[back] Holocaust revisionism
[The centre of the death camp myth. This was a work camp, hence the pool, theatre and brothel. Do you build a hospital next (30 metres) to a gas chamber? Does the Camp Commander live 400 yds from the gas chamber? See the absurdity of the Auschwitz 'gas chamber' (Krema I), and less obvious (due to it's demolition, by the Russians no doubt) the Birkenau 'gas chamber' (Krema II-V). If it was a horrific death camp why did the Auschwitz legend take such a long time to get off the ground, why did the Russians never let anyone into the camp straight away, 1 and why has no Forensic examination ever been done? And who would place a death camp 2 kilometres from a town?]
See: Belsen Belzec Buchenwald Dachau Sobibor Mauthausen Majdanek Treblinka US based Camps Allied Camps
Auschwitz brothel and library
Auschwitz 'gas chamber' (Krema I)
Auschwitz I Black Wall
Auschwitz Swimming Pool
Birkenau 'gas chamber' (Krema II-V)
Birkenau delousing buildings
 Krakow Auschwitz
 Frankfurt Auschwitz
Judge Wilhelm Stäglich
Dr. Fritz Klein
Maria Van Herwaarden
Joseph G. Burg
Dr Johann Paul Kremer
Pery S. Broad
Elie Wiesel Cons the World When he injures his foot, instead of being sent to a gas chamber (or the burning pit) because he is no longer useful, he is put into a hospital where surgery is performed on his foot! Not only that, his father is allowed to stay there with him.
Hunt, Eric 'Holohoax Survivors Who Tell The Truth' has really hit a nerve. It's shocking to hear Auschwitz inmates tell about their elaborate stage, with curtain rings and a grand piano, where they had plays and other musical performances. It's shocking to see video of happy children playing in Theresenstadt juxtaposed with a woman telling about fun costumed children's plays in her Auschwitz block, along with arts and crafts activities, with beautiful children's murals painted on the walls. According to the official Holocaust narrative, all children were immediately gassed upon arrival! "Testimony" such as this is extremely important to cast doubt on the "factory of death" Holocaust promoters push. Auschwitz and Buchenwald inmates speak about being paid for their work in special currency, using their currency in camp cantinas and at the camp movie theater, receiving and sending postcards, and playing in well organized soccer tournaments.
Daily Life in Auschwitz from British Intelligence decrypts, 1942
Elie Wiesel Knows Soviet “Liberators” Destroyed the Birkenau Crematoriums Crema IV was heavily damaged in an uprising on Oct. 7, 1944. Both were ultimately totally destroyed, but the question remains—by whom? The answer has to be by the Russians themselves. And it is Elie Wiesel who has told us. Just as with his failure to mention “gas chambers” in his book Night, Wiesel falls out of step with the official storyline at times and lets the truth slip out. Was he just saying what most people knew at the time, in spite of what was dreamed up at Nuremberg? I think so. He wrote this in 1954. Not even Elie Wiesel should confuse 9 days with 2 days when it comes to a matter of life or death. Which brings up another question: Is it reasonable that the prisoners left behind in an unguarded facility would just hang around for nine days waiting for the feared “Red Army” to arrive? Would they not take off once they got the chance? Elie says he was one of the hospital patients, his father being allowed to stay with him, yet they both were capable of going on the evacuation march and keeping up with the pace. Thus, many others lying around in the hospital surely could do the same. That is, unless the Soviet representatives surprised them by showing up already on the 20th, before they could prepare themselves to leave. The story of the Auschwitz liberation is as cloudy as it gets. It has been told in emotion-wrenching photographs that were all staged by Soviet photographers and film makers in the following month of February and even March–every one of them–and by revengeful witnesses who were coached in what to say. As portions of the book by Janina Struk point out, time would pass before a final solution of what happened at Auschwitz could be cobbled together for public consumption by Soviet propagandists.
The Auschwitz "Gas Chamber" Illusion by Nick Kollerstrom
[vid] Holohoax Survivors who Tell the Truth
 Major French Magazine Acknowledges Auschwitz Gas Chamber Fraud
Convergence or Divergence?: Recent Evidence for Zyklon Induction Holes at Birkenau Crematory II
An official Polish report on the Auschwitz 'gas chambers' Krakow Forensic Institute Confirms Leuchter's Findings
The Auschwitz Trial: A Judge Looks at the Evidence by Dr. Wilhelm Staeglich
 Reflections on Auschwitz and West German Justice by Thies Christophersen
The Lies, Slips, Bungles and Perjuries of Filip Mueller, Professional Witness of Auschwitz-Birkenau by Maria Temmer
[Kenneth R. Wilson] The 'False News' Trial of Ernst Zündel -- 1988
[Ditlieb Felderer] The 'False News' Trial of Ernst Zündel -- 1988
Documents from the Moscow Archives describe building of air-raid shelters in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1943 The document, as it stands, clearly supports the gas shelter/bomb shelter interpretation of Morgue 1 of Crematorium II, confirming Dr. Butz' hypothesis, as well as the interpretation of David Irving, Fritjof Meyer, Wilhelm Stäglich, Fritz Berg, Samuel Crowell, and several other revisionists.
