Vaccination during pregnancy
[back] Drugs During Pregnancy  Pregnancy 
Depopulation  Birth trauma

[Mercury (the vaccine ingredient that started the Vaccine autism epidemic) containing Flu vaccine is recommended for pregnancy (which is interesting considering Dr Ayoub has fingered mercury as part of the depopulation agenda), yet MMR is contraindicated. See: Vaccine mercury poisoning.  ] 

CDC vaccination in pregnancy banners
Vaccination and miscarriage (spontaneous abortion)
Vaccine foetal damage

See: Oxytocin  Squalene  Sterilisation  Tween 80  Human fetal cells

Covid  OB/GYN


Covid vaccine genocide Medical lies


Ep78- Vaccines for my Fetus? No thanks! [My Incredible Opinion]

[2015 Oct] Is Your Unborn Baby Part of a Vaccine Experiment? by Christina England  [Christina England]  "...despite recommending these vaccinations to all pregnant women, the CDC readily admits in their own documentation that neither vaccine has ever been tested during pregnancy for vaccine safety and that they have no idea whether the vaccines could harm a growing fetus."  Conclusion: CDC Cannot Be Trusted for Vaccine Safety of Unborn Children

[vid 2015] Infant Immunity Part I: Pregnancy, with Dr. Suzanne Humphries

[vid] Infant Immunity Part III: Birth, placenta, breastmilk with Hilary Butler    "We are told it's just what you would produce yourself.  Actually it's made of mammal brains, and the manufacturers are allowed 16% impurities, and it doesn't tell us what those impurities are."  ~  Hilary Butler Oxytocin (synthetic)

Dear Pregnant Mom who is just beginning to research vaccines

Infanrix DTaP (2017 April). Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with INFANRIX. It is also not known whether INFANRIX can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity.

DTaP (2017 April). DAPTACEL is not approved for use in individuals 7 years of age and older. Human or animal data are not available to assess vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy.

[vid] Vaccines and Brain Development(1/6)   CDC officials claim vaccines are safe and effective. Is that true? If vaccines are safe, why did the incidence of autism increase from one case of autism in 10,000 American children to one case of autism in 150 American children after the massive childhood vaccination program began? If childhood vaccines are safe, why are 560,000 vaccinated children afflicted with autism while nonvaccinated Amish and Mennonite children rarely have the disease? Why has the incidence of asthma, allergies, autoimmune disease, Type I diabetes, and neurologic conditions dramatically increased in vaccinated children?  Why do obstetricians give pregnant women influenza vaccines that contain a toxic dose of mercury? Why do newborn children receive Hepatitis B vaccine in the nursery when there is no medical justification for the immunization?  Dr. Blaylock's discussion addresses those, and many other, issues.

Allopath propaganda (lies):
"The benefits of immunization to the pregnant woman and her neonate usually outweigh the theoretic risks of adverse effects. The theoretic risks of the vaccination of pregnant women with killed virus vaccines have not been identified."  [2003] The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) ---- "Immunization During Pregnancy,"

[2009 Nov] What’s in your H1N1 flu vaccine?  Shaw turned to the 24-page product-information leaflet on the vaccine released by drug giant GlaxoSmithKline. Health Canada used this document in approving the shot.  The leaflet leaves Shaw cold. “You couldn’t turn this in as a master’s thesis anywhere I know of and get a passing grade,” he said, calling the leaflet a “shocking document”.  Shaw said the material lacks basic information. For example, there is no safety data at all for several groups of people—pregnant women, people aged over 60, kids aged 10 to 17, and children under three. For kids three to nine years old, there is only “very limited” data. “Where is the safety data that the government used to license the vaccine?” Shaw asked.

[2009 Nov] Third case of woman losing baby after Pandemrix jab in

[2009 oct] Switzerland forbids "swine flu" vaccine for pregnant women, young and old!  Swissmedic, the authority in Switzerland that gives permission for the use of drugs, today announced that the "swine flu" vaccine Pandemrix will not be allowed to be injected into pregnant women, children or young adults (below 18 years of age) or elderly (above 60 years of age).

