Satanic bible passages
(Old Testament)
Religion Racket
Satanism
Bibles
['Lord your God' in these passages is the heartless Lucifer and Jehovah, 'Gods' of the Satanists. He isn't the 'God' of true Christians, that is the heart God--Christ, which isn't surprising as it contains The Written Torah ('Oral Torah’ is the Talmud) from Judaism including the Five Books of Moses and the prophetic writings – e.g. Isaiah, Jeremiah, Psalms, Proverbs, etc. The Five Books of Moses – comprised of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy – was written down by Moses in 1273 BCE, and includes all 613 commandments (mitzvahs).]
See: False prophets Luciferian symbols Moses
Condoned (satanic)
behaviour
Rape
Animal
Sacrifice
Mass
Murder
Suppressing sexuality
Violence
"Both the Cathars and the Bogomils rejected the Church and all its sacraments completely, regarding it as the Church of Satan....Cathars alike rejected most of the Old Testament--and it's belligerent deity-- as satanic. Both movements (Cathars & Bogomils) regarded the entity of the Church -- Catholic in the west, Orthodoxy in the east--as the Church of Satan, and rejected it utterly.....the Cross was seen as the instrument of Christ's torture, and Bogomils and Cathars alike refused to venerate it." ~ Sean Martin (The Cathars p. 53)
'The Judaic God, as portrayed by Moses (in the above passage), is an evil deity, who leads his people to plunder, robbery and theft. The Catholic theologian Raymund Schwager found 600 passages of explicit violence in the Old Testament, along with 1000 descriptive verses of God's own violent punishments and 100 passages where God expressly commands others to kill. Violence is one of the most frequently mentioned activities in the Hebrew Bible.' The Wandering Who?: A Study of Jewish Identity Politics by Gilad Atzmon
'Jews believe and state openly that Moses was the author of the Hebrew Torah (the first five books of the Old Testament). He is also known to be the disseminator of the hidden Oral Tradition, that eventually inspired the Babylonian Talmud. But, as the great Sigmund Freud pointed out, and as we re-assert - MOSES WAS AKHENATON - the Bible is not a Jewish tome, but an Egyptian one. This is the great secret that has been kept from humankind for so long. The generations of alteration and re-editing by Josephus and Bacon and others has merely assisted in this truth being kept hidden. But when we understand the true identity of this Moses, we understand also the true authors of the Bible. This is the real reason why Bibles can be found on Masonic altars. It is not because Masons are Christians, but because they are Atonists, as are all Christians and Jews, regardless of what false notions the Vatican spin-doctors have connived and enforced.'--Michael Tsarion http://www.irishoriginsofcivilizatio...k2_chap41.html
Passages
'Then when the Lord your God brings you to the land he
promised your ancestors Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob to give you - a land with
large, fine cities you did not build, houses filled with choice things you did
not accumulate, hewn out cisterns you did not dig, and vineyards and olive
groves you did not plant - and you eat your fill, be careful not to forget the
Lord who brought you out of Egypt, that place of slavery.' -Deuteronomy
6:10-12
Animal sacrifice [Animal Sacrifice]
“Make an altar of earth for me and sacrifice on it your burnt offerings and fellowship offerings, your sheep and goats and your cattle. Wherever I cause my name to be honored, I will come to you and bless you." - Exodus 20:24
So they sent twelve thousand warriors to Jabesh-gilead with orders to kill everyone there, including women and children. "This is what you are to do," they said. "Completely destroy all the males and every woman who is not a virgin." Among the residents of Jabesh-gilead they found four hundred young virgins who had never slept with a man, and they brought them to the camp at Shiloh in the land of Canaan (Judges 21:10-24 NLT)
They attacked Midian just as the LORD had commanded Moses, and they killed all the men. ..... Then the Israelite army captured the Midianite women and children and seized their cattle and flocks and all their wealth as plunder. They burned all the towns and villages where the Midianites had lived. After they had gathered the plunder and captives, both people and animals, they brought them all to Moses and Eleazar the priest, and to the whole community of Israel, which was camped on the plains of Moab beside the Jordan River, across from Jericho. (Numbers 31:7-18 NLT)
Moses, Eleazar the priest, and all the leaders of the people went to meet them outside the camp. But Moses was furious with all the military commanders who had returned from the battle. "Why have you let all the women live?" he demanded. "........ Now kill all the boys and all the women who have slept with a man. Only the young girls who are virgins may live; you may keep them for yourselves. Numbers 31:13-38, Numbers 31:17
'You will chase your enemies, and they shall fall by the sword before you. Five of you shall chase a hundred, and a hundred of you shall put ten thousand to flight; your enemies shall fall by the sword before you.' Leviticus, 26:7-8
'When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and drives out before you many nations ... you must destroy them totally. Make no treaty with them, and show them no mercy.' Deuteronomy 7:1-2
'Do not leave alive anything that breathes. Completely destroy them ... as the Lord your God has commanded you ...' Deuteronomy 20:16
Violence against sexuality and the use of sexuality for violence,
particularly against women, has very deep roots in Biblical tradition, and is
spelled out very early. The nineteenth chapter of Genesis (19:1-11), the first
book of the Old Testament, holds that the rape of woman is acceptable but the
rape of man is "a wicked thing." This chapter about the destruction of Sodom and
Gomorrah describes Lot's hospitality to two male travelers (actually two angels)
who were housed with him.