 Pages From The Auschwitz Death Registry Volumes Long-Hidden Death Certificates Discredit Extermination Claims by Mark Weber
AUSCHWITZ: TECHNIQUE & OPERATION OF THE GAS CHAMBERS Or, Improvised Gas Chambers & Casual Gassings at Auschwitz & Birkenau, According to J.-C. Pressac (1989) by ROBERT FAURISSON
Evidence that there were no vent holes in the roof of an alleged Birkenau gas chamber in 1944.
The truth on Auschwitz
Red Cross death numbers 53,000 for Auschwitz.
11 'Eye-Witness' Stories Contradicted by Air Photos
Alfred Wetzler and “The True Story of the Auschwitz Protocol”
Experto Crede, or How to Escape from a Homicidal Gas Chamber
The first gassing at Auschwitz: Genesis of a myth, The Journal of Historical Review, Summer, 1989; 9(2), pp. 193-222
Auschwitz: A case of plagiarism, The Journal of Historical Review, Spring, 1990; vol. 10 no. 1: p. 5Two false testimonies from Auschwitz, The Journal of Historical Review, Spring, 1990; vol. 10 no. 1: p. 25
The Crematoria Ovens of Auschwitz and Birkenau, (with Franco Deana) in: Ernst Gauss (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust, Theses & Dissertations Press, Capshaw, AL, 2000, pp. 337-371
The Gasprüfer of Auschwitz
The Gassed People of Auschwitz: Pressac's New Revisions, Granata Publishing, Post Office Box 2145, Palos Verdes, CA 90274 USA, 1995
Morgue Cellars of Birkenau: Gas Shelters or Disinfesting Chambers?
Auschwitz 1270 to the Present. Critical Notes
Auschwitz: The Samuel Crowell Bomb Shelter Thesis: A Historically Unfounded Hypothesis
John C. Zimmerman and Body Disposal at Auschwitz: Preliminary Oberservations
Auschwitz: The Dwindling Death Toll, Auschwitz. Fritjof Meyer's New Revisions, The Revisionist 1(1) (2003), pp. 30-37
Open Air Incinerations in Auschwitz: Rumor or Reality? "Cremation Pits" and Ground Water Levels at Birkenau, The Revisionist 1(1) (2003), pp. 14-17
"No Holes, no Gas Chamber(s)". An Historical-technical Study of the Holes for Introducing Zyklon B in the Roof of Leichenkeller 1 of Krema II at Birkenau
Sub-Camps of Auschwitz Concentration Camp
Football at Auschwitz-Birkenau
 Auschwitz: The Underground Guided Tour by Carolyn Yeager
 Auschwitz—The Case for Sanity by Carlo Mattogno Auschwitz: the Case for Sanity is the revisionist response to Robert van Pelt. Its first revelation is that van Pelt has committed plagiarism: he plundered and basically regurgitated the research results published in 1989 and 1993 by French researcher Jean-Claude Pressac – yet without naming his source even once. On more than 700 pages, Mattogno thoroughly scrutinizes van Pelt’s contorted assertions by juxtaposing them to material and documentary facts. Mattogno’s analysis is devastating for van Pelt, as it reveals that van Pelt’s study of Auschwitz ignores crucial counter-arguments, fails to approach pivotal technical issues with technical means, is highly inconsistent, uses deceptive methods, presents conflicting sources without due source criticism, deforms all sources to serve the author’s perspective, and reveals a shockingly threadbare knowledge of the history of Auschwitz.
