[Thimerosal is the mercury vaccine
preservative, 49% Ethyl mercury. Vaccine mercury content
USA.
Bird flu vaccine
containslarge
amounts, can't keep these criminals down for long. It is quicker to Google "Which
vaccines contain Thimerosal?", than
search the UK Government site.
No surprise there. Vaccine mercury is the
main cause of autism and is part of the 'depopulation' plan [See: Video: David Ayoub M.D.Human
genocide].
Thimerosal was tested only once, by Eli Lilly on 22 adult patients
suffering from meningitis. There was no chance for follow-up to observe
long-term effects, as all of the patients in this 'study'
died, so was known as early as April 1930 to be dangerous,
yet they used this study to claim safety! See: Eli Lilly The
blood-brain barrier is not intact in infants until at least 6 weeks of
life. Between 1991 and 1999the Hepatitis B vaccine
was given at birth (USA), when the shot contained Thimerosal, resulting
in mercury crossing into the brain. Aluminiumenhances the toxicity of thimerosal.See:
Synergistic toxicity
quotes Currently (2008) they are trying to get
all kids (1) and pregnant women (1)
to take mercury containing 100% useless flu vaccine: "Exposure to mercury in utero and in
children may cause mild to severemental retardation and mild to severe motor
coordination impairment."----1999 Eli Lilly Material Data
Safety Sheet.See:
Drugs in pregnancyDrugs depleting nutrientsInfections & poisons.
While all the withdrawn Thimerosal vaccines are now going for Export.Chelation therapy is
successful on autistic children, yet another indication of its part in autism,
but Allopathy Inc won't use it. Read: Thimerosal, and autism-related research
by Gary
S. Goldman, Ph.D & P.G. King PhD.]
US Wants Mercury Out of Vaccines By Lauran Neergaard AP Medical Writer
Wednesday, July 7, 1999; 4:04 p.m. EDT WASHINGTON (AP) -- The government is about to ask
manufacturers to remove from vaccines a type of mercury used as a preservative since the
1940s, citing concern that small infants now need so many immunizations that they may get
too much of the chemical, The Associated Press has learned....
Mercury amalgam This is from a friend of a
friend..."On Thursday, I had the second of 3, possibly 4, appointments to get
the amalgam removed from my mouth. Note the hazmat suits. My hair is covered,
I'm wearing dark glasses, my clothing is covered, the teeth the amalgams are
being removed from are isolated and a rubber dam covers/protects the rest of my
mouth. The staff is covered as well, complete with full face splash guards and
they are wearing special filtration systems. All this to REMOVE mercury from my
teeth. Perhaps if medical folks had to wear all this to inject mercury and
other neurotoxins into our babies, we might have a better understanding of how
toxic it all is..."
Low-energy bulbsThe stories are abundant in our community and they all
go something like this.... "My son was six and nearly recovered from autism when
he broke a cfl bulb and regressed, losing language, social skills, and we spent
the next 3 years trying to get him back."
> Warning on Thimerosal
> Will Be Played Down By
> National Vaccine Program
> Office of the CDC on Friday
> BY JON CHRISTIAN RYTER
>
NOTE: I came into the possession of the second draft of a response
being prepared by the Inter-Agency Group [IAG] of the Nantional
Vaccine Program of the Centers For Disease Control for release sometime
late Friday afternoon. The CDC, like all other bureaus of government
recognizes that when you need to release negative information, release
it on Friday since most Americans ignore the news on the weekends. The
concern of the IAG staffer who turned this document over to me was that
the CDC was engaging in a coverup that was deliberately attempting to
play down the danger of the chemical THIMEROSAL, an organomecurial
preservative used to stabilize many of the vaccines, immoglobins and
some food products simply because the government cannot afford to
dispose of its entire inventory of vaccines containing this substance.
REPORT FOLLOWS.
The European Agency for the Evaluation of medicinal Products issued a
white paper on June 29, 1999 announcing the conclusions of a study
initiated by the EAEMP in conjunction with European Pharmaeopocia, the
WHO and "relevant" drug manufacturers in Europe. The FDA was
represented at this meeting by Dr. Norman Baylor. The purpose of this
meeting, which was held on April 19, 1999 was to discuss the
ramifications of the findings of CPMP Working Document CPMP2286/98.
This meeting was followed by yet another meeting on May 17, 1999. The
meeting was chaired by the CPMP's Multidisciplinary Group.
The sole objective on its agenda that day was to discuss a plan of
action to be followed with respect to the drug Thimerosal, which has
been found to create cumulative levels of toxicity in those who ingest
it through vaccination. Thimerosal is an organomercurial preservative
that is used to stabilize, or preserve the "shelf life" of most
vaccines, immunoglobins, and many other medical products. The awareness
that a problem existed with Thimerosal first arose in 1990 when the WHO
began to notice cases of allergic reactions to Thiomerosal due to the
presence of methylmercury in the bloodstreams of those who were
inoculated with vaccines containing Thimerosal. (Thimerosal metabolizes
as methylmercury, a toxic substance.)
If you remember the "mercury-poisoning"scare a few years ago when
Americans were warned not to eat fish netted in certain areas, you will
understand the concern discussed at this time by the IAG. Mercury is a
highly toxic element which, once ingested, is not expelled from the
body. It will continue to build with each additional ingestion until
it reaches a damaging level in the body. The concern expressed by WHO in
1990 with respect to methylmercury or ethylmercury, the metabolized form
of Thimerosal, was that there existed no international recommendations
on the maximum allowable intake of this
chemical in infants and small children. Because standards did not
exist, WHO was concerned that the accumulated affect of more than 200 Hg
of methylmercury in the system of a fetus or infant could cause moderate
to severe brain damage that would result in a rise in learning impaired
children. In the rebuttal being prepared at this moment by the IAG for
the National Vaccine Program Office of the CDC, the planned statement
(as of 4:00 p.m. on June 30) was: "The WHO, EPA, ATSDR, and FDA created
safety exposure guidelines for Hg based on studies of infants born to
women who chronically ingested high concentrations of methylmercury.