In the evening the townsmen of
Sodom came to Lot's house and said to him: "Where are the men who came to
your house tonight? Bring them out to us that we may have intimacies with them."
Lot went out to meet them at the entrance. When he had shut the door behind him,
he said, "I beg you, my brothers, not to do this wicked thing. I have two
daughters who have never had intercourse with men. Let me bring them out to you,
and you may do to them as you please. But don't do anything to these men, for
you know they have come under the shelter of my roof." They replied, "Stand
back! This fellow," they sneered, "came here as an immigrant, and now he
dares to give orders! We'll treat you worse than them!" With that, they
pressed hard against Lot, moving in closer to break down the door. But his
guests put out their hand, pulled Lot inside with them, and closed the door; at
the same time they struck the men at the entrance of the house, one and all,
with such blinding light that they were utterly unable to reach the doorway.
As the story continues, the two
angels escort Lot and his family to safety and then destroy Sodom and Gomorrah
for their great sinfulness. Yet not a word of reproach is given to Lot for his
willingness to hand over his two virgin daughters to be gang raped. This same
story is repeated in the books of Ezekiel (23:1-49) and Judges (19:22-30).
[1975] BODY PLEASURE AND
THE ORIGINS OF VIOLENCE By James W. Prescott
Ezekiel (23:1-49) and Judges (19:22-30).
Suppressing sexuality [Suppressing sexuality]
"Now concerning the things whereof you wrote to me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman" (1 Corinthians, 7:1).
Commentary:
Every war results from the struggle for markets and spheres
of influence, and every war is sold to the public by professional liars and
totally sincere religious maniacs, as a Holy Crusade to save God and Goodness
from Satan and Evil.-- Robert Anton Wilson (1932-2007)
[Rape] Given such a tradition, it is understandable that during the Inquisition only women were charged with having intercourse with the devil and put to death for this crime of pleasure. What man has died at the stake for having slept with Satan? This tradition is maintained in modern cultures where women are punished for prostitution but their male customers are not. The historical and Biblical acceptance of rape down through the ages has brutalized the psyche of males brought up in this tradition. [1975] BODY PLEASURE AND THE ORIGINS OF VIOLENCE By James W. Prescott
Every Theology and every Ideology, it seems to me, is an endeavor in hypnotism and self-hypnotism. If there is one thing that everybody knows in common sense — when they are in "their right minds" and not hypnotized — it is that "all generalizations are hazardous" and that individual cases are each unique. The function of Theological and Ideological hypnosis is to forget this common sense and follow a robot-program that evades the responsibility of thinking and feeling anew in each unique situation. It is not just the other gang's Theology or Ideology that is nefarious: all Theology and Ideology is nefarious. It is a form of sleep-walking in which we can do monstrous things because we are not alive, awake and aware of who we are, where we are and what is going on around us.--- SLEEP-WALKING AND HYPNOTISM by Robert Anton Wilson
I believe in God, but not in the "Catholic God," who is vengeful. There's the whole business about guilt, "impure thoughts," going to hell if you don't do what the church commands. One way this was solved for me, intellectually if not emotionally, was by reading the "Grand Inquisitor" chapter of Dostoevsky's /The Brothers Karamazov/in which Christ comes back to Earth. The Grand Inquisitor tells him, "When we saw those miracles in the street, we knew you were back. But this time we're not giving you any publicity. We're keeping you in this cell. We know how to run these people now." That just knocked the church right out of me, and by the time I was finished with Caltech, medical school, and psychoanalysis, that belief system was pretty well cleaned out of me. John Lilly
