusting agenda of child abuse.
Indeed, even before PIE was affiliated to it, the NCCL was campaigning to liberalise paedophilia and reduce the age of sexual consent to 14. In 1976, the NCCL argued ‘childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in with an adult, result in no identifiable damage’. And in 1977 it said: ‘NCCL has no policy on [PIE’s] aims, other than the evidence that children are harmed if, after a mutual relationship with an adult, they are exposed to the attentions of the police, Press and court.’ The assumption that paedophilia did not harm a child, and that the only harm was done instead by reporting it to the police, was, of course, grotesque. Yet during this time, when PIE members were being prosecuted on indecency and pornography charges, the General Secretary of the NCCL was Patricia Hewitt— later to become a Labour Cabinet minister.
A second future Labour minister, Harriet Harman, served as the NCCL’s legal officer for four years from 1978. Harman has called the Savile revelations ‘a stain’ on the BBC. Yet while she was at the NCCL she seemed untroubled by its PIE affiliate. Moreover, she campaigned for a liberalisation of child porn laws. In the NCCL’s response to a Bill that aimed to ban indecent images of under-16s, she stated absurdly that pornographic photographs or films of children should not be considered indecent unless it could be shown the subject had suffered, claiming that the new law could lead to ‘damaging and absurd prosecutions’ and ‘increase censorship’. Embarrassed by this reminder, Harman now insists she never condoned pornography and had merely wanted to ensure the new law delivered child protection rather than censorship.
How disingenuous. For in such liberal circles, freedom unconstrained by any rules at all had become the shibboleth. Not just freedom of expression but — fatefully — freedom to have sex without any constraints. Any form of sexual activity was seen as a ‘right’ — regardless of with whom you did it. That’s why the NCCL also campaigned to decriminalise incest. Objectors were damned as prigs, prudes and bigots. Their silence was enforced by the vicious, politically correct demonisation of anyone who tried to blow the whistle on licentious behaviour, which was blessed by liberals and thus deemed to be untouchable. The result was that in case after case over the years, the authorities turned a blind eye to the systematic sexual abuse of children in care homes, principally through the terror of being labelled ‘homophobic’.
[2011 June] Human right to sponge off UK: 3,200 criminals, failed asylum seekers and benefit tourists can't be kicked out because of right to family life Human rights law is demolishing every aspect of Britain’s immigration controls, Government papers reveal. Every year, more than 3,200 foreign criminals, failed asylum seekers and EU ‘benefit tourists’ are using Labour’s Human Rights Act to thwart Home Office attempts to remove migrants – or stop them arriving in the first place.
[2010 March] How violent crime has risen 44% after 13 years of Labour: But ministers insist it's DOWN
[2010 Jan] The £2.7bn drinks bill: The legacy in hospital costs of Labour's disastrous licensing free-for-all
[2010 Aug] Time for Change: Why the Corrupt Few Wreak So Much Death,
Destruction, and Suffering on the Rest of us Lobaczewski writes a lot about
the role of ideology for individuals or groups in the ponerogenic process that
leads to pathocracies. The ideology itself is usually not inherently evil
(although it may be, as in the case of Nazism), and the ideology does not
generally characterize the movement or group. Rather, the ideology
serves as a mask, to hide the actual intentions of the group.
Lobaczewski explains it like this:....."The fact is, even normal people, who
condemn this kind of union along with its ideologies, feel hurt and deprived of
something constituting part of their own romanticism, their way of perceiving
reality, when a widely idealized group is exposed as little more than a gang of
A perfect example of this explanation, in my opinion, is the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq. If George Bush and Dick Cheney had told the American public, in their run-up to war, that it was necessary to invade and occupy Iraq in order to open up tens of billions of dollars worth of economic opportunity for their corporate cronies and to gain access to Iraqi oil, the American people and even their corporate news media would have been hard pressed to drum up much enthusiasm for war. Instead, we were provided with (especially after the “weapons of mass destruction” excuse was proven to be a lie) the ideology of democracy (We’re doing it to bring democracy to the Iraqi people) and anti-terrorism (We have to fight them over there so we don’t have to fight them here.)
The last paragraph of Lobaczewski’s that I cite above explains why so many normal Americans are willing to accept the lame excuses of psychopaths hiding behind a wall of ideology. Acknowledging that our leaders are no more than criminal thugs and psychopaths is just too painful for most Americans. It is much more comfortable for them to believe that their country goes to war for idealistic and generous purposes.
To weaken the moral fiber of the nation and to demoralize workers in the labor class by creating mass unemployment. As jobs dwindle due to the post industrial zero growth policies introduced by the Club of Rome, the report envisages demoralized and discouraged workers resorting to alcohol and drugs. The youth of the land will be encouraged by means of rock music and drugs to rebel against the status quo, thus undermining and eventually destroying the family unit. In this regard, the Committee commissioned Tavistock Institute to prepare a blueprint as to how this could be achieved. Tavistock directed Stanford Research to undertake the work under the direction of Professor Willis Harmon. This work later became known as the "Aquarian Conspiracy". Targets of the Illuminati and the Committee of 300 By Dr. John Coleman
"At least 3.4 million children (27% of children in Britain, 41% of children in London) in the UK are blighted by destitution (in poverty), their parents too poor to feed, clothe or shelter them properly. 3/4 of a million children go without a warm wasterproof coat or proper shoes in winter....Babies from poor families are on average 4.5ozs lighter than those from rich families because of poor nutrition. Two adults with 2 children would have to work 55 hours a week at the minimum wage to get above the poverty line. 3 million families are expected to be unable to heat their home this year."[Media Oct 17, 2006] UK CHILD POVERTY - THE FACTS