These safety guidelines include safety factors of 3 to 10 fold." To
support this statement, they will declare that: "Since 1997, the FDA, as
mandated by FDAMA, has prepared and analyzed lists of Hg containing
drugs and foods. In addition, the European Agency for the Evaluation of
Medicinal Products formed a working group on Thimerosal and, with input
from the FDA, recommended that for [the] vaccination of infants and
toddlers, the use of vaccines without Thimerosal and other mercurial
containing preservatives should be encouraged; however, in order not to
jeopardize vaccine supplies and immunization programs, it is advisable
to introduce requirements for the elimination of organomercurial
preservatives in vaccines on a gradual basis."
The "lord" giveth and the "lord" taketh away. In other words, on
one
hand the report suggests that from the 1990 WHO warning that studies
were conducted to determine the "safety levels" of Thimerosal and the
IAG is assuring the public that the health care officials and physicians
who are administering vaccines containing organomercurial preservatives
are conscious of the potential toxicity to infants and toddlers if an
accumulated range in excess of 200 Hg is reached, and would no longer
vaccinate children, or prescribe other medical products containing
methylmercurial preservatives.
To that I say, HOGWASH!
Second the IAG recognizes that since too many of its stores of vaccines
contain methylmercurial preservatives that it cannot afford to dispose
of them since, as they state in the draft report, to do so would
jeopardize their national vaccination programs. In other words, the IAG
and the National Vaccine Program would rather play
with words in order to minimize the danger to both mothers and infant
and toddler children, and in some cases, the unborn fetus, because it
will prove to be either too expensive or too inconvenient to dispose of
their stockpile of mercurial based vaccines because, in their collective
brainstorming on June 30, the risk of permanent neurological damage to
those ingesting Thimerosal is, in their "public relations opinion,"
minimal.
In their world alert on June 29, the EAEMP identified what they termed
"...the well-recognized problem with Thimerosal," and detailed the
potential risks of the preservative. Those risks include, but are not
inclusive of nephrotoxicity, nerve damage, and hypersensitivity to the
vaccines themselves, causing allergic reactions.
The concern of this writer is, at the moment, what the CDC did with that
report when they received it from the EAEMP, and how the IAG--including
the same Dr. Norman Baylor who attended the April19 meeting--responded
to the report when they received it from Robert Breiman of the National
Vaccine Program Office at 1:36 p.m. on June 29.
The normal sluggish wheels of the federal government of the US speedily
chugged into action--not to issue a national alert of their own advising
physicians and health care workers to immediately suspend inoculations
containing Thimerosal until the vaccine supplies containing
methylmercury preservatives could be replaced with vaccines utilizing a
safer preservative, or even to address the potential problems Thimerosal
posed on those whose accumulated ingestion of the drug had exceeded 200
Hg. Instead,
the wheels of government churned out the first of two drafts of
"talking points" on how to address the EAEMP white paper when the news
hit the media...talking points to minimize the potential outrage ===
message truncated ===
This was sent to me anonymously. (M. Dorley)
******************************************
Thimerosal is not the only cause of damage with HepB vax.
The vaccine manufacturers and the vaccine authorities knowing that they had to give up
something to diffuse the very successful anti HepB vax campaign, offered this solution
just before the week-end ( the usual time of a "dirty trick" release)
Merck immediately tells the world their Thimerosal free vaccine is ready for release. (
What in God's name were they waiting for if they really thought Thimerosalwas a
problem???) Now they recommend that newborns whose mothers are fine receive onemerury-free
dose and three of the old ones ( combined with Hib) that is FOUR shots while the infants
who really need the vaccine, those, whose mothers dohave HepB, will continue to get only
THREE.......makes no medical sense, but increases sales by 25%.
Actually, it makes as much sense as recommending the vaccine for routine use in
1991.
Ray Gallup will comment today, I am pretty sure.
Damage by HepB is an auto-immune insult and not a heavy metal poisonning.
-Progressive neurological disorders ( on-going or increasing ) are against a single
"poison effect" and favor an ongoing slow "pervasive" ( forgive
the pun) process.
-Full-sized adults are getting similarly damaged damaged by the same dose.
Poisons damage is dose-body weight dependent.
-The French Government knows something that lead them to stop routinely vaccinating
adolescents and young adults and keep up the first year ommendation.( apparently not a
size factor therefore)
-Eosinophilia and particularly thrombocytopenia are not usually described in Mercury
poisonning and seem to pop out very frequently in auto-immune and
"allergic-type" disorders.
On the other hand, Mercury affects kidneys (? liver ) and not connective tissues,
joints and myelin sheaths.
vaccines contain Thimerosal?", than
search the UK Government site.
No surprise there. Vaccine mercury is the
main cause of autism and is part of the 'depopulation' plan [See:
Video: David Ayoub M.D.
Human
genocide].
Thimerosal was tested only once, by Eli Lilly on 22 adult patients
suffering from meningitis. There was no chance for follow-up to observe
long-term effects, as all of the patients in this 'study'
died, so was known as early as April 1930 to be dangerous,
yet they used this study to claim safety! See: Eli Lilly