The question arises as to how Christian philosophy and theology, which borrowed heavily from Aristotle, managed to avoid, if not outright reject, Aristotle's teachings regarding the morality of pleasure. The roots to this question can be found throughout the Old Testament, beginning with the account in Genesis of the expulsion of Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden. The first consequence of Eve's transgression was that nudity became shameful. This even may well be the beginning of man's hostility toward women and the equating of woman with evil, particularly the evils of the body. This is vividly portrayed in Zechariah (5:5-8) in an angel's description of the flying bushel: "This is a bushel container coming. This is their guilt in all the land." Then a leaden cover was lifted and there was a woman sitting inside the bushel. "This is wickedness, he said, and he thrust her inside the bushel, pushing the leaden cover into the opening."[1975] BODY PLEASURE AND THE ORIGINS OF VIOLENCE By James W. Prescott
[Rape]
Violence against sexuality and the use of sexuality for violence,
particularly against women, has very deep roots in Biblical tradition, and is
spelled out very early. The nineteenth chapter of Genesis (19:1-11), the first
book of the Old Testament, holds that the rape of woman is acceptable but the
rape of man is "a wicked thing." This chapter about the destruction of Sodom and
Gomorrah describes Lot's hospitality to two male travelers (actually two angels)
who were housed with him.
In the evening the townsmen of
Sodom came to Lot's house and said to him: "Where are the men who came to
your house tonight? Bring them out to us that we may have intimacies with them."
Lot went out to meet them at the entrance. When he had shut the door behind him,
he said, "I beg you, my brothers, not to do this wicked thing. I have two
daughters who have never had intercourse with men. Let me bring them out to you,
and you may do to them as you please. But don't do anything to these men, for
you know they have come under the shelter of my roof." They replied, "Stand
back! This fellow," they sneered, "came here as an immigrant, and now he
dares to give orders! We'll treat you worse than them!" With that, they
pressed hard against Lot, moving in closer to break down the door. But his
guests put out their hand, pulled Lot inside with them, and closed the door; at
the same time they struck the men at the entrance of the house, one and all,
with such blinding light that they were utterly unable to reach the doorway.
As the story continues, the two
angels escort Lot and his family to safety and then destroy Sodom and Gomorrah
for their great sinfulness. Yet not a word of reproach is given to Lot for his
willingness to hand over his two virgin daughters to be gang raped. This same
story is repeated in the books of Ezekiel (23:1-49) and Judges (19:22-30).
[1975] BODY PLEASURE AND
THE ORIGINS OF VIOLENCE By James W. Prescott
Given such a tradition, it is understandable that during the Inquisition only women were charged with having intercourse with the devil and put to death for this crime of pleasure. What man has died at the stake for having slept with Satan? This tradition is maintained in modern cultures where women are punished for prostitution but their male customers are not. The historical and Biblical acceptance of rape down through the ages has brutalized the psyche of males brought up in this tradition. [1975] BODY PLEASURE AND THE ORIGINS OF VIOLENCE By James W. Prescott
[Suppressing sexuality] The origins of the fundamental reciprocal relationship between physical violence and physical pleasure can be traced to philosophical dualism and to the theology of body/soul relationships. In Western philosophical thought man was not a unitary being but was divided into two parts, body and soul. The Greek philosophical conception of the relationship between body and soul was quite different than the Judeo-Christian concept which posited a state of war between the body and soul. Within Judeo-Christian thought the purpose of human life was to save the soul, and the body was seen as an impediment to achieving this objective. Consequently, the body must be punished and deprived. In St. Paul's words: "Put to death the base pursuits of the body—for if you live according to the flesh, you shall die: but if by the spirit you mortify the deeds of the flesh, you shall live" (Romans 8:13). St. Paul clearly advocated somatosensory pleasure deprivation and enhancement of painful somatosensory stimulation as essential prerequisites for saving the soul. "Now concerning the things whereof you wrote to me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman" (1 Corinthians, 7:1). [1975] BODY PLEASURE AND THE ORIGINS OF VIOLENCE By James W. Prescott