[2009 oct] Belgian doctors call for sack of government virologist in row over swine flu adjuvant advice  The Belgian association of doctors has called for the government's interministerial commissioner for the flu, the virologist Marc Van Ranst, to be fired after he said on Thursday that the Pandemrix swine flu jab with the adjuvant squalene was safe for pregnant women.

[2009 Oct] Adverse effects of vaccine's adjuvant are leading to changes in Switzerland - pregnant women and children will get non-adjuvanted vaccine

[2009 Oct] (Finland): Pregnant Women Administered Wrong Swine Flu Vaccine

[2009 April] The "Fable" of 2000 Women By Jim Thompson

[2009 Sept] Washington OKs mercury in swine flu vaccine The state Health Department will allow more mercury than usual in some of the swine flu vaccine to make sure shots are available to pregnant women and children under three.

[2009 June] In Memory of Marina McQuaig

[2008 Sept] Pregnant women may be offered the flu jab
[2008 Sept] Flu jab for pregnant women 'likely'

[Media May 2003] CDC reports 103 pregnancies in smallpox vaccinees

"My concern about the swine flu vaccine in this country is that it intends to reintroduce a substance that was eliminated some years ago and that is Thimerosal, the mercury preservative.  There is no safe level of Thimerosal, and there is most certainly no safe level to be given in an untested fashion to pregnant women or to infants, so why in heavens name is this now being reintroduced?" [2010 April. Video transcripts] Dr Andrew Wakefield - In His own words

"Right now there is a lot of concern in the field of neurology and neuroscience of the observation that women who develop the flu during the second trimester of their pregnancy, there’s a very high incidence of their child growing up to develop schizophrenia or autism… and so that led to this idea, well, we should vaccinate all pregnant women against the flu.
    Well, what I discovered in the research was that, in fact, the virus does not transfer from the mother into the baby’s brain, so it’s not the virus that’s causing the brain to change and produce schizophrenia and autism. What it is is when the mother’s immune system reacts to the virus, the immune chemicals, called cytokines, transfer through her placenta into the baby, and it’s the cytokines—the immune reaction—of her body that causes the destruction of the baby’s brain and the altered development of the baby’s brain.
    So now you’re saying, a small percentage of women are going to get the flu during the flu season, during that second trimester of pregnancy, but what we’re going to do, we’re going to stimulate the immunity of every woman. So what we’re probably going to see in 20 years from now is a tremendous increase in schizophrenia and in autism."  — Russell L. Blaylock, M.D. retired neurosurgeon

You may have a good doctor, but obviously you don't have any experience with an autism child. Otherwise you would not be as positive about your opinion.
    I got the Rubella vaccine when I was pregnant in 1969 before doctors knew that it should not be given to pregnant women. It took 40 years to get over the experience of having that child be damaged. He had an IQ of 20. He did not talk. He walked, but he could not take care of himself, ever. He died in 2010.
    Trust me, there are things you don't know about vaccines that I know, and those details are pretty horrific and frankly somewhat disgusting if you really want to get into how even the Salk vaccine was developed. It would be in everybody's best interest to have an open mind. Vaccines have been determined to be "unavoidably unsafe".
    It is a shame that the pharmaceutical industry has to resort to its tactics in order to satisfy their bottom line. I am not against vaccines. I am against unsatisfactory adjuvants, and I am against forcing multi-valent vaccines on anybody. Read up on today's drugs and find out what really is being done in the name of medical science. The lack thereof is sometimes frightening. The dark ages are not all history, yet.
    Posted by: Birgit Calhoun | January 26, 2015