[PDF 2005] Auschwitz: Auschwitz: Plain Facts Plain Facts Response to Jean-Claude Pressac With Contributions by Robert Faurisson, Carlo Mattogno, Germar Rudolf, and Serge Thion
The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry by Arthur R. Butz
The Auschwitz Myth by Wilhelm Stäglich
The Auschwitz Lie by Thies Christopherson
 Auschwitz: The End of a Legend by Carlo Mattogno
Carlo Mattogno, Auschwitz: The First
Gassing. Rumor and Reality
Download: PDF: 8.8 MB - HTML-ZIP: later | Buy this item
The first gassing of human beings in Auschwitz is claimed to have occurred on Sept. 3, 1941. The accounts reporting it are the archetypes for all later gassing accounts. This study exhibits the sources about this alleged event and analyzes them critically. It shows that these sources contradict each other in every essential point, rendering it impossible to extract a consistent story. Original wartime documents inflict a final blow to the tale of the first homicidal gassing
Carlo Mattogno, Special Treatment in
Auschwitz. Origin and Meaning of a Term
Download: PDF: 6.8 MB - HTML-ZIP: later | Buy this item
According to official historiography, terms like "special treatment," or "special action," when occurring in German documents in the context of the "Holocaust", were camouflage words which really meant the killing of inmates.
By bringing numerous documents into their proper historical context, Carlo Mattogno shows that this interpretation is profoundly wrong...
Carlo Mattogno, The Bunkers of Auschwitz.
Black Propaganda versus History
Download: PDF: 6 MB - HTML-ZIP: later | Buy this item
The so-called “Bunkers” at Auschwitz are claimed to have been the first homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz specifically erected for this purpose in early 1942. With help of the files of the Auschwitz construction office, this study shows that these “Bunkers” never existed, how the rumors of these alleged gas chambers evolved as black propaganda created by resistance groups within the camp, and how this propaganda was transformed into ‘reality’ by historians
Carlo Mattogno, The Central Construction
Office of the Waffen-SS and Police Auschwitz. Organization, Responsibilities,
Download: PDF: 6.8 MB - HTML-ZIP: later | Buy this item
The Central Construction Office of Auschwitz was responsible for the planning and construction of the Auschwitz camp complex. This study sheds light into hitherto hidden aspects of this camp’s history. This pioneering study, which is based on mostly hitherto unpublished Moscow documents, is indispensable for those wishing to avoid misinterpretations of Auschwitz documents
Germar Rudolf (ed.), Special Treatment in
Auschwitz. Origin and Meaning of a Term. Download:
PDF: 2.8 MB
- HTML-ZIP: later |
Buy this item
French pharmacist Jean-Claude Pressac was praised by mainstream Europe for his alleged refutation of the revisionists. Auschwitz: Plain Facts subjects Pressac's works to a devastating critique by leading revisionist scholars. The verdict: Pressac did not pay any attention to "the technique" of mass murder, as his books claim. In fact, he reveals such a massive technical incompetence that his works belong into the category of novels rather than history.
Germar Rudolf, Carlo Mattogno, Auschwitz Lies.
Legends, Lies, and Prejudices on the Holocaust. Download:
PDF: 14.3 MB
- HTML-ZIP: later |
Buy this item
What do Prof. G. Wellers, Prof. J. Markiewicz, Prof. J. Roth, Dr. R. Green, Prof. J. Zimmerman, and Prof. M. Shermer have in common? They all tried to refute the scientific findings of Holocaust revisionism -- and they all failed. This volume discusses these and more authors and exposes their attempts at refutation as a mixture of scientific bungling and fraud.
Germar Rudolf, The Rudolf Report. Expert
Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the "Gas Chambers" of Auschwitz
Download: PDF: 4.4 MB - HTML-ZIP: 1.4 MB | Buy this item as paperback | Buy this item as hardcover
The so-called Leuchter Report about the alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz and Majdanek has been subject to massive, and partly justified, criticism. Rudolf wrote a thorough forensic study about the alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz which irons out the deficiencies and discrepancies of the Leuchter Report. The Rudolf Report is the first English edition of this sensational scientific work.
Auschwitz was the site of Germany's newest and most technologically advanced synthetic rubber plant; and Germany was the world's leader in this particular field of technology. Shortly after the war the Germans were cut off from their supply of natural rubber.
In the months that followed they set about building our own synthetic rubber plants. Video. 1
Auschwitz was a major work camp that had forty different industries. The true reason for the existence of the Auschwitz camp is revealed in these little shown pictures of the industrial complex which surrounded the camp - most of it within full view of the interior of the camp itself.
Right The Monowitz industrial complex, where most of Auschwitz's inmates were put to work in a variety of heavy industries, ranging from rubber manufacture, medical supplies, armaments and, as illustrated in the picture right, clothing. This photograph shows the tailor's workshop at Auschwitz 1, where prisoners would make up clothing for use by the German army.1
Who has a pool at a death camp ?
Do you build a hospital next to a gas chamber ?
Does the Camp Commander live 1200' from the gas chamber ?
What is a theater doing there ?1