It is evident that the Judeo-Christian concept of body pleasure is quite the opposite of that outlined by Aristotle, particularly, the relief of body pain and discomfort through somatosensory pleasure. This denial of somatosensory pleasure in Pauline Christian doctrine has led to alternative forms of 'relief' through such painful stimulations as hair-shirts, self-scourgings, self-mutilations, physical violence against others, and in the non-sensory pleasures of drugs. [1975] BODY PLEASURE AND THE ORIGINS OF VIOLENCE By James W. Prescott
[Violence] Available data clearly indicate that the rigid values of monogamy, chastity, and virginity help produce physical violence. The denial of female sexuality must give way to an acceptance and respect for it, and men must share with women the responsibility for giving affection and care to infants and children. As the father assumes a more equal role with the mother in child-rearing and becomes more affectionate toward his children, certain changes must follow in our socioeconomic system. A corporate structure which tends to separate either parent from the family by travel, extended meetings, or overtime work weakens the parent-child relationship and harms family stability. To develop a peaceful society, we must put more emphasis on human relationships. [1975] BODY PLEASURE AND THE ORIGINS OF VIOLENCE By James W. Prescott
The following verse, from Deuteronomy 6:10-12, is a part of
an oration made by
Moses to his people while on their way to the 'Promised
Land':
'Then when the Lord your God brings
you to the land he promised your ancestors Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob to give you
- a land with large, fine cities you did not build, houses filled with choice
things you did not accumulate, hewn out cisterns you did not dig, and vineyards
and olive groves you did not plant - and you eat your fill, be careful not to
forget the Lord who brought you out of Egypt, that place of slavery.'
The Judaic God, as portrayed by
Moses in the above passage, is an evil deity, who leads his people to plunder,
robbery and theft. Yet there are many ways to deal with this negative image of
the Almighty. At the literary level, one can argue that the given verses are no
more than just three isolated lines in a lengthy text that is well-meaning and
offers some fundamental universal thoughts. At the contextual level, it may be
suggested that it wasn't actually God speaking to the Chosen People, but Moses
himself, who failed to deliver the true divine message - in other words, Moses
may have got it wrong, or even made it up. There are many other ways to save the
Judaic God and Judaism from being the logos behind contemporary Israeli plunder,
but it is not so easy to save the Israelis from being presented as robbers and
pillagers.
Moses, his contemporaries and their
current followers were and are excited about the possibilities that awaited them
in the Land of Milk and Honey. Israel, the Jewish State, has been
following Moses' call. The ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people in
1948, and the constant and total abuse of the Palestinian people since then,
makes Deuteronomy 6:10-12 look like a prophecy fulfilled.
[2011] The Wandering Who?: A Study of Jewish Identity Politics by Gilad Atzmon
Jews believe and state openly that Moses was the author of the Hebrew Torah (the first five books of the Old Testament). He is also known to be the disseminator of the hidden Oral Tradition, that eventually inspired the Babylonian Talmud. But, as the great Sigmund Freud pointed out, and as we re-assert - MOSES WAS AKHENATON - the Bible is not a Jewish tome, but an Egyptian one. This is the great secret that has been kept from humankind for so long. The generations of alteration and re-editing by Josephus and Bacon and others has merely assisted in this truth being kept hidden. But when we understand the true identity of this Moses, we understand also the true authors of the Bible. This is the real reason why Bibles can be found on Masonic altars. It is not because Masons are Christians, but because they are Atonists, as are all Christians and Jews, regardless of what false notions the Vatican spin-doctors have connived and enforced. http://www.irishoriginsofcivilizatio...k2_chap41.html
For more than sixty years, the Biblical call for theft has
been put into legal praxis. The Israeli looting of Palestinian cities, homes,
fields and wells has found its way into Israel's legal system: by 1950-51,
Israeli legislators had already approved the 'Absentee Property Law', a
racially-orientated law preventing Palestinians from returning to their lands,
cities and villages, and allowing the new Israelites to live in houses and
cities they 'did not build'.