[2009 June] In Memory of Marina McQuaig  Marina passed away at the age of eight on November 26, 2008. Marina suffered from a severe seizure disorder precipitated by vaccination and re-vaccination.... "I was given a flu shot with thimerosal [a mercury-containing preservative] when I was eleven weeks pregnant with Marina.....I avoided using asthma medication because I didn't want to harm my developing baby, but then I had to use it because the flu shot gave me oculo-respiratory syndrome and I couldn't breathe.....Marina was born with cutis applaisia [improper skin development] on her hands and feet, which to me is an obvious result of the vaccine because the last layer of skin forms at around the eleventh week of pregnancy.
    At two months she was diagnosed with epilepsy but she usually would never have more than one or two seizures a day. Because health authorities do not withhold vaccination for something they consider such a minor health problem [ie an evolving neurological condition], Marina was injected with all the usual infant vaccines on schedule at 2, 4, 6 and 12 months. Looking back, she did have reactions to most of the vaccines but we never linked it the way we should have.
     At 18 months, Marina was due for the seven vaccines given then: diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio, Haemophilus Infiuenzae B, chickenpox and meningococcus. She had been free of seizures for a year except for one possible seizure we didn't see but suspected two weeks be­fore the 18 month vaccines.
      We told our paediatrician and the health nurse about this but the nurse told me they changed the vaccine and it no longer affected seizures. At the time of the vaccines Marina had a cold. I kept asking the nurse if it was all right to go ahead. She said yes - just give Marina Tylenol for the next twenty four hours."
      The result was: a two week stay at Children's Hospital with one week in the ICU; unremitting seizures followed by seizures almost daily, up to more than fifteen per day; Marina came close to death 60 hrs after the seven doses. Unbelievably, public health carried on as if nothing had happened."
.......because public health denies any connection, what's happened to Marina will not go to 'statistics' to help prevent the same thing happening again. I hope one day. if enough parents continue to tell their stories, our children will be protected."

Our health officials continue to pump out junk science, for example the recent, seriously flawed NIAID study on H1N1 vaccine safety in pregnant women reported over the major media, to deceive Americans and enroll them in their national vaccination campaigns. The protocol in that study listed any pregnant woman who had a history of alcohol or drug abuse during a 6 year period, diabetes, compromised immune systems, asthmatic and allergic conditions, history of cancer-treatment drugs for 3 years, prescription to psychiatric drugs, and many other conditions as unqualified for the study. These conditions alone would disqualify the large majority of the nation’s pregnant women. Furthermore, any pregnant woman who enrolled in the trial, who spiked a temperature of 100 degrees or greater during the first 72 hours following vaccination, were excluded from the trial. Nevertheless, the CDC and its cronies in the media, particularly the pharmaceutical shills at The New York Times, touted this deranged trial as conclusive evidence that the swine flu vaccine was safe for all pregnant women. These are the kinds of medical distortions we have come to expect from the Federal health agencies. [2009 Nov] Federal Health Agencies Continue to Deceive Americans: Congressional Report on a Vaccine Mercury-Autism Link Ignored for Six Years by Richard Gale and Gary Null, Ph.D

Animal reproduction studies have NOT been conducted with Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal or FluMist. It is NOT KNOWN whether Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal or FluMist can CAUSE FETAL HARM when administered to a pregnant woman or can AFFECT REPRODUCTION CAPACITY. Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal or FluMist should be given to a pregnant woman ONLY IF CLEARLY NEEDED.

Never give to pregnant women, or women of child-bearing age not fully aware of the need to avoid pregnancy for one month after vaccination, since theoretically the vaccine virus could have an effect on the foetus. (Eolarix, 1994)

"Exposure to mercury in utero and in children may cause mild to severe mental retardation and mild to severe motor coordination impairment." [1999] Eli Lilly Material Data Safety Sheet for Thimerosal

"My wife and I are currently on active duty in the US Army. Recently, while serving in Korea, we were vaccinated against anthrax. Unknown to us, my wife was pregnant. Our daughter lived for approximately 2 hours before dying." Vaccine Safety Manual  by Neil Z. Miller. p423