The never-ending theft of Palestine
in the name of the Jewish people is part of a spiritual, ideological, cultural
and practical continuum between the Bible, Zionist ideology and the State of
Israel (along with its overseas supporters). Israel and Zionism, both successful
political systems, have instituted the plunder promised by the Hebrew God in the
Judaic holy scriptures.
But this continuum goes further than just theft - in reviewing the following
Biblical passages, recall the devastating images of Gazans being bombed in a UN
shelter at the time of the IDF's Operation Cast Lead (Dec-Jan 2008-2009):
'You will chase your enemies, and they shall fall by the sword before you. Five
of you shall chase a hundred, and a hundred of you shall put ten thousand to
flight; your enemies shall fall by the sword before you.' Leviticus, 26:7-8
'When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and
drives out before you many nations ... you must destroy them totally. Make no
treaty with them, and show them no mercy.' Deuteronomy 7:1-2
'Do not leave alive anything that breathes. Completely destroy
them ... as the Lord your God has commanded you ...'
Deuteronomy 20:16
There is no doubt amongst Biblical scholars that the Hebrew Bible contains some highly-charged, unethical suggestions, some of which are no less than calls for genocide. The Catholic theologian Raymund Schwager found 600 passages of explicit violence in the Old Testament, along with 1,000 descriptive verses of God's own violent punishments and 100 passages where God expressly commands others to kill. Violence is one of the most frequently mentioned activities in the Hebrew Bible.
Secular Israelis do not follow Judaic law, yet they somehow collectively interpret their Jewish identity as a Biblical mission, which perhaps sheds some light on the IDF massacres in Gaza and Lebanon in the last few years. The IDF used lethal methods, such as cluster bombs and white phosphorus, against civilians as though its main objective was to 'destroy' while showing 'no mercy' whatsoever. It seems as though the Israeli military, in erasing northern Gaza in January 2009, were following Deuteronomy 20:16 - they did indeed 'not leave alive anything that breathe[d]'. Yet why should a secular commander follow Deuteronomy verses or any other Biblical text?
Though most Jews do not follow the Bible, and many are even
ignorant of its content, the lethal spirit of the scriptures has infused the
essence of modern Jewish political discourse. Those who disagree with such a
generalisation may invoke the Bund and its 'progressive', secular, 'ethical' and
cosmopolitan heritage, but a quick glance at the Bund's heritage reveals that it
is not fundamentally different from Zionism. Bundists believe that instead of
robbing Palestinians, Jews should all unite and appropriate from the wealthy
classes, the strong, in the name of working-class revolution. Here is the Bund's
call for action, taken from its anthem, 'The Vow':
We swear our stalwart hate persists, Of those who rob and kill the poor: The
Tsar, the masters, capitalists. Our vengeance will be swift and sure. So swear
together to live or die!
On the face of it, confiscating the homes and wealth of the
rich is regarded as an ethical act at least within Bundist discourse -possessing
more is a crime.
As a young man, I myself took part in some Jewish righteous parades, ready to
grab my sword and join the hunt for a Tsar, a capitalist or any other enemy who
might cross my way. But then the inevitable happened: I grew up. I realised that
such vengeance toward an entire class of wealthy goyim is no more than an
extension of God's exhortations via Moses in Deuteronomy.
As we can see, robbery and hatred is imbued in Jewish modern political ideology
on both the left and the right. One must agree that, at least from an ethical
point of view, theft cannot be the way forward, whether from Palestinians,
Iraqis or even the Tsar himself. Theft involves a categorical dismissal of the
other, even when it is based on an inherent self-righteousness.
As far as unethical practice is concerned, the difference between Judaism and contemporary Jewish nationalism can be illustrated as follows: while the Judaic Biblical context is filled with references to violent deeds, usually committed in the name of God, within the modern Jewish national and political context Jews kill and rob in their own name, in the name of self-determination, 'working class polities', 'Jewish suffering' and national aspirations. Here is the ultimate success of the Jewish national revolution: it taught the Jews to believe in themselves. 'The Israeli' robs in the name of 'home-coming', the progressive Jew in the name of 'Marx', and the moral interventionist murders in the name of 'democracy'.