"VAERS ID: 274219. A 17 year old was vaccinated with Gardasil when she was about one week pregnant.  A subsequent ultrasound revealed that the fetus was positive for neural tube defect (a serious birth defect of the brain and spinal cord).  A 20 year old female was vaccinated with her first dose of Gardasil during pregnancy and had a spontaneous abortion 10 days later."  Vaccine Safety Manual  by Neil Z. Miller. p375

Gardasil, the heavily promoted cervical cancer and genital wart vaccine that Merck, the CDC and AAP want to mandate for all 11 and 12 year old girls, will not only increase the risk of cervical cancer for some of adolescent girls but can also make them susceptible to infection from the multiple other strains of HPV. In addition, five women who got the vaccine around time of conception gave birth to babies with birth defects. [NVIC May 2006] HPV Vaccine Increases Cancer Risk

Vaccinating a pregnant woman is associated with a high risk of autism, psychosis and other neurological problems as the baby reaches adolescence or adulthood. This is being completely ignored by those designing vaccines and making recommendations. At present, flu, chickenpox, hepatitis B and rubella vaccines are recommended for pregnant women. HPV was recommended for pregnant women at the beginning of the program, but a number of HPV-vaccinated women lost their babies or had babies born with deformities, resulting in a halt to such a dangerous practice.  Vaccine Safety Manual  by Neil Z. Miller. (Preface)

Cdr. Megan Ryan has found that women vaccinated for anthrax during the first trimester have a higher rate of birth defects in offspring than unvaccinated women.  Apparently this research was compelling enough, despite an army study to the contrary, for the FDA in 2002 to change the pregnancy warning on the vaccine label from a C (no data on risk) to a D (data suggests increased risk during pregnancy). However, the data have not yet been published.  Dr. Maria Araneta, also associated with the Naval Health Research Center and University of California, has shown that GW veterans are also likelier than controls to have children with certain birth defects.  My understanding of the safety of anthrax vaccine and its role in GWS ---Meryl Nass MD

With respect to the myth’s claim, “by 2002 no new childhood vaccines with Thimerosal were being sold in the U.S.,” this is also false because, among other Thimerosal-containing vaccines that could be given to children in 2002, the Thimerosal-preserved influenza vaccine, which, by its nature, is a new vaccine every year, was effectively knowingly added to the recommended vaccination schedule for pregnant women as well as to the recommended childhood vaccination schedule in April of 200228 at a time when all doses of the influenza vaccine approved for “healthy children aged 6–23 months” were Thimerosal preserved.
    Sixth, compounding the harm, in April of 2002, the CDC’s recommendation that the Thimerosal-preserved influenza vaccine be given to pregnant women who would be in their second and third trimesters of their pregnancies during the influenza season, thereby knowingly recommending the Thimerosal and mercury poisoning the developing child in utero when the risk of harm is even greater than it is postpartum and the results published in 197729 clearly found that Thimerosal-preserved influ vaccines that were given to pregnant women significantly increased (with a hospital-standardized relative risk of 2.0 or higher) their children’s risk of serious birth defects (cleft palate [RR = 7.1], microcephaly [RR = 2.3], and pyloric stenosis [RR = 2.0]). Key realities about autism, vaccines, vaccine-injury compensation, Thimerosal, and autism-related research----Gary S. Goldman, Ph.D & P.G. King PhD

Do not give M-M-R II to pregnant females; the possible effects of the vaccine on foetal development are unknown at this time. If vaccination of postpubertal females is undertaken, pregnancy should be avoided for three months following vaccination.  Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with M-M-R II. It is also not known whether M-M-R II can cause foetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Therefore, the vaccine should not be administered to pregnant females; furthermore, pregnancy should be avoided for three months following vaccination. M-M-R II---Merck Sharp & Dohme (Aust.) Pty Ltd(Distrib. CSL)

DPT   Whooping Cough